The manager effect: What really shapes wellbeing at work

A few years ago, a global workplace survey landed with a stat that was sharp enough to travel everywhere: 69% of employees said their manager affected their mental health as much as their spouse or partner. It was memorable, slightly uncomfortable, and for many people, not all that surprising.

But the more important point in 2026 is not whether managers matter as much as spouses. It is that everyday management quietly sets the operating conditions for mental health at work.

In my work with Fortune 500 companies across regions, I have seen this play out repeatedly: team strain is rarely driven by one dramatic event, but by the daily management patterns that shape pressure, clarity, pacing and recovery.

That sounds soft until you look at what managers actually control.

Managers shape how much ambiguity people sit with. They influence how quickly teams are expected to respond, how often priorities change, whether meetings swamp the day, whether people can ask for clarification without looking incompetent, and whether pressure comes in short bursts or settles into something more chronic. The World Health Organisation is clear that excessive workloads, low job control, low support, discrimination and job insecurity are all risks to mental health at work. In real organisations, managers often sit right in the middle of those conditions.

This is why the manager question matters more now, not less.

Gallup’s 2025 State of the Global Workplace points to manager engagement as a key pressure point in today’s workplace. When managers are stretched, unsupported, or disengaged, the effects do not stay neatly contained at the manager level. They flow down into the team through poorer communication, less clarity, weaker follow-through, and lower-quality support. Gallup’s argument is simple: if managers are not doing well, teams usually feel it.

That matters in modern work because many teams are not collapsing under one dramatic crisis. They are being worn down by repeated small overloads.

Also Read: The Vietnam startup visa gap: Why founders are renting, not residing

A priority shifts at 4:45 pm. A message arrives marked urgent with no real context. A team member spends the morning in meetings, then has to do their actual work after hours. Another sits on a problem too long because asking early feels risky. None of this looks dramatic in isolation. Together, it creates friction, attention residue, rework and strain.

This is where management becomes behavioural, not theoretical.

A good manager reduces unnecessary load. They create clearer response norms so that everything does not feel equally urgent. They make it easier to raise risks early. They notice when a person needs more clarity, not more pressure. They protect some degree of recovery instead of treating availability as commitment. They know that a team can look functional on paper while quietly leaking energy, judgment, and patience.

That last point is especially important in hybrid and remote work. Gallup’s 2025 reporting found a paradox: remote employees can show higher engagement while also reporting lower well-being. In other words, people may be productive and committed while still feeling more isolated, stressed or emotionally strained. That should be a warning to leaders who still treat performance and well-being as if they naturally move together. Sometimes they do not.

The lazy version of the conversation is to ask whether remote, hybrid or on-site work is best. The better question is what kind of management people are experiencing inside those models.

Are expectations clear?

Do people have enough control over how work gets done?

Is there a realistic path to doing focused work without constant interruption?

Can someone admit they are at capacity before a missed deadline forces the issue?

Can friction be repaired without blame hanging in the air for weeks?

These questions do not sit in a wellbeing programme. They sit in daily management.

This is also why perks so often underperform. Meditation apps, free lunches and one-off resilience workshops may be well-intended, but they cannot compensate for chaotic priorities, poor communication and a manager who signals that boundaries are optional for “real” performers. If the system keeps producing overload, no well-being strategy at the edges will be enough.

Also Read: Excel turns 41 – why it still runs the modern workplace

The practical implication is not that managers should become therapists. It is that leaders need to stop underestimating how much management behaviour shapes cognitive and emotional load.

The strongest managers do a few things consistently.

They reduce ambiguity early. They name what matters most this week. They distinguish between urgent and simply visible. They check in without putting people on the spot. They normalise clarification. They acknowledge effort, then remove blockers. They make it easier for people to recover after friction or mistakes rather than stewing in them. None of this is flashy. All of it changes how work feels in the body and how sustainable performance becomes over time.

This is not about making work endlessly comfortable. Fast-growing companies will always have pressure. Startups, especially, will always face uncertainty, compressed timelines and imperfect information. The question is whether managers turn that reality into useful momentum or into chronic overload.

If leaders want teams that can perform without tipping into constant strain, the most underestimated place to look is not the app budget or the wellness calendar. It is the quality of everyday management.

Because long before burnout shows up in an exit interview, it is often being shaped in smaller moments: how pressure is communicated, how support is offered, what gets rewarded, and whether ambitious work is pursued in ways people can actually sustain.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. You can also share your perspective by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

The post The manager effect: What really shapes wellbeing at work appeared first on e27.