Career health is becoming one of Singapore’s most important competitive determinants. More than employment stability, it reflects a worker’s ability to remain employable, adaptable and upwardly progressing across a lifetime of technological and economic change. At its core is mobility — the capacity to shift across roles, adopt new tools and reinvent one’s relevance as industries evolve.

Singapore continues to post strong labour-market numbers, yet deeper signals suggest rising rigidity. Structured training participation fell to 40.7 per cent in 2024, a nine-year low. Average job tenure has lengthened to roughly eight years. Fresh graduates show growing anxiety about job transitions in an AI-driven economy. The labour market appears to be outpacing traditional career pathways.

Career health, like physical health, depends not only on individual choices but on the environment that shapes them. At the Bloomberg New Economy Forum this week, Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warned that the world is being reshaped by several revolutions at once. Singapore’s career environment is undergoing the same transformation.

Revolutions reshaping career mobility

AI is the most visible force. The IMF estimates that 60 percent of jobs in advanced economies face significant AI exposure. IMDA’s data suggests that many jobs in Singapore contain significant automatable tasks. Nearly six in ten young workers say uncertainty about AI makes them hesitant to switch roles. Hybrid skills — combining digital literacy, communication and domain expertise — are now the foundation of career resilience.

Biotech and longevity form the second shift. The biomedical sector now contributes nearly a fifth of Singapore’s total manufacturing output, while the National Precision Medicine programme aims to sequence the genomes of up to 450,000 residents by 2031 — building on over 100,000 already studied. With AI-enabled genomics accelerating drug discovery, early disease detection, and health system planning, longer lifespans will increasingly stretch careers across distinct phases: From specialist roles, to hybrid or managerial positions, to advisory and cross-border work later in life, driving demand for talent that bridges science and data.​

Also Read: What the top 10 time attendance systems in Singapore tell us about workforce management in 2025

The green transition is the third force. Hydrogen pilots are scaling, green data centre standards are tightening, and the carbon-services ecosystem is maturing, signalling a shift to a more distributed, technology-driven energy model.

This transformation is driving structural change across the labour market: Workers in marine, petrochemicals, and industrial engineering are moving toward new pathways in energy storage, grid optimisation, and systems integration. As energy anchors the AI-powered digital economy, which now accounts for nearly a fifth of GDP, these ongoing shifts are reorganising industry ecosystems and demanding adaptable talent prepared for rapidly evolving sectors.​

Across these three forces, career health rests increasingly on mobility. Firms and individuals can support it in at least three ways.

Three ways to boost career health

First, firms should treat AI as literacy rather than a niche technical skillset. At Temus, we adopted a T-shaped talent model that pairs depth in one domain with the breadth to work across others; some colleagues now develop M-shaped profiles spanning multiple specialisations. As AI becomes more accessible, employees across functions are experimenting with its use to make their work more efficient.

One example is Temus’s head of legal vibe-coding to build a chatbot for day-to-day legal matters. A recent firmwide “innovation sprint” saw cross-functional teams, including many with no technical background, develop GenAI tools for project management, document evaluation, and client workflows. Together, these efforts have built a T-Shape Community, now more than one-fifth of Temus employees, where colleagues learn from one another and develop AI fluency, enhancing their career health within the firm and for future roles beyond it.

Secondly, Singapore’s progress on inclusive workforce integration could help strengthen career health more broadly across the economy. Labour-force participation among persons with disabilities has risen from 28.2 per cent in 2019 to 32.7 per cent in 2023. Ensign InfoSecurity’s partnership with the Autism Resource Centre is a leading example. Beyond recruitment, Ensign invests in structured assessments, role design, and workplace coaching, enabling individuals on the autism spectrum to perform effectively as Security Operations Centre analysts.

VITAL’s collaboration with Human Capital Singapore and SG Enable offers a similar model in HR and shared services, where targeted training prepares individuals for payroll and administrative roles with strong task alignment. The next phase will require reducing communication barriers and delivering customised training at scale.

The National Council of Social Service’s pilot of conversational AI, initially supporting officers conducting early needs assessments with youths, shows how sensitive, multilingual interactions can be handled with consistency. Applied thoughtfully, could similar technology make communication, task guidance and job matching more accessible, expanding workplace integration for persons with disabilities, too?

Also Read: Singapore SMEs outpace large firms in branding and networks but face AI skills gap

Finally, individual mobility becomes more viable when workers adopt what leadership expert Kevin Cottam calls a nomadic mindset, a concept introduced to me by Temus’ Chief People Officer, Melissa Kee. Nomads thrive through reinvention and lateral movement; Settlers prefer predictability and routine. As nomad traits grow increasingly salient amid rapid environmental change, one development to watch is the Skills Learnability Index pioneered by Singapore’s Institute for Adult Learning.

The data-driven analytics platform maps in-demand skills across occupations, estimates the difficulty and time required to acquire them, and identifies realistic transitions between roles. Its interactive dashboard provides personalised, evidence-based pathways for reskilling and career reinvention, giving individuals clearer visibility of emerging skills and viable next steps.

As employers shift toward skills-first hiring and portfolios of demonstrated capability, coupling such AI-guided fluency with the adaptability of the nomad can strengthen lifelong learning — and, ultimately, career health.

Career health as Singapore’s national advantage

“It is very clear now that AI will be a fundamental driving force for the economy for the next five to 10 years. In Singapore, we have an opportunity to be at the frontier of global AI innovation”, said Jeffrey Siow, Singapore’s Acting Minister for Transport and Senior Minister of State for Finance. 

This ambition matters not only for Singapore’s wider economic strategy, but because it strengthens Singaporeans’ ability to adapt and stay relevant as the pace of change continues to quicken. And as long as the country anchors itself at the centre of global digital and AI networks, it can turn that adaptability into a national advantage, supporting an economy where careers become not only longer but also healthier and more inclusive.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Enjoyed this read? Don’t miss out on the next insight. Join our WhatsApp channel for real-time drops.

Image credit: Canva

The post As Singaporeans live longer and healthier, our careers must too appeared first on e27.

In Southeast Asia, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) drive everything from manufacturing and trade to tech and logistics. According to the World Bank, they represent 90 per cent of all businesses globally and provide jobs for over half the world’s workforce. However, they still face significant challenges with financial infrastructure.

Large companies have access to advanced treasury systems and real-time dashboards. SME finance teams, often comprising just one to five people, continue to log into multiple bank portals, chase invoices, and reconcile spreadsheets. In a rapidly changing business environment, many small businesses remain entrenched in outdated silos.

The issue isn’t that SMEs lack ambition or talent. The financial tools available to them do not match the complexity of today’s world. The discussion needs to shift from providing SMEs “more software” to offering them greater intelligence.

The SME finance gap

If you speak to any SME finance lead, you’ll hear the same thing: managing money feels reactive. Every month-end is a scramble to reconcile, report, and explain where the money went. Cash is king, but visibility is lacking.

Most SMEs operate on narrow margins and have little financial cushion. A delayed payment or an unexpected FX fluctuation can affect suppliers, employees, and customers. However, the financial systems they rely on are either too basic and consumer-oriented or too complicated and expensive, tailored for large global businesses.

This leaves a wide gap in the middle where most SMEs operate.

Why real-time treasury visibility matters

Enterprise treasury systems are built for scale and complexity. They’re great at managing global cash pools and multi-entity reporting, but they’re not built for the smaller regional business that needs to pay overseas suppliers today, see cash positions across two markets, or decide right now.

Also Read: 2026’s fintech imperative: Lend responsibly, scale smartly, and build for the long term

For SMEs, real-time clarity is a matter of survival, not a luxury.

When a finance lead can see balances across accounts and currencies in one place, decisions can be made faster and more confidently: pay now, hold off, invest, or convert. That kind of visibility changes the game. It turns finance from a reporting function into a strategic one.

From experience, SME teams don’t want more dashboards or features. They want to know exactly where they stand today, and what they should do next. That’s what visibility really means.

Reimagining access, not just automation

A lot of fintech innovation still focuses on automation; how to make processes faster or reduce manual work. That’s important, but automation alone doesn’t build confidence.

What really matters is access to connected, contextual intelligence: data that helps a business make better decisions.

In recent years, a new generation of platforms has emerged with this principle in mind: tools that connect a business’s existing ecosystem rather than replace it. The idea is simple: consolidate what SMEs already use — banks, accounting systems, and payment providers– into a single intelligent layer that provides oversight, forecasting, and control.

This is how the modern finance function will evolve: not through the addition of more tools, but through connected intelligence.

At Finmo, for example, this thinking guided how we built our platform for SMEs and mid-market companies. Rather than replicate enterprise software, we focused on democratising financial intelligence, giving lean finance teams the same depth of insight that large corporates take for granted, but delivered through a more accessible and human-centred experience.

The goal isn’t to automate people out of the process; it’s to give them the clarity to act faster and with confidence, enabling them to connect, control, command, and create value with their finance stack.

From purpose to practice

The reason for this shift is clear: when SMEs manage their finances effectively, entire ecosystems improve. Supply chains stabilise, employment grows, and economies become stronger.

However, purpose only matters when it leads to action. In our experience, three things make the difference:

• Connectivity before complexity: Start with the basics: bank feeds, payments, and reconciliations. Only then should you introduce analytics or AI. Without data connectivity, intelligence cannot happen.
• Human-centred design: Finance tools should use language that their users understand. Dashboards and insights must be easy enough for anyone to grasp, not just a CFO with an entire data team.
• Outcome-driven thinking: The value of a good financial system isn’t measured by the number of features but by how well it helps teams make better decisions. Each product or workflow should link directly to a business goal: improved liquidity, reduced costs, or quicker decision-making.

Also Read: Millennials, Gen Z will shape 79% of SEA’s fintech landscape by 2030: Report

When these principles align, automation becomes empowerment. SMEs don’t just “save time”; they unlock a new level of visibility and control that allows them to plan with precision.

The mindset shift

For many SME leaders, the term “treasury” often seems to apply only to large corporations. Effective treasury management is just good business practice. It involves understanding where money is located, how it moves, and how it can be used more efficiently.

Finance teams no longer need to wait for quarterly reports to act. With the right systems, they can forecast cash positions, test scenarios, and simulate outcomes daily. The tools once reserved for global CFOs are now available to lean, fast-growing teams.

The biggest change needed isn’t about technology, it’s about mindset. SMEs must shift from a survival approach to a strategic one. They should understand that financial clarity isn’t just an extra consideration; it’s crucial for growth.

A more intelligent future

The finance leaders who will thrive in the next decade are not those who do more, but those who see more.

They’ll depend on connected systems, real-time data, and increasingly, intelligent ‘co-pilots’ that surface insights before issues arise.

Standing still is no longer an option. As technology democratises access to financial intelligence, SMEs in the region have a rare opportunity: to operate with the same strategic foresight as the corporates they compete with, but with the agility that only smaller teams possess.

When that happens, SMEs won’t just be the backbone of the global economy; they’ll be its most intelligent growth engine.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Enjoyed this read? Don’t miss out on the next insight. Join our WhatsApp channel for real-time drops.

Image credit: Canva

The post How SMEs can compete like big corporations with the right financial intelligence platform appeared first on e27.

The global AI boom has often been framed as a race for dominance, measured by who controls the most advanced chips and the largest compute clusters. But beneath the surface, the real contest has shifted from headline performance to the infrastructure that makes scale possible. Geopolitics, supply chain resilience, and execution reliability are now reshaping how AI hardware is built and where power truly sits.

For years, Nvidia defined the narrative of AI hardware, commanding over 80 per cent of the global accelerator market. But the world’s silicon supply chain no longer runs on simplicity.

The world is rewiring its silicon supply

Across the US and China, we’re witnessing a structural reset.

Washington is reshoring semiconductor production and rolling out a US$70 billion AI infrastructure plan spanning data centres and power grid upgrades, while Beijing’s Nvidia ban is accelerating domestic innovation led by Huawei and SMIC.

Yet despite this fragmentation, Asia-Pacific remains the backbone of the global chip economy, accounting for over 70 per cent of global semiconductor production value, up from 63 per cent in 2020.

In this new era, control no longer means self-sufficiency, but controlling the infrastructure across a deeply complex supply chain.

Asia’s strategic leverage: Precision over scale

Asia’s power lies in precision and reliability, qualities that have made the region indispensable to both Washington and Beijing.

• Taiwan anchors global chip fabrication, controlling about 70 per cent of foundry capacity.
• South Korea supplies over 80 per cent of the world’s high-bandwidth memory (HBM), the critical input for training large AI models.
• Southeast Asia, from Vietnam to Malaysia, is rapidly expanding assembly and testing, creating redundancy in the midstream.

Together, these players form what I call the neutral infrastructure of the global AI economy. As trade frictions rise, the world’s most advanced semiconductors still rely on supply lines that pass through Busan, Jakarta, and Singapore.

Also Read: Creative control meets AI: A practical guide from the frontlines

A single change in any of these nodes, from power stability to packaging capacity, can ripple through the global AI value chain.

For investors and corporates: The real leverage lies in the middle

Most global capital still flows toward visible brands like Nvidia and AMD, without seeing that the structural value and future returns are migrating deeper in the stack.

• Advanced packaging firms like ASE and Amkor now dictate AI chip delivery timelines.
• Memory and interconnect suppliers in Korea and Japan define the next performance bottlenecks.
• Emerging hubs in Vietnam, Malaysia, and Singapore are capturing diversification demand as firms rebalance risk across the region.

In other words, the advantage is in integrating across the Asian bridge that connects both ecosystems, and no longer lies in choosing sides between the US and China.

Precision will define the next era

The first phase of AI hardware was about scale, who could train the largest models on the most powerful GPUs. The next phase will be about precision: who can build them reliably, efficiently, and geopolitically secure.

That competition won’t be decided in Silicon Valley or Beijing alone, but in the quiet efficiency of Asia’s fabs, materials labs, and logistics networks. For investors, understanding this shift early is more about understanding where the future is being built.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Enjoyed this read? Don’t miss out on the next insight. Join our WhatsApp channel for real-time drops.

Image credit: Canva

The post Why Asia sits at the centre of the global AI chip disruption? appeared first on e27.

There is a stark contrast between traditional markets and digital assets as we approach the year’s end. Asian stocks advanced at the open following the S&P 500 Index’s climb to a record high, supported by robust US economic data indicating the fastest growth pace in two years. MSCI’s regional equities gauge extended gains into a fourth consecutive day, rising 0.3 per cent, with Japanese and South Korean benchmarks leading the advance. Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market tells a different story, falling 1.05 per cent over the past 24 hours and extending a seven-day decline of 0.71 per cent. This divergence highlights the complex relationship between traditional and digital asset classes during periods of economic strength and geopolitical tension.

The commodities market has captured significant attention with gold rallying to an unprecedented high of more than US$4,500 per ounce. This milestone represents gold’s strongest performance in recent memory, with its haven appeal amplified by Washington’s blockade of oil tankers linked to Venezuela. Silver also reached an all-time high, while copper prices exceeded US$12,000 per ton for the first time in history. Despite this remarkable performance in precious metals, crypto markets remained unaffected by gold’s surge, continuing their downward trajectory, even though they have historically shown some correlation during risk-off periods.

Geopolitical tensions have extended the oil price rally into a sixth consecutive session, with West Texas Intermediate crude trading above US$58.50 per barrel. These market dynamics indicate that investors are seeking traditional safe havens amid uncertainty. Yet cryptocurrency markets, often described as potential inflation hedges and stores of value, have failed to capitalise on the macroeconomic conditions that typically drive alternative investments.

The crypto market’s current weakness stems from three interconnected factors: institutional pullback, derivatives market deleveraging, and persistent risk-off sentiment. Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced net outflows of US$142.2 million, marking a significant reversal from November’s US$198 million inflows. This institutional caution reflects profit-taking behaviour and growing macroeconomic uncertainty as we approach year-end. ETF flow data serve as a critical leading indicator of institutional demand, and sustained outflows could delay a meaningful market rebound until fresh capital enters the ecosystem.

Derivatives markets reflect additional pressure, as total open interest fell 4.4 per cent to US$35 billion over 24 hours. Bitcoin perpetuals funding rates spiked 102.7 per cent as leveraged traders faced substantial liquidation pressure. Long position holders paid approximately US$81.6 million in forced liquidations, highlighting the vulnerability of overleveraged positions during market downturns. This deleveraging appears partly connected to holiday trading patterns, with many participants reducing exposure ahead of the Christmas period when liquidity typically dries up. However, the elevated funding rates paradoxically suggest a lingering bullish bias among remaining traders, creating a complex market structure that is vulnerable to cascading liquidations should Bitcoin break critical support levels around US$84,000.

Also Read: Holiday liquidity warning signs emerge across stocks gold and crypto markets simultaneously

Market sentiment metrics reinforce this cautious outlook. The CoinMarketCap Fear & Greed Index remained at 27 out of 100, classified in the Fear category for more than 18 consecutive days. This represents the lowest sentiment reading since November and indicates severely eroded retail confidence. Social media analysis reveals growing concerns about exchange manipulation, with Binance-linked selloffs trending across major platforms. The Altcoin Season Index at 19 indicates that capital remains defensively positioned, primarily in Bitcoin rather than rotating into alternative cryptocurrencies. This defensive posture contradicts the broader market narrative of strengthening risk appetite, which has driven technology stocks higher despite strong US economic data, scaling back expectations for near-term Federal Reserve easing measures.

The cryptocurrency market’s current disconnect from traditional assets warrants deeper examination. While technology stocks remain in high demand despite earlier concerns about valuation and saturation in artificial intelligence investment, digital assets face significant headwinds. Traders have regained confidence that established technology companies will deliver solid earnings growth in 2026, yet similar optimism has not extended to cryptocurrency projects despite their technological innovations and growing institutional infrastructure.

Several developments could potentially shift this narrative. JPMorgan’s reported consideration of crypto trading services for institutional clients represents a significant potential catalyst, though no confirmed moves or official statements have materialised yet. This development, mentioned in market reports today, aligns with the broader trend of traditional financial institutions gradually embracing digital assets despite current market weakness. Additionally, Ethereum’s ecosystem shows signs of evolution following the Shanghai upgrade, which fundamentally altered the network’s economic dynamics by enabling withdrawals of staked ETH and altering validator behaviour. These infrastructure improvements may position Ethereum for stronger performance once market sentiment recovers.

Technical indicators suggest the cryptocurrency market has entered oversold territory, with Bitcoin’s 14-day Relative Strength Index reading at 32. Historically, such readings have often preceded meaningful rebounds, though timing such recoveries remains challenging. Market structure analysis reveals a critical liquidation cluster between US$84,000 and US$93,000, suggesting this range will determine Bitcoin’s next significant directional move. A decisive break below US$84,000 could trigger additional leveraged selling, while a sustained recovery above US$93,000 might restore bullish momentum.

Also Read: Ecosystem Roundup: Why SEA’s tech exit problem persists | N Korean hackers steal US$2B in crypto | SEA startup winners and losers | Galatek, Olea Raise US$30M

The path to recovery for digital assets likely requires either renewed ETF inflows or a significant macroeconomic catalyst. Upcoming economic data releases, particularly Friday’s US Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation report, could prove pivotal. Higher-than-expected inflation figures might delay Federal Reserve rate cuts, potentially extending crypto’s risk-off tone as higher rates traditionally pressure growth assets. Conversely, cooling inflation data could reignite risk appetite across all asset classes, including cryptocurrencies.

This market environment creates opportunities for strategic positioning despite current weakness. The extended period of fear in the Fear & Greed Index has historically preceded market recoveries, though investors should await confirmatory signals before deploying capital aggressively. New cryptocurrency projects continue to generate interest alongside established coins, with tokens like APEMARS creating significant attention despite the broader market decline. This persistent innovation suggests underlying strength in blockchain development continues regardless of short-term price action.

As we approach year-end, investors face a complex landscape in which traditional and digital assets present divergent narratives. Strong economic data support equity markets while simultaneously pressuring expectations for monetary easing that could benefit alternative investments. Geopolitical tensions boost gold to record highs without translating to similar safe-haven demand for cryptocurrencies. Institutional capital shows caution through ETF outflows while simultaneously exploring expanded crypto services for clients.

The cryptocurrency market’s current consolidation phase may ultimately prove constructive, allowing overheated sentiment to normalise and creating a foundation for more sustainable growth. Technical oversold conditions, combined with historically low sentiment readings, suggest that a potential reversal may be approaching, though timing remains uncertain. Patient investors might view this period as an opportunity to build strategic positions while the broader market remains focused on traditional assets reaching record highs. The coming weeks will likely determine whether this divergence continues or if cryptocurrency markets reestablish correlation with the broader risk-on environment that has lifted global equities to new heights.

—

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Enjoyed this read? Don’t miss out on the next insight. Join our WhatsApp channel for real-time drops.

Image credit: Canva

The post Gold hits US$4,500 while Bitcoin bleeds: The year-end market disconnect explained appeared first on e27.

Singapore’s e-commerce sector is showing signs of maturity, but sustained success is becoming more complex as sellers face rising costs, intense competition and increasingly demanding consumers. New research by consumer insights firm Milieu Insight suggests that while resilience is becoming more attainable in the city-state’s advanced digital market, it remains unevenly distributed across the seller ecosystem.

The study found that 12 per cent of Singapore-based e-commerce sellers report operating without major challenges, a small but growing segment that signals increasing stability and operational strength. However, the remaining 88 per cent continue to navigate persistent pressures that require constant adaptation across logistics, platform dynamics and customer experience. The findings suggest a market that has transitioned beyond basic survival but has yet to achieve broad-based resilience.

Singapore’s e-commerce environment differs from those in emerging Southeast Asian markets. High internet penetration, sophisticated consumers and established digital infrastructure have raised baseline expectations for speed, reliability and transparency. As a result, sellers are less constrained by access issues and more challenged by execution.

Rising logistics costs are the most frequently cited concern, affecting 40 per cent of sellers surveyed. Meeting buyer expectations for fast delivery and smooth refunds is a challenge for 36 per cent, while competition from overseas sellers exerts pressure on another 36 per cent. Limited visibility or marketing support on platforms affects nearly one-third of respondents. These issues highlight the thin margins and operational precision required to compete in a mature market.

Also Read: Why Asia sits at the centre of the global AI chip disruption?

The research defines seller resilience in Singapore across three interconnected dimensions: operational capability, a supportive policy environment, and trust-driven customer relationships.

Operational strength remains the foundation. With 67 per cent of sellers processing fewer than 50 orders a month, even minor disruptions can have an outsized impact on revenue and reputation. Fast and reliable logistics are considered critical by 64 per cent of sellers, while 56 per cent prioritise digital readiness and access to online tools. Platform support, including subsidies, sales programmes and coaching, is seen as essential by 55 per cent, reflecting the role marketplaces play in shaping seller performance.

Beyond core infrastructure, sellers point to targeted enablers. Marketing support is valued by 40 per cent of respondents, while 28 per cent highlight the importance of affordable financing. These inputs are seen as practical levers for improving efficiency, increasing conversion and sustaining growth.

The second dimension of resilience is the operating environment. More than half of sellers, 51 per cent, say clear and supportive regulations are essential for business confidence, while 53 per cent value grants or financial assistance. Tax incentives and access to low-interest loans matter to 48 per cent, and 44 per cent point to the need for compliance and capital support to enable longer-term planning. When government measures align with platform initiatives, sellers are better positioned to invest and remain productive during economic uncertainty.

Trust and customer loyalty form the third and most enduring pillar. In a market where negative reviews can quickly affect visibility and sales, buyer-centric policies are seen as commercially essential. Easy returns and refunds help build confidence for 43 per cent of sellers, while 41 per cent say free or subsidised delivery encourages more frequent purchases.

Secure payment protection and buyer guarantees are important to more than one-third, and 38 per cent emphasise authenticity and quality checks. Together, these measures turn trust into a tangible economic asset.

Also Read: As Singaporeans live longer and healthier, our careers must too

Logistics sits at the centre of these challenges. Despite Singapore’s advanced infrastructure, one-third of sellers report late deliveries, while 31 per cent experience lost or damaged parcels. Inconsistent pricing affects 29 per cent. These problems translate directly into business impact, including lost revenue for 30 per cent of sellers, higher refund rates for 31 per cent and negative reviews for 33 per cent.

As a result, reliability, cost and speed dominate seller considerations when choosing logistics partners. More than half prioritise reliability, followed by cost and delivery speed. Notably, 72 per cent believe e-commerce platforms should take greater responsibility for ensuring consistent standards among third-party logistics providers.

The study concludes that long-term growth in Singapore’s e-commerce sector depends on stronger alignment across the ecosystem. Platforms, policymakers and sellers each play a role in scaling resilience beyond the current minority. The experiences of the 12 per cent operating without significant challenges offer a blueprint, but broader progress will require coordinated effort to meet the demands of one of Southeast Asia’s most advanced e-commerce markets.

—

Image Credit: Christian Chen on Unsplash

The post Operational resilience emerges as a key challenge for Singapore e-commerce sellers appeared first on e27.