Thai founders sometimes ask why a Vietnamese startup with a comparable product or level of traction can appear to raise a larger funding round.

The answer is rarely that one startup is inherently better than the other.

Venture capital reflects the company being financed, but it also reflects the market surrounding it. Investors consider the size and growth of the domestic economy, the availability of follow-on capital and the likelihood of eventually selling their shares.

On these measures, Vietnam currently benefits from a stronger growth narrative.

This does not mean Vietnamese startups always raise more than Thai companies. Southeast Asian funding data remain incomplete, many transactions are undisclosed, and a few large deals can distort national totals.

But a broader distinction is visible: investors are often more willing to finance Vietnamese startups against expected growth. Thai founders are more frequently required to demonstrate regional scale before receiving comparable backing.

Investors price future growth

Venture capital is a wager on what a company could become several years from now.

That makes national economic expectations important, even when investors are evaluating an individual startup.

Vietnam’s economy expanded by 8 per cent in 2025, while the World Bank expects growth of 6.8 per cent in 2026. Thailand, by comparison, is expected to grow by about 1.6 per cent in 2026.

Economic growth does not determine whether a particular software, healthcare or logistics startup will succeed. But it affects the assumptions investors place around that company.

Vietnam offers a population of more than 100 million, rising household incomes, manufacturing expansion and growing demand for digital services. An investor can reasonably expect some companies to expand alongside the economy.

Thailand is wealthier and has stronger infrastructure in many areas. It is also home to sophisticated banks, retailers, telecommunications groups and industrial companies.

These are valuable assets for startups seeking customers and partnerships. But they can also make the venture case more difficult.

A Thai startup may need to displace established companies in a relatively mature market. A Vietnamese company may be able to grow by serving demand that is still being created.

As a result, the Vietnamese startup can sometimes receive more credit for future scale, even when the Thai company has stronger revenue today.

Also Read: Inside SEA’s AI gold rush: The 20 investors writing the biggest cheques

Market size changes the fundraising conversation

Vietnam’s population is significantly larger than Thailand’s. This gives consumer-facing companies a broader domestic market from which to build.

A Vietnamese startup can often present domestic expansion as a venture-scale opportunity. A Thai startup in the same category may be asked almost immediately about Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia or the Philippines.

Thailand’s market can produce substantial companies. But venture funds are not simply looking for good businesses. They need a small number of investments to generate unusually large returns across a portfolio in which many companies will fail.

This pushes investors towards businesses that can reach large markets.

For Thai founders, the result is an execution discount. Investors may believe that the domestic business is sound while assigning limited value to regional growth that has not yet been demonstrated.

This is why the first customer outside Thailand can matter so much. It shows that the company’s opportunity is not restricted by the size or maturity of its home market.

Capital follows other capital

The composition of the investor ecosystem also influences funding rounds.

Vietnam attracted nearly 150 active venture investors in 2024, according to the Vietnam Innovation and Private Capital Report. Funds from Singapore and Japan were among the most active international participants.

Funding remains difficult. Vietnamese technology startups experienced a sharp decline in investment after the global venture boom, and national private-capital figures often include large buyouts that are unrelated to early-stage startups.

The important point is not that Vietnam has unlimited capital. It is that a growing number of regional investors already include the country in their investment strategies.

Also Read: Inside Singapore’s startup boom: The 21 firms investors can’t stop funding

Venture capital depends on networks.

A seed investor wants to know who might lead the next round. A Series A investor considers whether growth funds will be available later. Every investor eventually asks who might acquire the company or purchase its shares.

When many funds already follow a market, investors know the potential co-investors, corporate buyers and later-stage funders. This makes rounds easier to assemble.

Thailand does not lack capital. It has independent funds, family offices, government programmes and a substantial corporate venture sector.

Large Thai companies can provide startups with distribution, customers, regulatory knowledge and technical expertise. Yet corporate venture capital is not always a substitute for independent institutional funding.

Corporate investors may prioritise strategic alignment over financial returns. They may avoid companies that compete with another group subsidiary or require several layers of internal approval before investing.

They may also be willing to join a round without leading it.

A lead investor sets the terms, conducts extensive due diligence and gives other investors confidence to participate. Without one, a startup may receive interest from several organisations but still fail to close a substantial round.

The shortage of investors able and willing to lead larger early-stage rounds remains one of Thailand’s most important financing constraints.

The exit question begins early

Founders often discuss exits as a distant issue. Investors consider them before making the first investment.

A venture fund earns its return when it can sell its shares through an acquisition, a secondary transaction or a public listing.

Thailand has a large stock exchange and some of Southeast Asia’s most powerful corporate groups. Yet the country has not developed a predictable exit path for venture-backed technology companies.

This can create a cycle.

Limited exits attract smaller funds. Smaller funds write smaller cheques. Startups then have less capital to expand regionally, making large exits even less likely.

Vietnam’s exit market is not mature either. Its improving public-market narrative does not yet provide a reliable listing route for technology startups.

However, Vietnam’s role in regional manufacturing, trade and supply chains gives strategic investors several reasons to acquire local technology, logistics and enterprise businesses.

Thailand has similar strengths in tourism, healthcare, food, energy, automotive manufacturing and services. The challenge is to connect these sectors to regional buyers rather than treating acquisition by a domestic conglomerate as the only possible outcome.

What Thai founders can control

Founders cannot change Thailand’s demographics, economic growth or fund structure. They can change how dependent their company appears to be on the domestic market.

Regional expansion must be presented as an operating plan, not a collection of flags in a pitch deck.

A Thai software company might follow an existing corporate client into Malaysia. A hospitality platform could expand through Thai hotel groups operating abroad. A healthcare startup could target countries with similar private hospital systems.

Internationally comparable metrics are also essential. Recurring revenue, retention, gross margin, customer acquisition costs and contribution margin help investors compare the company with businesses in other markets.

Thai founders should also approach regional investors before they urgently need capital. A fund that has followed a company for a year can evaluate its progress more confidently than one receiving a pitch shortly before the runway expires.

Most importantly, founders need to identify which investors can actually lead a round. Interest from corporate funds and smaller investors is useful, but it may not be enough to establish the valuation and bring the full syndicate together.

An expectations premium versus an execution discount

The difference between the two ecosystems is not that Vietnamese founders consistently build better companies.

Vietnam benefits from an expectations premium. Investors see a large market, faster economic growth and a growing network of international funds. They are sometimes willing to finance the scale a company may eventually achieve.

Thailand faces an execution discount. Startups are more often expected to show regional revenue, efficient economics and clear evidence that they can grow beyond the domestic market.

Both perceptions are incomplete. Vietnam remains exposed to trade disruption, regulatory risk and limited exits. Thailand has sophisticated infrastructure, strong corporations and real competitive advantages.

But investor narratives affect how capital is allocated.

Vietnamese startups can sometimes raise against the future investors expect their market to create. Thai founders are more often required to begin building that future before investors will pay for it.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.

Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

The post Why investors often back Vietnamese startups more aggressively than Thai peers appeared first on e27.