Have you watched Squid Game 2?

As someone with over 10 years of experience in Public Relations, I couldn’t help but notice the Front Man’s incredible ability to manipulate and persuade. The Front Man is truly a character who continues to fascinate me, as I’m constantly deconstructing how people influence and argue.

His tactics felt eerily familiar. They also reminded me of someone I know in real life with Type A personality traits, which made it easy for me to connect with the Front Man’s persuasion patterns. Even as his methods took a darker turn, they felt unsettlingly real.

Recap: A clash of ideologies

At the heart of Squid Game 2 lies an ideological battle between the Front Man and Gi-hun. The Front Man believes humanity is inherently selfish and irredeemable, while Gi-hun represents hope, believing people can change and support one another. Their conflict forces viewers to grapple with their own beliefs about human nature.

Halfway through Squid Game 2, I was suddenly reminded of a conversation I had with a wealthy crypto bro who knew several business people of eight to nine figures in net worth.

I once asked him, “Why don’t the privileged and powerful pool their resources to solve the world’s problems?” His reply stopped me in my tracks: “They’re the ones who created the persistent problems, why would they fix them?”

Over time, I began to see the truth in his words. Like the VIPs in Squid Game, there are forces that thrive on keeping the status quo intact. Especially with AI today, we now definitely have the resources to address issues like poverty and climate change but solving these problems very often do not align with the interests of those in control.

The top one per cent of the world’s elite set the rules, leaving the rest of us to play within the games that they have created. To truly change the system, good intentions and hard work alone won’t suffice. The 99 per cent will need to elevate ourselves—mentally, emotionally, and strategically—to access the influence and resources necessary to create meaningful change.

But is that even possible, because the majority of human beings may not fundamentally want change?

Was this also what The Front Man was driving at? There seems to be a part of him that secretly wishes to change the system through Gi-hun.

But after finding out that Gi-hun would rather sacrifice his own allies for his horribly-thought out coup, the Front Man probably realised that change was not possible and stopped playing.

The Front Man’s mastery of persuasion

This made me feel that The Front Man is truly a master persuader. His strategies rely on a deep understanding of emotions and motivations.

Unlike his role as Game Operator in Squid Game 1, he takes on the role of Player 001 in Squid Game 2, and his actions are nothing short of calculated genius.

Also Read: Failing the Olympic hurdle: Is it the beginning of the end for the Airbnb boom?

One of the most striking moments happens during the first round of voting. The Front Man casts the deciding vote, choosing “O” (to continue the games) despite the overwhelming tension in the room. This move isn’t random—it’s designed to demonstrate to Gi-hun how desperation drives people to do anything for money. Through this single action, he puts his ideology on full display.

When Gi-hun confronts him about the vote, the Front Man doesn’t miss a beat. He uses Gi-hun’s own logic against him, explaining that he voted “O” because Gi-hun’s previous victory gave other gamblers hope. It’s a masterful manipulation that reframes the situation entirely.

Another chilling moment occurs during the mingling game. The Front Man and Gi-hun save Player 149, Geum-ja, and ask her a seemingly innocent question: “Where is your son?” in the room. This question is far from casual. It’s designed to strike a nerve, forcing Geum-ja to confront the painful truth that her son has abandoned her when push came to shove.

This wasn’t idle conversation—it was a strategic move to trigger an emotional reaction. Geum-ja’s realisation leaves her shaken and she retaliated emotionally, highlighting the power of the Front Man’s subtle yet devastating methods.

He doesn’t lie or manipulate facts; he simply holds up a mirror, forcing others to see the truths they’d rather ignore.

A deep understanding of human nature

This mastery raises an unsettling question: Is it his persuasion that’s dark, or is it a reflection of human nature itself? The Front Man’s tactics reveal the power of understanding human instincts and using them as leverage to achieve desired outcomes.

What do you think? Could you beat the game—and how?

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join us on Instagram, Facebook, X, and LinkedIn to stay connected.

Image courtesy: Squid Game 2

The post Squid Game’s Front Man: A masterclass in persuasion appeared first on e27.