Posted on

Why India needs to improve access to instant healthcare solutions

The fast spread of COVID-19 in India highlights the critical significance of public health. There has been an ardent need to strengthen public health services to serve India’s population beyond the pandemic by offering them instant access to healthcare solutions.

With India being one of the second-fastest adopters of digital services, constituting about half a billion internet users, there is an immense scope to unlock an additional economic value of US$1 trillion through inclusive growth.

Additionally, with the right application of digital to the Indian healthcare sector, the issues of access and affordability are getting tackled. The accelerating need for medical care is steering the country in the right direction amid a Medtech revolution.

The digital healthcare market in India stood at US$116.61 billion in 2018 and is expected to increase at a CAGR of 27.41 per cent to US$485.43 billion by 2024, according to The ‘Digital Healthcare Market in India 2019’ report.

The underlying challenges

However, despite the positives, the country still faces the acute problem of an unequal healthcare system where the wealthy have access to the best care while the impoverished are restricted to limited options.

It can be addressed by improving hospital and clinic infrastructure, bringing in telehealth facilities, channelling resources in the most disadvantaged areas, building awareness around chronic diseases, and prioritising early diagnosis.

Also Read: Modern solutions to modern problems: How Plusman LLC innovates healthcare

The other challenge is the lack of uniformity in record keeping. In most instances, local healthcare facilities or hospitals cannot uniformly document all records for services, especially in rural areas.

This results in repeated diagnostic tests and consultations, delayed treatments, concealment or ignorance of medical history etc. This can lead to a wrong diagnosis and further increase treatment costs.

Even in hospitals where digital records are maintained, there is no provision for the electronic transfer of patient records from one service provider to another. The lack of access leads to either the patient physically carrying the medical records or having no access to them.

Digitisation for bridging the healthcare gap

Through the National Digital Health Mission (NDHM) announced in 2020, the government endeavours to create a digital health ecosystem by leveraging the existing digital infrastructure (including frameworks related to Aadhar and UPI) and the pan India coverage of internet-enabled smartphones. The other objective is to ensure equitable real-time healthcare service delivery in India.

Healthtech has a crucial role in tackling the problem of an unequal healthcare system, thereby bridging gaps in India’s healthcare ecosystem, especially preventive healthcare and disease management.

This is evident with the vertical recently witnessing exponential growth, prompting trends like online patient consultation, e-pharmacies, telemedicine, integrated digital insurance memberships, etc. Investors are accelerating their funding in this sector due to the pandemic.

Democratising healthcare solutions

But the need of the hour is affordable real-time healthcare solutions encompassing OPD, IPD and wellness, facilitating instant access for different classes of the population.

We have been trying to democratise the affordable healthcare experience for SMEs, MSMEs, startups and growing businesses and their workforce across India by providing them monthly, comprehensive employee healthcare, including group health insurance, discounted telemedicine, teleconsultation etc.

More organisations should provide inclusive insurance to reach the unserved, underserved and low-income households. This will ensure deeper penetration of health insurance to families at grassroots levels.

What also works are innovative healthcare solutions in the form of sachets offering preventive care like doctor teleconsultations, affordable health checkups, discounted medicine, group mediclaim and accidental covers and hospitalisation support related to claim processing and reimbursements. Similarly, more startups should work on innovative, inclusive initiatives to improve India’s health equity.

Also Read: Bolstering healthtech: Thailand’s bid to become Asia’s medical hub

The insurance industry, which has always been under the dark cloud of mistrust due to rampant mis-selling, is now seeing disruption and innovation with Insurtech startups driving the transformation by leveraging technology.

Hence, there is an ardent need for them to deliver quality service that they have promised to rebuild trust with their customers. However, a lot of work needs to be done to change long-held consumer perceptions. But it’s not impossible.

Thus digitisation has the potential to bridge the mighty healthcare gap and improve the quality, access and affordability of health services by penetrating at grassroots.  This can lead to public-private partnerships, the birth of indigenous start-ups, path-breaking ideas, and thereby more skewed investment in India’s healthcare and healthtech sector.  

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: blueaperture15

The post Why India needs to improve access to instant healthcare solutions appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How important is whitelisting for the success of NFTs?

In a typical Silicon Valley startup, you look to start with an innovative product or service and then match that to customer demand, testing out your hypothesis with an MVP (minimal viable product) before seeking to scale up the business backed by VC funds.

The VC model seemed in decline during the crypto ICO boom years in 2017/18, when an ambitious whitepaper and an impressive founding team and advisors were enough to gain token investment.

But nowadays, as the world of DeFi, the metaverse and NFTs all usher in the Web3 world, that’s certainly not enough. Projects need to have purpose and be community-led, in a real sense, in terms of both governance and tokenomics.

As Maggie Hsu, partner at top crypto VC Andreessen Horowitz pointed out regarding the nature of Web3 projects earlier this year, “It means having a strong community, not just being “community-led” or “community-first,” but also being community-owned, blurring the distinction between owner, shareholder, and user. What allows for long-term success in Web3 is a clear purpose, having an engaged and high-quality community, and matching the right organisational governance to that purpose and community.”

That being said, how does the current practice of whitelisting, allowing early pre-sale access to NFT and DAOs, square with this Web3 vision? When there is an opportunity from being lucky enough to be whitelisted to make a significant short-term profit, is that right from the longer-term view of the project.

What is whitelisting?

Before we get into the expert discussion, let’s briefly consider the focus of this article. Whitelisting was introduced in the NFT space near the end of 2021 after NFT enthusiasts identified a critical issue during the launch of new projects.

Also Read: NFTs: The good, the bad, and the future

Before the concept of whitelisting became popular, NFT projects with a lot of hype were usually ‘botted’ on the mint day by NFT whales (people who hold large amounts of crypto), leaving little to nothing for retail investors. Using trading bots allows the whales to buy the NFTs before community members have a chance to buy.

As explained in the NFT Examiner, whitelisting is when a specific crypto wallet has been approved for minting a specific NFT.

“As an example, Neo Tokyo is a project where participants have to pass a test to become eligible to mint a Neo Tokyo Identity NFT. If they solve the challenge, they are added to the whitelist, allowing the participant to mint the highly sought after NFT. Without being on the whitelist, buyers could attempt to mint the NFT, but the transaction would fail.”

In the NFT world, whitelisting typically means that a crypto wallet address has been pre-approved for the minting of NFTs on specific dates and times.

Furthermore, due to the high demand for these projects, particularly on the Ethereum blockchain, there were usually ‘gas wars’, with transaction fees reaching thousands of dollars, which was a bad look for the NFT sector and hampered user adoption.

In addition, pre-approved users on the whitelist can spread out their minting so that they are not all transacting simultaneously, avoiding a sudden spike in transaction prices caused by demand. Most new NFT projects layout their whitelisting requirements on their respective

Discord servers, with different tasks and assignments ranging from chatting to a certain level, posting fan art, promoting the project on social media platforms, etc.

In some ways, it’s an evolution of the practice of ‘bounty campaigns’ used in the days of ICOs in 2017/18 to market token offerings by offering giveaways in return for tweets and Facebook likes to help promote the coin offering.

The lure of big profits

Of course, the popularity of getting yourself invited onto an NFT or DAO whitelist isn’t just about being part of an exclusive community, to be part of a long term Web3 project; for too many people simply a chance to make a quick buck.

In his video explainer on the power of whitelisting, YouTuber ‘_DB’ points out that if you get access to a pre-sale token, it usually sells between US$10 to US$20 or even US$30, though how much can vary according to the amount of hype behind a project; with a limit in the amount of pre-sale tokens typically set between US$1,500 to US$2,000.

The new NFT drop from the High Sloth Society (HSS) of 10,000 Elite Sloths recently organised a public sale that was sold out in 29 minutes for US$1.2 Million.

Also Read: 3moji aims to transform the way NFTs are used in metaverse with its composable avatars

The High Sloth Society NFTs started their public sale at noon UTC on the 28th of April. Then on the next day, they sold another 1,000 pieces at 0.08 ETH each at their whitelisting event.

“The High Sloth Society is a group of people that are no longer interested in money but want to focus on what money cannot buy. By owning a high sloth, the users are granted the opportunity to have a direct interest in the ancient artefacts. The Korean National Treasure is just the first one,” Leon Kim, Core Contributor of HSS, said.

Whitelisting can involve inviting a group of friends to join the project’s Discord server (Credit: High Sloth Society)

What’s the benefit for the community?

The purpose of whitelisting serves two core purposes. The first relates to the fact that if you are going to have any degree of success, you need to build a community around a project. Achieving this involves driving online engagement through social media.

And using a whitelist is an excellent way to do this. For the user, it’s a way of getting preferential access to a project, providing an incentive for a community to rally around a project.

“It can be a really good way to start getting people again, like talking about things on social media, retweeting, commenting, sharing pictures, all that sort of thing, because if you if you make things obvious, then you’ll get like, you’ll get some pretty good organic traction,” confirmed Ben Baldieri, Director of a Web3 tech consultancy Disintermediate Ltd.

The future for whitelisting

The whitelisting method currently dominating the NFT space is relatively new. Therefore, while it’s successfully prevented botted NFT project launches and conserving gas fees, they need to be used with the community in mind.

BigONE Chairman Anndy Lian said, “While the whitelisting practice was founded on good intentions, it has been tainted by some bad actors in the NFT space; this ranges from over-stringent requirements for being considered for a whitelist to some Discord server moderators giving out multiple whitelist spots to their family and friends.”

“I believe that commonly agreed best practices for the NFT space are the logical next step forward to ensure all participants’ safety and security in this exciting marketplace. NFTs have a lot of potential as their utility develops from collectibles to allowing fans to connect directly with artists and creators and their role to prove ownership in the metaverse and GameFi projects. But as things move quickly, we need to ensure we get the balance right in such a fast-changing technology,” Lian added.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: rokastenys

The post How important is whitelisting for the success of NFTs? appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Cryptocurrency, money laundering and KYC: Why are regulations important?

Cryptocurrency has come a long way since the very first Bitcoin in the world was mined back in 2009. Almost 12 years on, it’s safe to say that cryptocurrency has emerged well from the shadows and come into the mainstream.

But with cryptocurrency’s widespread interest and adoption comes another issue: how do we ensure that this innovation begets more good than harm? That’s the sentiment underpinning the numerous regulatory frameworks that are just beginning to emerge.

“Crypto’s outlaw days are over,” write the authors of this TechCrunch article, “but it’s gained an unprecedented level of legitimacy that can only be preserved and bolstered by abiding with regulatory oversight.”

What are cryptocurrency regulators concerned about?

Cryptocurrency regulations worldwide vary widely; one might even remark that the guidelines are almost as diverse as cryptocurrencies themselves.

Some governments ban cryptocurrency mining and trading outright. Others embrace cryptocurrency in the hopes of benefitting from its economic potential. But most countries fall somewhere in between, wanting to adopt the technology while at the same time being wary of its risks.

Being a decentralised form of money, cryptocurrency changes hands without passing through a central authority or institution that can be held accountable by laws and regulations. That makes it particularly susceptible to criminal uses such as money laundering and terrorism financing.

Most governments’ guidelines address these risks in some fashion. Below, we’ll look at what crypto regulatory frameworks may comprise.

What does a typical cryptocurrency compliance framework look like?

Given that governments worldwide are still working out how best to deal with cryptocurrencies, there is currently no such thing as a “typical” regulatory framework. However, we can take a closer look at Singapore’s regulations as an example.

Also Read: ‘I have seen the future, and it works.’ But is it Web3?

The city-state is known to be fairly progressive when it comes to cryptocurrency. Its Payment Services Act, which governs crypto exchanges and digital payment providers, was updated in 2020 following a consultation with the various players on the scene.

Singapore also granted formal licenses to two crypto exchanges in late 2021, a crypto-friendly move. Meanwhile, other crypto businesses continue to operate in Singapore on temporary licenses or exemptions as they await formal licenses.

In addition, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has a very robust set of anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) guidelines, summarised in the following infographic.

untitled image

(Source: MAS infographic on AML/CFT controls)

These guidelines can be roughly grouped into two main thrusts: KYC guidelines and monitoring and verifying transactions.

Know Your Customer

There are a slew of measures for screening and assessing customers in the MAS’ regulatory guidelines. The idea is that businesses should know who their customers are, and who are at higher risk of criminal activity.

Called KYC (Know Your Customer), this is a common expectation among financial institutions around the world. It is easy to see why some governments extend it to players in the crypto space too.

A licensed crypto exchange must first conduct extensive background checks on customers to verify their identities and determine their risk levels to comply with KYC requirements. This process is meant to weed out undesirable customers, such as those with criminal track records and known associations with terrorist groups.

The other important aspect of KYC is Customer Due Diligence (CDD). Having done its background screening and identity verification, the exchange is obliged to flag high-risk customers and build additional safeguards into any existing Customer Due Diligence (CDD) protocols.

For example, a customer with political connections is regarded as at higher risk for bribery or money laundering than someone from an ordinary background. The exchange must implement stricter measures on the former to minimise the risk of abuses.

Part 2: Monitoring and verifying transactions

The second part of the crypto compliance framework relates to monitoring transactions and account activity on an ongoing basis. Exchanges are obliged to maintain records of these activities, scrutinise them for any suspicious activity and report them to the relevant authorities.

There may be differentiated measures for customers of different risk levels too. Higher-risk customers are typically watched more carefully and may have to go through further rounds of verification or safeguards.

Also Read: A new type of digital arts are on the rise. How is Web3 redefining content ownership?

For instance, if a high-risk customer funds her crypto exchange account with a sum of fiat currency, the business may need to verify her source of funds to determine if the money comes from a legitimate source (for example, a bank account in her name).

If she funds her account with a large amount of Bitcoin, the exchange must also verify where the Bitcoin came from, and whether it was legitimate. The customer may be asked to furnish documentation, such as screenshots or email confirmation, to prove the Bitcoin purchase on another crypto platform.

In cases requiring further investigation, the exchange may need to establish her source of wealth, which explains how the customer’s funds were derived (e.g. income from work, inheritance, sale of assets). Proving a source of wealth is much more onerous than the source of funds, especially given the anonymous nature of crypto transactions.

Regulations: The end of cryptocurrency’s “outlaw era”?

“Regulation” may be a dirty word in some other industries, but we believe it is beneficial in the case of cryptocurrency.

Looking at the state of crypto regulations around the world today, it’s apparent that most governments are more interested in compliance and risk management than limiting the use and trade of cryptocurrency.

For the long-term investor, this focus is a good sign. The fact that authorities seek to clean up rather than stifle the cryptocurrency ecosystem shows us that they have already granted crypto a fairly high level of legitimacy.

As crypto regulations mature, we expect greater awareness of and adherence to crypto compliance guidelines. This can only be a good thing for serious investors. After all, no sane investor would want their asset class to be tainted by money laundering and terrorist financing.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: burdun

The post Cryptocurrency, money laundering and KYC: Why are regulations important? appeared first on e27.