Posted on

How digital technology can transform the food and beverage industry

Even in the face of the pandemic, the food and beverage sector in this country has come a long way in recent years, and there are a number of technologies driving those advances through digital transformation.

These include solutions within guest experience, kitchen operations (including food safety), business intelligence, HR and staffing, and inventory and procurement management. Furthermore, there are systems that can combine all these data points to collectively help improve operations as a whole. 

As one example of digitalisation within guest experience, it’s already hard to imagine a world without the option of online ordering and food delivery. Of the total number of meals consumed by Filipinos in 2021, one-third were ordered from restaurants. In 2020, subscriptions to food delivery aggregators increased by 61 per cent.

A more holistic digital approach

The sector has embraced and adopted new technology offerings to help improve operations and profit margins, driven by new solutions related to contactless ordering and payment, automated inventory replenishment and depletion, software used to schedule staff, improvements to loyalty programmes, and even food safety.

To streamline their offering and indeed save time and money for their businesses, food and beverage groups are now recognising the need for a full-suite solution to keep track of multiple vendors and apps via one platform.

Having worked with restaurant groups, as well as with the technology companies servicing these groups for many years across multiple geographies, I have long been a believer in the need for a fully-centralised restaurant management system.

The correct use of data, readily available to both management and employees alike, can help businesses make more informed decisions and thus maximise profits. Moreover, ask anybody in the industry, and they will agree that anything that makes restaurant operations simpler (and more profitable) is definitely a big step in the right direction. 

Platforms like that of Mosaic Solutions help streamline both front and back-of-house operations by bringing together POS (Point of Sale), purchasing and inventory management capabilities, while reporting and analytics dashboards bring it all together.

As the central nervous system of operations, we are able to create an ecosystem of other related products and apps around our core “operating system” and bring clients’ data together in one holistic view.  By using the software as the central hub for other restaurant technologies and apps, the inevitable end result is improvements in efficiency, a simplification of operations and better margins.

For example, imagine having an accurate dashboard of a customer’s preferences, favoured table, a popular dish, which dishes typically get ordered together, etc., and that this data is tied to the restaurant POS.  The server and kitchen can cater specifically to that customer quickly and efficiently to make a more memorable experience and build a loyal relationship while also helping to drive increased check size. 

Also Read: Why continuity plans for F&B businesses is a must

This customised customer experience will heavily influence future return visits, an invaluable boost in an ultra-competitive marketplace. It is well-known that margins within the food and beverage sector can be tight, while operations also can be pretty complicated. This next wave of restaurant technologies can help improve both.

Driving significant economic improvement

All across the globe, many industries were severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the food and beverage industry was no different. Revenue from the food service sector in the Philippines totalled just over US$8.5 billion in 2020, a significant decrease on 2019’s figure of more than US$15 billion.

Rapid adaptation to an omnichannel sales model was vital during this period, and a variety of revenue streams, from delivery to pick-up to ready-to-eat, were the keys to survival. Food and beverage companies adopted technologies to support this omnichannel approach as well as to optimise operations and improve margins, which had become particularly tight due to the pandemic. 

I believe the adoption of these technologies will continue as the industry recovers from the unforeseen and unprecedented losses of recent years. This already can be seen in the rebound of the industry within the Philippines in 2021 to US$10.3 billion and its projected annual growth of 7.8 per cent from 2021 to 2026, which should outpace the growth of the overall Philippine economy during those years (projected to grow at six per cent per year by the Asian Development Bank).  

The relative value and importance of the Filipino food service market to the overall economy are simply staggering. The Philippines is set to experience the highest consumption growth in ASEAN by 2030. At the centre of this consumer spending is food and beverage (F&B), which will account for up to 40 per cent of consumption, according to the WEF

If the food and beverage sector is to achieve such lofty rates of growth, continued investment in technology and internet infrastructure must play a significant role. This will enable efficiency-driving, cloud-based solutions such as mobile point of sale and contactless payments to thrive while also supporting the ability to provide insights and data anywhere, anytime.

By embracing more advanced cloud technology and supporting improved connectivity, as the country continues to recover post-COVID-19, the Philippine food and beverage market can undoubtedly reach its full potential in the months and years ahead.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post How digital technology can transform the food and beverage industry appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Does investing in Bitcoin still make sense?

2022 has been rough on Bitcoin, to say the least. This is in marked contrast to the crypto market’s enthusiasm just a year ago, when Bitcoin hit two record price highs: surpassing US$60,000 in April 2021 and peaking at nearly US$65,000 in November. Remember, these prices are for one Bitcoin!

But as we rang in the new year with a distinctly gloomy global economy, the Russia-Ukraine war, surging inflation, and interest rate hikes, to name but a few, investors lost their nerve, and Bitcoin’s price began to quake.

By June 2022, Bitcoin (and other cryptocurrencies) fell about 68 per cent from its previous highs. Today, the price hovers around US$23,000, a mere shadow of its former glory.

So, does it still make sense to buy Bitcoin? We believe so. Let’s talk about why this market crisis can actually be a good opportunity for investors to increase their exposure to Bitcoin, provided you have the ability to stomach significant volatility ahead.

Here’s why Bitcoin will not go to zero

During the crypto crash of 2022, the price of Bitcoin fell below US$19,000. For investors who entered this market during the bull run of 2021, this unprecedented low triggered fears of a free-fall down to zero.

But experts believe there is virtually no chance of this happening. While the market has undergone upheavals, the fundamental investment thesis for Bitcoin hasn’t changed a single bit, namely:

  • Bitcoin is increasingly seen as a store of value, similar to a form of digital gold.
  • Bitcoin is limited to 21 million and programmed into its code, and with its governance decentralised, it is next to impossible to change. Increased demand and acceptance and fixed supply will drive Bitcoin price and value over the medium term.
  • Bitcoin has become part of the financial infrastructure, being used for payments by companies like PayPal, and accepted by regulatory authorities such as the Bank of International Settlements and the El Salvador government. It is now even offered as a retirement savings plan option in the US.
  • Bitcoin is different to other cryptocurrencies in that it is the most secure and decentralised, making it better suited as a store of value. The other cryptocurrencies are more technology investments, which could also be very lucrative investments but have a fundamentally different investment thesis compared to a scarce store of value like Bitcoin.

With such widespread adoption and institutional acceptance of its value, it’s extremely unlikely for Bitcoin to plummet to zero.

In fact, Bitcoin’s price appears to have bottomed out. Following its US$19,000 low in June, the price rallied to about US$23,000 at the end of July. This uptick appears relatively stable and could develop into a steady climb, prompting some investors to rejoice that the crypto winter is beginning to thaw.

Also Read: 13 years on since the birth of Bitcoin, it’s now blockchain’s time to shine

This sentiment is echoed by experts, who believe that Bitcoin is undervalued at the moment. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase, Fidelity Investments and D.A. Davidson estimated Bitcoin’s value to reach between US$38,000 and US$50,000 in the next two years, that’s about double its current price.

Existing Bitcoin holders: Is it time to accumulate more?

If you have been holding on to your Bitcoin throughout the crypto crash of 2022, you deserve a salute. It takes a will of iron to hang on to Bitcoin in the current market environment, especially if you have significant paper losses.

It’s worth noting that nothing about Bitcoin’s fundamentals has changed this year. All signs of 2022’s crypto winter point to a swing in investor sentiment and, very likely, loss of access to easy money as interest rates shot up this year and not to the investment case of Bitcoin itself.

As the grandfather of all crypto assets, its key strengths are:

  • Its technology: The immutable blockchain ledger provides security and confidence that it cannot be manipulated and is expected to disrupt diverse industries.
  • Potential as a store of value: Due to the hard cap of Bitcoins that can be mined and increased mainstream acceptance that it is a store of value.
  • Institutional adoption: Not only businesses and individuals but regulators and governments are also coming on board.

Despite the recent market correction, we believe Bitcoin’s long-term impact remains. It is the crypto asset that has already kicked off massive changes in the way we think about and use money, and it’s here to stay.

Bitcoin’s true believers and holders can view 2022’s crypto crash as an opportune time to purchase more Bitcoin with the intention to hold it for the long haul.

New to Bitcoin: Why is it an excellent time to enter the market?

During the crypto craze of 2021, some investors shied away from dabbling in Bitcoin because of its high price. But since the recent crypto crash has caused the coin to plummet to previously unheard-of lows, the same investment can net you nearly three times the amount of Bitcoin as compared to its peak.

In addition, analysts from the likes of JPMorgan Chase and Fidelity Investments believe that the price of Bitcoin should more or less double in the near term. If they are correct, there’s a chance that a well-timed investment into Bitcoin now (at its current low price) will result in significant returns.

However, new investors should thoroughly understand the case for investing in Bitcoin for the long haul and the risks before taking on this exposure.

Also Read: Are we prepared to embrace the possibilities of Web3 beyond crypto?

Crypto is an incredibly volatile asset. Investors need to be both financially and mentally prepared for wild swings in prices, especially around major events like Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. Coinrule founder Oleg Giberstein has a good rule of thumb: invest an amount you are comfortable with and try not to worry about crypto prices for the next two years or so.

Fundamentally, Bitcoin should be a part of a diversified portfolio, and only a tiny proportion of it at that. Financial experts like Paul Tudor Jones recommend allocating five per cent of your total investments to Bitcoin, but do assess your own risk tolerance and goals before deciding on how much to invest.

Investing in Bitcoin still makes sense in 2022

Let’s recap: The crypto market underwent a major crisis this year, and the price of Bitcoin has fallen to about a third of its peak in 2021.

While the crypto crash has left many shaken, the fundamental case for investing in Bitcoin has not changed in the least. Bitcoin still remains the world’s most accepted cryptocurrency and is already highly entrenched in our financial systems.

At its current low price, Bitcoin is attractive to both investors looking to enter the market as well as existing investors looking to increase their Bitcoin holdings. That said, investors must be able to stay the course as the current climate is no doubt a turbulent one for crypto in general.

This article is not intended to be and does not constitute investment advice. It is for general purposes only and does not take into account your individual risk appetite and financial circumstances.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Does investing in Bitcoin still make sense? appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How payment networks are crucial to the rising fintech movement

This series is produced in collaboration with the Fintech Association of Malaysia (FAOM), a national platform that supports Malaysia in becoming the leading hub for fintech innovation and investment in the region.

The tale of fintech, like that of the wider technology industry, is often one told of daring entrepreneurs, burgeoning startups, and long-shot bets by venture capitalists. Yet, little attention is paid to the infrastructure builders of tech, the sinews that link the private and public sector, that act as nervous systems that make it possible for frictionless payments to take place. 

With such systems in mind, I spoke to Khairuan Abdul Rahman, the Director of Retail Payments Services at PayNet, the national payments network for Malaysia’s financial markets, to garner his thoughts about the state of the payments industry, the role of agencies like his, as well as the increasingly dynamic future of digital finance. 

PayNet is the coordinator and mediator between many interests: national and local, public and private. It has an unenviable task of navigating bureaucracy to achieve its goals. 

“We have a clear objective, which is to aid Malaysia’s transition to a sustainable digital economy. We act as a catalyst for innovation, to provide a system that is more data-rich than its previous iteration, and to bridge that gap between cash, check, and payment.

“It’s more than just services, there’s a lot of communication and coordination involved. Building a national infrastructure requires public-private cooperation, as well as an all-of-government approach. We bring in the ecosystem,” said Rahman.

The role of government in paving the path

In Silicon Valley and the US, there has been a long history of private actors moving first, building the infrastructure before the government. Such was the case for railways when tycoons like Cornelius Vanderbilt went ahead to construct train tracks via private money; the parallel today is Tesla which took on the gargantuan task of expanding EV charging networks before any federal body regulated them.

Also Read: The future of fintech: The latest trends in the industry

Even then, we are beginning to see the limits of purely private plays, especially in the payments space, where we saw Meta attempt to create its own ecosystem via Libra, only to be met with a tepid response from customers and hostility from regulators.

In our part of the world, however, it is often necessary for the government to put in a significant effort in developing infrastructure before private actors are willing to enter the space. In this context, entities like PayNet are crucial to creating an environment where fintech can survive and thrive.

According to a report recently published by ACI Worldwide, Malaysia is the fifth fastest-growing real-time payments market globally, with a CAGR of 26.9 per cent. It’s not an exaggeration to say that PayNet has been at the forefront of enabling such an environment, having provided essential services such as account-to-account credit transfers, national bill payments, Malaysia’s domestic debit card scheme, and more recently, DuitNow QR, the national QR standard. 

How PayNet is enabling innovation

The pandemic has been a massive catalyst for the industry, giving PayNet an increasingly important role. “During the first year of the pandemic, we saw more than 100 per cent growth in e-payment volumes, and even in this endemic phase, we’ve seen a huge uptick for QR payments. It has clearly changed consumer behaviour, not just for e-commerce, but even for face-to-face transactions,” said Rahman.  

Despite the immense strides in digital payments, there have also been growing concerns that digitisation has not benefited everyone. A 2020 report by Khazanah Research Institute raised issues of digital inequality, where the urban poor and rural with less access to the internet are falling behind, cut off from the payments revolution. That’s where agencies like PayNet come in, bridging the divide, especially in areas where there is little commercial incentive for profit-maximising firms. 

Rahman lights up upon mention of this. “Based on observation, participants tend to go after big cities first due to the larger market and tech savviness of the population, and then secondary cities after that. So we need to create alternative avenues. For instance, we recently worked with Bank Islam to onboard the traders at Pasar Siti Khadijah in Kota Bharu (the capital of the state Kelantan) to accept DuitNow QR.”

“We take a holistic approach to these matters. We’ve also cooperated with universities, ministries, and telcos to set up internet infrastructure. After all, you can’t have digital payments without internet access. At the end of the day, it’s about building the foundations; it will take its time, but it will not be overnight. When we do these programmes, it’s not just about having a glamorous launch today, but about continuous education resulting in long-term changes in consumer behaviour.”

Also Read: How this startup is leveraging fintech, HR tech and service tech for changing the FDW industry

To this end, PayNet, in collaboration with the Fintech Association of Malaysia (FAOM), launched its Fintech ePayment Accelerator Programme in February earlier this year to support innovative solutions that can cater to the underserved population and encourage digital adoption.

Thus far, PayNet has received 25 proposals from a diverse array of use cases, including property, accounting and inventory management; the successful applicants will receive up to MYR500,000 in grant funding and access to PayNet’s extensive network.

“One of the core problems we identified for startups was a lack of funding, weak connections to the financial industry, and a lack of understanding of the current services available in the payments infrastructure. We wanted to provide not just a grant, but also an opportunity to work with PayNet’s ecosystem and platform.”

“It’s incredibly important for fintech to understand the real-time payments platform. What is unique about this is we allow non-banks direct access to it, which is rare in the region. This gives fintech opportunities for much richer customer data and superior integration. Of course, we have to manage the risks and processes, but it is part of our strategy to open this up to non-banks as well.”

This strategy of closer integrations, seamless transactions and a tightly intertwined global system is the heart of the payments industry. Yet, recent geopolitical rifts, whether it be Russia’s exile from the global financial infrastructure or the US-China trade war, have raised concerns that the trend towards frictionless payments is not inevitable. 

Rahman provides a measured response, “As a national entity, we have to mitigate that risk. We have to emphasise the local switch and data sovereignty, continuously think of backups and work on building resilience. But all these developments don’t change our goal. In the end, it’s about creating as robust a national payments infrastructure as possible.”

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: jippu2498

The post How payment networks are crucial to the rising fintech movement appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Book excerpt: Singaporean tech leaders on the high and low of their entrepreneurial journey

Koh Shiyan is the Co-Founder and Managing Partner at Hustle Fund, a venture capital fund that invests in pre-seed software startups in the US, Canada and Southeast Asia. Prior to that, she was VP Business Operations and Corporate Development at NerdWallet, a fintech startup that helps users with a range of financial decisions through content, community and tools. Over the course of six years at NerdWallet, she led product teams, ran business operations and corporate development, and helped grow the company from US$1 million to US$150 million in revenue.

Knowing how to learn is incredibly important because there’s just so much in the world you’re not going to know. You just have to have a prepared mind to go figure it out. In startup land, people want to index on credentials or experience, but the fact of the matter is that a startup is either inventing a new market or having a different approach. The team that learns and implements the fastest will win, not the team that started off with the most experience or the most capital.

Jeremy Au: How would you describe your personal journey?
Koh Shiyan: If we start from college, I had the opportunity to go to Stanford for undergrad. In many ways, that was a dream come true. My parents were Asian parents that really wanted me to go to Harvard, so I early-decisioned Stanford to hopefully not have to do that. I was like, “I grew up in a tropical country! I like being warm.” Boston winters just didn’t sound like a great time.

When you grow up in Singapore, you think that because you’re fluent in English, going to school in the US will be really easy. You’ve watched American TV, you listen to American music, and then you show up on campus and you realise, “These people are super different.” The first year of college is just figuring out what was going on and being blown away by the quality, and the ambition of the people, but also feeling, “I don’t know anything that they’re talking about. I don’t watch Seinfeld, I don’t watch the Simpsons or South Park or any of these things.” Just tells you how old I am.

I majored in economics and, a little bit unusually, biomechanical engineering. If I had been smart, I should’ve majored in computer science. I really loved building things. I had always played sports through my life so I really loved the idea of learning how to build things that could help people, whether it was new knees, new ankles, pieces of body that I would probably need when I get older and retire from all my physical activities.

Also Read: Book Excerpt: Why successful fundraising begins with understanding your company’s needs

Fate has many funny twists and turns. I wound up doing an internship in college for JP Morgan, at the investment bank arm. I didn’t really know what an investment bank was. I had a friend who had interned for Credit Suisse the year before and said, “I think you would like this. It’ll be good for you, and it’s only for 10 weeks. You can do anything for 10 weeks.” I replied, “I guess that’s true.” I read a bunch of books and it seemed like you had to learn how to create discounted cashflow models and do math or whatever. I was like, “Okay, I think I can do these things.”

They didn’t want to do any of these things that I had practiced for. Twenty years later, you’ve been that person who’s had to interview tons of kids and you had to read hundreds of resumes. He didn’t actually want to ask me any questions about whatever fake preparation I’d done. He was just like, “Oh, so you play rugby?” And like, “Yeah, I play.” And he’s like, “Oh, I played soccer in college.” We literally spent the whole time talking about sports.

Then the interview ends and I said, “Actually, my team bus is going to pick me up from outside this JP Morgan office in San Francisco and we’re going to go play a match.” He’s like, “That’s so amazing!” There’s more reminiscing about trips. Then I get on the bus and all my teammates were like, “Did you get the job?” I was like, “I don’t know! I’m so confused! He didn’t even ask me anything that I’d prepared for. We just talked about rugby the whole time.”

I wound up getting the job. My friend was right. I really enjoyed 10 weeks there. It was the summer of ‘03, so we were in the run-up to the first boom and crash. It was intoxicating to be 21 and working on transactions at companies that you heard of, used their products. It could be eBay, it could be Cisco, all of these things.

I wound up going back there full-time after I graduated. I spent two years in the investment bank covering tech and healthcare out of San Francisco. Because it was the boom, I did 19 transactions in two years. I don’t remember all that much about the two years. I drank a lot of Diet Coke and coffee, and I didn’t sleep very much. What I learned was a lot about how businesses get financed, because I worked on IPOs, followons, converts, high-yield, investment-grade. I also learned that I didn’t want to be an investment banker.

I just caught up with my old boss from that period. He’s now a vice chairman at JP Morgan, a long-time guy. When I told him I was leaving, he said, “You don’t want to grow up to be like me?” I said, “No. I’ve seen how you live your life. You’re on a plane 15 days a month.” He had a six or seven-year-old daughter, he had a stay-at-home wife. I said, “I don’t know what’s going to be my future but I’m pretty sure it’s not a stay-at-home wife, so I don’t think this is going to be particularly sustainable.”

JP Morgan San Francisco is interesting because it’s actually built from the old Hambrecht & Quist teams, which were part of the four horsemen of those boutique investment banks that took a lot of the startups public.

Also Read: Book Excerpt: What Google, Facebook did to grow from zero to 1,000

The practice on the West Coast was much more growth company-focused than the East Coast. They covered a lot more like the IBMs of the world. What I found was, I really like that part of it. I don’t need to go sell another revolver or credit facility. That’s not that interesting. I am much more interested in smaller companies.

I wound up working for a late-stage venture fund called Institutional Venture Partners. They are old-school, founded in 1978. Reid Dennis, the founder, is one of the original grand old men of Silicon Valley in Sand Hill Road and got to work on deals like Twitter and Zynga, and all these enterprise software companies that you’ve probably never heard of. That was a fantastic education because you evaluate thousands of deals a year. You end up making six to 10 investments a year. It’s a very thorough process to whittle that down.

After a couple years there, I wound up going to Harvard Business School. For women, business school is like an insurance policy, a place to mark your career in case you ever do take time out or work for smaller companies that people hadn’t heard of. I realised that I had no formal business training. I’d learned a lot from the financing side but I hadn’t really thought about businesses all that much. I didn’t really know anything about marketing, sales, or all these functions. I knew a lot about financial statements.

I go to business school, and this is a great reminder of how narrow my view was. I remember very clearly the practice case. HBS teaches lessons through the case method, so every case has this expository essay about the founder and the problems they were considering in their head.

At the end, there’s always financial statements. This practice case was about an ice cream distributor business. I flip to the back and I look at the financial statements and I was like, “Two per cent net margin? Why do these people even get up in the morning? What kind of business is this?” I had just been so brainwashed by software businesses that it was actually really hard for me to think about non-software businesses.

Business school was a great widening of my field of view, both in terms of types of businesses and also types of people. You meet people from all over the world who you never would have met in any more standard professional capacity – people who had served in the military, people who worked in more traditional industries, you name it, someone had done it.

There was a girl in my section. She was Polish. She had trained to be a professional musician, came from a family of professional musicians, and then decided she was bored. She became a professional competitive ballroom dancer, and then consultant. Super crazy bundles of skills and experiences. That was just fascinating. Of course, you go for the network and whatnot.

Also Read: Book Excerpt: In this digital age, customer journey as we know it may no longer exist

The fun fact about business school is, I wound up living off-campus and my apartment wound up being super startup-y and entrepreneurial. The first year, one of my roommates was Kat Lake, the founder of StitchFix. The second year, one of my roommates was Justin McLeod, the founder of Hinge. Any of you who are using Hinge, it started in our living room in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That’s funny to think about. It’s crazy to think about where StitchFix and Hinge started, and how those businesses have grown.

I thought I was going to come back to Singapore after business school. This was 2011. There wasn’t as much venture capital then and I figured it’d be pretty hard to try to get a venture capital job. In a very strange series of events, I wound up getting a hedge fund job because I thought, “there will be more finance jobs in Singapore.” I wound up working for a hedge fund in Connecticut called Bridgewater, one of the world’s largest hedge funds. The founder & CEO, Ray Dalio, is pretty well known for his writing. First, many asset managers read Bridgewater’s daily notes. Ray has written a lot about his management philosophy, which was encapsulated in the book Principles. I was there for a year. I was on the investment team. I worked on FX trade strategy.

What I learned was I didn’t like public markets much. I didn’t like living in Connecticut and I really just wanted to be back with smaller companies, closer to the action, things that felt more tangible to me.

We were living in New York at the time. Katharine, my now-wife, was working at a startup, so I was like, “Okay, I’m going to find a startup job in New York.” I started networking, doing some small consulting projects for people, trying to find teams or businesses that I liked to work with. I was really struggling. I did a bunch of projects and realised, “I don’t really care about fashion. I don’t really care about jewellery. I don’t really care about advertising technology,” which is a lot of what was in New York at the time.

I wound up chatting with an old friend. He had been in New York ever since college. I said, “You’ve been here for a while, tell me some interesting startups that you recommend that I go reach out to?” He said, “I don’t really pay attention to anybody else’s company. I’m too busy working on my own business. You should come work with me.” I was like, “What do you do?” We were social friends. He said, “Well, let me show you.”

This was Tim Chen of NerdWallet, which at that point was him and Jake Gibson, the co-founder, and a couple people they’d hired off of Craigslist. They had just made the decision that they were going to try to build and scale it. They’d been running it, just the two of them, for a while. I’m like, “Okay, well, tell me more. That’s interesting. Show me the books. Show me what you guys have been doing.”

Also Read: Book Excerpt: How chatbot threatens to upend an entire industry in the Philippines

I don’t really know how to explain it. As he was talking, and walking me through the business, and explaining how it worked, I just had this feeling, “There’s something there. I don’t really know what it is, but there’s something there.” I said, “Okay. Well, theoretically, suppose I did come work with you. What would I do?” Tim says, “What do you want to do? There’s so many things to do.” And me, being the idiot MBA, was like, “Would you let me be a product manager?” That was the pinnacle, right? And he’s like, “You want to manage the engineers?” I was like, “Yeah! Can I do that?” He said, “Sure. Whatever. So much to do. Whatever you want.”

I was like, “Okay, make me an offer.” He makes me an offer. I call Katharine. I was like, “Hey, I just got this offer to be a product manager at my friend’s company.” Small detail, they’re in San Francisco, because he’d just moved the business to California. I said, “I can commute.” Katharine’s like, “We just got here. We just moved to New York a year ago. I like it here. I’m not moving.”

I take this job. And it’s very funny, because I always get calls or questions from fresh grads or MBA grads. They’re like, “How do you make the decision to join an early-stage startup? What’s in your framework? What metrics?” I was like, “Look, it was pretty basic. The way I thought about it was, this is a big market. Tim is a high-integrity person. I believe the thesis, because there’s early signs, but it’s super early. I’m going to give it a year. If it works, I’m a genius. If it doesn’t work, I’ll get another job. If it doesn’t work, it won’t be because someone screwed me or there wasn’t a market. It’ll have not worked because we didn’t do a good job. We didn’t execute properly, which is a bet I’m willing to take. I’m betting on myself and this team.”

The first year I was at NerdWallet, 2012, I commuted back and forth between San Francisco and New York. I would do three weeks on, three weeks off. In San Francisco, I slept on people’s couches for the whole year. I slept on every single one of the management team’s couches. As we grew the team, I slept over at everyone’s house. Then I also had a home-couch with some business school friends, which included Russ Heddleston, the founder of DocSend, that just got bought by Dropbox. I paid them US$400 a month to have the right to sleep on their couch. I would buy booze periodically for their fridge, and I thought this was a real steal because, if you can imagine, a one-bedroom in San Francisco at the time was US$2,800 per month, and we were already paying rent in New York. I wasn’t going to be paying rent in two expensive cities on a startup salary.

I did this for a whole year. Later, that spring, my mom flies in for the engagement party, which is in Sonoma at Katharine’s aunt’s house. She lands at the airport and she’s like, “Where’s your apartment?” I was like, “Oh, I don’t have an apartment.” She’s like, “What do you mean you don’t have an apartment?” I was like, “Well, we have an apartment in New York but I don’t have an apartment here.” She’s like, “What are you talking about?” I was like, “Oh, I just sleep on people’s couches.” She’s like, “This is unacceptable.” The whole time we’re driving to Sonoma, she’s on the phone with realtors setting up viewings.

Saturday’s the engagement party. Sunday, we drive around the city and look at apartments. Sunday night, she’s at the lounge at SFO flying out, and she’s calling me. She’s like, “Did you sign a lease yet? Did you sign a lease yet? Did you sign a lease yet?” So, I signed a lease and we moved full-time to San Francisco.

Also Read: Meet Facebook Community Accelerator 2022’s additional funding recipients who are turning impactful ideas into action

I was at NerdWallet 2012 through 2018. We bootstrapped that business the first three years I was there. We didn’t raise money externally until 2015. IVP, my old fund, led the round. It was a US$69 million series A, so it was a pretty big series A. At that point we were probably doing about US$52 million revenue run rate. I don’t even know what that would be in today’s market. I shudder to think about that.

Tim kept his promises. In the early days, I managed engineers in Russia, Pakistan, Vietnam, Brooklyn. The first two years, we ran outsourced teams because as a bootstrap business, we couldn’t really afford Bay Area engineers. After we raised, we really pushed hard to bring engineering in-house, so I ran a couple product teams. My last
couple years there, I ran business operations and corporate development. We acquired a couple businesses, integrated those.

As most people in startup life know, you do whatever you need to do at the time that you need to do it. I make the joke that I have done almost every job at the business. When I left, NerdWallet was over 400 people. I think I knew the first 300 employees all by name. Then I had maternity leave, so there was a four-month period where people arrived and I never met them. When I came back from maternity leave, there was a big catch-up to try to learn all those new names.

It was an incredible crazy ride. Business continues to do well. It’s growing, it’s profitable. They’ve done another couple acquisitions this year, so it’s really cool to see that and to remember where we started.

What’s even cooler is to see all the people we hired as fresh grads who’ve grown up in the business, who’ve left, either to start their own companies or to take really good jobs at other neat businesses.

We decided we were going to move back to Singapore in 2018 and I had to figure out what to do. The choices were: start a company, join a company, start a fund, join a fund. I spent a few months traveling in the region, meeting with entrepreneurs and VCs. Where I landed was I felt like I was at a point in my life that I wanted to found something.

If I was going to work my ass off, I wanted to work with a little bit more control.

Then, this opportunity with Hustle Fund came along. My partners, Eric and Elizabeth, are actually old friends from college. Elizabeth and I have known each other since we were five, so we have a long history together. We’ve all tried to hire each other. I tried to hire Eric at NerdWallet, I tried to buy Elizabeth’s company at NerdWallet. Liz tried to hire me the startup before. We’ve always tried to do stuff, and this was our chance to work together.

Also Read: CrediBook’s CrediMart: A case study on compound product-market fit

I feel like with Hustle Fund, I get the best things. I get to start something. Emerging management funds are just like startups. You are constantly raising money and constantly figuring things out. I get to give back to a nascent ecosystem, share some experiences, and build an institution that endures. If you really think about the great funds of Silicon Valley, they’re institutions. They survived generational transition. That’s something we aspire towards.

Jeremy Au: You talk about your career journey in terms of learning what you like and learning what you don’t like. Is that how you think about life?
Koh Shiyan: When I take a job, I think about optimising for learning. I think about what I want to learn. I tell fresh grads: you don’t really know how to be at a job, so your first job should be a place that maximises teaching you how to be a professional and then exposing you to a wide range of things.

Traditional paths, whether it’s investment banking or consulting, have that feature where you can see lots of stuff. Then you’re like, “Oh, wait. Do I like this or do I not like this? Which do I prefer? What am I good at?” I’m sure kids today are much more sophisticated than we were back then. When I graduated college, I knew that I was good at school, and that’s not actually the same as being good at life or good at work. At least in your first role, finding an opportunity to be exposed to what high-quality professional work looks like and then either different functions or different industries, is super useful.

Early on in your career, you’re often primed to optimise for optionality, where you’re like, “I could do anything!” At some point, you only get compounding returns when you focus on something. Then you have to think about, “How do I pick that something?” You can only get a better decision when you have more data. The only way to get data is to do more stuff. I think about it that way, which is, my early jobs were very intense, but I got to do more stuff in a smaller period of time, which then meant you could actually, really reflect on what are the things you’re good at, what do you enjoy, what gives you energy, what doesn’t feel like work, which sounds like a very privileged take on work. That’s how I think about it.

With venture, I love the intellectual exercise of figuring out a business. That’s what I really like. I am a nerd about business and business models. What I learned in the startup world with NerdWallet is that I also really like figuring out people and where they sit in an organisation and how to make them do great work. How to create the conditions to do great work, on one hand, and then how to think about how that intersects with the actual business you’re building. Those are things that I’m very interested in and enjoy spending time on.

Jeremy Au: You were not only learning about optimising for learning. You’re also learning about the business. You kept mentioning the people you were working with. You’re learning about your boss, learning about the founder, learning about your boss’s lifestyle. How do you learn who’s someone you want to work with? You mention big market and early signs on the business side. You mentioned high integrity on the personal side. You talk about one year as a time gate.

Koh Shiyan: I think of life as a repeated game. I often tell people, “Life is long but the world is small, so act accordingly.” That governs how you want to operate with people and what kind of people you want to operate with. When you say high integrity, do they make the right decision even if it comes at personal cost to them? Do they have a sense of right or wrong? That’s important to me because life’s too short to work with people that make you feel icky. If you don’t feel great about having them come over for dinner and meet your family, that’s not a good sign. All the money in the world doesn’t change that. If you went to college, you have a pretty decent life. Adding 10x more money doesn’t make it 10x better. Those are personal values and trade-offs that you have to think about.

Also Read: Three books I loved reading in 2021 and the lessons they provided

I look for people who make me better. Ideally, they’re good at things that I’m not good at. They are self-aware human beings. This is a hard one, because everyone thinks they’re self-aware, but they are not emotionally mature enough to have hard conversations. They are passive-aggressive. If you think about most human drama, it’s because Person A wants to tell Person B something but can’t find the way to say it. Person B senses something is wrong with Person A, but Person A says nothing is wrong. So, Person B makes up stories in their head about what could possibly be wrong. Meanwhile, no work is getting done. You want to work with people who are like, “Hey, it’s the classic formulation, when you do X, it makes me feel Y. I would prefer if you did Z.” Then you get over it, and you move on.

This sort of emotional maturity, self-awareness, has become increasingly important as I get older because I just don’t have the energy to deal with that anymore. In this remote world, strong communications and strong communicators are really important to high-quality work situations. It’s not just tooling, although tooling matters. It’s not just process. People actually need to understand and value high-quality communication. That can be written, it can be spoken. When I look for people to work with, that’s what I index on. I like people who are a little bit weird, who don’t take themselves too seriously, because for this business, you have to be a little bit weird.

Jeremy Au: What’s interesting is that you became more sophisticated. You’ve learned more about learning over time. You learned about bosses, you learned about companies, you learned about different industries, you learned about yourself. You think quite a bit about learning, which shows that you’ve been learning about learning. Do you have thoughts about that?

Koh Shiyan: That’s why it’s so funny when people are like, “Oh, what should somebody major in?” It’s like, “Well, I don’t know.” Influencer is a job now. That was not a job when I was in college. How could you ever have majored in that? You wouldn’t have. If you are good at learning, you would’ve figured it out.

Knowing how to learn is incredibly important because there’s so much in the world you’re not going to know. There’s no way you can prepare for it. You just have to have a prepared mind to go figure it out. In startup land, people want to index on credentials or experience. The fact is, a startup is either inventing a new market or taking a different approach. It’s not knowable, so you’re going to have to figure it out. The team that learns and implements the fastest will win, not the team that started off with the most experience or the most capital.

When we look at entrepreneurs, we think about, “What is this person’s pace of learning? What is the ramp?” You can see it. I have this company. They send us an update every week and it is incredible because you can see the progress. Every week, they’re like, “Here’s how many people we talked to. Here’s what we learned. Here’s what we implemented into the product. We shipped this feature.” Then, the next week, they’re like, “From the feature we shipped last week, here’s what happened.” Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat. You can see the business taking shape.

Conversely, there are people who never send you updates. You have to call them or text them, be like, “Hey, let’s catch up. Tell me what’s happening.” They’ll be like, “Well, we’re thinking about these things.” I was like, “What would make you do something? What would change your mind?” In the early stage, at least for software, I’m a big believer that good plans violently executed now, better than perfect plans executed later. That is all about pace of learning. How do you teach yourself that? It’s really hard, because the more experience you accumulate, the more the tendency is to be like, “In my day, this was how we did things.”

Also Read: Want to strengthen your communities? Facebook and e27 are here to help

Sometimes that works, and then sometimes it makes you miss the big things. How do you stay constantly open to that, tune that balance between what matters and what is new information that really is a paradigm shift? How do you prepare yourself for that?

Jeremy Au: You asked people and said, “What would change your mind?” That’s a really interesting question. Have you seen that question be effective? Does it actually wake people up? How have you used that phrase?

Koh Shiyan: It sometimes accelerates conversations, where you can feel like everyone’s going around in a circle and you just have to make a call. Talking more doesn’t actually give you more information. Either it’s, “Okay, I’m not having more information, but I think this is a reasonable hypothesis, I will try.” Or, “I don’t have more information. Therefore, I don’t feel comfortable acting.” At least when you ask the question, what you have to see to act, then you know. “Okay, we don’t need to talk about this anymore. Move on.” When I do see this thing, whatever it is, I’ll know I’m going to go do this. I think about meetings. It’s like trying to score a goal in soccer. I’m not a big soccer fan. The thing that irritates me most about soccer is that you can play to a draw. Even more irritating is when you watch people just pass
the ball back and forth, back and forth, and it doesn’t move down the field.

Every conversation, you want it to go somewhere. You want it to move down the field. It’s the same thing with these decision-making things. Either we’re going to score the goal or we’re going to stop playing, but we’re not going to run around in the middle of the field and do nothing. That seems like not a great use of time.

Jeremy Au: You can be learning eternally but if you’re not communicating it well, you can’t work as a team and therefore can’t learn as a group. When you were talking about your startups, you’re talking about teams debating. You’re talking about working with that person, founder or teammate. You’re also talking about the investor updates that startups are giving to you. How important is communication as part of that learning loop?

Koh Shiyan: It’s huge. I’ve been thinking about this a lot, because in the remote world, if you don’t deliberately make an effort to communicate, then there isn’t that serendipity of running into someone in the pantry and being like, “Oh, hey, how’s that thing going?” Or, “Oh, you look excited,” or, “You look down. What’s happening?” You have to initiate effort to communicate this thing.

If you think about it, we all operate with each other based on our prior experience with the person. You emit a series of dots, like data points, over time. In my mind, I am like, “Oh, Jeremy. He has this pattern of dots.” When I first meet you, I have no dots. I only have this first impression. Then, imagine that we didn’t hang out for five years. I have no intermediate dots except random things that I saw on social media. Then Jeremy’s like, “Shiyan, I’m raising US$10 million. Will you back me?” And
it’s like, “Oh, well…” It’s almost like having no dots. I would just evaluate it separately.

It’s also with people. If you or your company doesn’t emit dots at a regular cadence that lets people update their picture in their mind then they have to cast back their minds to that last dot they had about you and be like, “I seem to remember the business was struggling with X, Y, Z thing.” Then the founder’s just like, “Oh, we fixed all those things and that’s why we’re raising money,” or, “That’s why we need you to bridge us,” or whatever the case may be. It’s just more work to get there than, “Oh, I’ve been receiving steady reports on progress. I understand how they’re thinking about this problem. It makes total sense to me. Okay, maybe the data’s not that great, but because I’ve seen all this progress, I trust the process.” That’s ultimately what you’re trying to build with people. Whether it’s human beings, one-to-one, we’re trying to build trust with each other, companies to investors, companies to their own employees, you’re trying to build trust with each other.

Also Read: Restaurant booking app Chope reveals the secret sauce to its profitability in home market Singapore

That’s something we haven’t touched on, which is, as companies grow, one thing they systematically under-invest in is employee communication. Everyone is so used to, “I’ve got 10 people, I stuff them all in a room, and we’re jamming.” Then suddenly, “The business is doing great.” Now we’re at 25 people or 30 people. You can’t stuff 30 people in a room. In a remote world, you definitely can’t do that. How does everybody know what’s going on, and what is the cadence by which they are constantly reminded, this is where the business is going, here’s how we’re going to get there, this is your role in getting us there. It feels like you’re repeating yourself over and over. You’re like, “How can no one know my strategy by now? I say it all the time.” The bigger your company gets, the more you have to repeat it. High-quality communication is such a superpower. It is systematically under-invested in.

Jeremy Au: A lot about what you said is about trusting the process. You’re not only absorbing all this information. You also practice what you preach. You do regular writing, and you work very hard to communicate with your teammates and founders. How have you improved your communication practice over time?

Koh Shiyan: There’s some professional training around it. When you work on a project team in a bank, you’re on a deal team. There’s always people you have to keep apprised of what’s happening because you’re on a deal timeline. It’s always like, “This is what’s happening. This thing is in motion. We need this.” It’s the same thing with venture. You have this weekly meeting cadence. You’re always like, “What deals am I looking at? What am I evaluating? Who do I need introductions?” It’s very regular. Bridgewater took it to the next level. Bridgewater has this thing called the daily update. Everyone has to write a daily update and they have a whole internally-developed software system to do that. I actually found it most helpful when, at NerdWallet, I implemented it when we were 10 or 15 people. We were already starting to feel that strain where you have people running around and you have no idea what they’re doing. It was end of the week, everyone writes an email that just says, “Here’s what I did this week and here’s what I learned, and here’s where I need help.” We actually did that. It evolved a little bit.

At one point, the company got too big. You can’t just send an email to 50 people. No one’s going to read 50 update emails, so it’s just by team. You send it to your manager and then the manager rolls it up to the manager’s manager, and then if you’re the CEO or the management team, you can see updates from every business unit on Sunday night. When you head into the office Monday morning, you know, “What fires do I need to go fight?”

Actually, it was Bridgewater, plus Diane Greene from VMware who talked about how she ran this. I was like, “We need to do this.” I have to check in with Tim. When I left, we just did a version that was CEO’s reflections that went out to the whole company. We alternated between the CEO, the COO, the CFO. They would alternate reflections that went out to the company. That was incredibly useful, separate from our allhands meetings or whatever it was, because you basically could just see, “Oh, this is what’s on Tim’s mind.” It gave that intimacy and that communication channel.

It’s a lot of practice. It’s a lot of fine-tuning. Some of it is the forcing function. Last year, I said I was going to write a note every week to the portfolio. I did, and that was just a forcing function. I still don’t do it enough. My business partner, Elizabeth, is really good at it. In the spirit of learning from people who are better at things than you, I am constantly learning from her on how to get even higher-quality, higher-frequency.

Jeremy Au: Where were you 10 years ago? And if you could travel back in time, what advice would you give?

Koh Shiyan: Ten years ago, I would be in my final semester at HBS. I had this job. I was starting at Bridgewater in the summer. It probably would’ve been to do more self-care. In the first three years at the startup, and even at Bridgewater, I didn’t feel particularly healthy. In the spirit of things that compound over time, sleep, exercise, good diet. All those things are useful to invest in over time.

Jeremy Au: Thank you so much for sharing your journey. I love what you said, learning what you like and don’t like, startups learning faster, what would change your mind, communication and learning. My favourite phrase still, is, you can do anything for 10 weeks.

Koh Shiyan: That’s true. The human body is incredibly adaptable. It’s good to push yourself early because then you know what you’re capable of. It gives you more confidence for subsequent period.

This is an excerpt from the book BRAVE10: The Singapore Edition by Jeremy Au. You can buy it here.

Image Credit: © inspirestock, 123RF Free Images

The post Book excerpt: Singaporean tech leaders on the high and low of their entrepreneurial journey appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Techstars, Crestone VC join Filipino HR-tech startup Betterteem’s financing round

Betterteem Co-Founders Leonard Dumasig and Bo Discarga (R)

Philippine HR-tech startup Betterteem has secured an undisclosed sum in funding from Techstars, Crestone Venture Capital, 1337 Ventures (Malaysia), and Suresh Thiru (ex-CEO of JobStreet).

The fresh funding will be used to launch its mobile app and expand its service offerings while further developing the AI capabilities of its platform, said Founder and CEO Bo Discarga.

Discarga and Rey Leonard Dumasig (CTO) co-founded Betterteem in Metro Manila in 2021 with a mission to find out and define the specific drivers of employee experience in the BPO sector in Asia Pacific.

Also Read: Betterteem is Slack, Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, Intranet all rolled into one

It is a predictive workplace app focused on the overall employee journey. It uses machine learning to predict churn, provides on-demand mental health support, and is a digital community platform to influence their experience positively. Betterteem does this by sifting through volumes of data coming in and out of the app after its daily use by employees.

In simple words, Betterteem amalgamates the features of several HR apps like Slack, Microsoft Teams, HRIS, SharePoint, and Intranet. This allows the app to collect usage data and create predictive analytics of a team member’s experience. It alerts people leaders/HR executives about their experience and attrition possibility using its predictive analytics.

“Our goal is to get all these employee data in one place and harmonise them to support HR transformation and digitalization,” added Discarga.

Since its launch in January this year, Betterteem claims it has onboarded over 14,000 BPO employees on its platform, representing a month-on-month average user growth of 34 per cent.

The startup reported an improvement in HR services efficiency by 12 per cent and employee retention by an average of 9 per cent compared to the same time last year before its existing clients used Betterteem.

Betterteem intends to launch its iOS and Android app by Q4 of this year.

Also Read: How machine learning really impacts us in our daily lives

Aside from its ongoing service offerings in the Philippines, Betterteem is also piloting its HR offerings in South Korea through the K-Startup Grand Challenge 2022.

Betterteem is one of the two Filipino startups selected to participate in the fifth cohort of the Ernst & Young Foundry programme.

The firm earlier raised undisclosed funding from local angel fund Buko Ventures and IdeaSpace, a non-profit, local startup accelerator.

Fundraising or preparing your startup for fundraising? Build your investor network, search from 400+ SEA investors on e27, and get connected or get insights regarding fundraising. Try e27 Pro for free today.

The post Techstars, Crestone VC join Filipino HR-tech startup Betterteem’s financing round appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How to meet your customer expectations fluently with the power of business messaging

A few months ago, I wrote about our first global Business Messaging event, Conversations, which brought together our business, partner and developer communities. We shared vital product announcements and the investments we’re making to help businesses use messaging to start conversations with customers, achieve scale, and deliver a seamless experience. You can read a useful recap here.

We continue to see Business Messaging gain momentum across industries, especially in the Asia Pacific. This is why I’m excited to share the results of a recent study by Meta and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), which surveyed 6,500 respondents across Australia, Indonesia, Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.

According to the study, over 40 per cent of people surveyed said they were messaging with a business more frequently than compared in the pre-pandemic period, with one in three consumers chatting with businesses at least once a week. The trend was similar across all age groups, especially among Millennials and Gen Zs, who are messaging businesses up to eight times every month.

Changing trends

The study, Business Messaging: The Quiet Channel Revolution Across Tech, packs a lot of insights, but here are the ones that stand out to me.

Messaging is an integral communication channel for businesses and consumers:

  • 90 per cent of businesses recognise that messaging apps are essential for success
  • 80 per cent of consumers plan to continue using messaging to interact with businesses

Financial Services (FinServ) is emerging as a high-potential vertical for Business Messaging:

  • Across APAC, consumers said it was vital for them to message a business before they signed up for a financial product

Use cases for Business Messaging continue to expand across industries such as CPG, retail, FinServ and e-commerce, ranging from basic enquiry, lead generation, one-to-one consultation, customisation, gaining feedback, re-marketing and signals collection:

  • More than half of businesses say that they use Business Messaging for after-sales services
  • 61 per cent of retail and e-commerce businesses use it to process pre-sales enquiries
  • An average of 50 per cent of businesses said they use messaging to process orders and transactions

The power of business messaging

So what should a business do if they want to become more conversational? Here is a clear pathway we’ve defined to help businesses start, scale and delight customers with business messaging:

Start

Define clear objectives for messaging. Evaluate the potential of messaging throughout the whole customer journey and see where it can help solve unique pain points in each phase depending on business context and challenges.

Also Read: How small businesses can boost brand visibility via videos and messaging

Take the case of Philippine-based courier company LBC express, they saw an opportunity to automate common queries for customer service while providing live service for more complex queries. By using proactive package notifications on Messenger, they received 4.5x more loyalty programme sign-ups compared to traditional methods.

Scale

Adopt third-party messaging technology solutions and providers to scale messaging capabilities rapidly. Meta has a vast ecosystem of Meta Business Partners specialised in messaging solutions.

Our messaging partners are expert developers who build messaging experiences at scale. They can help solve specific challenges, from building a chatbot through messaging automation to handling payment and logistics. They provide simple and affordable solutions to help a business manage a high volume of conversations and personalise the experience at the same time for each customer. You can find a complete list of our partners here.

Delight

Delight customers with a seamless experience. Customers want to hear from businesses when the information is timely, personal, and relevant.

era-won, a Thai menswear brand, had customer queries around the clock and found they could not respond to customers in real-time. The brand decided to try an automated Messenger solution that could respond to messages and also update customers about tracking numbers and order delivery status.

To achieve scale, they worked with Meta Business Partner Zwiz.ai to set up a Messenger-powered digital assistant to help manage a large volume of customer queries. They saw an 8x return on ad spend, which they attribute to delighting customers with a smooth shopping experience.

The future looks bright

The conversational future is here, and businesses need to start now. Certain verticals such as financial services, beauty, apparel and automotive should definitely explore how to incorporate business messaging in their marketing strategy, given the nature of their customers’ path to purchase.

To learn about the report and unlock the power of business messaging, you can find more information here.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post How to meet your customer expectations fluently with the power of business messaging appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Ecosystem Roundup: Dana raises US$554M, turns unicorn; Atome banks US$100M debt facility; Emtek mulls IPO for Vidio

Atome

Indonesian e-wallet Dana raises US$554M from Sinar Mas, Lazada
This brings DANA’ valuation to US$1.3 billion; Dana said that it has acquired more than 115M users and processed over 10M daily transactions; According to its CEO Vincent Iswara, the presence of new investors will help add more services and improve its tech scalability.

Emtek mulls IPO for OTT platform Vidio
Emtek holds 79.37 per cent stake in the OTT platform through its subsidiary SCM in Vidio; The Indonesian conglomerate is also a top shareholder of IDX-listed Bukalapak.

Atome banks US$100M HSBC debt facility
It will support the fintech company’s efforts to expand and strengthen its presence in Asia; Atome is a buy now, pay later platform that works with over 15,000 retail partners across 10 Asian markets.

Aramco’s VC arm leads US$35M round of HK’s Insilico Medicine
Besides Prosperity7 Ventures, Warburg Pincus, B Capital Group, and Qiming Venture also joined; Insilico uses AI to discover and develop drugs for cancer, fibrosis, central nervous system diseases, and ageing-related diseases.

Indian crypto firm CoinSwitch Kuber launches US$10M Web3 fund
It aims to incubate up to 100 Indian early-stage startups building blockchain solutions; The crypto firm said it has over 18M users: In April 2021, CoinSwitch raised US$25M Series B led by Tiger Global.

Indonesian digital pharmacy Lifepack raises US$7M
Investors include Golden Gate Ventures; Lifepack aims to provide quality and affordable medicine for patients. Besides OTC drugs and general supplements, the company also offers medication for chronic diseases.

Expedock banks US$13.5M to allow supply chain brands to transform paper docs into data
Investors include Insight Partners, Neo and Pear, and angels; Expedock uses AI to transform paper documents into data, quickly classify them, and bring them into existing freight forwarder tools.

‘DAOs aren’t different from community-building efforts seen in Web2’
Anyone can start a DAO; all you need is a group of people with a shared bank account, explains Web3 expert and Menyala executive Siddharth Krishnan.

Traveloka ex-CMO’s healthtech startup Diri Care closes US$4.3M seed round
Investors include East Ventures, Sequoia India, Surge, and Henry Hendrawan; Indonesia-based Diri Care is an on-demand, one-stop digital clinic for skin, hair and intimate health conditions.

Singapore pet care startup ZumVet closes US$3.7M Series A
Investors include Quest Ventures, Pine Venture Partners, and Pentepebble; Aimed at making pet care accessible and affordable, ZumVet offers remote care options and self-administered diagnostics and treatment programs across SEA.

ProfilePrint adds food supplies giant Cargill to its cap table
ProfilePrint predicts the quality and profile of a food sample “within seconds”; Over the last six months, Cargill has completed pilots with ProfilePrint’s solutions across its portfolio of ingredients.

Techstars, Crestone VC join Filipino HR-tech startup Betterteem’s financing round
Betterteem predicts employee churn, provides on-demand mental health support to them, and is a digital community platform to influence their experience positively.

Social finance platform Ethis relaunches angel investor group
The ESA Syndicate is by invitation only for angel investors who aim to back startups focusing on the Muslim world and halal sectors; It’ll have a “special interest” for the fintech, agritech, and halal food distribution industries.

Gobi-backed startup Avana’s co-founder Luqman Adris passes away
It is understood from a former colleague and investor that Adris had been suffering from a severe illness; Avana helps businesses automate transaction processes on social media and instant messaging platforms.

GoTo launches food delivery service on Tokopedia
Currently, the service is available in the Greater Jakarta area; The rollout of this service will allow users to search for food options on Tokopedia, while GoFood merchants can reach a wider audience.

The post Ecosystem Roundup: Dana raises US$554M, turns unicorn; Atome banks US$100M debt facility; Emtek mulls IPO for Vidio appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How this startup is bringing efficiency to the process of exchanging business cards

Having been in business for years and like many other business professionals, I have to attend a fair share of meetings. At many of these, I’d be meeting someone for the first time. Of course, we’d greet one another and exchange business cards, and at the end of a day of several such meetings, I’d have collected between five-20 business cards.

Now some unfortunate soul (usually myself) would have to deal with typing out the names, job titles, emails, phone numbers, etc. from each card and saving it to our CRM. Oh, and then occasionally, there would be conferences and networking events I’d have to attend. My work bag would need a separate compartment for all the business cards received.

So being a sucker for efficiency, I searched for tools which would solve this niggling problem. There were a handful of apps which using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology scans printed cards to grab the contact data automatically. Problem solved, right? No.

Only some of the scanned data would be accurate and then I’d still have to copy and paste the data into my CRM. So essentially, only part of the problem was being partially solved. Not good.

As a result of recent restrictions on physical mobility and more regional and international business, remote meetings are here to stay. Fewer cards to collect then! Yes, but we still have to manually copy and save names, phone numbers, emails, etc. into a CRM or contact list.

It’s time to fix this

Being a designer and entrepreneur my entire career, my natural instinct is to come up with new and innovative ways to tackle challenges in the best possible manner. And given that this challenge continued to hinder me personally, I decided to investigate.

Why has no one successfully fixed this problem? Well, none of the attempts had really and thoroughly addressed the complete needs which businesses and business people have in this process.

When I analysed the deeper issues at hand, I realised that it wasn’t simply about making business cards fully digital. Nor just about facilitating easier contact data exchange.

It is much more about data integrity and automating the storage of that data centrally. And this would then contribute to the necessary digital transformation for every company.

Is it the biggest problem we encounter? No, but it’s one which everyone who takes meetings has. And on a daily basis. And this made it clear to me that this seemingly small problem invariably aggregates to being a very big one begging for the proper fix.

The journey required exploring the fundamental values which contact data provide as an asset for both individual business people as well as to the companies who employ them. Then it required creating and refining the product such that the user experience would be as seamless as possible.

Also Read: Succeeding as a technical founder with Dave Shanley

But building a great product is only part a of creating a business. The key is to create practical and viable strategies to market and scale the company with a revenue model which the market would accept and embrace.

No easy feat, I assure you. But having grown various businesses over the years, the process, whilst challenging, was something I was confident of handling.

A complete solution to bring efficiency

This is what gave birth to my company, Shake. Shake is a contact data exchange and management app platform which truly digitises the business card and makes for seamless data distribution and collection. More importantly, the platform addresses a variety of needs and problems which businesses and business people likely didn’t even realise they have.

And the benefits are real and tangible. By fully digitising contact data, the process of exchanging and saving this data is made far more simply, which clearly increases productivity. Because the data is in the cloud, the data integrity is never outdated.

Furthermore, with many people and companies placing more priority on CSR and environmental concerns, Shake promotes a greener carbon footprint for sustainability contributions whilst reducing measurable costs.

Of course, we ensure that the data privacy is optimised not only for individual users but also for companies to save and access this data automatically.

Having already signed up close to 100 companies not only in Asia but also in Europe, the Americas and even the Middle East, our ultimate goal is to solve the problem with contact data, for business people and companies, throughout the world.

Aside from our team injecting our own cash into the business, we’ve had the fortune of securing angel investment from a number of quality investors. As we are continuing to grow our sales team and presence, we’re also continuing to fundraise.

So, we welcome every business person to try Shake and soon, your bag and your desk will be free of the clutter of business cards. More importantly, you’ll have added an integral step to your and your company’s digital transformation journey.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post How this startup is bringing efficiency to the process of exchanging business cards appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Why ‘Indonesia-only’ Intudo Ventures believes SEA as one cohesive market is a fallacy

Intudo Ventures Founding Partners Eddy Chan (L) and Patrick Yip

When Eddy Chan and Patrick discussed starting an Indonesia-only venture capital firm in 2017, many frowned upon and laughed at them. But nothing could prevent them from launching their dream company, Intudo Ventures, which boasts of being the first VC firm focussing only on the archipelago’s home-grown startups.

Today, Intudo manages three VC funds and has over two dozen investments to its credit, of which one is a unicorn.

e27 spoke with Intudo’s Founding Partner Eddy Chan about the VC firm’s investments, philosophy, opportunities and deals.

Edited excerpts:

What is Intudo Ventures? What was the motivation to start Intudo Ventures in 2017?

Intudo Ventures is the first “Indonesia-only” independent VC firm with an involved/concentrated portfolio approach. 

Back in 2017, if you were to get on Google to search for phrases like ‘Indonesian venture capital firm’, ‘Jakarta-based venture capital firm’, or “venture capital firm in Indonesia’, you would come up with a smattering of results. There were maybe a few pages representing minor snippets of activity in an otherwise unoccupied terrain. 

While there was a handful of VC firms headquartered in Indonesia, none of them took the stance of being ‘Indonesia-focused’ or ‘Indonesia-only’. Instead, they opted for the more geographically diverse mandate of ‘Southeast Asia regional’, jet-setting between Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and beyond to hunt down founders.

So it is no surprise that many people saw it as more novelty when we decided to create the Indonesia-dedicated VC firm in 2017 that would become Intudo Ventures. 

Looking back to those days, Indonesia was still a nascent market—booming with potential but lacking in concrete results. The country had just crowned its first unicorn with local ride-hailing startup Gojek’s US$1.4 billion valuation. There was a shortage of exits — no one had the money to prove that Indonesia worked. Instead, investors opted to take Southeast Asia piecemeal, believing that cross-border synergies would create a bigger pie for both entrepreneurs and investors.

For us, we believe that regional mandates often compel funds to invest in Southeast Asia as one collective market, underestimating the difficulty presented by fragmentation that such a strategy faces hopping from market to market. 

Instead, we held a contrarian belief in the market that Southeast Asia as one cohesive market was a fallacy and that focusing on one market –Indonesia — would lead to better investment and entrepreneurial outcomes. It was a simple matter of common sense for us.

Also Read: Of COVID-19 and funding winter: Why these 2 VC firms are bullish about SEA amid back-to-back crises

Based on the characteristics of the market, at the outset of creating Intudo Ventures, we believed that a successful Indonesian VC firm would need to demonstrate the following characteristics:

Dedication to the Indonesian marketAs the biggest and most consequential market in Southeast Asia, success in Indonesia is paramount for success in Southeast Asia. By focusing on Indonesia, we can concentrate our resources to maximise value for our founders and investors, more effectively source and secure deals through reputation and network effects, and become a go-to partner for global capital wanting exposure to Indonesia. Very few companies can be successful in Southeast Asia without going through Indonesia.

Owned and operated independently of any external group: Indonesia’s VC market has traditionally been dominated by local conglomerates and their associated families and state-owned enterprises, in each case, which exerts sway over major portions of the economy. 

As an independent firm, Intudo can work with a diverse group of conglomerates to help them navigate the Indonesian digital economy and create diversified value for founders to connect them with corporate partners. This is why Indonesia’s more than 30 most prolific families and their associated conglomerates have come onboard as Intudo LPs, building synergies between our investors and our founders, allowing everyone involved to become more significant than the sum of our parts.

Globally connected with access to smart capital and elite talent: Indonesia has always been off-the-radar of global capital; even today, it is still considered exotic for many institutional investors. It is still to this day a non-consensus market. 

However, in 2017, we believed Indonesia could be the next emerging market success story based on historical trends and on-the-ground dynamics. By building up awareness of Indonesia among international investors and acting as a beachhead for global capital, Intudo could provide global capital for our founders and create unfair advantages within our portfolio for future financing. 

Based on this strategy, 30-plus leading global funds and managing partners, including ten global Forbes Midas List VC investors, have joined us as LPs to gain exposure to Indonesia. 

Moreover, nearly a third of our founders were sourced from overseas through our Pulkam S.E.A. Turtle founder recruitment strategy. To this date, we are the sole Indonesian homegrown VC firm with a global presence in 1) Silicon Valley and Indonesia.

Able to make concentrated bets on a small stable of companies at an early stage: To have a seat at the table and provide meaningful value to founders, we knew that we would have to focus our efforts on a select group of companies. Indexing deals is great for accumulating logos, but it means that efforts are stretched out among many companies, and returns are diluted after several financing rounds. We wanted to be a trusted partner for Indonesian entrepreneurs from the first check all the way through IPO.

These four characteristics would make for a powerful mandate and is a fantastic technical way to build a firm. 

However, we are running a business driven by people and character. We wanted to build something that would be both unapologetically Indonesian. More importantly, we represent the spirit of our core values not only as investors but also as people. We decided upon the amalgamated word ‘Intudo’. It is a stitched-together combination of the Bahasa Indonesian words representing the firm’s core values of integrity (integritas), sincerity (tulus), and serendipity (jodoh). 

These three ideals embody the spirit we aspire to achieve in everything we do — from the managing partners, team members, advisors, and advocates. We also look for these characteristics in the founders that we back.

Why is there an emphasis on ‘Indonesia-only’? Why don’t you expand to other SEA markets?

“Indonesia-only” is a common-sense proposition; we exclusively back Indonesian homegrown companies. When we talk about Southeast Asia’s economic growth and market potential, what we’re talking about is Indonesia is pure and simple. It is the elephant in the room for many corporations and investment managers operating in the region due to its sheer market size, vibrant consumer base, and opportunity for generating outsized investment returns.

Also Read: Indonesia-only Intudo Ventures hits final close of Fund III at US$115M, to back 12-14 firms

From a macro perspective, the numbers say it all. No matter how you slice it, Indonesia makes up more than 35 per cent of the region’s GDP, 35 per cent of economic growth, and 35 per cent of the region’s population. 

With no other market in Southeast Asia even coming close in terms of market share, businesses and investors cannot claim to be covering Southeast Asia as a region without a significant commitment to Indonesia.

It is a market with both scale and momentum. With its young population of 270 million and growing, Indonesia has a domestic consumer market dwarfed only by China, India, and the US. Over the past few decades, Indonesia has experienced a massive poverty reduction, dramatic urbanisation, strong income growth, and an increasingly affluent middle class. Alongside significant regulatory reforms, this has created comfortable conditions for cultivating startups and the digital economy.

Non-Indonesian homegrown deals in the region are not in our mandate. Generally speaking, we have the flexibility to cover companies that become regional over time. However, our baseline is derived from the company’s headquarters in Indonesia. As we take relatively concentrated positions among our portfolio companies, we want to be sure that we are creating the greatest possible value for our founders and investors by focusing on what we do best, Indonesia.

Who are your LPs?

Black Kite Capital: Singapore-based family office of Koh Boon Hwee;

Wasson Enterprise: US-based family office of former Walgreens Boots Alliance CEO Greg Wasson;

PIDC, the investment arm of Taiwan-based international food/beverage and retail conglomerate Uni-President Enterprises Corp;

30+ of Indonesia’s most prolific families and their associated conglomerates;

30+ leading global funds and managing partners—including ten global Midas List investors; and

20+ tech unicorn founders.

What is your average ticket size? Has it increased over the years?

Seed/pre-Series A: US$1-3 million; 

Series A: US$3-8 million; 

Series B and beyond: US$8-25 million.

Our ticket size has gradually increased over the years with the maturation of Indonesia’s venture landscape. Larger tickets have allowed us to put more skin in the game for our founders and enhance concentration among breakout deals.

What are your key focus verticals? How many investments have Intudo made so far? Has any of your portfolio companies become unicorns?

Intudo Ventures is investing in industries poised to define the future of Indonesia, driven by the dual economic engines of private consumption and digitisation. We actively seek opportunities in agriculture, B2B & enterprise, education, finance & insurance, healthcare, logistics, and new retail & entertainment.

Also Read: Funding winter: VCs ask startups to focus on corporate funds from developed countries

In six years, we’ve invested in a total of 25 companies, as we generally try to adopt an even keel approach and invest in 4-6 new companies a year in bull (greed) and bear (fear) market cycles.

Xendit is an Intudo portfolio company that has become a unicorn.

How many funds have you launched so far? Can you share the sizes and their respective investments in Indonesia?

Intudo manages three Indonesia-dedicated venture funds.

Fund I – US$20 million (2017 vintage)

Select deals include: Xendit, Pintu, and BeliMobilgue (acquired by OLX Autos), Kargo.

Fund II – US$50 million (2019 vintage):

Select deals include: Xendit, Pintu, Kargo, PasarPolis, and Halodoc.

Fund III – US$144 million (2021 vintage):

Select deals include: Xendit, Pintu, Pinhome, Nalagenetics, Populix, and Andalin.

How does Intudo pick startups for potential investments? What are the different criteria that you look for in them?

Intudo is not a trend-driven investment firm; we believe companies make trends rather than trends make companies. This is reflected in our backing of many non-consensus overlooked companies over the years. 

We focus on sectors that we and our LP network can deliver tangible value before and following the investment process. Companies that operate in non-consensus, overlooked and underfunded sectors can develop multiple moats due to their unique business models, access to specialised resources and networks, leverage technical advantages to attract talent and customers, and have stronger operational and economic fundamentals that lead to profitability. What may be non-consensus or overlooked today will likely create new company categories and industry leaders—and we see that already in our portfolio.

Indonesia’s regulatory and business landscape remains highly dynamic as an emerging market. It presents opportunities for companies to change how people do business and live their lives by filling significant unmet needs and creating a reliance on their products and services through compelling value-add. In this spirit, Intudo Ventures aims to invest in companies that build powerful “moats”—businesses that leverage unfair advantages to amass market position and gain category leadership.

Some types of moats we look for include:

Commercial distribution: Companies that develop offerings with immense “stickiness” or intellectual property advantages, causing customers to be operationally dependent upon their products and services.

Regulatory: Companies that operate in heavily regulated spaces and have received or are soon to receive official licensing to become critical partners for private and public sector customers.

Deeptech specialisations: Companies that adopt deep-tech as a core component for their business, allowing them to attract the unique human capital to join the team and making their offerings difficult for others to replicate.

With our focus on moat-driven businesses, Intudo Ventures aspires to invest in three categories of companies. They include non-consensus companies early in overlooked and underfunded sectors; emerging category leaders demonstrating breakout potential and establishing strong moats and profitability, and undisputed category winners on a trajectory to define entire segments of the economy.

Globally, Intudo Ventures aspires to bring Indonesia to the world—while bringing the world to Indonesia. The firm is highly active in the US through Intudo’s Pulkam S.E.A. Turtle Fellowship, closely mentoring aspiring Indonesian founders, sponsoring and hosting major university and industry events, such as the annual Harvard Asia Business Conference, MIT Asia Business Conference, Southeast Asia MBA Weekend, weekly discussions with Indonesian professional and student associations, and visits with Indonesians at top tech companies in Silicon Valley. 

As a result, Intudo has sourced one-thirds of its deals from university campuses and tech community engagement in the United States through the firm’s three funds.

What is more critical for a startup to get your attention or funding — the team, product, market or something else?

For the seed to pre-Series A investments, we are investing mainly in the talent of the founding team and the initial level of traction. Some of these investments may be considered ‘non-consensus’, meaning they are building models entirely new or unique to the Indonesian context. 

Working with Intudo, companies at this stage (even before term sheet discussions) can receive hands-on mentorship, sign business contracts with Intudo-sourced partners, and build fundamentals to help them raise future financing rounds. We have subsequently co-led the Series A rounds of several of our early plays as they have proven their business models.

As we get into Series A investments, our focus shifts to companies where we believe in their potential to become category leaders, where they have the possibility one day to dominate their respective verticals or transform entire industries. We can boost these businesses by sourcing key talent, helping them in distribution and business development opportunities with domestic and international corporate partners, and gaining access to global capital.

For Series B and beyond, we are only looking for proven consensus winners who are already achieving escape velocity and are on a trajectory to claim dominance in one or more sectors. As we do for our Series A companies, we can boost these businesses by sourcing key talent, helping them in distribution and business development opportunities with domestic and international corporate partners, or gaining access to global capital.

What opportunities do you see in Indonesia? How has the market grown over the years?

Indonesia’s startup industry is entering a maturation stage, where capital, talent, and ideas are more abundant than ever. The influx of global capital has changed the game, with more investors looking at the market. We are seeing more capital and talent being recycled into the ecosystem, creating new companies and opportunities for growth.

For Indonesia, the underlying dynamic is digitisation and transformation of traditional industries—a process that has only accelerated with the pandemic and correlating economic fallout. Whereas technology enablement was historically a nice-to-have for companies of all sizes, post-pandemic, it has become a must-have. There will be a continuation in the scaling of pick-and-shovel foundational businesses such as payments, logistics, and enterprise services to support e-commerce and key traditional economic sectors.

Digitisation is happening across the Indonesian economy, ranging from conglomerates, the government, SMEs, and small mom & pop businesses. We have witnessed this throughout our portfolio in the sectors in which they operate. Consumers have also flocked to digital offerings throughout the crisis, and many will continue to adopt technology to meet daily needs. This dominant trend will continue to be the driving force for the Indonesian venture market for the foreseeable future.

However, as optimistic as we are about the future of Indonesia, it has been a long journey to get here. Over the past decade, Indonesia has gone from a venture capital backwater to becoming one of the most compelling emerging markets for investors. 

For fundraising, founders had few options, with only a few mainstay firms to choose from at the early stage and even thinner in growth. From an investor landscape perspective, Indonesia has evolved from a market dominated by corporate venture capital firms (CVCs) and regional fly-in investors to one where local investors have begun to dominate the landscape and gatekeep access to the market. Talent, still cited as an issue today, was even more scarce.

Awareness of Indonesia among investors has grown dramatically. When we started as a firm, some investors even laughed at us for the notion of setting up a firm to invest exclusively in Indonesia. We had to spend hours educating potential investors on Indonesia, including what now feels like basic market knowledge. Those days are gone.

Founders are now blessed with an abundance of options. Capital has become a commodity through the maturation of Indonesia’s venture market. With the market flush with capital, founders now want more than just money. Unless it is a global firm with significant brand power and know-how, founders expect their investors to offer concrete value-add deliverables—in particular in-country resources, access to customers and regulators and hands-on guidance. Gone are the days of fly-in fund managers.

 

Fundraising or preparing your startup for fundraising? Build your investor network, search from 400+ SEA investors on e27, and get connected or get insights regarding fundraising. Try e27 Pro for free today.

The post Why ‘Indonesia-only’ Intudo Ventures believes SEA as one cohesive market is a fallacy appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Alpha JWC leads Filipino parenting e-commerce startup edamama’s US$20M Series A round

The edamama leadership team

edamama, an e-commerce startup targetting millennial mothers in the Philippines, has announced a US$20 million Series A funding round led by Alpha JWC Ventures.

Existing investors, including Gentree Fund, Robinsons Retail Holdings, and Kickstart Ventures, joined the round. Temasek affiliate Innoven Capital, Foxmont Capital, and angel investor Lisa Gokongwei-Cheng also participated.

This capital will fuel the expansion of edamama’s operations, including same-day and next-day delivery solutions to more locations across Metro Manila and beyond. It will also enhance its content and community elements, launch its own offline stores and scale its private label portfolio.

Also Read: Innoven Capital backs Philippine e-commerce startup edamama

Launched in May 2020 by the husband-wife duo of Nishant D’Souza and Bela Gupta, edamama offers a personalised shopping experience through content, community, and commerce-driven strategies that simplify decision-making for parents.

The Series A funding comes on the back of the 100x growth the e-commerce firm achieved amidst the global pandemic. The startup claims it has delivered over 1.5 million products to Filipino doorsteps across the country, leveraging its embedded warehousing and logistics fleet.

The firm also runs an online gift registry, subscription services for everyday essentials, and an integrated portal for content and services.

Last October, edamama secured undisclosed debt funding from Innoven Capital. A few months earlier, it bagged US$5 million from a clutch of investors, including Gentree Fund, Robinsons Retail Holdings, Kickstart Ventures, Foxmont Capital and angels.

Fundraising or preparing your startup for fundraising? Build your investor network, search from 400+ SEA investors on e27, and get connected or get insights regarding fundraising. Try e27 Pro for free today.

The post Alpha JWC leads Filipino parenting e-commerce startup edamama’s US$20M Series A round appeared first on e27.