Posted on Leave a comment

PPI day warning: Bitcoin faces make-or-break moment as US$79,900 level hangs in balance

Bitcoin slipped 1.02 per cent to US$80,700.70 over the past 24 hours, underperforming a broadly flat global equity market amid renewed macroeconomic anxiety. The cryptocurrency’s decline reflects a confluence of sticky inflation data, hawkish Federal Reserve expectations, and escalating geopolitical tensions that have pushed traders toward safer assets. With Bitcoin showing a 76 per cent correlation to the S&P 500, this move appears fundamentally rates-driven rather than crypto-specific, signalling that digital assets remain tethered to traditional monetary policy expectations.

The primary catalyst is hotter-than-expected US inflation data released this week. The April Consumer Price Index print came in at 3.8 per cent year-over-year, exceeding the 3.7 per cent consensus forecast, while core CPI landed at 2.8 per cent. This seemingly small miss has profound implications for market participants who had priced in potential rate cuts later this year.

Instead, traders now face the possibility of prolonged periods of elevated interest rates, or even a rate hike, a scenario that drains liquidity from speculative assets like Bitcoin. The potential appointment of Kevin Warsh, considered a hawkish nominee, as Federal Reserve Chair adds another layer of concern about a higher-for-longer interest rate environment.

Global equity markets reflected this anxiety with mixed but generally negative performance. The S&P 500 slipped 0.16 per cent to 7,400.96, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite led declines with a 0.71 per cent drop to 26,088.20. The Dow Jones Industrial Average bucked the trend, edging up 0.11 per cent to 49,760.56, supported by healthcare stocks like Humana, which surged 7.7 per cent following a bullish price target upgrade.

Technology stocks bore the brunt of the selloff, with Qualcomm plunging 11 per cent and Micron falling 3.6 per cent as a massive monthly semiconductor rally paused. Asian markets showed similar strain, with the Shanghai Composite retreating 0.25 per cent to 4,214.00 on higher energy costs and local economic caution, though the Straits Times Index managed a 0.64 per cent gain to 4,977.58 in early trade on May 13, supported by regional gains and local bank strength.

Also Read: Bitcoin above US$80K but falling: The pre-CPI shakeout or something worse?

Geopolitical tensions added pressure when comments from President Trump suggested the US-Iran ceasefire remains fragile. This injected immediate market anxiety and triggered a wave of long liquidations, wiping out over US$52 million in Bitcoin positions in 24 hours. The instability pushed investors toward the dollar, with the US Dollar Index strengthening by 0.305 points to reach 98.26.

Energy markets reacted sharply to the geopolitical strain and continued closure concerns around the Strait of Hormuz. West Texas Intermediate futures jumped over 9.7 per cent to settle at US$95.73 per barrel, while Brent futures surged 9.2 per cent to cross the psychological barrier of US$100 per barrel at US$100.46. Higher energy costs feed back into inflation concerns, creating a cycle that further pressures risk assets.

The bond market sent clear signals about shifting expectations. The benchmark US 10-year Treasury yield rose to 4.43 per cent as investors repriced the probability of future rate cuts. This yield movement directly impacts Bitcoin and other risk assets by increasing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding investments. Even traditional safe havens like gold struggled, sliding US$14.90 per ounce to US$4,713.80, while silver dropped slightly to US$85.52 per ounce, suggesting that the dollar’s strength overwhelmed traditional flight-to-safety flows.

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin faces a critical juncture. The cryptocurrency has encountered resistance at US$82,000 multiple times and now tests immediate support at the psychological US$80,000 level and the 23.6 per cent Fibonacci retracement at US$79,912. The market structure remains fragile but not broken, with Bitcoin holding above its multi-week bullish trendline.

A break below the US$79,000 support could trigger a drop toward the 38.2 per cent Fibonacci level near US$78,130. The key trigger for the next major move is the Producer Price Index report, which will confirm whether inflation pressures persist at the wholesale level. A hot PPI print could break support and confirm bearish momentum, while a cooler reading might allow Bitcoin to stabilise and potentially reclaim the US$82,000 resistance level.

Also Read: Bitcoin drops to US$80K while these 4 tokens surge over 100% in 7 days

The current market dynamics reveal that Bitcoin remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic narratives despite its growing institutional adoption through exchange-traded funds. While long-term structural demand from ETFs provides a fundamental floor, short-term sentiment remains cautious and reactive to traditional financial indicators.

The 76 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 underscores that Bitcoin has not yet decoupled from traditional risk assets during periods of monetary policy uncertainty. Traders now watch whether Bitcoin can defend the US$79,900 to US$80,000 support zone following the PPI data release, or whether this marks the beginning of another leg down in a broader risk-off environment driven by inflation fears and geopolitical instability.

Bitcoin’s near-term trajectory hinges on the interplay between macro data, geopolitical developments, and technical levels. The path forward requires careful navigation of both traditional macro indicators and crypto-specific technical levels, with liquidity conditions and leverage ratios playing outsized roles in amplifying moves in either direction.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.

Join us on WhatsAppInstagramFacebookX, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

The post PPI day warning: Bitcoin faces make-or-break moment as US$79,900 level hangs in balance appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

The cloud crossroads: Why your startup should weigh the risks before betting on NetSuite in 2026

The cloud crossroads: Why your startup should weigh the risks before betting on NetSuite in 2026

In the high-stakes world of Southeast Asian tech, the “growth at all costs” mantra has been replaced by a much grittier reality: operational resilience. For years, moving to a Tier-1 ERP system like NetSuite was considered a rite of passage. It was the “grown-up” choice—the software that signaled you were ready for global expansion.

But as we cross the midpoint of 2026, the narrative is shifting. From reported system fluctuations to a parent company pivoting toward the AI frontier, the “NetSuite Comment” circulating in founder circles isn’t as unanimous as it used to be. For startups sitting on a proposal to migrate their financial stack, the current climate suggests that “due diligence” needs to be deeper than ever.

Learning from 2025: The cost of digital dependency

To understand the current skepticism, we have to look at the operational hurdles reported across the industry last year. In 2025, the market observed three significant system outages that disrupted global operations. For any enterprise, these moments are more than technical glitches; they represent hours where finance teams cannot close books and warehouses cannot ship orders.

For a startup, an ERP is the central nervous system. When that system experiences downtime, the friction costs run high. While these incidents were largely addressed, they left many CFOs questioning the inherent risks of “putting all your eggs in one cloud.”

A pulse check on system robustness

If 2025 was the year of the “wake-up call,” 2026 has been a year of continued scrutiny. Recent months have seen a series of service indicators that suggest the road to total stability remains under construction.

In mid-April 2026, reports surfaced of service degradation affecting users in the US Phoenix region. For startups running integrated stacks where NetSuite communicates with Shopify or Salesforce, UI sluggishness or API timeouts can create data synchronization backlogs. Furthermore, a degradation of the NetSuite Payroll Service on May 1, 2026, added to the conversation regarding system reliability.

When you invest in a premium ERP, you are paying for the promise of a “utility-grade” service. However, recurring reports of degradation—even if brief—force a conversation about whether the platform’s robustness has evolved at the same pace as its price point.

Also read: Top 5 popular HRMS software for manufacturers in Singapore

The oracle pivot: Stability vs. the AI euphoria

Perhaps the most discussed signal isn’t coming from the status dashboard, but from Oracle’s corporate restructuring. In April 2026, Oracle announced a significant workforce reduction, a move widely interpreted as a pivot to reallocate resources toward AI and data center infrastructure.

This raises a strategic question for the ERP market: Where does the “boring” but essential world of business applications sit on Oracle’s priority list?

We are living through an “AI Euphoria.” Oracle, like many titans, is moving aggressively toward GPU clusters and LLM training. But ERP excellence requires a massive human “success” infrastructure—consultants, support engineers, and developers who understand the nuances of local tax laws or complex audit requirements. If the market perceives a thinning of these specialized teams, the perceived value of the platform may begin to erode.

The technical debt of modernization

The 2026.1 update cycle has also highlighted the “maintenance tax” that often accompanies legacy-scale software. Mandatory shifts in authentication protocols (OAuth 2.0) and changes to journal entry sublists mean that lean startup engineering teams must spend time fixing what isn’t “broken” rather than building new features. In an era where every developer hour is a precious resource, the complexity of maintaining a Tier-1 ERP integration is a factor that must be weighed against its benefits.

Also read: Navigating the new era of brand mention tracking and AI visibility in Singapore

Why thinking twice is strategic, not cynical

This isn’t to say NetSuite has lost its power. It remains a feature-rich environment. However, the context of 2026 has changed the risk-reward calculation. Before signing a long-term contract, founders should ask:

  • The Support Reality: Following the recent layoffs, what does the support path look like? Is the institutional knowledge still there to help you through a complex implementation?
  • Downtime Tolerance: Does your business model allow for the “outage frequency” observed over the last 18 months?
  • Vendor Alignment: Is your ERP provider innovating for your specific operational needs, or are you a passenger on their journey toward an AI-first future?

The verdict

The ERP market is no longer a one-horse race. The rise of agile, specialized financial platforms suggests that startups have more choices than ever. You no longer have to default to a legacy giant if you feel their focus is shifting elsewhere.

NetSuite’s recent track record suggests a platform navigating a period of transition. In 2026, the most “mature” move a startup can make is to look at the performance data, listen to the peer commentary, and decide if the “safe choice” still aligns with their need for absolute reliability.

Why we write this article

PRbyAI enjoys in sharing updated market news, using our team’s tech knowledge, to help corporate clients looking for the most informed decisions.

Want updates like this delivered directly? Join our WhatsApp channel and stay in the loop.

This article was shared with us by PRbyAI

We can share your story at e27 too! Engage the Southeast Asian tech ecosystem by bringing your story to the world. You can reach out to us here to get started.

Featured Image Credit: Canva Images

About PRbyAI

PRbyAI is a tech-driven Martech startup leveraging cutting-edge AI SEO (GEO) to help customers generate leads and tap into new markets.

The post The cloud crossroads: Why your startup should weigh the risks before betting on NetSuite in 2026 appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

Gift2O is building the infrastructure layer for rewards and gifting value exchange in Asia’s digital economies

Across Asia, digital commerce is scaling at an unprecedented speed. Payments are real-time, marketplaces are more mature, and consumers are deeply embedded in digital ecosystems. Yet one critical layer remains underdeveloped: how non-cash value moves across these ecosystems.

Rewards, vouchers, incentives, and stored value are still managed through fragmented merchant networks, single-brand systems, and manual fulfilment processes. There is limited visibility into usage. This is not a minor operational inefficiency. It is a structural gap in the digital economy.

The scale of the opportunity is significant. The global gift card market is projected to reach US$2.22 trillion by 2034, while ASEAN’s digital economy has already surpassed US$300 billion in GMV.

Businesses increasingly need to move value across employee rewards, customer engagement, partner incentives, merchant-funded campaigns, and loyalty ecosystems. However, the infrastructure supporting these flows has not kept pace.

The real problem: Value doesn’t move efficiently

Every business today needs to move value. HR teams reward employees, banks incentivize customer behavior, insurers drive engagement and retention, and FMCG brands motivate distributors and retailers. Enterprises also run promotions, loyalty programs, and large-scale campaigns.

However, the systems supporting these functions remain rigid. Rewards are often difficult to deploy at scale, limited in where they can be redeemed, poorly aligned with user preferences, and hard to track or optimize. When redemption fails, the entire value chain breaks. A reward that is not used has no impact.

The current system can issue value, but it cannot ensure that value is meaningfully used.

Turning vouchers into infrastructure

Gift2O is a globally positioned brand built to address this gap across markets, with Thyaga as the Sri Lanka based counterpart behind the platform’s development, market validation, and operating foundation. Founded in 2021 and backed by Accelerating Asia Ventures, Thyaga developed the multi-merchant digital value exchange platform that now powers Gift2O’s broader proposition, enabling businesses to issue flexible, usable, and trackable value across ecosystems.

Sri Lanka was Thyaga’s first operating market and the launchpad from which the model was proven at scale before being carried forward through Gift2O’s wider brand positioning. Today, through Thyaga’s operating base in Sri Lanka, the platform serves over 500 corporates and hundreds of thousands of users, supported by a network of more than 200 merchants across over 3,000 outlets. It has also demonstrated repeatable enterprise usage across sectors such as banking, insurance, FMCG, and corporate HR, reinforcing its position as a B2B platform with consumer applicability rather than a consumer gifting business alone.

A fundamental shift: From closed-loop rewards to open value networks

At the core of Gift2O’s approach is a fundamental shift in how vouchers are understood. Traditional vouchers operate as closed systems tied to a single brand and redemption path. Gift2O, powered by Thyaga’s platform infrastructure, replaces this with a multi-merchant value layer, allowing a single voucher to be redeemed across multiple brands, categories, and everyday use cases.

This shift improves usability and directly increases the effectiveness of rewards. The value of a reward is tied to its usability and broader redemption options increase both engagement and perceived value.

Also read: Revolutionising retail: A blueprint for future success

Product decisions that drive real commercial outcomes

This thinking is reflected in product design. The platform’s partial redemption feature allows users to spend part of a voucher and retain the remaining balance for future use, aligning with real-world spending behavior. Combined with multi-channel delivery options, including SMS, email, and physical formats, the platform ensures accessibility across different users and use cases.

Its merchant network expands the likelihood that recipients will find a relevant and usable redemption option within their everyday spending behavior. This strengthens redemption outcomes, improves user experience and engagement, and increases the practical value of each reward issued.

Why this is a B2B infrastructure play, not a gifting business

Gift2O operates at the intersection of payments, engagement, and commerce. Built on Thyaga’s proven platform foundation, it is embedded in high-frequency enterprise workflows, including customer rewards and loyalty programs for banks, retention initiatives for insurers, employee recognition for corporates, distributor incentives for FMCG companies, and promotional campaigns for brands.

Across these use cases, the platform addresses a broader business need: helping organizations issue value in ways that are flexible for users, operationally efficient for businesses, and measurable over time. This positions Gift2O not as a niche gifting solution, but as a horizontal infrastructure layer that can support multiple industries and recurring enterprise workflows.

Traction signals a scalable model

The platform’s growth trajectory reinforces this positioning. The company has achieved 300X growth over the last four years, alongside rapid expansion of both its merchant and enterprise networks. Its usage is increasingly embedded within repeat enterprise workflows, where rewards and incentives are recurring expenditure categories.

This creates a system with compounding value. As the merchant network grows, user experience improves. As user experience improves, enterprise adoption increases. As enterprise adoption increases, transaction volume grows, further strengthening the platform.

The emerging moat: Network, integration, and data

At scale, Gift2O’s defensibility is driven by merchant network density, enterprise integration, and behavioral data. Building and maintaining local merchant networks across fragmented markets is operationally complex, creating barriers to rapid replication.

As the platform integrates into enterprise systems such as HR platforms, banking ecosystems, and loyalty programs, switching costs increase. At the same time, data on redemption behavior enables better targeting, smarter reward design, and improved engagement outcomes. Together, these elements create a reinforcing system where value increases with scale.

Also read: Time is the new currency: Why APAC’s SMEs can’t afford slow financing anymore

From Sri Lanka to regional relevance

The opportunity extends well beyond Sri Lanka. Across South Asia and Southeast Asia, digital payments and e-commerce are advancing rapidly, but systems supporting non-cash value exchange remain fragmented.

This creates a consistent regional gap. With Thyaga as the local parent company and proven operating base, Gift2O represents the broader outward-facing brand for expansion into other markets. Markets such as Bangladesh, Malaysia, and the Maldives reflect the kind of environments where the need for flexible, multi-merchant value systems is already present. While each market differs, the underlying problem remains the same.

Why now: The rise of embedded value exchange

The timing of this opportunity is critical. The first wave of digital transformation across Asia focused on payments, marketplaces, and access. The next phase is centered on engagement, retention, and the ability to move value across ecosystems.

Businesses are no longer asking whether they can transact digitally. They are asking how to influence behavior, retain users, and drive engagement at scale. This shift requires infrastructure that enables flexible and measurable value exchange.

A category in transition

Gift2O represents a compelling opportunity within this transition. It operates in a large and underdeveloped category, has demonstrated product-market fit, and is built on a scalable B2B model with network-driven advantages. While it may appear to be a voucher platform, it is more accurately building the infrastructure layer for how value moves in digital economies.

What comes next for digital commerce

As digital ecosystems across South and Southeast Asia continue to expand, the ability to move value seamlessly between businesses, merchants, and consumers will become a foundational capability.

Companies that enable this shift will define the next phase of digital commerce. Gift2O, built on Thyaga’s operating foundation and market validation, is positioning itself at that intersection, building a system designed to make value exchange more flexible, more usable, and more integrated into the everyday flow of business.

Want updates like this delivered directly? Join our WhatsApp channel and stay in the loop.

This article was sponsored by Gift2O

We can share your story at e27 too! Engage the Southeast Asian tech ecosystem by bringing your story to the world. You can reach out to us here to get started.

Featured Image Credit: Gift2O

The post Gift2O is building the infrastructure layer for rewards and gifting value exchange in Asia’s digital economies appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

Building something real: How young founders are turning ideas into ventures

There is a particular kind of energy that surrounds a first-time founder. It is the moment when an idea stops being something you think about and starts being something you build — when the question shifts from “what if?” to “how?”. For a growing number of young entrepreneurs, that moment is arriving earlier than ever, and the ventures emerging from it are tackling some genuinely interesting problems.

What stands out about this year’s lineup by Singapore Polytechnic (SP) Entrepreneurship Centre (SPiNOFF) at Echelon 2026 is the range of ideas they are choosing to build. From artificial intelligence platforms to peer-to-peer marketplaces, from brain-computer interfaces to communication tools for people with disabilities, young entrepreneurs today are not waiting for permission to work on hard things. They are finding platforms, building teams, and getting to work.

Making as a right, not a privilege

BuilderLab uses artificial intelligence and taps into a global supplier network to translate concepts into manufacturable designs, removing much of the technical complexity that has traditionally stood between an idea and its realisation. The premise is simple but meaningful: the ability to make things should not be limited by your access to resources.

Rethinking how communities share

SnapRent is a peer-to-peer rental platform connecting people with underused assets to those who would rather rent than buy and reflects a broader shift in how younger generations think about ownership and community. It encourages people to see their neighbours as a network and their possessions as shared resources, creating value that flows in both directions.

Also read: Ecosystem Roundup: The day geopolitics broke a mega AI deal

Technology with purpose

Some of the most compelling work happening in youth entrepreneurship today sits at the intersection of technology and real human need. Neural Drive and Assistive Technologies are both building in that space.

Neural Drive is developing brain-computer interface technology that enables paralysed patients to communicate instantly. Their breakthrough eliminates the complexity of traditional brain-computer interfaces, delivering instant communication when it matters most. It is technically complex work, driven by a clear and urgent purpose.

Assistive Technologies is working in adjacent territory, building what it describes as the world’s first messaging tool for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) users, designed to open up communication for people with non-verbal disabilities and connect people from all walks of life. 

Giving students the space to build: SPiNOFF

Ventures like these do not emerge fully formed. Behind every founder with a compelling idea is a space that allowed them to explore it — somewhere they could prototype, fail, iterate, and try again without the pressure of having to get everything right immediately.

SP’s entrepreneurship centre seeks to provide exactly that sort of space for its student founders. Designed for those ready to take their first steps towards building a venture, SPiNOFF offers the space, mentorship, and resources that early-stage founders need to move from idea to reality.

The Small Project Fund gives students pre-seed support to explore and prototype their ideas with resources. Students can enrol in entrepreneurship electives that give structured exposure to the skills and thinking that underpin entrepreneurship, while its entrepreneurship internship programme offers something more unusual: the opportunity to spend their internship period developing their own startup rather than working within an existing organisation for a semester. For students who are ready to build, it is a chance to treat their own venture as the work itself.

Also read: FusionAP’s US$2M raise signals Malaysia’s push up the semiconductor value chain

Leading the SP’s broader entrepreneurship ecosystem, SPiNOFF also connects students to a wider network of programmes, opportunities, and industry touchpoints — giving early-stage founders not just internal support, but visibility and traction in the world beyond campus.

The result is a community of founders who arrive at the market better prepared — with prototypes tested, ideas validated, and a network behind them. For young entrepreneurs working on ventures as varied as medtech, AI, and the sharing economy, that foundation matters.

From idea to venture

What connects BuilderLab, SnapRent, Neural Drive, and Assistive Technologies is not just that they are youth-led. It is that each of them started as an idea that someone chose to take seriously — and then found the platform and support to build it into something real.

That journey from idea to venture is rarely straightforward. It takes time, resources, and the kind of environment that encourages students to back themselves even when the outcome is uncertain. At SPiNOFF, we provide that environment for our students to try, fail forward, and try again.

Want updates like this delivered directly? Join our WhatsApp channel and stay in the loop.

This article was sponsored by  Singapore Polytechnic (SP) Entrepreneurship Centre (SPiNOFF)

We can share your story at e27 too! Engage the Southeast Asian tech ecosystem by bringing your story to the world. You can reach out to us here to get started.

Featured Image Credit:  Singapore Polytechnic (SP) Entrepreneurship Centre (SPiNOFF)

The post Building something real: How young founders are turning ideas into ventures appeared first on e27.

Posted on Leave a comment

Southeast Asia’s nuclear question: Is the region ready for a security-driven nuclear revival?

Southeast Asia’s energy systems are entering a testing phase. Electricity demand is rising as economies urbanise, industries electrify, and data centres expand. Meanwhile, governments are under pressure to reduce emissions and keep power affordable for households and businesses.

These competing demands are forcing policymakers to look beyond familiar solutions and reconsider options that once seemed politically or socially unviable.

One of those options is nuclear energy. Long treated in Southeast Asia as a distant or theoretical possibility, nuclear power is quietly returning to regional policy discussions, as the risks of energy shortfalls, price instability and system fragility are becoming harder to ignore.

Globally, nuclear is simultaneously being reframed as a tool for reliability and energy security. The question now is whether the region is prepared to engage with that debate in a serious and transparent way.

A global shift that ASEAN cannot ignore

Nuclear energy is experiencing a worldwide cautious but noticeable rehabilitation. In Europe, countries that once planned rapid phase-outs are reassessing nuclear’s role in maintaining grid stability as renewable capacity expands.

India is scaling up nuclear generation to support industrial growth and data-heavy sectors. In the US, major technology companies are backing nuclear projects to secure reliable, low-carbon electricity for data centres and artificial intelligence.

The common thread is not enthusiasm for nuclear per se but concerns about the reliability of other major energy sources. Wind and solar are expanding quickly, yet they remain dependent on weather and grid capacity. Battery storage is improving, but it is not yet sufficient to replace firm generation everywhere. Gas markets, meanwhile, remain exposed to geopolitical shocks.

Nuclear fills a gap that other technologies currently cannot. It offers large-scale and continuous power with low operational emissions. For governments under pressure to keep electricity affordable and dependable, these are key considerations.

Also Read: Biocomputing: The race for energy efficiency, storage capacity, and machine sentience

ASEAN’s energy dilemma

ASEAN economies are among the fastest-growing in the world. Electricity demand is expected to rise sharply over the next two decades as manufacturing expands, transport electrifies, and digital services grow. For now, many countries remain reliant on imported fuels, leaving them vulnerable to price volatility and supply disruptions.

Solar energy has become the region’s most popular clean technology, thanks to falling costs and abundant sunlight. Hydropower plays an important role in some countries, while gas remains a backbone of power generation in others.

Yet each of these options has limits. Solar strains grids without sufficient storage, while hydropower is vulnerable to changing rainfall patterns. Gas ties countries to global markets at a time of geopolitical uncertainty.

Against this backdrop, nuclear energy is resurfacing, not as an immediate solution, but as a strategic question.

Malaysia has been explicit in its reluctance, prioritising solar and regional grid integration instead. Indonesia and the Philippines periodically revisit nuclear feasibility studies, though political and public resistance remain strong. Vietnam paused its nuclear programme years ago and has yet to revive it decisively.

Singapore stands out as an outlier in the region. While it has no plans to build a nuclear plant in the near term, it is actively studying nuclear technologies, safety frameworks and regulatory requirements. International experts have noted that Singapore’s governance capacity and safety culture would place it among the more technically prepared countries, should it choose to proceed.

This divergence highlights a central issue for ASEAN: nuclear power is not only a technological challenge, but an institutional one.

Trust is the real constraint

Public sentiment remains nuclear energy’s greatest obstacle. Penta Group’s latest analysis on global sentiment towards energy drew on more than sixteen million pieces of content across over one hundred languages, and found that the top concerns are around safety, waste disposal, cost overruns and long construction timelines. These anxieties are especially pronounced in countries without an existing nuclear industry.

Southeast Asia is one of these countries, where memories of high-profile energy-related accidents elsewhere still shape perceptions. These concerns cannot be dismissed as irrational, as they reflect a deeper issue: trust.

Nuclear energy demands confidence in regulators, operators and governments, gradually developed over decades. Without that confidence, no amount of strategic justification will secure public acceptance.

Also Read: Quantum readiness for energy sector: Not encryption, operational longevity

What an ASEAN nuclear conversation must prioritise

The experience of other energy transitions offers a warning. Wind power, despite steady innovation, has stalled in many places due to local opposition. Hydrogen enjoys strong political and investor backing, yet consumers remain unsure what it means for their daily lives. Even solar, the most trusted clean energy source, can lose public support when policy changes increase household costs or strain infrastructure.

In each case, national ambition was prioritised over local consent. If nuclear power is to be part of Southeast Asia’s long-term energy discussion, the approach must be deliberate and transparent.

First, governments need to be clear about why nuclear is being considered. Energy security, not abstract climate targets, is likely to resonate most. Citizens want to understand how nuclear would improve reliability, affordability and resilience, and how it compares with alternatives.

Second, governance must come before commitment. Safety oversight, waste management, emergency preparedness and cost accountability cannot be afterthoughts. They are prerequisites for credibility.

Third, regional cooperation matters. Shared research, common safety standards and open information exchange could reduce mistrust, even among countries that ultimately choose not to pursue nuclear power.

Finally, public engagement must be treated as essential infrastructure. Trust is built slowly and lost quickly. Sudden policy shifts, opaque studies or dismissive messaging can derail years of groundwork.

Also Read: The hard truth about Asia’s energy future: Why we need a new class of sovereign alternatives

A decision that cannot be rushed or avoided

Nuclear energy will not be right for every ASEAN country, and it may never move beyond the exploratory stage for some. But as energy security pressures intensify, it will not disappear from the conversation.

The question is not whether Southeast Asia should immediately embrace nuclear power. It is whether the region is prepared to have an honest, informed and transparent debate about its future energy needs.

Energy security may be forcing the question, but it is public trust that will determine the answer.

This article was co-authored with Husni Nassir-Deen, Director at Penta Group.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.

Join us on WhatsAppInstagramFacebookX, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

The post Southeast Asia’s nuclear question: Is the region ready for a security-driven nuclear revival? appeared first on e27.