PolicyStreet has pulled in US$21 million in the first close of its Series C round, with Japan’s Cool Japan Fund leading the cheque and existing backers Altara Ventures and Gobi Partners returning for more.

On the surface, it is a straightforward funding story. Look closer, and it reads more like a market signal: investors are no longer paying up for insurtech swagger alone. They want profit, discipline, and a credible role in Southeast Asia’s digital infrastructure.

The Malaysian-born company, now operating across Asia and Australia, says it posted more than US$1 million in profit after tax for the financial year ended December 2025. It also reported 2.5x year-on-year net revenue growth, doubled the number of customers served from five million to more than 10 million since 2023, and lifted total sum insured from US$6 billion to more than US$10 billion.

Also Read: ‘Profitability is an inflexion point, not the finish line’: PolicyStreet CEO

For a sector that spent years promising scale before economics, that matters.

PolicyStreet is not a consumer insurance brand in the old sense. It is trying to become plumbing: the layer that enables digital platforms, telcos, travel players, logistics firms, and gig-economy companies to embed insurance into everyday transactions. That position, straddling distribution and infrastructure, is what has now attracted a second sovereign wealth fund after Khazanah Nasional backed its US$15.3 million Series B two years ago.

Profitability, but not the full picture

The headline number, more than US$1 million in profit, is enough to stand out in Southeast Asia’s insurtech market. It is not, by itself, enough to settle every question.

In a recent interview with e27, co-founder and Group CEO Yen Ming Lee described FY2025 as “a significant milestone for a venture-backed insurtech”, arguing that the company had focused on “building a disciplined, scalable model, not short-term margin maximisation”. That is a fair defence, but it also comes with limits. PolicyStreet has not disclosed group revenue, margin breakdowns, cash burn in 2024, or how much of the Series B capital remains on the balance sheet. It has also declined to provide a detailed geographic revenue split, beyond saying Malaysia remains the core market and regional businesses are contributing progressively.

Still, the available data points suggest a company that has moved beyond the frothy growth logic that once defined the category. In a tighter funding market, profit after tax, revenue growth, and an expanding insured base make a stronger case than customer acquisition rhetoric ever did.

Even the 10 million customer figure, while impressive, needs context. Lee noted that the number reflects cumulative policies issued across PolicyStreet’s embedded ecosystem, adjusted for overlap across products and partners. That means the figure should not be read as 10 million deeply engaged insurance customers marching in neat formation. Many will be users of micro-insurance or transaction-linked cover. But that does not automatically make the number inflated. It reflects the reality of embedded insurance, where relevance comes from frequency and context, not from a one-size-fits-all premium.

The company says coverage varies widely across products. While some are short-duration, low-ticket policies, others are materially larger. Gig workers on partner platforms such as foodpanda or ShopeeFood, for instance, can be insured for around US$25,000 per policy.

Why Cool Japan Fund sees more than an insurtech bet

Cool Japan Fund’s entry is not just another foreign investor taking a punt on Southeast Asia. It is a strategic fit.

The Japanese fund was set up to expand overseas demand for Japanese products and services. PolicyStreet’s embedded insurance model directly supports that ambition by reducing one of the biggest bottlenecks in cross-border digital commerce: trust. If consumers feel protected when buying, travelling, shipping goods, or working through online platforms, they are more likely to transact. That makes it easier for Japanese brands and services to travel across the region.

Cool Japan Fund President, CEO, and COO Kenichi Kawasaki put it bluntly, saying PolicyStreet is “building a sense of security and assurance through its embedded insurance model”, which could become “a foundation for the safe and confident expansion of online commerce and digital services”.

That is the real synergy. PolicyStreet gets capital, institutional backing, and a potentially valuable bridge into Japanese commercial networks. Cool Japan Fund gets exposure to a company sitting inside the rails of Southeast Asia’s digital economy. One side brings infrastructure for insurance distribution and risk management. The other brings a mandate tied to overseas market creation. This is not a vanity investment; it is a bet that protection products can help commerce travel further.

Also Read: “SEA + Japan is a long game”: MUIP’s Gerrard Lai on cross-border startup collaboration

It also helps explain why Japanese investors have become more active in Southeast Asian startups. Japan offers stability and capital, but domestic growth is slower and digital adoption curves are less dramatic than in emerging markets. Southeast Asia offers younger consumers, rising internet penetration, growing spending power, and whole sectors still being formalised through software, fintech, logistics, and embedded services.

Japanese investors are also no longer treating the region simply as an export destination. Increasingly, they see it as a strategic operating environment. Startups give them an earlier foothold in shifts that matter, whether in payments, commerce, climate, health, or insurance.

The sectors driving PolicyStreet’s expansion

PolicyStreet’s recent push into gig work, mobility, travel, logistics, and telecommunications is not a grab bag of buzzworthy verticals. These are sectors where insurance can be attached to a clear moment of risk, and where distribution works best when the product is built into the user journey.

In gig work, platforms need coverage for riders, drivers, and freelancers who often fall outside traditional employment protections. In mobility, insurance can be tied to vehicle usage, rides, or accidents. In travel, embedded cover can be sold with less friction at the point of booking. In logistics, it can protect shipments, cargo, delays, or other operational risks. In telecommunications, insurance can be bundled into device protection and digital service offerings at scale.

This matters because PolicyStreet’s model relies on context. It is easier to sell protection when the customer already understands what can go wrong. Embedded distribution lowers customer acquisition costs, allows platforms to monetise or strengthen retention, and makes insurance less of a cold sell and more of a service layer.

Lee argued that affordability and profitability are not incompatible if distribution is efficient. Embedded insurance, he said, cuts acquisition costs compared with traditional channels, while modular products let customers choose narrower, cheaper cover instead of buying oversized bundles. In some cases, he added, platform partners may partially or fully fund the protection as part of their broader user proposition.

That sector mix has likely done more than lift volumes. It has reinforced the platform. More partners mean more data, more use cases, more touchpoints, and stronger distribution logic across the business.

The risk beneath the momentum

None of this makes PolicyStreet bulletproof.

A business built around digital platforms and telcos must answer a familiar question: what happens if a major partner decides to bring insurance in-house? Lee’s answer is that insurance remains a regulated, specialist activity involving underwriting, reinsurance, compliance, risk assessment, and capital management — capabilities that most consumer platforms do not want to build themselves. He also pointed to a diversified partner base across sectors and markets as protection against concentration risk.

That argument is credible, though not absolute. Large platforms have a habit of internalising valuable layers once they become strategically important. PolicyStreet’s defence will depend on whether it remains more useful as an expert infrastructure partner than it would as a replaceable integration vendor.

Also Read: Japan’s innovation dilemma—and why SEA startups could be the answer

That is why this fundraise matters beyond the amount. The US$21 million first close suggests investors think PolicyStreet has a shot at becoming essential infrastructure rather than an optional add-on. Profitability gives the story weight. The Cool Japan Fund tie-up gives it strategic shape. And the company’s presence across high-frequency sectors gives it room to deepen rather than merely widen.

The harder part starts now. Southeast Asia’s insurtech market has little patience left for businesses that confuse distribution with defensibility. PolicyStreet has shown that embedded insurance can scale and, at least for now, make money. The next test is whether it can turn that momentum into something more durable: a position in the region’s digital economy that platforms, insurers, and investors cannot easily route around.

The post PolicyStreet’s US$21M raise signals a shift from insurtech hype to infrastructure reality appeared first on e27.

The crypto market advanced 1.86 per cent to US$2.34T over 24 hours, driven primarily by a major institutional catalyst. This rally shows a strong 93 per cent correlation with the S&P 500, indicating a shared macro-driven move rather than isolated crypto speculation. The primary reason for this surge is a US Department of Labour proposal to allow retirement plans to invest in crypto, potentially unlocking trillions in institutional capital. Secondary factors include sustained positive sentiment from recent regulatory clarity from the SEC and CFTC, and technical breakouts in specific altcoin sectors like Layer 1s. The near-term market outlook suggests momentum could extend toward the US$2.38T to US$2.41T resistance zone if the March Jobs Report on April 3 supports a dovish Fed narrative, while a weak report could trigger a pullback toward US$2.27T support.

The key driver behind this institutional capital catalyst is a proposed rule from the US Department of Labour that would permit 401(k) retirement plans to include cryptocurrencies. This news circulated widely on social media and signals a potential flood of long-term institutional capital, which could directly boost market sentiment. This represents a structural bullish development because it reduces a major barrier for institutional adoption and provides a new source of predictable demand. When retirement accounts gain the ability to allocate even small percentages to digital assets, the cumulative effect could reshape market dynamics. The proposal indicates a shift in how regulators view crypto, moving from skepticism toward cautious integration within established financial frameworks. This change matters because it validates crypto as an asset class worthy of long-term savings, not just speculative trading.

Regulatory clarity continues to support market strength as participants digest the recent SEC and CFTC joint guidance classifying major assets as commodities. This guidance reduces regulatory overhang and provides a cleaner operating environment for projects and investors. Concurrently, the Layer 1 sector outperformed, posting a 2.25 per cent gain, fuelled by events such as Algorand’s recognition in a Google quantum security report. Regulatory tailwinds provide a foundation for growth while capital rotates into fundamental narratives, indicating a maturing rally beyond pure speculation. When investors see projects advancing on technical merits like quantum resistance, they allocate capital based on long-term utility rather than short-term hype. This shift toward fundamentals suggests the market is developing deeper roots and attracting more sophisticated participants.

Also Read: The return of crypto—or just a technical bounce?

The immediate trajectory hinges on the March US Jobs Report released on April 3. A weak number could reinforce rate-cut hopes, supporting a test of the US$2.38T level, which represents the 38.2 per cent Fibonacci retracement, to the US$2.41T level at the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement. Conversely, strong data may pressure risk assets, with the US$2.27T swing low acting as critical support. Traders should watch whether volume sustains above the 7-day moving average at US$2.33T. This technical perspective matters because it frames the market’s next move in terms of observable levels, allowing participants to manage risk while staying aligned with the broader bullish narrative. The interplay between macro data and technical structure will likely dictate whether the rally extends or consolidates.

Global markets experienced a euphoric rally on April 1, 2026, primarily driven by optimism regarding a potential de-escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. US indices surged on Tuesday, March 31, 2026, following unconfirmed reports that Iran’s president expressed willingness to end hostilities on certain conditions. The S&P 500 jumped 2.9 per cent to close at 6,528.52, marking its best daily performance since May 2024. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 3.8 per cent to 21,590.63, led by a recovery in mega-cap technology shares. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained over 1,100 points, a 2.4 per cent increase, to end at 46,341.51. This broad-based strength in traditional markets provided a supportive backdrop for crypto’s advance, reinforcing the high correlation between risk assets.

International markets reflected this optimism, with Asia-Pacific markets in Sydney, Tokyo, and Hong Kong poised to open at least one per cent higher following the Wall Street rally. ASX 200 futures rose 1.5 per cent while the Straits Times Index recently crossed the 5,000 mark for the first time. European equity futures indicated a positive start, with the euro rising 0.2 per cent to US$1.1572. In commodities, West Texas Intermediate steadied around US$102 per barrel after prices fell 1.5 per cent on Tuesday when President Trump suggested the US might leave Iran within 2 to 3 weeks. Gold surged 2.8 per cent to US$4,654 per ounce as investors balanced safe-haven demand with high volatility. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell 0.1 per cent, losing safe-haven appeal amid hopes of de-escalation. Within this complex tapestry, Bitcoin remained stable at US$68,137 while Ether saw a marginal decline to US$2,103, showing relative resilience amid broader risk-on sentiment.

Also Read: Oil surges 59% in March while S&P 500 drops 6%: What this means for your crypto portfolio

The economic outlook presents both opportunities and risks as the IMF projects 3.3 per cent global growth for 2026, though persistent US inflation and geopolitical tensions remain key downside risks. J.P. Morgan forecasts a 35 per cent probability of a US recession in 2026, citing sticky inflation as a prevailing theme. This macro uncertainty underscores why the crypto market’s correlation with traditional indices matters. When institutional capital enters through retirement channels, it may dampen volatility over time, but near-term price action will still respond to inflation data, employment reports, and central bank signals. The market’s ability to hold gains above the US$2.33T 7-day moving average will signal whether bullish conviction outweighs macro caution.

As the crypto market integrates more deeply with traditional finance, its movements will increasingly reflect a blend of crypto-native catalysts and broader economic forces. This convergence demands that investors maintain a dual focus, tracking both on-chain developments and macro indicators. The path forward likely involves volatility, but the direction appears upward as institutional gates slowly open and regulatory frameworks solidify. Either outcome would represent a normal phase within a larger bullish trend, one powered by genuine adoption rather than speculation alone.

—

The post Breaking: US Labour Department opens door to crypto in 401(k) plans, market jumps 1.86% appeared first on e27.

In this fireside chat from Echelon Philippines 2025, moderator Artie Lopez, Co-Founder and Startup Coach at Brainsparks, sits down with Saul Molla, Founder and CEO of FlowerStore and Potico, to discuss his bold leap from corporate stability to entrepreneurship.

Molla recounts leaving his role as CFO of Lazada to enter the gifting industry — a uniquely demanding niche within e-commerce that requires exceptional precision and a strong sense of aesthetic. He also opens up about the complexities of scaling across Southeast Asia, sharing candid insights into the distinct cultural nuances and market challenges he encountered while expanding his business regionally.

The post Echelon Philippines 2025 – Risk, roses, and ROI: The founder + team blueprint to go regional appeared first on e27.

Singapore’s updated advertising guidelines, which took effect on March 25, are forcing banks and financial firms to rethink how they monitor advisers and influencers online — or risk reputational and regulatory consequences.

The new MAS regulation governing digital financial communications has arrived, and for institutions still relying on periodic spot audits to oversee their advisers’ online activity, the window to act has effectively closed.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s updated guidelines establish a clear expectation: financial institutions are now accountable for the content their financial advisers and affiliated influencers (“finfluencers”) publish across digital platforms. Reactive oversight, regulators have signalled, is no longer sufficient.

“The urgency is immediate,” said Ram Bojeesh, Country Manager for Southeast Asia and India at Meltwater. “Those relying on manual spot audits will fall short, as they cannot meet the expectation of continuous oversight or demonstrate it in practice,” he stressed in an email interview with e27.

The shift demanded by the new MAS regulation is fundamental. Traditional compliance structures built around selected case reviews, legal escalation, and periodic sampling were designed for a slower media environment. Digital channels operate differently. Content can spread within hours, reach audiences well beyond its original context, and potentially surface in AI-generated search results. In a market where more than half of Singaporeans reportedly turn to social media for financial guidance, the stakes are considerable.

Also Read: PolicyStreet’s US$21M raise signals a shift from insurtech hype to infrastructure reality

Bojeesh argues that existing compliance teams and legal functions, while still essential, are structurally insufficient on their own. “Manual processes rely on sampling and escalation, so there will inevitably be gaps,” he said. “It becomes difficult to practise full oversight in a way that complies with the new regulatory standards.”

What the guidelines effectively demand is a shift toward technology-enabled monitoring: systems capable of tracking adviser activity across digital channels in real time, flagging unapproved keywords, missing disclaimers, misleading claims or improper use of branding, and generating audit trails that can be presented to regulators on request.

Beyond regulatory risk, Bojeesh frames the new MAS regulation as an opportunity for institutions to exercise greater control over how they are represented online. A single non-compliant post, he notes, carries outsized consequences.

“If an adviser publishes something misleading or non-compliant, it can be amplified across digital platforms within hours,” he said. “As financial advisers are seen as representatives of their institutions, such content is rarely viewed in isolation.”

Over time, individual lapses can compound into a broader public narrative that reshapes an institution’s credibility across online discussions, social media, and increasingly, generative AI search outputs.

The concern is not purely theoretical. In a digitally fluent financial market like Singapore, the connection between compliance and brand reputation is direct and fast-moving.

Also Read: Building equity into Asia’s AI future: From principles on paper to power in practice

A regional regulatory trend

Singapore’s move reflects a wider pattern across Southeast Asia and India. Bojeesh points to regulators in Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia as having already introduced or strengthened guidelines on financial advertising, adviser responsibility, and online promotion. In India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India has intensified scrutiny of unregistered financial influencers and inadequate disclosures.

The trajectory across the region, he argues, points toward convergence. “Gaps in compliance across the region are unlikely to persist in the long term,” Bojeesh said. “Given how deeply embedded digital channels are, expectations around regulating digital financial communication will increasingly converge.”

One concern raised by industry practitioners is that intensive monitoring risks creating a surveillance culture that damages adviser morale. Bojeesh pushes back on this framing, arguing that effective oversight, when implemented with clarity, functions as a support system rather than a penalty mechanism. When advisers understand the boundaries and receive real-time guidance, he contends, they are better positioned to engage confidently — not less.

For institutions that have yet to act on the new MAS regulation, the calculus is straightforward: scalable, technology-enabled oversight is no longer a competitive advantage. It is the baseline.

—

Image Credit: Meltwater

The post Why the new MAS regulation makes continuous digital monitoring a business imperative appeared first on e27.

MSIG Asia has taken a strategic equity stake in Singapore-founded travel insurtech Ancileo and entered into a regional partnership aimed at expanding its travel insurance business across Asia Pacific.

While the deal size remains undisclosed, this is less about headline funding and more about control of distribution in one of Asia’s most competitive digital battlegrounds: travel.

Also Read: PolicyStreet’s US$21M raise signals a shift from insurtech hype to infrastructure reality

For years, travel insurance has largely been treated as an afterthought at checkout, the tiny box many travellers ignore while rushing to book a flight. That model is now under strain. Airlines, online travel agencies, and digital platforms increasingly want insurance products that are easier to embed, simpler to understand, and faster to claim.

Insurers, meanwhile, want a larger slice of travel demand returning across Asia, but without relying on the same clunky legacy systems that slowed expansion in the past.

That is where the MSIG-Ancileo tie-up fits.

MSIG gets a technology and distribution partner with deep airline and OTA integration experience across more than 25 markets. Ancileo gets capital, a major insurer with balance-sheet strength, underwriting muscle, and a footprint stretching across Southeast Asia, India, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand, China, Korea, and Taiwan. In plain English: one side brings the pipes, the other brings the water.

As MSIG Asia CEO Clemens Philippi put it, the partnership combines Ancileo’s “technology and distribution expertise” with MSIG’s regional footprint to deliver faster and more relevant travel experiences. Strip away the corporate polish, and the point still lands. This is a distribution deal disguised as a partnership announcement, and distribution is where travel insurance is increasingly won or lost.

Why this deal matters to both sides

For MSIG Asia, the investment is a shortcut to speed. Large insurers are good at underwriting, capital management, and regulation. They are usually less nimble when it comes to product personalisation, user journeys, and integration with digital travel sellers.

Also Read: Poni’s Cassandra Wee on why the most meaningful insurtech innovation will not come from operating in silo

Ancileo helps close that gap. Its platform is built around B2B2C travel insurance, enabling insurers to distribute policies through airlines, OTAs, and travel partners rather than relying solely on direct channels or old-school brokers.

That is crucial because travel insurance is increasingly sold at the moment of purchase. If MSIG wants to grow across Asia’s travel boom, it needs to sit where travellers book, not where they file paperwork.

For Ancileo, the benefit is equally obvious. Strategic capital from a heavyweight insurer is more valuable than a passive financial cheque if it comes with underwriting access, distribution scale, and regional credibility. Ancileo has spent years building the technology layer for travel protection. MSIG gives it a far larger field on which to deploy that technology.

Ancileo founder and CEO Olivier Michel said the goal is to “reimagine what B2B2C travel insurance looks like in Asia”. That ambition sounds lofty, but the business logic is grounded. Ancileo’s products can become harder to ignore if they are backed by a recognisable insurer and deployed across more markets at scale.

Ultimately, the deal benefits three groups beyond the companies themselves. Travellers get more relevant and better-integrated protection. Airlines and OTAs can offer an insurance product that increases ancillary revenue while improving customer trust. And both firms improve their competitive position in a region where digital travel recovery has been outpacing many earlier forecasts.

Where the capital is likely to go

Neither MSIG nor Ancileo disclosed a detailed use-of-funds plan, so there is no official line-item breakdown of how the money will be spent. But the commercial intent is clear enough from the structure of the partnership.
The capital is likely to support four areas.

First, product personalisation. Travel insurance is moving away from generic annual policies and towards modular cover tied to trip type, route, traveller profile, and disruption risk. That means more dynamic pricing and more tailored policies rather than blunt, one-size-fits-all products.

Second, deeper integrations with airlines and OTAs. Ancileo’s value lies in helping partners embed insurance inside booking flows without turning checkout into a conversion-killing maze. More capital and insurer backing should help it expand these integrations faster across Asia Pacific.

Third, claims automation and customer experience. One of the industry’s biggest headaches is not just selling policies but handling claims without driving customers to despair. Faster claims, automated triggers, and cleaner digital journeys are likely to be a major investment focus.

Also Read: What Southeast Asia can learn from Europe’s insurtech revolution

Fourth, regional expansion. MSIG’s footprint gives Ancileo a ready-made path into more markets. That does not mean instant rollout everywhere, but it does create a credible route to scale that many insurtechs spend years trying to build from scratch.

Asia’s travel rebound is rewriting the insurance playbook

The timing is hardly accidental. Travel across Asia has been recovering on several fronts at once: rising intra-Asia tourism, expanded airline capacity, visa waivers in key corridors, and a continued shift to mobile-first booking behaviour. Southeast Asia, in particular, has benefited from strong regional demand as travellers opt for shorter-haul, more frequent trips.

This is important because travel insurance adoption tends to rise with booking frequency and digital convenience. The more often people travel and the more they book through apps and online platforms, the easier it becomes to present insurance as part of the booking journey rather than as a separate financial product.

Several forces are accelerating that shift.

The first is higher disruption awareness. Travellers have become more conscious of delays, cancellations, baggage issues, medical emergencies, and weather-related disruptions. The pandemic changed traveller psychology, and climate volatility has kept that anxiety alive.

The second is embedded distribution. Airlines and OTAs no longer want insurance to be a clumsy upsell bolted awkwardly onto a transaction. They want integrated products that are easier to explain and easier to claim. That increases take-up rates.

The third is a better digital claims infrastructure. Consumers are more willing to buy insurance when they believe they will not need to wrestle a call centre for weeks to get paid.

As for market size, exact estimates vary by research firm, but most industry trackers place the global travel insurance market in the low tens of billions of US dollars in the mid-2020s, with Asia Pacific among the fastest-growing regions. Broadly, the market is expected to expand strongly over the next decade as more travel sales move online and embedded insurance becomes standard at checkout. Asia’s share of that growth is likely to be disproportionately high, thanks to rising middle-class travel demand, stronger regional air connectivity, and the sheer scale of outbound and intra-regional traffic.

That is the larger backdrop to this deal. MSIG and Ancileo are not inventing a market. They are trying to get ahead of one that is already changing shape.

The Iran factor and the limits of travel cover

One complication hangs over the broader travel insurance sector: geopolitics.  Wars and tensions between countries (for example, the ongoing war in the Middle East) would ripple through the travel insurance market quickly. Airspace restrictions, flight rerouting, cancellations, fuel-cost pressure, and destination risk repricing all feed into the economics of travel cover.

This is where the industry gets messy. Most travel insurance policies contain war exclusions, meaning losses caused directly by war are often not covered. But indirect consequences (delays, missed connections, or trip disruption linked to changing airline operations, etc.) may be covered depending on the policy wording and trigger. That creates exactly the kind of ambiguity travellers hate, and insurers must price carefully.

For firms such as MSIG Asia, this means tougher underwriting, sharper policy wording, and potentially higher claims volatility around disruption products. For insurtech players such as Ancileo, it raises the bar on product clarity and real-time distribution. Travellers want to know what is covered before they buy, not after they are stuck in an airport staring at a departures board that resembles performance art.

Also Read: Meet Forgettable, the startup transforming the world’s most forgettable product: insurance

In that sense, geopolitical volatility strengthens the case for smarter travel insurance technology. Products need to be clearer, more modular, and easier to distribute dynamically as risk conditions change.

That is the real story behind this investment. MSIG Asia is not merely buying into an insurtech. It is buying into a mechanism for selling, adapting, and servicing travel protection in a region where the travel rebound is real, the competition is intensifying, and the risks are becoming more complex. Ancileo, meanwhile, gets a powerful ally in its effort to turn travel insurance from a neglected add-on into a core part of the booking experience.

The post MSIG takes stake in Ancileo to win Asia’s travel insurance battle appeared first on e27.