According to calculations from Our World in Data, the global population grew by 31 per cent between 2000 and 2023, while global rice production increased by 33.7 per cent. Meanwhile, these figures suggest that rice productivity has outpaced population growth over the past 23 years, but they do not guarantee food security by 2050.

A report by the World Resources Institute (WRI) Indonesia indicates that agricultural productivity must increase by at least 100 per cent to meet global food demand by 2050. Without optimisation, food scarcity and hunger could worsen due to uneven distribution, climate challenges, declining agricultural labour, and varying productivity across regions.

For instance, Thailand faces a shrinking young farmer population (ages 15–40), which dropped from 48 per cent in 2013 to 32 per cent of total farmers, alongside severe droughts in areas like Phi Phi Island, Pattaya, and Koh Chang. 

The Philippines struggles with climate volatility, leading to erratic harvests and suboptimal land use. 

Indonesia grapples with small-scale farming dominance, declining generational turnover in agriculture, and poor market access for farmers.

On the other side, according to the graphic above, Southeast Asia leads global rice production, followed by Africa, the Americas, Europe, and Australia. Countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia are key exporters, making regional production stability critical for domestic and international supply chains.

However, achieving global food security requires tailored solutions for each region. Technological adaptation and not just adoption is basically the key to reaching the ultimate goal, that is food security.

The role of localised agritech in boosting productivity and distribution

Farming tech is getting smarter, but for many Indonesian farmers, it’s still out of reach.

The problem is not that they do not want it; it’s that the price tag can be jaw-dropping. FlyeEye, for instance, says a sprayer drone costs around US$18,000–22,000 (IDR 290–350 million), while a crop-monitoring drone is about US$13,000–15,000 (IDR 211–244 million).

Also Read: Why agritech startups will call for the next e-commerce revolution

With costs like these, smallholders are often locked out of the tech revolution. Many still rely on traditional methods such as planting, watering, and harvesting in ways that can be time-consuming, less efficient, and harder to sustain in the long run

This is why the real conversation shouldn’t just be about which technology to use, but how to make it accessible and relevant. For example:

• Precision farming: Instead of pricey sensor networks, farmers can use smartphone-based mapping apps, shared sensors, or low-cost soil test kits.
• Smart irrigation: Full IoT setups are great, but smaller options like solar pumps, moisture controllers, or community-managed systems are more realistic.
• Digital marketplaces: Fancy apps work best when paired with simple solutions like SMS ordering, e-vouchers, or local aggregation points.
• Post-harvest tech: Community cold rooms, pay-per-use storage, or solar dryers can do a lot without the massive upfront cost.

The key is finding the right mix of tech, financing models, and local know-how, whether that’s renting equipment, joining a cooperative, or paying only when you use the service. After all, one size doesn’t fit farms; what works for a Sumatra rice farmer won’t necessarily suit a Thai sugarcane grower or a Filipino coconut producer.

With 62 per cent of Indonesia’s farmers operating at a small-scale level, we face a significant structural challenge in agricultural development. These smallholder farmers typically focus on immediate, short-term gains and use harvest income primarily for daily subsistence rather than reinvesting in future production cycles. This subsistence mindset creates a critical barrier to developing sustainable farming businesses.

To address this challenge, comprehensive intervention programs are needed. Reliable institutions including agribusinesses, startups, and vocational training centers, must take an active role in providing ongoing mentorship, promoting sustainable business practices, enhancing financial literacy, and teaching business scalability principles.

These efforts are crucial because many smallholder farmers currently lack understanding of long-term investment returns, less knowledge of business growth strategies, and minimal access to financial management tools.

Also Read: Revitalising Indonesian agriculture: Unlocking potential through practical technology innovation

By implementing these educational initiatives, we can help transition subsistence farming into viable, growth-oriented agricultural enterprises.

On the distribution front, supply chains play a critical role in ensuring agricultural products reach people’s tables. In line with the SDGs’ goal to strengthen food security, it is equally important to ensure that distribution processes are efficient. In a geographically complex country like Indonesia, which consists of thousands of islands, distribution presents a major challenge. 

Even established agri-e-commerce platforms such as Sayurbox and Segari currently operate only in select cities and have yet to reach the broader Indonesian market, largely due to geographic barriers. Additionally, the high costs of maintaining production facilities, warehouses, and delivery systems often push these platforms to focus only on cities with stronger purchasing power, where the returns justify the budget and effort. Expanding into smaller cities would make the costs disproportionate to the potential gains.

This situation highlights the urgent need for more localised platforms to emerge across different regions to bridge the gap. 

Moreover, this gap highlights the critical need for investment to support small-scale farmers, improve productivity, and ensure long-term agricultural sustainability.

Investor’s role: Social and economic impact

Investors like impact funds, angel investors, and VCs can drive scalable agri-tech solutions with dual benefits:

Social impact

• Strengthens local food resilience and reduces import dependency.
• Attracts youth to farming through tech-driven opportunities (e.g., drones, AI).
• Boosts rural economies via digital literacy and job creation.

Economic impact

• Taps into underserved smallholder markets with high ROI potential.
• Streamlines supply chains, increasing margins for farmers and startups.
• Enables regional scaling across SEA due to shared agricultural challenges.

On the other hand, to have a good risk mitigation system for investors there has to be something like conducting rigorous due diligence, including on-site visits to verify operations. Then, monitor farmer-business partnerships and audit financial health via third parties. After that, acknowledge seasonal fluctuations and profitability isn’t always linear.

Preparing for 2050 is not only about higher yields but it is about smarter farming and fairer distribution. Southeast Asia doesn’t need imported fixes; it needs homegrown innovations built by those who understand its fields, weather, and markets.

—

The post Homegrown solutions for a hungry future: Why Southeast Asia must localise agritech by 2050 appeared first on e27.