Generative AI has made video creation remarkably fast. A scene that once required a camera crew, actors, locations and hours of post-production can now begin with a prompt and an idea.
But after working with AI-generated cinematic videos, I have learned that generating a video quickly and producing a video that is actually usable are two very different things.
An AI model can create an impressive scene on the first attempt. At first glance, everything may look great: cinematic lighting, realistic environments, convincing characters and smooth camera movement.
Then you look closer. A car is moving in the wrong direction. A character suddenly looks different. An important object disappears. The environment does not accurately represent the intended location. A person appears twice. The camera moves differently from what the story requires.
The video may look impressive, but it is not necessarily usable.
Good-looking is not the same as correct
One of the most interesting things about AI video is how easily visual quality can hide mistakes. A generated scene can look highly realistic while containing small problems that make the entire shot unusable.
This becomes particularly important when creating content based on real locations, products or brands. If a scene is supposed to represent Singapore, for example, recognisable landmarks, roads, architecture and the overall environment need to make sense. A beautiful futuristic city is not enough if it no longer feels like Singapore.
The same applies to branded content. A logo that changes shape, text that becomes unreadable or a product that changes appearance can quickly turn a visually impressive generation into something that cannot be published.
This means creators need to evaluate AI-generated footage beyond visual quality. Accuracy matters too.
Also Read: AI boom pushes chipmakers to expand across Asia Pacific, FedEx report finds
Consistency is one of the biggest challenges
Creating one impressive AI-generated shot is becoming increasingly easy. Creating 10 shots that feel like they belong to the same film is much harder.
A character may look correct in one scene and slightly different in the next. Clothing can change. Buildings can move. Objects can disappear. Lighting can suddenly shift.
Individually, each generation might look good. Together, however, they may not feel like one continuous story.
This has changed the way I approach AI video creation. Instead of thinking only about individual prompts, I increasingly think about continuity: What must remain the same? What can change? Where should the character be? What direction should objects move? What should the camera be doing? What details from the previous scene need to remain visible?
Consistency becomes part of the creative process.
Prompting is becoming more like directing
Early AI prompts could be relatively simple. “Create a futuristic city.” Today, producing more controlled cinematic content often requires much more thought.
A creator may need to define the subject, action, environment, camera movement, framing, lighting, visual style, timing and restrictions. Instead of simply asking AI to create something beautiful, you begin directing what should happen. The difference is important.
A prompt might specify that the camera slowly pushes forward while the main character remains visible, vehicles continue moving naturally in the correct direction, the environment stays consistent and the shot ends at a particular visual moment. At that point, prompting starts to feel less like giving a computer a sentence and more like communicating instructions to a virtual production team.
The ability to describe an idea clearly becomes increasingly valuable.
Also Read: AI chats are becoming the new starting point for online shopping
Human judgement still decides what is usable
AI can generate alternatives very quickly, but it does not always understand why one result works better than another. A human still needs to notice when something feels wrong.
Is the movement natural? Does the location look accurate? Is the character consistent? Does the camera movement support the story? Is the branding correct? Does the scene communicate the intended message?
These decisions require judgement rather than generation. This is why I do not see AI video simply as a replacement for traditional creative work. It changes where some of the work happens.
Instead of manually producing every visual element, creators increasingly spend time defining ideas, setting constraints, reviewing generations, correcting problems and deciding which results deserve to become part of the final production.
Businesses should look beyond generation speed
For businesses considering AI-generated video, speed is understandably attractive. But “How quickly can AI generate a video?” may not be the most useful question. A better set of questions might be:
- How many generations are required before the result is usable?
- Can characters, products and brand elements remain consistent?
- How much human review is required?
- Can the technology accurately communicate the intended message?
- Does the final content actually feel appropriate for the brand?
AI can dramatically reduce some production barriers, particularly for ideas that would otherwise require expensive locations, visual effects or complex production. But businesses should still treat AI-generated content as creative production rather than a one-click solution.
The role of the creator is changing
AI video technology will continue to improve. Many problems that are difficult today will probably become easier.
Characters will become more consistent. Physical movement will improve. Models will understand environments better. Creators will gain more precise control.
But better technology does not eliminate the need for creative decisions. Someone still needs to decide what the audience should see, how the story should unfold, what feels authentic and whether the final result communicates the right idea.
The tools are changing rapidly, but storytelling, direction and judgement still matter.
AI can generate the footage.
Someone still has to direct it.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.
Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.
The post AI can generate a video in minutes. Making it usable is the hard part appeared first on e27.