Indonesia’s SME lending ecosystem looks different in 2026 than it did five years ago. The peer-to-peer lending sector that produced KoinWorks, Investree, Modalku, Akseleran, and dozens of others has consolidated. The number of OJK-licensed P2P lenders has fallen sharply since 2022. The platforms that remain — KoinWorks among the most prominent — operate inside a tighter regulatory perimeter, with a more institutional funding mix, and with a credit posture that resembles traditional non-bank lending more than the original P2P model.
After fifteen years inside Indonesian risk functions, I have watched this transition with more interest than most parts of the industry. The SME credit gap the original P2P model was designed to address is still real — arguably larger now than it was in 2018.
What the P2P era built
The Indonesian P2P sector that emerged after OJK’s POJK 77/2016 did something the traditional banking system had not. It built credit access infrastructure for SMEs that conventional banks were not set up to serve — too small for commercial banking, too formal for microfinance, too thinly documented for traditional underwriting.
KoinWorks, founded by Benedicto Haryono and Willy Arifin in 2016, was one of the platforms that built deliberately for that segment from early on. Its emphasis on productive SME credit, on developing alternative data underwriting capability, and on maintaining a measured growth trajectory gave it a more durable position than many peers when the sector consolidated.
What changed
Three structural shifts have reshaped the sector.
Funding mix institutionalised. The original retail-investor-to-SME model has been steadily replaced by institutional funding — banks, asset managers, structured-credit vehicles. The platform’s role shifted from retail marketplace to credit origination intermediary.
Also Read: What I’m learning about the second wave of insurance digital transformation in Indonesia
Regulatory perimeter tightened. POJK 10/2022 and subsequent rules raised capital requirements, codified credit risk management expectations, and required clearer governance. Smaller platforms could not absorb the compliance cost. Consolidation followed.
Credit posture matured. The early sector underestimated default risk in the segments it served, partly because alternative data models were younger than the underwriting confidence they produced. Surviving platforms rebuilt credit policy around tighter limits, more conservative scoring, and active portfolio management.
Lessons learned
Six principles from this decade are worth carrying into the next chapter of Indonesian SME credit.
Discipline beats velocity. The platforms that survived grew slower than the market wanted them to. The ones that did not are mostly no longer licensed. Underwriting discipline is not a brake on growth — it is the condition for it.
Funding mix is survival, not treasury. A platform with multiple institutional funding lines has options. A platform with one funding line of any kind has a deadline.
Regulator engagement compounds. The platforms that spent time with OJK before the rules tightened got more flexibility when they tightened. Time-with-supervisors is the most under-priced asset in fintech.
Alternative data is a hypothesis, not a verdict. Models built on novel data require longer back-testing than founder optimism typically permits. Models should be continuously revisable, never declared proven.
Also Read: A 90-episode series in 3 weeks: How AI is speeding up Indonesia’s creative economy
The credit gap is durable, the model is not. Indonesia’s SME credit gap will exist as long as the banking system is structured the way it is. Founders who anchor on the gap rather than on the specific model will adapt faster.
Consolidation cycles repeat. The 2022-2024 P2P shake-out was not a one-off. The next category — embedded finance, vertical lenders, supply-chain credit — will go through its own version of this cycle inside five to seven years. The platforms that prepare for it instead of treating this round as the last one will still be operating after the next.
The macro stakes
KoinWorks and the platforms that came up with it gave Indonesia’s SME segment an underwriting infrastructure designed for them rather than adapted reluctantly from larger products. That contribution has not been fully absorbed by the formal banking system, and the gap remains for the next generation to address.
The lessons from the P2P era — discipline, diversification, alignment, humility about data, durability of the problem — are the foundation. The opportunity to build on them is still open. The institutions that build well in the next five years will be the ones that treat the previous five years as research, not as critique.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.
Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.
The post The KoinWorks era: What Indonesia’s SME lending journey has taught the next generation appeared first on e27.