We extracted data from our database to bring you our first Southeast Asia ecosystem report, which will focus on 2018

2018 was a year of continued growth and new breakthroughs for Southeast Asia’s tech startup ecosystem. In the blink of an eye, a year has passed and we’ve reached the season of year-in-reviews and new year resolutions.

As e27 continues to be an active catalyst of this growth and movement, we want to help all stakeholders to get a solid grasp and make sense of the current state of the regional ecosystem and gear up for 2019’s Big Hairy Audacious Goals (BHAGs).

To that end, we are compiling in-depth report on Southeast Asia’s tech startup ecosystem based on e27’s data. But first, here’s a teaser for you.

A 30,000 ft overview

We tracked 5,828 startups currently active across the six ASEAN countries; these are companies who either created a new profile and/or updated their existing ones on e27’s media platform in 2018.

Although Singapore led in terms of total amount of startup funding recorded this year, Indonesia’s average deal sizes overtook that of Singapore. This is because the country had far fewer deals and the huge investment deals raised by its two unicorns –  GOJEK and Tokopedia – managed to skew the average deal size per startup to a whopping US$220 million.

Of course, the 327 deals recorded in Singapore were 3.5 times that of Indonesia’s 93, which also affected the calculation of the above.

To add context to those figures, here’s a one-liner for each of the ASEAN-6 to sum up each their narrative in 2018.

• Singapore: The government continues to ramp up deep tech innovations as part of its Smart Nation drive, giving rise to the new ABCDs in tech- Artificial Intelligence, blockchain, cybersecurity, data science.
• Malaysia: Major political changes and high profile movements within MDEC and MaGIC, two influential agencies driving Malaysia’s innovation movement.
• Indonesia: The country is finally embracing cashless payment, with competition among Go-Pay, Tcash, OVO, and Dana.
• Thailand: The government approved the use of seven key cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Ether, for various commercial and retail applications.
• Vietnam: The only country with 2 equally vibrant startup hubs — Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City — has moved beyond frontier Market status and is firmly a growth market.
• Philippines: The Philippines ecosystem has been quick to adopt blockchain technology; expect to see more blockchain innovations in the country.

Tier 2 Cities

While the bulk of the startup activity takes place mostly in capital cities, we are seeing a growth in new ventures opening up in secondary and fringe cities. For example, did you know that Siem Reap has given rise to notable startups including Kopernik and Apulus, attracted global startup events like Techstars’ Startup Weekend to be hosted there?

Wait a minute, are you kidding me?

If you’ve read this far, you must have either been mind-blown (because you were too busy hustling to notice 2018’s growth in Southeast Asia), or noticed that there are still a lot of details and context missing to get a full and accurate picture.

Fret not, for this is just a teaser, and we’re reserving more figures and analyses for the actual publication titled e27 Startup Ecosystem Report 2018, which we expect to launch on the 15th of January.

But first, a caveat: the statistics in the full report will give you a clearer idea of the regional ecosystem but we do not claim the figures are completely accurate, as it is reliant on inbound participation and we are fully aware there are startups who do not have any engagement with e27.

Nevertheless, the year 2018 saw the birth of this new initiative and we have great plans to be the Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends and roll it out annually.

This is not a one-off, but a continuous effort to improve visibility and transparency in Southeast Asia’s tech startup ecosystem, and we are speaking to key stakeholders and various governments and in the region for strategic partnerships. But this is also a plea to the #e27community to continue engaging our platform proactively, as we continue serving our mission- to empower entrepreneurs to build & grow their business.

–
Get first access to the e27 Southeast Asia Startup Ecosystem Report 2018. Get report here.

The post A quick look at the state of Southeast Asia’s tech ecosystem in 2018 appeared first on e27.

Carl Urzo is one of the two geeks from Southeast Asia to make it to Pioneer, a programme run by Daniel Gross and funded by Marc Andreessen

Clark Urzo grew up in a not-so-good neighbourhood in a Philippines village. And his childhood was filled mostly with bad memories that he wants to forget in life.

The first major shocking event occurred when he was just four or five years; one of his neighbours was brutally killed in a shootout in front of his house. But it was just a beginning. When Urzo turned eight, he and his mother had to move to a police camp, as his father was bad with money management. However, he fought all odds to achieve something that many of his peers couldn’t really conquer.

“Statistically speaking, I shouldn’t be here,” Urzo tells me. “Don’t get me wrong: the Philippines is not as lawless and hopeless a land as is usually portrayed in the media. After all, I was able to go to a decent school and eat three square meals a day until I was old enough to forgo buying lunch to fatten up my piggy banks. But it wasn’t the most ideal setup, I guess, and I thank the lucky collusion of coincidences and opportunities that allowed me to survive to this day.”

Urzo, now 23, is one of the two entrepreneurs from Southeast Asia to win the Pioneer tournament —  a programme launched by Daniel Gross (whose startup Cue was acquired by Apple in 2013) and funded by Marc Andreessen and Stripe to discover the “lost Einsteins” of the world.

Also Read: How a lazy student who caught and sold spiders transformed himself into a successful founder

Urzo was selected for creating a new programming language, which enables anyone who can code to contribute to serious physics research (for example, simulations of gravitating systems). This opens up the field to the wondrous forces of Open Source and promotes open and accountable science along the way.

The “itch” inside

From a very young age, Urzo was compulsively curious; he would see something and tinker with it until it yielded to “kid logic”, or otherwise he would be off reading books about topics that were frankly a bit over his head.

“We had this stack of encyclopaedias at home about magnetism, dinosaurs and star charts, and I read them all as best as I could. I also played pretend-scientist a lot when I was a kid, and I’m lucky I didn’t burn my entire neighbourhood down in all the times I toyed with fire and flammable substances,” he laughs.

Urzo learnt about computers while toying with gaming consoles. When he was about six, his older brother taught him how to use the ‘memory card’ of a PlayStation I, and from there he started doing all sorts of weird things to all the computers he could find.

“I got hooked especially on ‘cheat codes’ and I remember getting absolutely stumped as to why entering random hexes into the hulking machines translated into infinite money for my role-playing game characters. It was a pretty interesting (and oftentimes frustrating) ride, going from computer experimentalist to technician and the graveyard of PCs I’ve bricked is testament to that journey,” Urzo walks me through his early life.

“Eventually I learnt to code in Python when I was 12 and rediscovered my love for the sciences one year later, when I couldn’t advance in Algebra I. I had trouble grokking the concept of plotting equations when I first encountered them, so in response I discovered BetterExplained.com and found one of his really intuitive explanations of how you can get areas of figures by dividing them up into rings or bars (which is really Riemann summation in disguise),” he goes on.

In the ninth grade, he moved to a new school to curb some of his hyperactivity problems. It was a single-sex school which simultaneously operated as a seminary. “My mum couldn’t really afford to send me to a school abroad, so I opted to stay here. I decided to major in Physics instead of Computer Science (my university doesn’t allow double degrees). In the freshman year, I got wind of the whole Oculus Kickstarter and ordered from one of the first post-Kickstarter batches. Eventually, this led me to the folks over at VR Philippines, whose founding members roped me into starting a company with them.

Thus Urzo co-founded his fist company when he was just 19.

Applying for Pioneer

Urzo’s startup applied to 2018’s Y Combinator’s Startup School. Around this period, he encountered a headline ‘Lost Einsteins’ when he was looking for success stories (It was the American economist Raj Chetty, who first used this term, which refers to geniuses who would have been able to do great things had they been exposed to opportunities in the right way).

“‘Lost Einsteins’ was an interesting observation. Given the sheer abundance of talent in the world, where are all the geniuses — the groundbreaking scientists, artists, engineers, entrepreneurs?,” Urzo wonders.

“There was a paper I read way back, that looked at the variation in mathematical talent across countries as measured by performance on the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO). I realised two things : 1) IMO scores reflected the underlying distribution of mathematical talent in the country, not a mere success-begets-success dynamic, and b) there was a pernicious disparity between the intellectual productivity of high-income countries vs middle-to-low income countries,” he says.

Urzo figured that it is part of a really telling pattern of absence in the modern world, like, given other plausible socioeconomic forces like the fact that high-performing people tend to clump together (in universities and other institutions where problem-solving and/or ability to compete for prestige is highly valuable), and the fact that there are very serious winner-take-all effects in various industries, like how Silicon Valley is literally three times bigger in terms of available venture capital than the next startup hub which is New York —all of these effects should lead to cities full of these Einsteins. “But we see none. And as the data suggests, it’s largely a structural problem.”

Also Read: How the son of a humble watch repairer became the owner of a multi-million dollar realty tech startup

This is when he heard about Pioneer, which is on a mission to discover the lost Einsteins of the world.

What is Pioneer?

Pioneer was started early this year. According to Founder Gross, the Pioneer programme was created to tackle the uneven distribution of wealth and opportunity around the world; using software and internet scalability to reach high-potential outsiders no matter where they may be.

“I started Pioneer in an attempt to build a community for people who feel the way I do about the world. It’s an attempt to find the most brilliant people in the world, wherever they are, and to identify cheap and scalable interventions that might help them achieve their goals. I want to provide some of the non-intuitive benefits of Silicon Valley to many more people,” says Gross.

Pioneer has been intentionally designed without strict application criteria. People all over the world can submit an idea (across any discipline) and compete in a four-week tournament to rapidly advance their startup/research/project/idea. Pioneers share weekly updates detailing the progress of their projects, allowing the community to upvote the projects that move on to the next round.

“Those at the top of the leaderboard get a final ranking from a panel of mentors—including people like Marc Andreessen (Andreessen-Horowitz), Patrick Collison (Stripe), and Balaji Srinivasan (Coinbase)—and the highest-scoring applicants become Pioneers. The selected cohort of Pioneers receive a grant of US$5,000 (with the option of receiving a US$100,000 investment), an additional US$6,000 in Stellar lumens, as well as a round-trip ticket to San Francisco to connect with one another and relevant mentors. A new tournament starts every four weeks. For the December Tournament, winners will also receive US$100,000 in Google Cloud credits and a cash grant of US$1,000,” he explains the process.

Pioneer’s first tournament attracted applicants from more than 100 countries, ranging from 12 to 87 years old, claims Gross. “We believe the world has thousands — maybe millions — of ambitious people who have the talent and creativity and just need a nudge of support to unlock their potential. Our mission is to scalably identify and nurture the creative outsiders of the world.”

In Gross’s opinion, traditional institutions like the Ivy League try to solve this problem by relying on a small set of individuals to screen thousands of applications. This doesn’t scale, he claims. And it leaves many geniuses (especially those from non-traditional backgrounds) undiscovered.

Also Read: Infightings, quitting of key people didn’t deter this entrepreneur from realising his dream

“We’re trying something radically different. We’re trying to find these “Lost Einsteins” by building an online game — Fortnite, for productivity. Players are rewarded based on the progress they make on their project. Every month, we fund the best with a cash grant, return-ticket to Silicon Valley, and up to US$100,000 in follow-on investment,” Gross continues.

Long-term benefits

“The biggest help would be the financial security from the US$5,000 grant,” Urzo says. “My country has been hit by the worst inflation crisis in recent memory and all my bills have skyrocketed as a result. With US$5,000 in the bank I wouldn’t have to worry about going without food on some days and getting my internet cut off.”

“That said, the network of Pioneers has also served as an avenue to meet interesting people. Interacting with others doing ambitious stuff, getting constructive criticism on your projects, occasionally hearing about sudden low-hanging fruits like conferences, all of these have network effects that will only scale as the number of Pioneers grow. And of course, the success of Pioneer will also help us people from low-income countries to have a shot at improving our quality of life significantly and permanently, allowing us to pursue more ambitious projects in service of humanity,” Urzo concludes.

The post The extraordinary tale of a Filipino geek who swam against the odds in life appeared first on e27.

Spearheaded by Alipay-NUS Enterprise, the challenge grants S$140,000 reward for top innovation tech startups delivering social impact in Southeast Asia

A rising number of emerging startups are placing social impact at the heart of their entrepreneurial pursuits, finding ways not only to balance financial sustainability between tech investments and providing, say, tangible humanitarian aid—but actually utilising tech in order to amplify the impact and reach of that aid.

In more traditional enterprises like agriculture, returns can be amplified through establishing efficient and easy access between goods and consumers through farm-to-market roads. The same line of logic applies to other pre-existing industries.

Tech can be used not only to enrich products and services in creating impact, but also to streamline systems and deliver results faster to the right people.

Trends among social impact startups in Southeast Asia

Tech startups premised largely on social impact are cropping up in different places all over Southeast Asia.

A recent example is Singapore-headquartered startup, Positive Energy, which is a blockchain-based renewable energy finance platform, seeking to revolutionise the energy-funding process by streamlining the deployment of renewable energy assets around the world.

With Positive Energy’s initiative, green investments are made faster, more liquid, and more economically viable for all relevant stakeholders.

Another one is Warung Pintar, an Indonesia based social venture that provides micro and small businesses easy access to digital tools powered by IoT and data analytics.

Warung Pintar is built around the vision of eradicating massive income gaps through providing equal entrepreneurship opportunities to those who belong in the fringes of society. In the span of less than a year, Warung Pintar has digitised 1,000 kiosks across the greater parts of Jakarta.

Also read: Disobedience as a necessity for success, especially for social innovation

These are mere examples of how tech startups across Southeast Asia with social impact at the center of their businesses have been performing in recent history, overcoming obstacles like sustainability issues that often surround social impact startups.

More than providing grants and other forms of financial support, what budding social impact startups can gain in order to really drive their mission across is a spectrum of help ranging from mentorship, financial aid, key insights on business sustainability, and other similarly important components.

Initiatives that nourish tech startups to create social impact

All support when combined, will not only allow startups to execute their ideas, but also to rigorously polish and streamline those ideas.

This is what ultimately led to the creation of the Alipay-NUS Enterprise Social Innovation Challenge, a partnership between Alipay, the world’s largest mobile and online payment platform operated by Ant Financial Services Group (Ant Financial), and NUS Enterprise, the entrepreneurial arm of the National University of Singapore (NUS).

With examples such as expansive educational opportunities for low-income children, housing development in underprivileged communities, and even care programmes for the elderly and the disabled, the Alipay-NUS Enterprise Social Innovation Challenge aims to identify and support startups in Southeast Asia—particularly Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia—that use digital technology to foster a more inclusive society.

“We understand that we can’t do it all by ourselves,” said Geoff Jiang, Ant Financial VP and General Manager of Technology and Business Innovation Group, “because the impact of one company may be limited, but when we build an ecosystem of partners with a shared vision, we will be able to achieve much more.”

Also read: Can social impact be growth hacked?

As part of the Challenge, Ant Financial and Alipay have been facilitating the sharing of ideas and experience on leveraging digital technology for social impact, organising roadshows in various cities in the region.

During the Indonesian roadshow, Keith Zhai, Ant Financial’s Head of Corporate Development for Southeast & South Asia, shared the story of Ant Forest, one of the company’s CSR platforms. By May 2018, Ant Forest had encouraged more than 350 million users to lead a low-carbon lifestyle, planting over 55 million trees in China’s arid regions and reducing more than 2.8 million tons of carbon emission.

In the Malaysian roadshow, Alipay’s Senior Algorithm Engineer Xin Guo explained to social entrepreneurs how he and his team developed the idea of using AI to help insurance companies reduce their costs of claims handling by over RMB 1 billion.

This initiative saved claim adjusters 750,000 hours of time through the automation of the claims process, and most importantly, reduce car owners’ average waiting time of claims handling from 30 minutes to just a few seconds.

 

Singapore and Indonesia as breeding grounds for social impact startups

Now exactly what makes these countries the best places to start? We have seen a number of Southeast Asian startups from Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia show promising ideas that fit precisely what the Alipay-NUS Enterprise Social Innovation Challenge is looking for.

Singapore is currently home to Hapticus, which has created a virtual transportation hub for sectors with special needs (similar to an “Uber” service especially for those with disabilities). Hapticus is already operating domestically and is in the process of expanding regionally.

In Malaysia, a social enterprise called Soara Industries uses technology to drive social change by providing access to safe drinking water through the use of a compact water purification design, and basic solar lighting in rural and marginalised communities.

Also read: Startups should focus on creating social impact, plus insights on fundraising, unicorns, and traffic from Scoutedby CEO

Meanwhile in Indonesia, Endapo is a travel platform that fosters environmental consciousness through their “green urban lifestyle” system, operating as a form of green technology with their paperless processes. They also provide reusable bags as a means to endorse the green lifestyle.

These are only some of the existing social impact startups that use cutting-edge technology not only to foster societal inclusivity that ultimately impacts the world, but have proven that sustainability is the best path to take for social entrepreneurship.

 

Opportunities for tech startups that focus on social impact

“NUS Enterprise helps innovators scale their efforts and maximise social impact, through our strong support ecosystem and extensive entrepreneurial networks, which include mentors, impact investors, corporate CSR teams, capacity builders, and community partners,” said Professor Wong Poh Kam, NUS Enterprise’s Senior Director of the NUS Entrepreneurship Centre.

With a chance to win S$140,000 in cash prize, the Alipay-NUS Enterprise Social Innovation Challenge also offers important business insights, plus the unique opportunity of obtaining training, mentorship, and support for growth anchored on financial sustainability while achieving massive social impact.

This means more than just the cash reward, social impact startups will stand to gain commitments from both NUS and Ant Financial to fully realise their visions.

Together, NUS and Ant Financial challenges you to partner with them in creating lasting and sustainable social impact for Southeast Asia and the world.

Have an innovative idea that harnesses digital technology for social impact? Sign up for a chance to receive funding and support to bring your idea to the next level.

 

–

Disclosure: This article is produced by the e27 content marketing team, sponsored by Alipay-NUS Enterprise

The post The Social Innovation Challenge: Digital technology that truly makes a difference appeared first on e27.

It’s clear that the cross-border e-commerce industry in China is becoming more and more complex

The article Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 was written by Don Zhao for TechNode.

TechNode Editor’s note: A version of this article originally appeared on Azoya Consulting’s website.

It has been a great year for the cross-border e-commerce industry in China. It’s clear that the cross-border e-commerce industry in China is becoming more and more complex. Brands and retailers will have to choose an appropriate market entry model, and be more targeted in their marketing efforts. This means narrowing down what kinds of customers they want to reach, as well as what kind of brand image they want to convey to them.

However, the government’s support for the cross-border e-commerce industry remains strong and policies are likely to be further relaxed. All in all, we remain positive on the outlook for the industry and think that 2019 will be a year in which many new opportunities will arise. Brands and retailers who remain flexible and open-minded will be best positioned to succeed.

That being said, the competition is heating up and brands and retailers are finding it increasingly difficult to differentiate themselves in a crowded market.

Here is Azoya Consulting’s Top 10 predictions for the industry in 2019:

1. Chinese government will continue to lower tariffs and restrictions on cross-border e-commerce 
What’s going on: China is expanding the scope for cross-border e-commerce because cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) can be better tracked and taxed, when compared to gray-market daigou purchases. It also makes it easier to protect consumers from fake/shoddy goods. The recent limits on CBEC purchases have been expanded to RMB5,000 (around US$75) per transaction and RMB 26,000 (US$3,800) per year, up from RMB2,000 (US$291) and RMB20,000 (US$2,900), respectively. In November, taxes on inbound postal shipments for the top two tax brackets were reduced to 25 per cent and 50 per cent from 30 per cent and 60 per cent, respectively.

Implications: Expect the government to relax more restrictions on the industry and expand its scope.

2. The ‘consumption upgrade’ trend in China will continue to power cross-border e-commerce growth
What’s going on: Despite concerns over the slowing economy, young professionals in Tier 1-2 cities will continue to spend on higher-quality imported products, specifically those that can enhance one’s health and aesthetics. AliResearch showed that average spending on Tmall Global was more than RMB550 (US$80) for Tier 1 cities, up from RMB400 (US$58) in 2014. Cosmetics and skin care take up almost 40 per cent of total sales on Tmall Global, up from less than 25 per cent in 2014, according to figures from consultancy Deloitte. Similarly, Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) also expects the health food market in China to grow to RMB300 billion (US$43 billion) by 2021 from RMB237.6 billion (US$34 billion) in 2017.

Implications: Demand for cross-border e-commerce imports will remain strong. Brands marketing healthy, natural products will continue to be in demand.

Also Read: Alibaba to facilitate cross-border e-commerce trade between Malaysia and China

3. Niche-focused categories will continue to emerge as Chinese consumers become more sophisticated 
What’s going on: In the past, Chinese consumers have flocked to the same well-known brands that everyone else buys. Now, as consumers become more sophisticated they are beginning to consider long-tail products that do a better job of catering to a specific need or function. Examples include Chinese women adding more steps and products to their makeup routines, and more niche sub-categories such as probiotics emerging within the health & nutrition category.

Implications: It might be more beneficial for foreign brands to start focusing on smaller niches where there may be less competition.

4. New and creative marketing tactics will continue to emerge
What’s going on: To differentiate oneself in a competitive market, brands have to come up with unique ways to connect with customers and build their loyalty. Brands are mixing e-commerce with games, live streaming, short videos, and more to stand out from the crowd. Some recent examples include L’Oreal livestreaming Chinese influencers at the Cannes Film Festival on its WeChat mini-program, and Dior designing a Tetris game to promote its lipstick products.

Implications: Brands should think more carefully about how to make themselves stand out from competitors.

5. Daigou will split into two groups and some will exit the market completely
What’s going on: China’s new e-commerce law is forcing individual sellers on WeChat and Taobao to obtain business licenses and file tax returns. This includes daigou agents using personal accounts to sell online. Other smaller daigou may forego selling and become micro-influencers, helping larger daigou organisations market products on WeChat, getting a commission in the process. Many daigou may exit the market completely.

Implications: All in all, expect the quality of daigou agents to improve, the supply of goods to shrink, and more consumers to purchase from official cross-border e-commerce channels.

Also Read: Indonesian cross-border e-commerce portal WeShop raises 7-digit funding from NextTech and Haspro

6. More retailers may leave large marketplaces like Tmall Global and consider other alternatives
What’s going on: Large e-commerce platforms such as Tmall Global, JD Worldwide, and Netease Kaola are procuring their own inventory directly from brands, and stocking them in bonded warehouses closer to China. This means that Tmall Global can provide lower prices, faster logistics, and stronger customer experience. Third-party retailers selling the same brands on these platforms will find it difficult to compete on price and logistics and may launch their own independent websites instead. Macy’s is one retailer that has left the China market after closing down its Tmall store and official China website.

Implications: Expect more retailers to leave Tmall Global, JD Worldwide, etc.,  and launch their own platforms.

7. Customers’ expectations for faster shipping times will become higher and higher
What’s going on: The large cross-border e-commerce platforms are purchasing more inventory directly and stocking them in bonded warehouses in China and Hong Kong. JD.com has pledged to purchase RMB 100 billion (US$14.5 billion) in imported goods, and Kaola announced its plans to spend three billion Euros on European goods last year. Because they are stocking more inventory in warehouses closer to China, shipping times are being reduced drastically, raising customer expectations.

Implications: There will be more pressure on other brands and retailers to ship packages quickly. Those with clear, predictable demand should stock more inventory in Hong Kong or Chinese free trade zones to keep up.

8. Smaller e-commerce platforms will continue to fall into Alibaba’s and JD’s orbit
What’s going on: E-commerce is becoming more competitive as Alibaba and JD can provide lower prices, wider product selections, and faster shipping when compared to smaller competitors.
Smaller players are partnering with Alibaba and JD because they have stronger operational capabilities (logistics). Alibaba and JD are partnering with smaller platforms because they are niche-focused and do a better job at marketing to certain audiences. Examples include Little Red Book (Xiaohongshu) contributing product reviews to Taobao and Farfetch partnering with JD.com.

Implications: Expect Alibaba and JD.com to make more investments in the e-commerce space as growth slows and they look for additional channels to drive traffic.

Also Read: Cross-border e-commerce: Delivering beauty from Korea

9. Marketplace platforms such as Tmall Global, JD Worldwide, and Netease Kaola will set up more offline cross-border e-commerce stores
What’s going on: Offline retail is good for driving brand awareness amongst potential customers who may not normally purchase cross-border e-commerce products. JD’s latest experience center in Chongqing is one offline cross-border e-commerce store that’s opened in recent months. Customers can browse and test out products at the store, and the products are shipped from bonded warehouses within the same day.

Implications: Expect more of these stores to open up as the big players seek to expand their reach. However, these stores are likely to be limited to well-known brands, as opposed to emerging ones.

10. Cross-border WeChat shops built on mini-programmes will grow in popularity
What’s going on: For small brands, WeChat stores are a cost-effective way to build a China e-commerce presence without paying large upfront fees for marketplace platforms or setting up an official Chinese website. For big brands, they can be used for different functions such as launching limited collections, livestreaming makeup tutorials, or designing creative games.

Implications: Smaller brands based overseas will enter the China e-commerce market through WeChat mini-programmes, though traffic will still be hard to drive. Expect bigger brands to design more creative marketing campaigns and mini-programs to differentiate themselves from the pack.

—

The article Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 first appeared on TechNode.

Image Credit: h heyerlein on Unsplash

The post Top 10 predictions for China cross-border e-commerce in 2019 appeared first on e27.

The funds will be used to accelerate the development of its model EST-X, a fully-electric and intelligent motorcycle

Singapore-based EuroSports Technologies (EST), a developer of next generation electric motorcycles, announced today it has received S$2 million (US$1.5 million) in seed capital from its parent company EuroSports Global (ESG), with a commitment of another S$3 million subject to certain milestones.

The funds will be used to accelerate the development of its model EST-X, a fully-electric and intelligent motorcycle. It is initially slated to launch in Southeast Asia, which represents a massive initial target market for the startup, with 200 million motorcycles and regional sales of 15 million units per year right on our doorstep.

After its successful launch in this region, the company will follow up with an international debut

“By launching this new electric motorcycle, EST aims not only to deliver a dramatically better mobility experience for end users but also help alleviate the world’s air pollution problem,” said Joel Chang, COO of EST, which has just come out of stealth mode.

Also Read: ClickClinic lets you check crowd and queue at clinics online, receive text notifications

According to the World Health Organisation, air pollution is the number one cause of premature deaths in low-and middle-income Asian countries, accounting for 88 per cent of these fatalities. Globally, air pollution is estimated to kill a shocking seven million people per year. Vehicle emissions are a major cause of this, including those from scooters and motorcycles which remain mostly gasoline powered and highly polluting.

“Air pollution is clearly a health crisis globally. By encouraging societies to switch to electric motorcycles, we can help alleviate the problem. Electric motorcycles are cleaner, easier to maintain given fewer moving components, and cheaper to use over their lifetime compared to gasoline motorcycles,” added Chang.

ESG is Singapore’s distributor of ultra-luxury automobiles and is the exclusive distributor for Lamborghini.

The post Singapore’s e-scooter startup EuroSports secures US$1.5M from its parent ESG appeared first on e27.

The verdict marks the end of an 18-month-long trial, in which Vinasun accused Grab of unfair business practices

Vietnamese taxi firm Vinasun’s Christmas present may have come a little late, but it has been vindicated nonetheless, as today, it has emerged victor in a lawsuit against ride-hailing giant Grab.

The People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City found Grab guility of operating as a taxi company and has therefore violated regulations in the country; Grab currently operates in Vietnam as a technology provider.

Grab has been ordered to pay a VND 4.8 billion (US$208,000) fine to Vinasun to compensate for the losses that the latter has suffered as a result of what it described as “unfair business practices” by Grab.

This sum, though, is a lot less than Vinasun’s original demands, which was VND 42.2 billion (US$1.8 million).

The verdict marks the end of an 18-month-long trial — dragged on by a series of hearing postponements and suspensions — between the Southeast Asian behemoth and one of Vietnam’s key taxi companies.

Vinasun had accused Grab of being disingenuous about the true nature of its operations in Vietnam; it claimed that Grab used its hefty war chest to poach large numbers of drivers and attract riders to its platform. Because of this, it said Grab upended the taxi market and dealt a significant blow to the Vinasun’s bottom line.

Grab said it intends the appeal the court’s ruling, and added that it is preparing to launch a defamation lawsuit against Vinasun and other companies who had colluded with the taxi firm if they do not retract the allegations.

“Today is an extremely unfortunate day for technology and foreign investment in Vietnam where clearly, innovation is no longer seen as a virtue,” said Jerry Lim, Country Head of Grab Vietnam, in an official statement.

“It contradicts the Vietnamese government’s pursuit of its Industry 4.0 and digital economy ambitions. Vinasun’s anti-competitive tactics have succeeded only in stifling innovation,” he added.

“E-hailing has come so far to become an indispensable part of people’s lives and the industry shouldn’t be forced to take a giant step backwards to now conduct itself and provide its services similar to that of traditional taxis,” said Lim.

The basis of Vinasun’s lawsuit

In an official statement published last month, Vinasun laid out its grievances with the ride-hailing giant and asserted why the company should claim damages.

Vinasun claimed that Grab’s status in the country as a provider of connection management services for “contract-based transportation” (in other words, a private ride-hailing platform) is a mere guise; in reality, the company is operating as a “complete taxi business”, it said.

Because of this, Vinasun claimed that Grab had breached its original agreement with the Vietnamese government, which had placed Grab under a private ride-hailing service innovation pilot project called Decision 24.

By running a full-fledged taxi business, Vinasun said, Grab has to be subjected to regulations under the taxi operating license, which go beyond the company’s current obligations as solely a software provider for private transportation. Because of this, Vinasun believes that Grab is exploiting loopholes in the legal system to avoid coming under taxi laws.

“Vinasun fully agreed with the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Procuratorate at the hearing on October 24, 2018, confirming the convincing evidence that clearly demonstrates that Grab operates as a complete taxi business with tariff, charge, promotion, discount, reward and fine … with clear evidence,” read Vinasun’s statement.

“Grab, as a taxi business, managed to escape 13 taxi business conditions, thereby hiring a huge number of drivers, has resulted in Grab violating Decision 24 … in addition, there are other issues such as customer data management, customer confidential information, penalties, insurance for drivers, etc,” it said.

Vinsaun added that Grab employed a “loss-making strategy”, offering monetary rewards to entice drivers to come onboard its platform. This would effectively enable Grab to get rid of any competition and dominate the market.

It also said that Grab failed to inform authorities of its promotional deals and discounts, and overextended the length of these promotions — a violation of the country’s trade law — with approval.

For Grab’s alleged violations, Vinasun is demanding the company compensate for losses as a result of reduced income to the sum of VND 42.2 billion (US$1.8 million). The company appointed Cuu Long, an Inspection Valuation company, to act as an independent assessor for the damages incurred.

“The lawsuit will not only bring about fair competition for businesses as well as promote and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the Vietnamese business community,” Vinasun declared, “but also contribute to the completion of related policies and laws related to the enterprise and the business environment so as to ensure the long-term sustainable development of the country and the real benefits for consumers.”

Grab’s position

Grab has maintained that its operations and business activities do not fit the legal definition of a transport business; that it merely provides a software to help transport companies conduct business.

The company said that the Ministry of Transport has even reaffirmed its status as a software provider.

In a legal argument document prepared by Grab’s lawyers, it said “the Department of Transport of Khanh Hoa stated that ‘GrabTaxi Limited is a software provider, not a transport business, however, the functions and goals of the transport business are still performed by GrabTaxi.’”

It added that the ministry said that would be “no change in the draft [of the Pilot Project]” denoting Grab as a software provider, and that any transportation-related activities it conducts are ‘only meant to support the transportation units on the basis of business cooperation contracts.’”

This portion of Grab’s argument is pretty telling:

“In fact, Defendant (Grab) could not assign a driver to a particular trip in the way that taxi companies dispatch their cars.  Defendant’s app works in the following manner: when a car is requested, the app will alert the drivers who are closest to the passenger.

At that moment, the driver has full autonomy to consider accepting the trip with the suggested fare calculated by the app and the first driver to accept the passenger’s request will provide the ride. Therefore, Defendant does not interfere in any way with this process and does not in any way manage or dispatch cars; rather. Defendant only facilitates rides between drivers and passengers through the use of technology.”

Grab also disputed that Vinasun’s claim that its loss of income was due to uncompetitive business tactics employed by Grab; rather, it said that Vinasun had every opportunity to innovate new solutions — based on Scheme 24 — and compete on the same level.

“All the reasons cited leading to so-called ‘damages’, and the so-called ‘effects’ on the business of Vinasun flow from technological progress and reform spearheaded by the Government, in turn led by the Prime Minister through the authorization of the Pilot Project rather than any violations, such as cars without ‘taxi signs’ on top,” said Grab, in an official statement.

In a press statement, Jerry Lim, Grab’s Country Head of Vietnam, said that “Vinasun has been and continues to be given an equal opportunity under Decision 24 to compete on fair grounds with 8 other players who have been granted an e-hailing pilot licence by the government to operate e-hailing services in 5 cities and provinces.”

Lim said that Vinasun itself has already developed an app as part of the pilot programme for its taxi and car-hailing service.

Grab also expressed doubts on Cuu Long’s credibility and ability to accurately measure the damages. It also remarked that even Vinasun’s management had acknowledged that the company’s reduced income could have been attributed to a slew of factors unrelated to Grab.

“At the General Meeting of Shareholders of 2017, the management of Plaintiff [Vinasun] acknowledged that ‘The company faced a lot of challenges, such as gasoline price changed 22 times, falling demand, increasing costs such as insurance cost and increase salary of nearly 13 per cent,” it said.

Other macro trends affecting the company’s stock prices and market capitalisation such as economic policy, politics or micro factors like market trends and investor behaviours should also be taken into account, Grab argued. It described Cuu Long’s claim that Grab’s entry into the Vietnamese market was the sole cause of Vinasun’s reduced market cap as “baseless”.

“[This] is is completely baseless and simply non-scientific from an economic
perspective; this is a reflection of Cuu Long’s fundamental lack of expertise regarding the stock market, particularly market capitalization …It is unacceptable to pick the difference between market value and book value at a particular point in time to calculate damages” said Grab.

Grab’s woes are not over. The Vietnamese regulator has recently ruled that the company breached anti-competitive laws when it acquired Uber’s assets in the region.

—

 

 

 

The post Grab ordered to pay US$208K to Vietnamese taxi firm Vinasun in lawsuit appeared first on e27.

Every failure has a lesson to teach

Sometimes all you need to become a success is to fail first. There are numerous examples around us. LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman first started a social networking platform called SocialNet that failed. However, he attributes the success of LinkedIn, which raked in $1 billion in revenue in 2017, to his failure with his earlier startup.

If you are thinking about creating your own startup, you first need to look around. The failure rate for startups is too high. That should not discourage you but give you more opportunities to learn before stepping on the ground. You will probably still make mistakes but studying other people’s experiences will save you from repeating their mistakes.

Here are nine notable startup and product failures you should know about:

1. Beepi

Beepi.com looked like a promising venture on paper. The used car selling and buying marketplace was released at a time when such online marketplaces had a lot of potentials. They even managed to get $60 million Series B funding round.

It finally shut down in 2017 after being in business for over four years. The used car dealer DGDG tried to buy the startup but pulled out eventually.

What went wrong?

Beepi was a classic example of bad leadership and management. Some would say they went too big too soon. The founders were able to quickly raise a lot of money but did not spend it carefully. Apparently, the company was burning through $7 million monthly at one point just paying salaries which included very high salaries for top executives.

What lesson should you learn?

Money runs out eventually if you do not spend it carefully. Time and again, startups have failed because of running out money. For many it is simply bad luck, however, in the case of Beepi, it was bad management.

2. Google Glass

Google is one of the biggest companies in the world but it has its fair share of failures as well. Google Glass was a futuristic smart device by Google that brought a new twist to wearable technology. Even after much hype, it failed immediately.

What went wrong?

Perhaps it was a bit ahead of the time or it raised privacy concerns. Most importantly, it was super expensive for the masses. It just failed to connect with the consumers who did not see a much value in it.

What lesson should you learn?

Innovation is great as long as it benefits the consumers. Also, you have to do anything and everything including cutting costs to bring the price down if you want to sell your product. You need to set up a smart marketing strategy where you can offer discounts in a way that it benefits you as well as your customers.

Also read: 5 lessons I learned from a startup failure

3. Jawbone

When talking about failed startups, nothing could be of a bigger scale than the consumer electronics company Jawbone. It produced products like headsets, Bluetooth speakers, and fitness trackers. It raised over $930 million as a venture-backed startup. VC companies like Sequoia, Khosla Ventures, and Andreessen Horowitz invested millions in the company but it failed in 2017 and announced liquidation of its assets.

What went wrong?

Experts say that overfunding killed this startup. They artificially increased its valuation and the company was almost force-fed with funding. Their wearable technology failed to compete with the industry leaders Fitbit and Samsung. The company became only the second biggest VC backed startup failure according to CB Insights.

What lesson should you learn?

Too much money is not good either, especially if the future of the product is uncertain.

4. Yik Yak

When Yik Yak, an anonymous chatting app, was first released it became an immediate success. This was back in 2013 when the smartphone boom was happening and innovative apps were coming out. It became very popular among college students. However, it starting losing following after Snapchat came out.

There were many controversies as well involving cyberbullying and harassment. It peaked at $400 million. Then in 2017, it closed its doors when no one even knew about it anymore.

What went wrong?

Yik Yak picked up on a trend and could not live up to changing expectations and dynamics. Somehow, it lost its appeal and sound among myriads of other chatting and dating apps (Tinder, Grindr, and Snapchat).

What lesson should you learn?

Your startup idea needs to be pivoted towards a long-term solution and not just current trends. Also, adapting and changing is survival in the cut-throat world of digital startups.

5. Canadadrugs.com

CanadaDrugs.com started as a viable solution to providing simple mail order medications to millions of patients across the country. Before it could even test the time for success, they were shut down by authorities and left with a long legal battle.

What went wrong?

This company made a grave mistake of misleading the customers about FDA approvals. It was selling drugs saying they were being manufactured in FDA approved facilities. However, the truth was that they did not know where it was being made. The US federal prosecutors accused the people behind the company of illegally importing and selling misbranded and unapproved drugs.

What lesson should you learn?

Never ever cheat your customers and risk their lives. Not only is it unethical but can send you to prison.

Also read: Unfazed by 3 failures, this 20-year-old is building a new startup, with some big names backing it

6. Doppler Labs

Doppler Labs flagship product was the Here One, wireless earphone and microphone. It stayed in business for four years and raised a whopping $51.1 million. When the product came out, Doppler Labs anticipated sales of 100,000 Here One but only a dismal quarter of that actually sold.

What went wrong?

Doppler Lab ended because of faults in their product and their delayed release. First of all, few manufacturing problems delayed release which made them miss out on crucial holiday season sales. Secondly, when customers used the product, they found out that it only lasted about two hours on full charge.

What lesson should you learn?

Do not create a product you cannot sell. Also, there is too much competition and high-standards to face when it comes to producing hardware.

7. Wonga

The UK-based company Wonga has a somewhat typical story of the rise and fall of a company. It was a unique idea backed by private equity investors. It was a payday lender giving short-term credit at high interest. It was going well until it was not. Turns out people were struggling to pay back the money. The situation got so bad that it got a £10 million injection.

What went wrong?

The company started making good money but it soon became clear at what cost. When stories emerged about people struggling to pay back the credit, authorities started regulating the company. They also admitted that they were lending money to borrowers who could not pay back. Then there were too many complaints whose compensation was costing Wonga on average £550.

What lesson should you learn?

Profitability is important but do not get greedy.

8. Juicero

Juicero’s failure can only be described in one word: epic. The company started crowdfunding in 2013 but the product did not come out until 2016. And when it did it was an immediate bust thanks in part to a lot of negative press. The founder promised a high-end luxury juice machine that was much more than a juicer. The company raised a whopping $118.5 million.

Also read: Why failing your startup does not mean you are a failure

What went wrong?

When the machine was actually released, it used proprietary juice packs to squeeze the juice. The machine basically just squeezed juice out of the packets. Obviously, $699 was too much for such a thing.

What lesson should you learn?

Entrepreneurship is about solving problems not reinventing the wheel or in the case of Juicero, breaking the wheel.

9. MyBizHomePage

Founded by a serial entrepreneur, Peter Justen, the site worked with QuickBooks software to help companies keep a track of their finances. It was started in 2006 and became a quick success. At one point, the company was valued at $100 million. However, the company drowned when its site’s security was compromised.

What went wrong?

Founder Peter Justen did not want to sell the business and had issues with the company’s Chief Technology Officer. After the CTO was fired, the website suffered multiple attacks and crashed. The backup data was compromised and the site had to be shutdown.

What lesson should you learn?

Web security is extremely important. And so is working with people you can trust.

The Bottom Line

The bottom line is that every failure has a lesson to teach. And it is better to learn from other people’s mistakes than your own. Startups face an incredible amount of challenges and there is no magic formula for success. However, you can improve your chances by avoiding the obvious pitfalls.

It is quite clear from the examples above that even if you find investors and get all the funding you need, you might still fail. It is an ever changing world and you need to stay at the top of your game no matter what.

—-

e27 publishes relevant guest contributions from the community. Share your honest opinions and expert knowledge by submitting your content here.

Photo by Austin Neill on Unsplash

The post These 9 famous startup failures have a lesson for you appeared first on e27.

The complicated relationships and partnerships among all the key players involved means the AI battle is more about alliances between platforms

There has been much discussion and dispute around who will be the winner in the battle for global dominance of artificial intelligence – the US or China. I discussed it in some depth recently.

However, viewing the AI war as being between just nations – most commonly the US and China – is drastically oversimplifying things. In reality, the complicated relationships and partnerships among all the key players involved means the AI battle is more about alliances between platforms than nations.

These days, most products and services are a combination of arts and breakthroughs from all around world. “Designed by Apple in California. Assembled in China,” sums up the globalised reality.

What’s more, the very entrepreneurs building AI technology often have complicated identities themselves. The majority don’t work with a nationalist vision of their companies. But they often do identify with brands and platforms.

Look at the established tech giants who are also leaders in AI: Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Alibaba, Tencent, Samsung, and IBM. Most of these companies are building alliances with each other in one way or another – usually through APIs which allow competitors and collaborators connect with their services – so long as they also stand to benefit from it themselves.

According to Kai-Fu Lee, author of AI Superpowers, the big AI giants (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu) are mostly focusing on creating “AI grids”. They then “act as the utility companies, managing the grid and collecting the fees,” he said.

It’s the platform, stupid

Last year, I read Platform Revolution by Geoffrey G. Parker, Marshall W. Van Alstyne, and Sangeet Paul Choudary, a profound book that changed the way I thought about the tech race. I have since applied that thinking to AI.

As the authors noted, “In recent years, more and more businesses are shifting from the pipeline structure to the platform structure.” Examples include cloud computing and computer services platform Salesforce, which generates 50 per cent of its revenues through APIs, and Expedia, for which the figure is as high as 90 per cent.

Indeed, every tech giant is racing towards a specific goal in the area of AI. It is now about becoming the platform for AI, the new lifeblood technology that is being layered across almost every product and service rather than being offered as a separate module or capability.

The Watson AI assistant, a platform being built by IBM, is being used by companies like The Royal Bank of Scotland, among others, to better engage their customers.

Also read: How artificial intelligence is disrupting education

The reality, of course, is that we cannot easily predict who will win the AI race in the long term. The situation is further complicated by the growing number of impressive AI startups, some of which sprout from nowhere to become frontrunners in their respective industries in just a few years.

According to Lee, startups now have have opportunity to build “highly specific ‘battery-powered’ AI products for each use case,” instead of waiting for the overall AI platforms, or “grids” to take shae.

Don’t miss the AI moon

The point that I want to drive home, though, is that while countries like the US and China – and even the UK, for that matter – hold incredible potential for research and development in tomorrow’s AI technologies, we still ought to think in terms of platforms, not nations, if we really want to understand where the real war for AI dominance is being wrought.

Otherwise, we risk committing a technological faux pas equivalent of that great Zen saying, so well captured by Bruce Lee in Enter the Dragon: “It is like a finger pointing out to the Moon, don’t concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.”

While countries, in this analogy, are the fingers pointing, platforms are unmistakably the moon. Just make sure you are not paying attention to the wrong thing!

—-

e27 publishes relevant guest contributions from the community. Share your honest opinions and expert knowledge by submitting your content here.

Photo by Greg Rakozy on Unsplash

The post The AI war is between platforms, not nations appeared first on e27.

How Nuren Group, Fave, and DahMakan are shaking up the Malaysian digital marketplace ecosystem

As with all traditional forms of trade, when it comes to eCommerce it is important to gauge consumer behaviour. This ranges from what consumers want to what consumers need, and bridging those interest points with capturing a market that’s actually willing to make a purchase.

This is the beauty of eCommerce: it revitalises conventional markets by introducing new and innovative ways to deliver products and services anchored on wants and needs. More importantly, eCommerce puts these products and services in a digital platform, making it accessible and convenient to use.

In the attempt to harness the power of digital as a means of powering Malaysia’s growing economy, three startups are coming up with ways to innovate the marketplace through smart solutions and to revolutionise customer experience.

Digital platforms enable businesses to cut costs and offer goods affordably

One problem that’s being solved by a startup is the need for healthy meals amid a fast-paced and busy lifestyle. Because of society’s growing demands, people have less and less time to prepare food for their daily meals. DahMakan, a startup from Malaysia, seeks to solve this problem by providing hassle-free, high quality everyday meals to make people’s lives easier.

They achieve this by delivering affordable and ready-to-eat meals at the push of a button through their purely digital platform, cutting out traditional F&B business costs. This allows them to regulate their prices and make sure their products stay affordable.

“Starting in Malaysia was the best choice we made. There is so much support from the ecosystem and people are generally curious and super supportive of new ideas and concepts. Malaysia is truly outstanding compared to the many other countries I’ve visited,” said Jonathan Weins, CEO and co-founder of DahMakan.

Weins credits much of his success to the collaborative help he has received from various entities. He enthusiastically adds, “the ecosystem and government linked organisations such as Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC) are doing an outstanding job, and we are excited about the many upcoming initiatives!”

Also read: How Malaysia helps bolster the less glamourous side of tech

DahMakan has expanded to Thailand with their Thai office growing twice as fast as the one in Malaysia. Weins said, “The best way to deal with cultural differences and customer types has been to approach a new country with a completely open mind and without any assumptions.”

The food delivery startup was part of Y Combinator’s summer 2017 programme – the first-ever Malaysian company to participate in Y Combinator. It has since raised $1.3 million seed round in 2017, and a $2.6 million pre-series A in February this year.

He added, “we are about to close another funding round which will give us additional capital to continue attracting incredible talent, and to make high quality food accessible for everyone.”

Important for startups to have a strong sense of identity

Another thriving Malaysian startup is the Nuren Group, the largest female engagement platform in Southeast Asia.

Guiding women through their journeys of wedding and motherhood, Nuren Group operates content-driven marketplaces, which enable thousands of small, medium, and large global brands to sell their products and services. On top of that, they also run digital content and activation campaigns with their community of female influencers and celebrities.

The idea behind the company was simple: three years ago, they started as a wedding platform. But as their customers aged and shifted to different interest points (from wedding to motherhood), they knew there was an untapped market waiting to be addressed.

Their platform allows the company to retain existing clientele through a simple paradigm shift. What had to be consistent was making sure that their products and services always empowered women and catered intrinsically to their best interests.

“There are many opportunities and challenges ahead for eCommerce. Domestic players are facing competition from marketplaces that heavily subsidised and offer cross border cheaper OEM products. Merchants and platforms like us will have to master the combination of showrooming and webrooming, events, product demos, in-store experiences – focusing on after sale customer service,” said Petrina Goh, CEO and co-founder of the Nuren Group.

“We also foresee ecommerce companies that use data to predict consumer spending and trend setting to perform above the peers,” she added.

Nuren Group currently maintains a solid community of over 1,000,000 moms, 5,000 wedding businesses and 1,000 baby’s and children’s brands. With their regional presence in Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand, they are assessing borderless transactions that enable their sellers to sell and fulfill across the countries.

Supporting the “old” by harnessing the new

The third startup we spoke to doesn’t appear to fit the eCommerce model that we know, but they are also certainly revolutionising the market in their own unique way.

Fave is a startup that focuses on helping offline businesses to succeed, by bringing them to new customers (Fave Deals), retain their existing customers (FavePay, Fave stamp cards), and reengage customers who haven’t come back to their stores, as well as leverage on their customers’ behaviour, trend and demographics. In addition, Fave provides comprehensive merchant solutions (FaveBiz) to enhance their understanding their businesses, and drive further growth.

Essentially, Fave digitally optimises brick and mortar retail stores that do not have the understanding and the capacity to digitalise their business practices. Doing this helps offline businesses to take advantage of data and tech in gathering new customers and retain old ones.

“It’s been great experience so far. We have built up a team of 200 people in Malaysia where all our products, technology, innovation, data, and so forth are performed from Malaysia for the region,” said Chen Chow Yeoh, co-founder of Fave, which has expanded its brand to Singapore, Indonesia, and built some presence in the Philippines, and Hong Kong.

“MDEC has been instrumental in helping us through this journey, especially in facilitating the process to enable us to bring in quality knowledge workers to join the team here, and make Malaysia our hub,” he added.

As of today, Fave is doing over 100 million USD worth of sales per year within its first two years of starting up. They are currently gunning to find breakthroughs that will score them their first billion-dollar sale.

Next steps for Malaysia’s eCommerce

All three startups agree that some work still needs to be done. Goh said Malaysia could provide more support through projects, endorsements, and recognition. “There should also be more collaborations or partnerships between conglomerates and startups to support innovation and growth,” she added.

This sentiment is echoed by Weins who believes that better terms should be made between investors and startups. He said the current investment frameworks tended to be unfair, which reflects poorly on how money is being funnelled into businesses – and the kind of businesses that are willing to accept those investments.

Also read: Navigating through Southeast Asia’s startup industry the Malaysian way

“Investment terms should be standardised, similar to other global ecosystems. I have heard from other entrepreneurs in Malaysia about very ‘erroneous’ terms from investors. We have to change this mindset here regarding this,” said Weins.

Yeoh on the other hand thinks there should be more industry-relevant academic training for tech-based professionals at a university level. He believes this would help the pool of talent in Malaysia become more ‘startup aware.’

Ultimately, all three startups are happy with many things that they have experienced in the Malaysian framework. Much of their success derives from support received from other startups in the ecosystem, as well as government-sponsored initiatives under MDEC’s helm.

This paints to a hopeful future for Malaysia’s startup ecosystem, and consequently enhances the positive view of the nation’s vibrant digital economy bolstered by its eCommerce sector.

The post eCommerce: Revitalising conventional forms of trade in Malaysia appeared first on e27.

The startup will deploy the funds to expand to newer markets and geographies besides increasing its logistics network and supply chain across India

India-based B2B commerce company Moglix has secured US$23 million in Series C round of funding, led by existing investors Accel Partners, Jungle Ventures and International Finance Corporation (IFC), a member of the World Bank Group.

Venture Highway, Shailesh Rao (former VP at Twitter and Google), and InnoVen Capital also participated in the round.

The company plans to deploy the raised fund to expand to newer markets and geographies besides increasing its logistics network and supply chain across India. It also continues to beef up its integrated digital supply chain technology solutions with data science and machine-learning capabilities.

“The funds will play a critical role in fuelling our expansion efforts by optimising efficiencies in our focus areas such as technology innovation, analytics and building a wide logistics infrastructure network. We foresee that there is immense strength and scope of innovation in the B2B commerce space and the sectors we operate in. We are now focussed on our next phase of growth across diverse markets and going forward, we will continue to bring in new talent and strengthen our talent base,” said Rahul Garg, Founder and CEO of Moglix.

Also Read: The extraordinary tale of a Filipino geek who swam against the odds in life

Founded in August 2015, Moglix is a platform for industrial products catering to suppliers and buyers across the globe. With a team comprising 450-plus people, Moglix currently operates across 10 centres in India and caters to both institutional customers (B2B) and individual customers (B2C). It works with over 400 large manufacturing clients and over 250,000 SMEs. The team has built a network of over 5,000 SME and big suppliers across 25 states in India and brought them on a digital supply chain platform.

Anurag Srivastava, Founding Managing Partner at Jungle Ventures, said: “With businesses becoming globally competitive and decisions taken with the speed of thought, automation is the new keyword for any industry. Moglix has been performing commendably for the manufacturing sector and we are delighted to be a part of their success story.”

Moglix has previously raised pre-Series A and Series A funding of approximately US$6 million from Accel Partners, Jungle Ventures, SeedPlus and Venture Highway.

The post Jungle Ventures, InnoVen join B2B e-commerce startup Moglix’s US$23M Series C appeared first on e27.