In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, businesses are confronted with a dynamic array of threats that demand more sophisticated defence mechanisms. While traditional antivirus software has long been a stalwart guardian against known malware, the growing complexity of cyber threats necessitates a shift towards a more comprehensive solution — endpoint protection.
In this article, we will delve into the differences between antivirus and endpoint protection, outlining when and why businesses should consider upgrading to the latter.
Coverage
Traditionally, antivirus solutions focus on individual files or the entire system. While endpoint protection encompasses the entire endpoint environment, this solution extends coverage to include a broader range of security measures.
Adaptability
Antivirus relies on predefined and known signatures. Antivirus solutions will struggle with newer, unknown threats and are generally more reactive in nature. Meanwhile, endpoint protection incorporates advanced features like behavioural analysis, heuristics, sandboxing, and machine learning, making it more proactive and adaptable to emerging threats.
Management and control
Antivirus is often standalone with limited centralised management capabilities. Endpoint Protection is designed for centralised management, enabling administrators to monitor and control security measures across multiple devices within an organisation.
Also Read: Two decades of digital defence: Why cybersecurity must remain a top concern for everyone
When should businesses consider upgrading?
As businesses grow and face more sophisticated threats, the scalability and advanced features of endpoint protection become crucial for effective defence.
Here are a few questions businesses should ask themselves:
- Am I dealing with more than just known malware? Have we encountered emerging and unknown threats like targeted phishing attacks, ransomware, and Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)? As a benchmark, businesses with less than US$1 million in annual revenue are less likely to attract advanced attackers. Hence, they would be considered in the low-risk bracket. Businesses with US$1 million to US$10 million revenue would be considered medium risk, and any business with more than US$10 million revenue would be at high risk.
- Is my IT team struggling to keep up with security concerns? Do they require more centralised management over security control? As a benchmark, businesses with less than 10 employees would have a low priority. Businesses with 10 to 100 employees would have a medium priority, and it becomes a significant pain point for businesses with over 100 employees.
- Is my business dealing with sensitive data, intellectual property, or customer information that could be attractive to cyber threat actors?
Final thoughts
The cybersecurity landscape demands a proactive and adaptive defence strategy, making the shift from antivirus to endpoint protection a logical and imperative step for businesses as they grow.
As the threats continue to evolve, endpoint protection provides a broader set of tools and features to safeguard not only against traditional malware but also the multifaceted challenges posed by the modern cyber landscape.
By understanding the differences and recognising the need for a more comprehensive solution, businesses can fortify their defences and navigate the digital frontier with greater confidence and resilience.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic
Join our e27 Telegram group, FB community, or like the e27 Facebook page
Image credit:
The post Navigating cybersecurity: Antivirus vs endpoint protection appeared first on e27.