Capital A’s (formerly AirAsia Group) latest numbers tell a company coming out of crisis, but not yet one firing evenly across all engines.
The Malaysia-based group, which has spent the past few years restructuring after the pandemic and disposing of its airline business, reported second-quarter revenue of about US$193 million, up 9 per cent year-on-year. For the first half of 2026, revenue stood at about US$376 million, a 4 per cent increase from a year earlier.
On the surface, that points to stability. Capital A also reported profit after tax of about US$6 million for the quarter and US$11.9 million for the first half, giving it another profitable quarter after the airline disposal.
Also Read: AirAsia unit Teleport buys stake in Indonesia’s ‘Uber for logistics’ Kargo Technologies
But the recovery is more uneven than the topline implies. Growth is being driven mainly by two units: Asia Digital Engineering (the aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul business) and Teleport (the logistics arm). Together, ADE and Teleport accounted for more than 70 per cent of first-half group revenue.
That leaves the rest of the portfolio (AirAsia MOVE, AirAsia Next, and Santan) with a harder job to prove that Capital A can build a broad-based, asset-light aviation services and digital platform business beyond the airline brand that made it famous.
Profitability returns, but margins remain thin
Capital A’s return to profitability is meaningful. The group has exited PN17 status, a classification for financially distressed companies on Bursa Malaysia, and is trying to rebuild investor confidence around a cleaner corporate structure.
Yet the profit margin leaves little room for error. Second-quarter profit after tax of around US$6 million on revenue of US$193 million implies a net margin of roughly 3.1 per cent. For the first half, profit after tax of US$11.9 million on US$376 million revenue works out to about 3.2 per cent.
For a group still in transition, that is not alarming by itself. But it does mean the turnaround remains vulnerable to foreign exchange movements, interest costs, lease obligations, capital expenditure and slower volumes.
The operating picture is also less flattering. First-half net operating profit fell 21 per cent year-on-year to about US$16 million, despite revenue growth. Capital A said core group net operating profit rose 6 per cent after adjusting for the loss of aviation interest income following the airline disposal.
That adjustment may be fair, but it is also doing a lot of work. The reported number shows operating profit declined. The adjusted number supports the recovery story. Investors will want a clearer bridge between the two.
Group EBITDA also fell 5 per cent in the first half, even as revenue rose 4 per cent. That suggests either costs are rising faster than sales, or the revenue mix is tilting towards lower-margin activities.
ADE and Teleport carry the group
The strongest part of the update is ADE. The aircraft maintenance unit reported second-quarter revenue of about US$67.6 million, up 29 per cent year-on-year, with EBITDA of about US$16.4 million. Capital A said hangar slots are booked through next year and that ADE is building a new four-line maintenance hangar.
That demand backdrop is credible. Southeast Asia’s airline industry is still rebuilding capacity after the pandemic, while narrowbody aircraft fleets across the region need maintenance as utilisation rises. Supply-chain delays and aircraft delivery bottlenecks have also made maintenance capacity more valuable.
The question is how much cash ADE will need to keep growing. Maintenance is not a pure software-style business. Tools, hangars, engineering talent and certifications require investment, and depreciation will rise as capacity expands. EBITDA may look healthy while free cash flow tells a more complicated story.
Teleport also showed momentum. Second-quarter revenue rose 22 per cent year-on-year to about US$74 million, while first-half revenue grew 21 per cent to about US$147.6 million. Tonnage in the quarter reached 85,877 tonnes, up 11 per cent year-on-year, and parcel volume jumped 79 per cent to 56.6 million.
Also Read: AirAsia aims to fulfill super app ambition with upcoming launch of ride-hailing services in Malaysia
For a logistics business operating in a softer global freight market, that is a solid result. But margins remain modest. Teleport’s second-quarter net operating profit was about US$1.8 million on US$74 million in revenue, implying an operating margin of around 2.4 per cent. Profit after tax was around US$1 million.
There is also some selective framing. First-half tonnage was 182,660 tonnes, which means first-quarter tonnage was around 96,783 tonnes. On that basis, second-quarter tonnage declined sequentially even as the year-on-year comparison looked positive.
Consumer units still have work to do
AirAsia MOVE, Capital A’s travel platform, is where the pressure is more visible. The unit reported second-quarter revenue of about US$22.9 million, up 5 per cent year-on-year. But its WANO B2B business contributed 11 per cent of total revenue, or roughly US$2.5 million.
Excluding WANO, MOVE’s underlying revenue appears to have declined year-on-year. Flight sales also fell 3 per cent, which Capital A attributed to an 11 per cent reduction in AirAsia capacity. That explanation is reasonable, but it underlines MOVE’s continued dependence on the AirAsia airline ecosystem.
AirAsia Next, which includes loyalty and licensing activities, remains profitable. It posted second-quarter revenue of about US$18.6 million, EBITDA of US$6.2 million and net operating profit of US$5.2 million. But part of the growth came from non-aviation licensing fees and AirAsia Rewards, where revenue recognition can be influenced by points redemptions. The company said redemptions rose 34 per cent, helping revenue but also increasing redemption expenses.
Santan, the group’s food business, remains small. Second-quarter revenue was about US$10.7 million, broadly flat on a normalised basis, while passenger volume fell 14 per cent due to airline capacity constraints. Its push into e-commerce through TikTok and Shopee is sensible, but Capital A did not disclose the absolute revenue base, making the 30 per cent quarter-on-quarter growth figure hard to assess.
Rivals are not standing still
Capital A’s challenge is that each part of the group competes with specialised players. ADE faces established maintenance providers such as SIA Engineering, ST Engineering Aerospace, GMF AeroAsia and Lufthansa Technik Philippines. Teleport competes in a crowded logistics market against DHL, FedEx, UPS, J&T Express, Ninja Van and regional cargo operators. AirAsia MOVE is up against Traveloka, Agoda, Booking.com, Trip.com and airline direct channels. That makes execution harder: Capital A is not fighting one market battle, but several at once.
The balance sheet update also leaves questions unanswered. Capital A said shareholders’ equity is comfortably above US$119 million and operating cash flow was about US$35.7 million. It also said refinancing reduced interest expenses.
Those are positive signs. But without clearer disclosure on total debt, net debt, lease liabilities, cash balance, capital expenditure commitments and interest coverage, it is difficult to judge how strong the balance sheet really is.
Also Read: AirAsia calls off US$10M acquisition of Gojek Thailand’s fintech arm: report
The fairest reading is that Capital A is in better shape than it was during the depths of its restructuring. ADE and Teleport are growing, the group is profitable again, and the PN17 overhang has been removed.
But this is not yet a broad, high-margin recovery. It is a narrower turnaround led by two operating units, while consumer-facing businesses remain tied to airline capacity, accounting-sensitive revenue streams and early e-commerce bets. Capital A has stabilised. Now it has to prove the new group can compound.
The post Teleport powers Capital A’s rebound, but thin margins show logistics remains a hard road appeared first on e27.