Posted on Leave a comment

Will Bitcoin hold US$77,000 or drag the market to US$2.51T? The September 10 answer

The global cryptocurrency sector experienced a slight contraction today, with total digital asset valuation down 0.75 per cent to US$2.66T. This downward movement primarily stems from investors taking profits after a robust multi-week upward trend. Market participants actively shifted their capital back toward the leading virtual coin.

Interestingly, this crypto consolidation exhibits no direct correlation with traditional macroeconomic indicators. Traditional financial markets face their own distinct set of pressures today. I view this current token behaviour as a highly specific internal consolidation rather than a broader financial panic. Traders simply decided to lock in their profits after an extended period of uninterrupted price appreciation.

This deliberate action highlights a mature ecosystem where participants rationally manage their risk exposure without succumbing to blind fear. The blockchain environment currently operates on its own internal mechanics while external equity markets grapple with entirely different fundamental challenges.

External financial markets indeed suffered significant setbacks today. Global equities and government bonds declined sharply as energy prices surged and borrowing costs increased. Brent crude oil prices climbed past the US$100 mark to top US$101 per barrel. Escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East directly fuelled fears of energy disruptions.

Simultaneously, the United States government executed a US$6 billion debt buyback plan that disappointed institutional investors. This disappointment pushed the 10-year US Treasury yield to its highest level since 2023. The benchmark S&P 500 index consequently fell for three consecutive sessions as inflation anxieties and interest rate concerns mounted heavily across Wall Street.

Financial derivatives markets currently price in a 62 per cent probability that the Federal Reserve will implement a 0.25 interest rate increase on September 16. Asian equity markets followed this negative trajectory and were positioned for substantial declines as regional investors reacted to energy-driven inflation fears.

Returning to the virtual coin sector, the primary catalyst for the current valuation correction involves routine profit-taking following a remarkable 20 per cent monthly rally. The total crypto capitalisation successfully gained 20.23 per cent over the past 30 days before hitting a recent local peak. Such a substantial and rapid increase in valuation naturally incentivises early buyers to sell their holdings and realise their gains.

We witnessed this exact behaviour materialise in real time as the 24-hour spot trading volume jumped exactly 18 per cent to reach a massive US$86.96B. This heightened selling activity clearly signals that traders actively chose to secure their capital rather than hold through a potential correction. I consider this specific volume spike a completely normal and healthy reaction to a sustained advance. The ecosystem simply requires time to digest these recent gains and establish a solid foundation for any future upward movements.

Also Read: Asia has not opened yet: What will the first bell reveal about Bitcoin and oil?

This modest pullback represents a typical phase in the cycle rather than a fundamental structural breakdown. Buyers and sellers are currently negotiating fair value following an aggressive upward move. Observers now closely monitor whether the broader crypto landscape maintains its position above the crucial 30-day simple moving average, which sits precisely at US$2.51T. Holding above this specific technical level would strongly indicate that buyers still control the broader narrative despite the short-term profit-taking.

A failure to defend this moving average might invite additional sellers and accelerate the current downward momentum. The current structure remains entirely intact as long as valuations respect these key historical support zones. The ongoing action merely reflects a necessary cooling-off period after weeks of relentless buying pressure and speculative enthusiasm. Participants now wait for fresh capital injections to drive the next major valuation expansion across the entire digital asset space.

A secondary but equally important factor driving the current dynamics is a clear rotation of capital away from altcoins and back toward the premier cryptocurrency. The dominance metric for the leading virtual coin remains at an impressive 59.03 per cent. This high dominance figure clearly illustrates that institutional and retail investors actively prefer the relative safety of the largest crypto during periods of uncertainty.

Concurrently, the Altcoin Season Index plunged exactly 23.53 per cent over the last 24 hours. This dramatic drop in the index perfectly captures the widespread abandonment of smaller speculative assets. Investors currently rotate their funds defensively into the premier digital asset to protect their capital from extreme volatility. I observe this defensive rotation as a classic risk-management strategy that typically occurs when participants anticipate broader economic turbulence or sector-specific corrections. A sustained rise in dominance above 60 per cent would confirm a prolonged period of outperformance for the largest asset.

Also Read: Why a strong jobs report hit Bitcoin and Ethereum harder than the stock market

The derivatives arena simultaneously underwent a significant deleveraging event, further contributing to the spot valuation decline. Total open interest across major perpetual futures contracts declined by 3.93 per cent as leveraged speculators rapidly unwound their overly optimistic positions. This reduction in open interest indicates that traders actively closed out their borrowed positions to avoid potential liquidation cascades.

Furthermore, perpetual funding rates fell sharply by 38 per cent. Lower funding rates mean that buyers no longer pay a massive premium to maintain their long positions. This derivatives reset significantly reduces systemic risk within the broader financial ecosystem. This deleveraging process is an incredibly positive development for long-term health.

Excessive leverage often triggers violent swings and unnecessary crashes. The current unwinding of these leveraged positions creates a much cleaner and more stable environment for genuine spot buyers to accumulate assets at fair valuations without facing artificial price suppression from forced liquidations.

The near-term outlook hinges on the premier digital asset’s ability to defend the crucial US$77,000 to US$78,000 zone. A decisive break below this support level could trigger algorithmic selling and push the total valuation down toward the 38.2 per cent Fibonacci retracement at US$2.51T.

Conversely, a strong bounce from this support zone would likely initiate another aggressive upward leg. Market participants also eagerly await the upcoming United States Consumer Price Index data release and the next major spot exchange-traded fund flow report arriving on September 10.

These specific macroeconomic and institutional data points will serve as the primary catalysts for the next major directional move. I expect the environment to remain in a short-term consolidation phase within a much broader macroeconomic uptrend until these crucial data points provide clear guidance to institutional investors looking to deploy fresh capital into the digital asset ecosystem.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.

Join us on WhatsAppInstagramFacebookX, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

The post Will Bitcoin hold US$77,000 or drag the market to US$2.51T? The September 10 answer appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

TikTok deepens Vietnam commerce bet with US$980M logistics project in Ho Chi Minh City

TikTok’s ambitions in Vietnam are moving beyond short videos and livestream shopping into the less glamorous, but more decisive, world of logistics.

Tokgistic Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-registered affiliate of TikTok, will invest US$980 million in a new logistics project in Ho Chi Minh City, according to a statement from the city’s Department of Finance. The agency said it granted the investment certificate to Tokgistic on September 7.

Also Read: Why TikTok Shop wants Singapore merchants to think like content teams

The project, called Swift Logistics, is scheduled to run for 50 years and begin operations in November. Tokgistic will initially contribute US$196 million, equal to 20 per cent of the registered capital, and raise the remaining amount later.

On paper, Swift Logistics is registered for postal, delivery, market-research and management-consulting services. In practice, the structure suggests TikTok is laying the groundwork for a deeper role in Vietnam’s e-commerce infrastructure without necessarily building every part of the delivery network itself. For postal services, Swift Logistics will contract directly with customers but pass the actual delivery and logistics work to third-party providers.

That distinction matters. It points to a model where TikTok can sit closer to merchants, shoppers and transaction data while relying on external logistics operators for physical fulfilment. For a platform whose shopping business depends heavily on impulse purchases, livestream selling and high order volumes, tighter control over the customer journey can be as important as owning warehouses or fleets.

From content platform to commerce infrastructure

The investment is part of a wider plan TikTok discussed with Ho Chi Minh City authorities in November 2025. At the time, the company proposed establishing three businesses in logistics, digital payments and digital commerce, with links to the city’s Vietnam International Financial Center.

The financial centre is a government-backed effort to position Ho Chi Minh City as a regional financial hub. For Vietnam, attracting a global technology platform into logistics, payments and commerce fits neatly into a broader push to deepen the country’s digital economy and draw higher-value foreign investment.

For TikTok, the logic is also clear. Vietnam has become one of Southeast Asia’s most important consumer internet markets, with a young population, high social media usage and a fast-growing online retail sector. It is also a market where entertainment and commerce increasingly overlap. A product can go from viral video to checkout page in minutes, particularly on platforms that combine creators, livestreams and in-app shopping.

TikTok said last year that its planned logistics operations in Vietnam could handle 1 billion to 2 billion orders annually. It also said a payments arm could serve about 45 million users in the country, while its digital-commerce activity could support more than US$10 billion in annual transaction value.

Those numbers underline the scale of the company’s Vietnam ambitions. They also show why logistics is not a side activity for TikTok Shop. In e-commerce, especially in Southeast Asia, growth is often constrained not by demand but by fulfilment: delivery speed, failed orders, returns, cash-on-delivery handling, and the reliability of third-party couriers outside major cities.

Vietnam’s FDI pull strengthens

Swift Logistics follows another sizeable TikTok-linked commitment earlier this year. In April, TikTok Shop Vietnam announced a foreign investment of US$125 million in Ho Chi Minh City. With the new Swift Logistics project, the two projects have combined registered capital of about US$1.1 billion.

Also Read: Shopee, TikTok, Lazada: Three ways to win and no easy way in

The timing is notable. Ho Chi Minh City attracted more than US$10.06 billion in foreign direct investment in the first eight months of 2026, up 167.3 per cent from a year earlier, according to the Department of Finance. That figure was already equal to 91.5 per cent of the city’s annual target.

For the city, a large project tied to TikTok helps reinforce its position as Vietnam’s commercial and digital hub. Ho Chi Minh City already acts as the country’s startup centre, home to many local technology companies, digital lenders, e-commerce sellers, SaaS startups and cross-border trade businesses. The addition of a major logistics-linked investment from a ByteDance affiliate could strengthen the city’s role in regional digital trade, particularly if TikTok’s commerce, payments and fulfilment plans become more integrated over time.

The investment also reflects a broader shift in Southeast Asian e-commerce. The first phase of the sector was about acquiring users and subsidising transactions. The current phase is about operational discipline: who can deliver cheaply, quickly and reliably while keeping merchants and consumers inside one ecosystem.

That is why logistics has become a strategic battleground. Shopee, owned by Singapore’s Sea Group, has built out SPX Express across several markets. Lazada, backed by Alibaba, has long invested in Lazada Logistics. Independent operators such as J&T Express and Ninja Van have also scaled across the region by serving multiple platforms and merchants. TikTok’s Swift Logistics does not appear to replace these kinds of providers immediately, but it could give the company more leverage over delivery standards, data flows and merchant relationships.

Rivals will be watching

TikTok’s move will be closely watched by competitors across both e-commerce and logistics. In Vietnam and the wider region, its most direct commerce rivals include Shopee and Lazada, both of which have spent years building seller networks, payments tools and fulfilment capabilities. Local and regional delivery players such as J&T Express, Ninja Van, GHN, Giao Hang Tiet Kiem, SPX Express and Lazada Logistics already compete fiercely on cost, speed and coverage.

The challenge for TikTok is that logistics is a very different business from content. Viral videos scale with software. Delivery networks scale with people, depots, service-level agreements and thin margins. Even if Swift Logistics outsources physical delivery, TikTok will still need to manage customer expectations in a market where late parcels, failed delivery attempts and difficult returns can quickly erode trust.

There is also the regulatory dimension. TikTok, owned by China’s ByteDance, has faced scrutiny in several markets over data, content moderation and platform influence. In Southeast Asia, governments have generally taken a pragmatic approach, welcoming digital investment while keeping a closer eye on consumer protection, payments, tax and the impact of foreign platforms on local merchants.

Also Read: The next meal in Southeast Asia starts on TikTok, not in an app

Vietnam is likely to be no different. A US$980 million logistics project signals long-term commitment, but it also places TikTok more squarely inside the country’s digital economy infrastructure.

For now, Swift Logistics marks another step in TikTok’s evolution from a social media app into a commerce machine. The bet is that whoever controls attention, transactions and fulfilment will have the strongest hand in Southeast Asia’s next phase of online retail. In Vietnam, TikTok appears ready to pay heavily for that position.

The post TikTok deepens Vietnam commerce bet with US$980M logistics project in Ho Chi Minh City appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

The capital drought: Over 7,500 SEA startups extinguished since 2020

Between January 2020 and mid-2026, the Southeast Asian technology ecosystem underwent a profound transformation. What began as a high-flying venture boom turned into an unprecedented “funding winter.” Tracxn data reveals that a total of 7,538 tech startups across the region deadpooled, driven by high global interest rates, macroeconomic friction, and shifting investor demands toward path-to-profitability.

While peak closures occurred during 2021 (2,260 shutdowns) and 2022 (2,059 shutdowns), attrition persisted through 2023 (1,121), rebounded in 2024 (1,378), and claimed another 308 ventures in 2025.

Also Read: From shutdown to surge: How macro relief is lifting crypto and equities

Below is a detailed retrospective examining 76 notable Southeast Asian startups that ceased operations between 2020 and 2026, complete with their business descriptions, latest funding amounts, and final fundraising dates.


🛒 E-commerce, fashion & quick-commerce

  1. Sorabel
    • Description: Indonesian fashion e-commerce platform offering a signature “try-first-pay-later” model, delivering affordable, trend-driven proprietary apparel directly to women across tier-2 and tier-3 Indonesian cities.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Aug 27, 2019
  2. Fabelio
    • Description: Indonesian online furniture and home decor e-commerce brand that combined an online storefront with physical experience centers to design and sell custom, locally manufactured furniture.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$9M
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 17, 2020
  3. Dropezy
    • Description: Indonesian quick-commerce startup that operated a network of dark stores delivering groceries, household essentials, and fresh produce to urban consumers in under 20 minutes.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$2.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Sep 23, 2021
  4. Shox Fashion
    • Description: Indonesian social commerce platform empowering community resellers in rural and non-tier-1 regions to aggregate demand and sell affordable apparel via WhatsApp and social channels.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$5.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 18, 2022
  5. BlinQ
    • Description: Singaporean luxury fashion-tech platform utilizing augmented reality and virtual try-on software to allow shoppers to preview and purchase high-end apparel and designer accessories online.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$2.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 01, 2019
  6. MadThread
    • Description: Singapore-based luxury fashion rental subscription platform providing women with unlimited monthly access to designer dresses, workwear, and occasion outfits through a circular wardrobe app.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$500.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jul 24, 2019
  7. The Shonet
    • Description: Indonesian social commerce and beauty recommendation community where content creators and consumers shared peer reviews, style advice, and directly purchased curated lifestyle products.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 05, 2019
  8. WOWBID
    • Description: Indonesian interactive live-streaming auction marketplace enabling merchants and brands to host real-time video bidding events and sell electronics, apparel, and collectibles directly to viewers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$5.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 25, 2019
  9. PriceArea.com
    • Description: Pioneer Indonesian shopping search engine and price comparison portal that aggregated product listings across major online merchants to help consumers find the best deals online.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 17, 2012
  10. Kotoko
    • Description: Indonesian retail-as-a-service pop-up platform enabling online direct-to-consumer digital brands to test physical storefronts, offline retail distribution, and interactive customer touchpoints.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 09, 2020
  11. Kasosio
    • Description: Regional social commerce platform enabling micro-influencers and small merchants to launch social storefronts, curate product catalogs, and earn sales commissions across social media channels.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Dec 2020

Also Read: ‘Companies shut down not because of crises but only when founders give up’: Joseph Phua of M17


🏢 Proptech, co-working & co-living

  1. Propzy
    • Description: Vietnamese proptech platform providing end-to-end real estate marketplace services, offline transaction hubs, digital mortgage financing, and property management tools for buyers and sellers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$25.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 09, 2020
  2. CoHive
    • Description: One of Indonesia’s largest co-working space operators, providing shared office spaces, private desks, flexible corporate suites, and community events across major Indonesian urban centers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$13.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 19, 2019
  3. Oxfordcaps
    • Description: Singapore-headquartered student housing technology startup that operated standardized, tech-enabled coliving residences and dormitories for university students across India and Southeast Asia.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$994.5K
    • Latest Funded Date: May 29, 2020
  4. YourRent
    • Description: Regional proptech startup providing landlords and property managers with digital tenant screening, automated lease agreement execution, maintenance tracking, and online rent collection software.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jul 16, 2020

🚚 Logistics, supply chain & transport

  1. Ritase
    • Description: Indonesian B2B digital freight logistics platform connecting commercial shippers with trucking transporters through automated load matching, real-time GPS tracking, and electronic proof-of-delivery software.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$8.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: May 03, 2019
  2. CarPal
    • Description: Singapore-based on-demand urban logistics platform that utilized crowd-sourced drivers to provide same-day courier services, express parcel delivery, and localized distribution for businesses.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$2.8M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 26, 2017
  3. Catchthatbus
    • Description: Malaysian online travel booking platform enabling passengers to search, compare schedules, and purchase intercity bus and coach tickets across Malaysia and Singapore.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$1.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Aug 31, 2015
  4. DedaaBox
    • Description: Myanmar parcel delivery startup that deployed automated smart parcel lockers across residential and commercial buildings to streamline last-mile e-commerce package pickups.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$550.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Dec 03, 2017
  5. Hello Cabs
    • Description: Early Myanmar ride-hailing and taxi dispatch network providing urban passengers with phone hotline and mobile app bookings for metered taxi transport.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 24, 2017

💳 Fintech, crypto, Web3 & insurtech

  1. Cabital
    • Description: Singapore crypto wealth management platform that allowed retail and institutional users to buy, sell, transfer, and earn high-yield interest on digital assets and stablecoins.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$4.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Sep 03, 2021
  2. Toast Me
    • Description: Singaporean mobile payments and fintech platform offering integrated point-of-sale solutions, peer-to-peer money transfers, and digital merchant loyalty programs for retail stores and restaurants.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$1.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Nov 10, 2016
  3. SALPay
    • Description: Philippine fintech and payroll management platform connecting cloud HR software with employee prepaid debit cards to automate wage disbursements and offer micro-financial services.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$7.1M
    • Latest Funded Date: Dec 28, 2017
  4. Halofina
    • Description: Indonesian robo-advisory and personal wealthtech startup helping young professionals set financial goals, track personal budgets, and invest automatically in regulated mutual fund portfolios.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Nov 29, 2019
  5. AgenKAN
    • Description: Indonesian micro-fintech platform empowering neighborhood mom-and-pop grocery stores (warungs) to sell financial products, process bill payments, and distribute digital micro-loans.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 16, 2020
  6. Pax Credit
    • Description: Singapore cross-border fintech startup offering international students transparent currency exchange, overseas tuition payment transfers, and digital student bank accounts worldwide.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 24, 2021
  7. AlgoBlocks
    • Description: Singaporean DeFi aggregator platform enabling Web3 users to discover, build, and execute complex multi-step decentralized finance investment strategies using a visual drag-and-drop workflow.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$1.9M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 16, 2022
  8. Qarbon
    • Description: Web3 sustainability protocol developing decentralized carbon offset verification software and tokenized environmental asset management tools for global corporate ESG compliance.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$5.5M
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 10, 2023
  9. UexGlobal
    • Description: Singapore insurtech startup offering a paperless, digital health insurance platform that provided customizable international medical policies for expatriates, remote workers, and SMEs.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$983.4K
    • Latest Funded Date: Feb 23, 2018
  10. Seed Token
    • Description: Blockchain infrastructure project developing decentralized protocols for tracking clean energy generation, verifying carbon reductions, and trading renewable energy certificates transparently.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 28, 2018

Also Read: Indonesian e-commerce platform Sorabel to shut down by end-July


🤖 Enterprise SaaS, AI & deeptech

  1. Taiger
    • Description: Singaporean artificial intelligence software company providing natural language processing and automated document extraction technology to streamline complex operations for banking and government clients.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$25.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Jul 09, 2019
  2. FireVisor
    • Description: Singaporean industrial AI startup offering automated computer vision and predictive analytics software to detect product manufacturing defects in real time for semiconductor and solar factories.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$739.7K
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 19, 2019
  3. Braiven
    • Description: Enterprise AI and operational decision intelligence software firm providing predictive analytics, workflow automation, and supply chain optimization tools for heavy industry and logistics operators.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$3.7M
    • Latest Funded Date: May 27, 2019
  4. Bonza
    • Description: Indonesian no-code big data analytics platform that helped enterprises ingest large data streams, build custom machine learning models, and generate real-time operational BI dashboards.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$2.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: May 06, 2021
  5. Omnilytics
    • Description: Malaysian fashion market intelligence platform offering fashion retailers real-time competitive pricing analysis, assortment benchmarks, and inventory trends across global e-commerce channels.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$1.1M
    • Latest Funded Date: Sep 22, 2020
  6. Botbot
    • Description: Singapore enterprise conversational AI startup building automated chatbots to optimize internal corporate workflows, HR employee onboarding, and customer support across enterprise chat channels.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Oct 22, 2018
  7. Peoplewave
    • Description: Singapore HR technology startup providing data-driven performance management software, continuous feedback tools, and automated employee onboarding analytics for mid-sized corporate enterprises.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$500.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Nov 10, 2017
  8. Synchronous
    • Description: AI productivity platform offering remote teams automated workflow synchronization, intelligent task extraction, and cross-platform communication summaries for distributed workforces.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$55.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 23, 2019
  9. IsItUp.com
    • Description: Malaysian cloud asset management SaaS platform enabling businesses to catalog, audit, track maintenance schedules, and manage physical equipment and office hardware assets.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Nov 14, 2016
  10. Nook
    • Description: Virtual workplace SaaS platform that allowed remote and hybrid teams to create customizable digital offices, audio rooms, and collaborative screen-sharing spaces for spontaneous team meetings.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$125.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 13, 2023
  11. koinearth
    • Description: Blockchain and AI enterprise software firm specializing in digital supply chain provenance tracking, asset tokenization, and secure cross-company data sharing protocols.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$1.8M
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 05, 2021
  12. NIS Solution
    • Description: Regional enterprise technology services provider offering specialized custom software engineering, system integration, cloud deployment, and cybersecurity management for corporate clients.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$29.3K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 26, 2017

📺 Media, entertainment, gaming & audio

  1. Migo
    • Description: Content delivery network utilizing micro-server hardware in local corner stores across Indonesia and the Philippines to let low-income consumers download digital video and educational content data-free.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$20.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Feb 10, 2023
  2. PicMix
    • Description: Indonesian photo-sharing mobile social platform allowing millions of users to apply artistic filters, share photo collages, interact in interest groups, and participate in brand contests.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$3.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 12, 2016
  3. Nooble
    • Description: Singaporean audio social platform enabling content creators and casual users to record short-form voice notes, host micro-podcasts, and hold asynchronous voice discussions around trending topics.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$144.1K
    • Latest Funded Date: Aug 16, 2021
  4. Momolay
    • Description: Myanmar digital media portal and entertainment news app delivering localized pop-culture news, celebrity gossip, viral articles, and lifestyle content to mobile readers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$200.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Oct 27, 2015
  5. Chate Sat
    • Description: Myanmar digital freelance portal matching local enterprises and agencies with vetted freelance graphic designers, content writers, translators, and web developers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Oct 03, 2018
  6. HaloHola
    • Description: Indonesian transit entertainment network that installed localized Wi-Fi servers on buses, trains, and planes to stream free movies, music, and games to passengers without mobile internet.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: 2017
  7. UpNext
    • Description: Web3 digital curation platform helping creators and web users aggregate digital links, monetize content streams, organize NFT collections, and engage audience communities.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$150.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: May 05, 2022
  8. i Digital Connect
    • Description: Thai online gaming platform and digital game publisher distributing massively multiplayer online games (MMORPGs) and localized gaming content across Thailand and Southeast Asia.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Oct 12, 2016
  9. Playy.World
    • Description: Regional esports social hub enabling mobile gamers to host community tournaments, track player rankings, compete on leaderboards, and win digital gaming rewards.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 08, 2020
  10. Allwoman
    • Description: Malaysian digital lifestyle platform and online publisher creating empowerment content, wellness guides, career advice, and community events tailored for modern women.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$100.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 10, 2019
  11. Trustory
    • Description: Malaysian collaborative debate platform designed to combat online fake news by encouraging users to verify digital claims, cite evidence, and debate news stories.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$3.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: May 24, 2018

Also Read: High-profile startup failures in Southeast Asia: What went wrong?


🎓 Edutech, healthtech & cleantech

  1. Taamkru
    • Description: Thai gamified edtech platform providing interactive preschool learning apps, developmental tracking, and competitive testing benchmarks for young children and parents across Southeast Asia.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$620.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jul 30, 2014
  2. EduReviews
    • Description: Malaysian educational review directory allowing parents and students to search, evaluate ratings, and compare private schools, enrichment centers, and tuition courses.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$266.2K
    • Latest Funded Date: Feb 25, 2021
  3. Impact Terra
    • Description: Myanmar agritech social enterprise operating a mobile app for smallholder farmers, delivering localized weather alerts, crop disease management tips, and agricultural market price data.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$2.3M
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 19, 2018
  4. EcoWorth Tech
    • Description: Singapore cleantech company utilizing proprietary carbon fiber aerogel technology to convert industrial wastewater into reusable clean water while recovering valuable organic liquids.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: May 25, 2022
  5. NephTech
    • Description: Singapore MedTech startup developing non-invasive vascular access surveillance devices to help hemodialysis centers monitor blood vessel health in end-stage kidney failure patients.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 19, 2020
  6. Pesan Lab
    • Description: Indonesian healthtech platform providing on-demand home medical lab testing, permitting patients to book clinical blood tests and health checks delivered by visiting phlebotomists.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: 2017
  7. Thinkphi
    • Description: Sustainable clean-tech hardware startup engineering umbrella-like structures designed to harvest rainwater, generate solar power, and provide shaded green spaces for urban environments.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$549.3K
    • Latest Funded Date: May 15, 2018
  8. Tera
    • Description: Singapore advanced materials manufacturer producing eco-friendly, ultra-high-barrier protective films and biodegradable barrier packaging for electronics, solar panels, and food preservation.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Aug 24, 2009
  9. Exora
    • Description: Philippine digital energy marketplace connecting commercial and industrial power buyers with renewable energy suppliers to facilitate open-market electricity bidding and procurement.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: 2018

🍽 Services, lifestyle, travel & on-demand apps

  1. Kaodim
    • Description: Leading Malaysian services marketplace matching homeowners and businesses with vetted service professionals, including plumbers, electricians, air-con technicians, and home cleaners.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$7.0M
    • Latest Funded Date: Nov 06, 2017
  2. TokoTalk
    • Description: Indonesian e-commerce SaaS tool helping social sellers turn messaging chats into automated e-commerce web stores with integrated payment processing and delivery dispatch.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$3.2M
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 25, 2019
  3. Flexible Pass
    • Description: Myanmar fitness and health marketplace providing gym-goers with flexible, multi-venue access to fitness centers, yoga classes, and sports activities through a single pass app.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Aug 13, 2019
  4. Adventoro
    • Description: Malaysian travel tech platform providing online bookings for curated adventure tours, eco-tourism activities, outdoor excursions, and authentic local travel experiences in Southeast Asia.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: 2017
  5. Food2U
    • Description: Early Myanmar food delivery marketplace connecting urban diners with local restaurants for doorstep meal delivery via a mobile app platform.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 23, 2018
  6. become
    • Description: Malaysian personalized skincare and beauty marketplace utilizing digital diagnostic quizzes to match consumers with customized skincare routines and products.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$150.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 01, 2020
  7. Instawash
    • Description: Thailand-based on-demand doorstep mobile car wash service enabling vehicle owners to schedule eco-friendly auto cleaning and detailing at home or work.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Dec 14, 2018
  8. JomPaw
    • Description: Malaysian pet services marketplace matching pet owners with reliable local pet sitters, dog walkers, home groomers, and pet trainers.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$24.8K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jan 17, 2019
  9. Globerekker Challenge
    • Description: Singapore corporate health and wellness platform engaging employees in gamified team fitness challenges, step-tracking competitions, and corporate wellness programs.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$600.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Sep 28, 2015
  10. Box24
    • Description: Thai smart kiosk operator providing automated 24/7 parcel collection lockers, smart dry cleaning drop-offs, and urban laundry services.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: 2017
  11. Kerjadulu
    • Description: Indonesian social recruiting app linking job candidates directly with company hiring managers through social network connections and instant messaging.
    • Latest Funded Amount: Undisclosed
    • Latest Funded Date: Mar 01, 2016
  12. Hoorah
    • Description: Mobile marketing engagement startup offering brands interactive digital loyalty cards, instant consumer reward promotions, and gamified customer retention tools.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$358.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Apr 23, 2017
  13. Stubapp
    • Description: Regional digital event ticketing app enabling event organizers to create, market, sell mobile tickets, and manage event access control.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$136.1K
    • Latest Funded Date: Jun 19, 2018
  14. Resdi
    • Description: Hyperlocal social platform enabling neighbors to post local alerts, buy and sell second-hand goods, and share community recommendations within their residential zip codes.
    • Latest Funded Amount: US$25.0K
    • Latest Funded Date: Dec 23, 2019

The post The capital drought: Over 7,500 SEA startups extinguished since 2020 appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

Anatomy of a shakeout: what 7K+ deadpooled startups reveal about Southeast Asia’s new tech reality

For much of the last decade, Southeast Asia’s startup story was told through funding milestones, rising valuations and the promise of a young, mobile-first population coming online. But beneath the optimism, another dataset was forming: the companies that did not make it.

Between January 1, 2020, and July 9, 2026, 7,538 technology startups in Southeast Asia deadpooled, according to the Tracxn dataset reviewed. The figure captures a sharp correction after years in which cheap global capital, rapid digital adoption and pandemic-era behaviour shifts encouraged companies to chase scale before proving whether their economics worked.

Also Read: When debt replaces equity: How SEA startups mask a funding winter

The correction was not evenly spread. A deeper look at 76 notable venture-backed startups that shut down shows where the pressure was most severe: e-commerce, social commerce, quick commerce, proptech, co-working, fintech, Web3, logistics, on-demand services, deeptech and media distribution.

Many of these businesses had raised institutional capital. Several had secured more than US$10 million. Yet their models depended on assumptions that stopped holding once interest rates rose and investors began asking harder questions about margins.

The delayed impact of the pandemic boom

The first year of the pandemic did not immediately produce the largest wave of failures. In 2020, 412 startups in the region shut down. Emergency government support, bridge rounds and aggressive cost-cutting helped many companies buy time. Founders also benefited from the belief that digital adoption had permanently accelerated.

The real reckoning came a year later. In 2021, 2,260 startups deadpooled, a 5.5-fold increase from 2020 and the highest annual number in the dataset. These closures reflected the hangover from 2019 and 2020, when valuations often assumed endless growth and abundant capital. Many companies had spent heavily to acquire users, subsidise transactions and enter new markets before demonstrating durable revenue.

In 2022, another 2,059 startups shut down as inflation rose and central banks tightened monetary policy. Together, 2021 and 2022 accounted for 57.3 per cent of all closures in the six-year period. By then, the venture funding winter had moved from boardroom discussion to operational reality.

Late-stage capital became harder to secure, down rounds carried stigma, and companies that had raised at peak valuations found themselves trapped between shrinking runways and difficult reset conversations.

The pace eased in 2023, with 1,121 closures, as many weaker companies had already liquidated and survivors slashed costs. But the pressure returned in 2024, when 1,378 startups shut down. This second wave was driven by companies that had survived on bridge financing in 2022 and 2023, only to run out of options when Series B and Series C capital failed to arrive.

By the latest period, covering 2025 to July 9, 2026, the number had dropped to 308. That does not mean Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem has become risk-free. It suggests the most indiscriminate phase of the correction has passed, leaving behind fewer companies but, in many cases, more disciplined ones.

Where the business models broke

The highest-profile failures were concentrated in sectors where growth required constant cash injection.

E-commerce and social commerce were among the most exposed. Indonesian fashion platform Sorabel, known for its “try-first-pay-later” model, shut down after exhausting its runway. Direct-to-consumer furniture company Fabelio closed despite raising US$9 million in June 2020, weighed down by inventory, showroom costs and operational complexity.

Social commerce players such as Shox Fashion, which raised US$5.5 million in April 2022, and WOWBID, which secured US$5 million in April 2019, struggled as customer acquisition costs rose and reseller-driven growth became harder to sustain.

Also Read: The capital cost strategy: Why high initial investment is your strongest protection

Quick commerce faced a similar problem. Dropezy, a dark-store grocery delivery startup, collapsed after raising US$2.5 million in September 2021. The thesis was familiar across the region: use dense urban demand and neighbourhood fulfilment centres to deliver daily goods quickly. The challenge was that speed did not automatically translate into healthy margins. Rent, labour, stock management and last-mile delivery costs proved difficult to absorb without subsidies.

Proptech and shared-space companies were hit by another weakness: fixed obligations. Vietnam’s Propzy shut down despite raising US$25 million in Series A funding in June 2020. Indonesia’s CoHive, once one of the country’s largest co-working operators, closed after raising US$13.5 million in June 2019. Student housing platform Oxfordcaps also folded after securing nearly US$1 million in May 2020. These businesses were especially vulnerable because they carried real-world liabilities while trying to deliver venture-style growth.

Fintech and crypto companies faced a different combination of pressures. Liquidity tightened, regulators became more cautious, and investor appetite for speculative models weakened. Crypto wealth manager Cabital closed after a US$4 million raise in September 2021. Web3 protocol Qarbon failed despite raising US$5.5 million in June 2023. Philippine payroll fintech SALPay, which had raised US$7.1 million in December 2017, and DeFi aggregator AlgoBlocks, which secured US$1.9 million in April 2022, also ceased operations.

Logistics and on-demand services were squeezed by thin margins. Freight marketplace Ritase shut down after raising US$8.5 million in May 2019, while Malaysian services marketplace Kaodim folded despite raising US$7.0 million in November 2017. Delivery app CarPal also closed after securing US$2.8 million in April 2017. In these categories, scale was supposed to improve utilisation and reduce costs. In practice, fragmented demand, driver supply issues and price competition often kept profitability out of reach.

Even deeptech and media infrastructure were not spared. Enterprise AI company Taiger shut down after raising US$25 million in July 2019. Migo, which raised US$20 million in February 2023 to distribute digital content through offline hardware in Indonesian corner stores, also ceased operations after its capital needs overtook revenue generation.

Three lessons from the deadpool

The first lesson is that timing matters. More than 60 per cent of the 76 notable companies raised their final funding rounds between 2019 and 2021. Many built teams, operations and market plans for a world where capital would remain cheap. When that world disappeared in 2022, cutting fast enough became almost impossible.

The second lesson is that gross merchandise value can mislead. For years, startups reported transaction volumes and user growth as proof of momentum. But GMV does not pay salaries, rent or delivery costs. Once subsidies stopped, companies with weak contribution margins had little room to manoeuvre.

Also Read: The capital drought: Over 7,500 SEA startups extinguished since 2020

The third lesson is that Southeast Asia punishes premature expansion. The region is often discussed as one market, but it is a patchwork of different languages, regulations, payment behaviours, logistics networks and consumer expectations. Expanding across ASEAN before winning at home multiplied burn without necessarily building a moat.

The shakeout is painful, but it is not only a story of failure. It marks the end of a cycle in which capital often substituted for product-market fit. The next generation of founders will still pursue large markets, but they will be expected to show clearer paths to cash flow, stronger unit economics and more careful capital allocation.

For Southeast Asia, that may be the healthier reality. The ecosystem is smaller than the boom years promised, but it is also becoming harder to fool.

The post Anatomy of a shakeout: what 7K+ deadpooled startups reveal about Southeast Asia’s new tech reality appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

The imported risk: How geopolitics moved from ASEAN’s macro problem to ASEAN’s balance sheet

Last quarter I reviewed the credit file for a mid-sized Indonesian manufacturer applying for a working capital facility. The numbers were healthy. The covenants were standard. The collateral was sufficient. What stopped me was the customer concentration disclosure: more than 60 per cent of the manufacturer’s annual revenue came from a single buyer in a sector currently subject to US export controls, with components sourced from a Chinese supplier whose parent company appeared on a US entity list earlier this year.

The credit risk, in conventional terms, was manageable. The geopolitical risk inside the credit risk was not, and the bank’s credit policy framework had no formal way of pricing it.

That kind of file is now arriving across ASEAN banking, multifinance, and trade finance functions in volumes the supervisory infrastructure designed for the older version of geopolitical risk has not caught up to.

The shift that happened

For most of the past two decades, geopolitical risk in ASEAN was a macro problem. It showed up as currency stress when capital flowed out, trade volume drops when major partners imposed tariffs, and cross-border funding stress during episodes of dollar tightness. The supervisory toolkit was correspondingly macro, capital adequacy buffers, reserve requirements, foreign exchange limits.

The decisions made in Washington, Beijing, and Moscow since 2024 have pushed risk down two layers, out of the macro statistics and into individual loan files, individual compliance reviews, and individual technology stacks. The macro toolkit has not stopped being useful. It has stopped being sufficient.

Where the imported risk now sits

Four transmission mechanisms deserve to be named.

Supply chain credit risk. ASEAN exporters are increasingly caught between US export controls and Chinese counter-measures. A borrower whose primary customer is now on a sanctions list, or whose primary supplier was added to an entity restriction, has experienced a material change in credit risk that conventional financial statements may not yet reflect.

Also Read: Code, power, and chaos: The geopolitics of cybersecurity

Sanctions compliance burden. The Russia sanctions architecture established since 2022 has been more durable and secondary-effect-heavy than ASEAN compliance teams initially modelled. Banks operating across multiple jurisdictions now face overlapping US, EU, and UK secondary sanctions regimes, with documentation requirements that exceed what regional supervisors require domestically.

USD funding fragmentation. The architecture for dollar funding in Asia has not broken, but it has become more conditional. Episodes of US monetary tightening now carry geopolitical signals attached, counter-China policy, sanctions enforcement, election-cycle volatility, that make dollar funding more expensive and more uncertain than the pre-2024 baseline.

Technology stack geopolitical risk. US export controls on semiconductors, cloud services, and AI infrastructure now reach into the technology stack of ASEAN financial institutions. The vendor a bank depends on for fraud detection, AI scoring, or core banking may itself be subject to restrictions on what it can sell or deploy in specific markets.

Why ASEAN risk teams are behind

Outsourced thinking. For most of the post-1997 period, ASEAN institutions could reasonably outsource geopolitical risk analysis to global research houses, ratings agencies, and the IMF. Since 2024, the gap between global frameworks and ASEAN-specific exposure has widened. The outsourced analysis is no longer applicable in the way it used to be.

Capacity gap. Few ASEAN financial institutions have an in-house geopolitical risk function with depth comparable to their credit, market, or operational risk teams. The volume of files now requiring that kind of analysis exceeds the capacity that exists.

Supervisory silence. ASEAN supervisors have updated frameworks for cyber risk, climate risk, and operational resilience over the past five years. Geopolitical risk frameworks remain conspicuously underdeveloped. The supervisory expectation is unclear, which produces uneven institutional responses.

What is starting to work

Geopolitical exposure mapping. Large ASEAN banks are mapping the geopolitical exposure inside their major credit relationships, which clients are sanctions-exposed, which supply chains run through controlled jurisdictions, which technology dependencies sit inside sanctions architecture.

Also Read: The shifting geopolitics of sustainability, energy, and climate

Geopolitical scenarios in stress testing. Some institutions have added explicit geopolitical scenarios to internal stress tests, a sustained US-China trade dislocation, a Taiwan escalation, a sanctions tightening event, and tested portfolio impact.

Cross-functional geopolitical desks. The institutions making the most progress have created small cross-functional teams including treasury, compliance, credit, and government relations, meeting frequently enough to translate breaking developments into specific portfolio decisions.

What needs to happen

Build in-house geopolitical capability. Outsourcing to global houses is no longer sufficient. ASEAN institutions need staff who can read the same primary sources as their compliance counterparts in New York or London, in real time, and translate them into local decisions.

Update credit policy to include geopolitical exposure. Credit committees should require explicit geopolitical exposure disclosure for material relationships, alongside traditional credit metrics.

Develop supervisory expectations. ASEAN regulators should publish frameworks for geopolitical risk in financial institutions, institution-level frameworks that match what cyber and climate already have.

The macro stakes

For most of my career, geopolitical risk was something ASEAN’s central banks worried about during crises and the rest of the financial sector worried about as background context. That arrangement worked because the geopolitical risks of the post-1997 era were episodic. The current era is not.

The decisions being made in Washington, Beijing, Moscow, and Brussels are now landing inside ASEAN balance sheets month after month, across loan files, vendor contracts, technology stacks, and compliance frameworks. The institutions that adapt their risk infrastructure to that reality will be the ones still functioning when the next material geopolitical shock arrives.

The imported risk is no longer arriving once a decade. It is arriving once a quarter. The risk function that absorbs it has to absorb it that often too.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.

Join us on WhatsAppInstagramFacebookX, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

The post The imported risk: How geopolitics moved from ASEAN’s macro problem to ASEAN’s balance sheet appeared first on e27.