Startup founders often embark on a journey filled with hurdles and opportunities. Among these challenges, securing funding from venture capital firms stands as a critical milestone. However, while VCs can inject much-needed capital into your business, it’s essential to understand the nuances of the investment terms they propose, especially regarding anti-dilution clauses.
In this article, we’ll explore how these clauses can impact your startup and offer insights into making informed decisions that safeguard your venture’s future.
The anti-dilution dilemma
VCs typically invest in early-stage startups with uncertain valuations. To protect their investments, they often request anti-dilution clauses to be included in the terms of the deal. These clauses can have significant implications for founders, affecting valuation, ownership stakes, and even the overall control of the company.
There are two main types of anti-dilution clauses:
- Full Ratchet
- Weighted Average
Each comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
Full Ratchet: The founder’s nightmare
Full Ratchet is the most favourable option for investors but the harshest for founders. Under this clause, your share price is adjusted to match the lowest price paid by any new investor in any future funding round. For example, if a new investor purchases shares at a lower valuation than yours, your share price and ownership stake are dramatically reduced.
Example: If your startup raises US$10 million at a US$5 million valuation, your share price could plummet from US$1 to US$0.5, effectively halving your ownership to two million shares instead of one million.
Weighted Average: Striking a balance
Weighted average, on the other hand, is a more balanced approach. It adjusts your share price based on the average prices paid by all investors in all rounds, considering the amount of money raised. This method is considered fairer to founders and offers more adaptability.
Example: If the same US$10 million is raised at a US$5 million valuation, your share price may decrease from US$1 to US$0.75, and you would own approximately 1.33 million shares instead of one million.
Also Read: ‘Want VC funding? Your startup needs to be valued at least US$700M in 10 years’: Jeffrey Paine
Choosing the right path
Navigating anti-dilution clauses requires careful consideration, as they can significantly impact your startup’s future.
Here are some key factors to keep in mind:
Stage and potential
Early-stage startups with greater valuation uncertainty and potential for multiple financing rounds may find the weighted average clause more suitable. In contrast, later-stage startups with stable and higher valuations might negotiate with the full ratchet.
Balancing act
Striking a balance between anti-dilution safeguards and other contractual elements such as valuation, liquidation preference, board representation, voting rights, and exit strategies is crucial. Sometimes, compromising on one aspect can lead to more favourable terms elsewhere.
Final thoughts
Venturing into the world of startups and VC funding involves making difficult decisions. Anti-dilution clauses are just one piece of the puzzle.
It’s essential to thoroughly understand the implications of these clauses and tailor your choice to your startup’s stage and potential. By doing so, you can protect your vision while securing the funding needed to bring your startup to new heights.
Remember, every term sheet is negotiable, and it’s in your best interest to seek legal counsel to ensure your startup’s future remains secure and promising.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic
Join our e27 Telegram group, FB community, or like the e27 Facebook page
Image credit: Canva
The post VC deal-breakers: How anti-dilution clauses could sink your startup appeared first on e27.