
Imagine two founders raising their first million dollars this year.
One is in San Francisco. She emails a former operator who exited a company in her space. He replies in two hours. They meet the next morning. The term sheet arrives within the week.
The other is in Singapore. He pitches a regional VC firm. He waits for the partner meeting. Then the investment committee. Then the second IC. Three months in, the firm passes. He starts over with another fund.
These two founders are building similar companies. They are facing similar markets. But they are raising capital on completely different playbooks. The first founder is operating on the new US model. The second is still on the old one.
The US version is coming to Southeast Asia. Within the next two to three years, the founders who understand this will have a structural advantage. The ones who do not will be running last decade’s race.
Here are the five shifts to track.
Shift one: The rise of the one-person fund
In US venture capital, the most influential investor in many deals is now a single person. No partners. No committee. No quarterly approval process. Just one investor making a call.
These are called solo GPs. They now make up more than half of all new fund managers globally. The most famous of them, Elad Gil, raised a billion-dollar fund on his own in 2024. Partners at top firms like Sequoia are leaving to do the same.
Why does this matter for a Southeast Asian founder? Because the speed advantage is dramatic. A solo GP can decide on a deal in days. A traditional VC firm takes months. When you are racing to ship a product, that gap is the difference between catching a market and missing it.
India is already seeing solo GPs rise. Southeast Asia is next.
Shift two: Operators are beating institutions for the best founders
Five years ago, the best founders in the US wanted Sequoia or Andreessen Horowitz on their cap table. The brand was the prize.
Today, many of those same founders are choosing someone different. They are choosing the operator who built a similar company ten years ago. The investor who knows the playbook because they wrote it themselves. The check writer who can pick up the phone and introduce them to their first ten customers.
Brand has not stopped mattering. But it has stopped being decisive.
What changed? AI made building faster. A small team can now ship a product, find customers, and hit revenue in months. Founders moving at that speed cannot afford an investor who moves at quarterly committee speed. They need someone who has been in the trenches and can answer the hard question on the same day.
The Southeast Asian founders who win in 2026 will increasingly choose their investors the same way.
Shift three: The middle of the funding ladder is disappearing
For two decades, the path was simple. Raise seed. Then Series A. Then B. Then C. Each stage had its own investors, its own valuations, its own playbook.
That ladder is breaking.
At the bottom, solo GPs and operator angels are taking the early deals before the traditional firms can run their process. At the top, mega-funds are writing the giant cheques into AI companies. The middle, where most traditional partner-stage VCs lived, is becoming empty.
Southeast Asia is showing the same pattern. In the first quarter of 2026, regional startups raised US$2.81 billion. Sounds healthy. Look closer and the picture changes. That money was spread across just 98 deals, the lowest quarterly count in eight years. A handful of mega-rounds carried the entire quarter. Singapore alone absorbed over 90 per cent of the capital. The middle has thinned.
If you are a founder raising a Series A in Southeast Asia today, you may already be feeling this. The firms that used to be there are quieter. The deals that close are either small and fast at the bottom, or huge and concentrated at the top.
Shift four: Selling shares before IPO is becoming normal
US founders used to have one way to get personal liquidity. Wait for the IPO. That could take ten years. Sometimes longer.
A new path has opened. It is called the secondary market. Founders, early employees, and sometimes even VCs sell portions of their shares to other investors before the company exits. In 2024, this market hit US$160 billion in transaction volume globally. In 2025, it crossed US$210 billion.
For Southeast Asian founders, this matters because the IPO window here has been effectively closed for three years. Waiting for the public market to reopen is not a viable personal financial plan. The founders who learn how secondary liquidity works, and how to negotiate it into their later rounds, will have options that their peers do not.
Most Southeast Asian founders have never thought about this. Their global counterparts have.
Also Read: Founders’ playbook: What it really takes to scale beyond Series A
Shift five: The cheque has become the least valuable thing investors offer
Ask a US founder what they want from an investor in 2026. Capital will not be the first answer.
They will say distribution. Customer introductions. Hiring networks. Help with positioning. Strategic advice when the pivot fails or growth slows. The cheque is assumed. Everything around the cheque is the actual product.
This is the shift Southeast Asian founders are least prepared for. Most regional accelerators and VC firms still pitch themselves on the bundle of money, mentorship, and demo day access. The Y Combinator playbook from 2010.
In the US, that bundle has been taken apart. Founders evaluate investors on each capability separately. Money is a commodity. Everything else is differentiation.
The Southeast Asian founders who learn to evaluate investors this way are going to make very different decisions than the ones who do not.
What to do about it
None of these shifts will land in Southeast Asia in exactly the same way they did in the US. Capital structures here are different. Regulation is different. The culture of risk is different. But the directional reality is clear.
Three actions for founders raising in 2026 and 2027:
Start studying which Asian solo GPs and operator-investors are emerging. They are still few in number, but they are growing. Knowing them before the rest of the market does is the kind of asymmetric advantage that compounds.
Treat your cap table as a strategic asset. Every cheque carries non-financial implications. The investor who solves your distribution problem is worth twice as much as the investor who just adds a logo.
Understand secondary liquidity before you need it. The founders who walk into their Series B already knowing how to negotiate secondary terms will leave more value on the table than the ones who learn it under pressure.
The founders raising in the next two years will define the next decade of Southeast Asian technology companies. The ones who study the US shift early will be building on the new playbook. The rest will spend the decade catching up.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.
Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.
The post 5 US venture capital shifts every Southeast Asian founder should be tracking right now appeared first on e27.
