When venture capitalists (VCs) evaluate startups for potential investment, one critical factor they consider is the cap table or capitalisation table. A cap table outlines the ownership structure of a company, including equity ownership, shareholders, and various classes of shares.

VCs generally have a strong aversion to messy cap tables, which can create complexities, legal uncertainties, and challenges for future funding rounds. We explore below the reasons why VCs tend to dislike messy cap tables and the potential implications for startups seeking investment.

Complexity and legal uncertainties

A messy cap table can result from a multitude of factors, such as excessive or poorly structured equity grants, multiple classes of shares with different rights, and unclear ownership records.

This complexity can lead to legal uncertainties and disputes, making it difficult for VCs to assess the true ownership and value of the startup. VCs prefer clean and straightforward cap tables that provide a clear understanding of ownership percentages and rights.

Difficulty in dilution management

VCs invest in startups with the expectation of future dilution as the company raises subsequent rounds of funding. However, a messy cap table can complicate dilution management. If the ownership structure is convoluted or unclear, it becomes challenging to determine how future investment rounds will impact the ownership stakes of existing shareholders. VCs prefer cap tables that allow for transparent and predictable dilution calculations.

Also Read: Jeffrey Seah of Quest Ventures launches new SEA-focused VC firm MSW Ventures

Time and cost implications

Cleaning up a messy cap table can be a time-consuming and costly process. VCs prefer to invest in startups that have already addressed these issues, as it saves time and effort during the due diligence process. Startups with clean cap tables can proceed with fundraising more efficiently, focusing on other critical aspects of their business. A messy cap table may require legal assistance and extensive documentation, leading to delays in closing investment deals.

Signals of poor governance and management

A messy cap table can be seen as a signal of poor governance and management practices within a startup. It may indicate a lack of structure, control, and strategic decision-making.

VCs prioritise startups that demonstrate good governance, as it reflects the ability of the founding team to manage and navigate challenges effectively. A messy cap table raises concerns about potential conflicts, disputes, and the ability to handle future financing rounds successfully.

Limited flexibility for future funding rounds

A startup’s cap table sets the foundation for subsequent funding rounds. A messy cap table can limit a startup’s flexibility in raising additional capital or attracting new investors.

VCs often prefer startups that have a well-structured cap table, allowing for easier negotiations, transparent terms, and the inclusion of new investors without complications. Messy cap tables may deter potential investors, narrowing the funding opportunities for startups.

Final thoughts