Founders still ask me the question they asked in 2019: what does a good backlink cost. This September I finally answered it properly. ESBO Ltd, the link building and digital PR agency I run, exported its entire publisher database, 16,625 sites across 53 languages with verified authority scores and traffic, and published the numbers as the State of Link Building and Brand Mentions 2026. The median sponsored article costs US$570. That turned out to be the least interesting thing in the data.
The publishers who charge most sell no equity
One publisher in ten sells nofollow links only, meaning links that search engines are explicitly told not to count. Move up the authority ladder and the share climbs: at a Domain Rating of 80 and above, the top tier of site authority, 39 per cent of publishers are nofollow only, and among sites with more than a million monthly visits, 36 per cent. Those publishers quote a median of $1,840 per article. Everyone else quotes US$510.
I expected the opposite when I ran the numbers. Instead the pattern is clean: 3.6 times the price for placements that pass none of the search equity buyers think they are paying for. Large publishers do not sell link equity. They sell their audience and their name, and they price that as advertising, with the hyperlink as a formality.
The machines already agree with them
Two public data sets explain why that pricing now makes sense. Ahrefs tested which factors correlate with a brand’s visibility in Google’s AI Overviews across 75,000 brands, and branded web mentions correlated at 0.664 against 0.218 for backlinks. On that measure, being talked about predicts AI visibility about three times better than being linked to. Muck Rack, analysing more than 25 million links cited by ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, found earned media accounts for 84 per cent of AI citations, and paid or advertorial content for 0.3 per cent.
Put those together and a sponsored placement in 2026 buys three separate things: an audience that reads it, a brand mention in a context machines index, and sometimes a link. The market has repriced from the top down, and it is the mechanism under everything I have written in this column since February about becoming the source machines quote.
The Southeast Asia discount, and the trap inside it
Now the part that matters for this region. English is not one market in the data. English-language sites whose readers sit mainly in Western countries carry a median price of US$593. The 1,697 English sites whose readers are mainly in South and Southeast Asia or Africa: US$150. Sites read mostly from India: US$100.
Read one way, that is a genuine buying opportunity. A startup selling into this region can appear in front of its actual buyers for a quarter of Western prices, and the same gap runs through local languages, where Central and Eastern European placements cost half of what Western European ones do.
Also Read: Taiwan bets on Gen Z founders to move beyond its chip-supplier image
Read the other way, the cheap end is where the trap sits. Disclosure collapses as prices fall. Estonian publishers state a sponsored label 83 per cent of the time, Indonesian publishers 9 per cent. And if machines cite paid content 0.3 per cent of the time, a US$60 undisclosed link on a site nobody reads buys neither search equity nor machine memory. It buys a line in a report.
Spending a small budget like it is 2026
Four adjustments follow for a founder with modest money.
Buy the audience and the mention, not the metric. A US$300 placement whose readers are your actual buyers beats a US$900 one chosen for its authority score.
Treat the link attribute as a bonus. If the article is worth publishing with a nofollow link, it is worth publishing. If it only makes sense followed, you are buying the wrong thing.
Move the saved money to earned coverage. Journalists, reviewers and industry newsletters generate the 84 per cent, they cost effort rather than invoices, and publishing original numbers about your market is still the fastest way to interest them.
Measure mentions. Most teams still count referring domains. Start counting how often your name appears, per market, in contexts machines read, because that is the number moving your AI answers.
The price lists are telling founders something the industry took years to admit. The most sophisticated publishers quietly stopped selling links some time ago. They sell being known, and that is the part the machines keep.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.
Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.
The post The most expensive links aren’t really links: What 16,625 publisher price lists tell SEA startups appeared first on e27.