
Ask anyone to name Southeast Asia’s most successful startups and you will hear the same names. Grab. Sea. GoTo. Each is a consumer company. Each won by reaching enormous numbers of users, burning enormous amounts of capital, and surviving long enough to consolidate a market.
This is the story the region tells about itself. It is also the reason Southeast Asia is structurally underbuilt in the categories that, almost everywhere else in the world, produce the most durable companies.
The boring layer is where durable value compounds
Globally, the companies that compound value over decades are rarely the exciting consumer names. They are the unglamorous infrastructure businesses that sit underneath the economy: supply chain software, vertical applications for traditional industries, payments rails, logistics tooling, compliance systems. These companies are boring to talk about. They are also extraordinarily hard to displace once they are embedded, which is exactly why they compound.
Southeast Asia has underweighted this layer for a decade. The capital chased consumer scale because consumer scale produced headlines, and the founder pipeline followed the capital. The result is a region with world-class consumer platforms sitting on top of a thin and underbuilt layer of business infrastructure.
The data shows both the gap and the turn.
Southeast Asia’s B2B digital commerce market passed US$90 billion in 2024 and is heading toward US$130 billion by 2026. Average SaaS spending per employee in the region rose from US$3.79 in 2020 to US$13.47 in 2025, a 2.5-fold increase in five years. The share of software and services in emerging industry investment jumped from 28 per cent in the second half of 2023 to 50 per cent in the first half of 2024. On the physical side, McKinsey estimates a roughly US$60 billion gap between existing or announced supply chain infrastructure investment and what the region’s future trade flows will require.
These are not the numbers of a mature market. They are the numbers of a market that has barely started building its business infrastructure, growing quickly from a very low base.
Also Read: What Southeast Asia’s edutech startups can learn from AI’s limits in education
Why the underbuild persists
Three forces keep the boring layer underfunded.
The first is capital habit. A decade of consumer outcomes trained the region’s investors to look for winner-take-all scale stories. Business infrastructure does not look like that early on. It grows through slow, defensible adoption inside individual industries, not through viral user curves. To an investor pattern-matching on the last cycle, a vertical software company solving a specific operational problem for mid-sized manufacturers looks small. It is not small. It is early.
The second is founder training. Founders in the region have been taught, implicitly, that the prize is consumer scale. The most ambitious technical talent gravitates toward consumer problems because that is where the celebrated outcomes have been. The boring problems, the ones embedded deep in logistics, procurement, financial operations, and regulatory compliance, attract less talent than their economic importance warrants.
The third is visibility. A consumer app is legible to everyone. A supply chain traceability platform serving Vietnamese manufacturers under pressure to meet global compliance standards is invisible to most observers, even though it may be solving a more durable and defensible problem than most consumer apps ever will.
The categories that are most underbuilt
For founders and investors willing to look at the boring layer, several categories in Southeast Asia are conspicuously underbuilt relative to the size of the problem they address.
Supply chain and logistics tooling, where the region’s emergence as a manufacturing alternative to China is creating demand far faster than software is being built to serve it. SME financial software, where tens of millions of small and mid-sized businesses still run on spreadsheets and manual processes. Vertical SaaS for traditional industries, where deep workflow integration creates the network effects and switching costs that make companies durable. Compliance and regulatory technology, where fragmented rules across ten markets create a problem that is painful, recurring, and exactly the kind of thing businesses pay for indefinitely. B2B payments and financing infrastructure, where cross-border trade is growing but the rails underneath it remain thin.
None of these will produce the next viral consumer story. All of them can produce companies that are still compounding in twenty years.
Also Read: The capital drought: Over 7,500 SEA startups extinguished since 2020
What this means for capital allocation
The investors who recognise this early have an advantage that the consumer cycle no longer offers. Vertical software companies in the region are already attracting stronger conviction precisely because they show what consumer companies often could not: sustainable unit economics and high retention. Sector-focused funds are increasingly treating these as defensible plays that can dominate a niche before global incumbents arrive.
The thesis is straightforward. The next generation of durable Southeast Asian companies will disproportionately be built in the boring categories, because that is where the combination of real demand, defensibility, and underbuilt supply is strongest. Capital that continues to crowd into the exciting categories will compete for diminishing returns. Capital that moves into the boring categories will be early to the layer where durable value is actually created.
A region’s most valuable companies are not always its most visible ones. Southeast Asia spent a decade building the visible layer. The durable companies of the next decade are being built underneath it, in the categories most people find too boring to watch.
That is exactly why they are worth watching.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of e27.
Join us on WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.
The post Why Southeast Asia is underbuilt in the categories that produce its most durable companies appeared first on e27.
