
There’s a silent shift happening in India’s education system, and it’s not another edutech startup promising to “disrupt learning.” It’s quieter, older, and far better funded.
Private equity (PE) firms, KKR, Kedaara, Gaja, Apollo, and the like, are now deeply invested in schools. Not apps. Not coaching centres. Not gamified math. Actual schools.
This trend could redefine how capital flows into education, raising questions not just for educators, but also for startups, founders, and investors across Asia.
And not in a one-off “let’s uplift society” kind of way. We’re talking ₹1000 crore+ (US$1.2 billion+) deals, multiple rounds, aggressive M&A, and full-blown portfolio strategies.
Here’s what’s already public:
- Kedaara: ₹1,200 (US$1.45 billion) crore in Orchids International
- KKR: ₹1,475 crore (US$1.78 billion) into EuroKids, EuroSchools, Lighthouse Learning
- Gaja Capital: 130 crore in Kangaroo Kids
- BanyanTree, Apollo, Navis, and others circling similar assets
This isn’t just capital inflow. This is the McKinsey-fication of the Indian classroom.
But wait… aren’t schools supposed to be non-profit?
They are. In fact, the law is very clear.
Under Indian law, private unaided schools must be registered as:
- A trust (under the Indian Trusts Act)
- A society (under the Societies Registration Act)
- Or a Section eight company (under the Companies Act, 2013)
All three are non-profit legal structures, which means:
- No dividends
- No equity stakes
- No profit distribution to shareholders
- No “sale” or “buyout” of the school entity itself
So how does PE get in? Through the backdoor — fully legal, and frankly, very smart.
The real play: Parallel companies
You see, while the school remains a non-profit, there’s nothing stopping the same promoters from setting up for-profit companies around the school. These might:
- Own or lease the school real estate
- Sell uniforms and books
- Provide canteen, transport, or IT services
- License curriculum IP
- Supply teachers or staff through manpower companies
- Build edutech platforms used by the school
The school trust pays these vendors. The vendors are profit-making. And the profit accumulates outside the school, in structures where PE can invest, hold equity, and exit.
Also Read: The future of edutech: Personalising learning for all
If this sounds like a related party playground, that’s because… it kind of is. But if structured right, and it usually is, it’s perfectly legal.
Profit vs purpose: Are we crossing a line?
Not necessarily. Because frankly, India’s school sector needed capital. It also needed structure, scale, and systems. And PE is bringing all of that.
The older model, a single-school trust run by a family, resistant to any change has its charm, but also limitations:
- No clear succession planning
- Low investment in infra
- No capacity for M&A or regional expansion
- No incentive for teacher training or tech upgrades
So now, PE brings:
- Operational discipline
- Standardised curriculum
- Hiring practices
- Brand equity
- And… yes, return expectations
The fear is whether these “returns” will come at the cost of quality or accessibility. But let’s be honest, the idea that private schools were ever truly non-profit is a fairy tale we told ourselves. All this does is move it from under the table to on the cap table.
Why PE is now obsessed with education
Greg Parry, an education investor who’s seen both the big wins and the belly flops calls education the next big frontier for private equity. His thesis?
Education is:
- US$7 trillion globally, and growing
- Recession-resistant
- Emotionally inelastic (parents don’t cut tuition spend easily)
- And full of predictable revenue from tuition fees, often paid upfront
In other words, this isn’t just a good sector. It’s future-proof capital deployment.
But here’s the tradeoff, profit isn’t pedagogy
If you zoom out of the models and multiples, what you often see is: PE’s 5–7 year horizon clashing with education’s 15–20 year gestation cycle. It’s a cultural mismatch.
Some real, tangible risks:
- Curriculum narrowing (what’s measurable > what’s meaningful)
- Decreased investment in teachers or “non-core” programs
- Arts and humanities fade out as “non-revenue-generating”
- Students become monthly metrics
As one educationist put it: the child, the very heart of education is missing from most investment decks.
Education as a balance sheet category?
Some fund managers are openly calling schools “predictable assets with EBITDA potential and regulatory moats.”
That sounds more like a toll highway than a classroom.
And sure, in India’s context, with 320 million children in K–12, rising incomes, and a growing aspiration for private schooling the economics are sound.
But just because a thing makes sense on Excel, doesn’t mean it sits right in real life.
Legally speaking: Where’s the line?
This model operates in a grey-ish zone that lawmakers have… well, quietly tolerated.
Also Read: In this age of digitalisation, is edutech a bane or boon for educators?
What’s legal:
- Having related companies provide services to schools
- Paying market-rate (or even slightly higher) fees to these vendors
- Licensing curriculum content
- Leasing school land from a promoter-owned entity
What’s not:
- Diverting school fees into private accounts
- Inflating vendor charges disproportionately
- Transferring school assets to for-profit entities
- Misusing charitable status to evade taxes or regulation
The trick is to keep the “non-profit” entity clean and audit-friendly, while letting the economics play out in the surrounding shell. It’s a game of optics, governance, and tax structuring, something PE excels at.
But regulators are slowly catching on.
The bigger picture
Why are global investors so bullish on Indian schools?
Because India offers the holy grail of investing:
- Massive demand (320M kids in K-12)
- Urbanisation + nuclear families = school selection pressure
- Rising disposable income
- Parents who treat education as non-negotiable
- Low churn: students stay 12-15 years in the system
Also, education in India isn’t cyclical. It’s recession-proof, emotion-driven, and billable.
Some open questions worth asking:
- Is this funding improving quality or just valuation?
Are we getting better schools, or just better investor decks? - Are teachers benefiting?
Or are they just another cost centre being “optimised”? - Is there enough transparency for parents?
Most don’t even know their fees flow through 3-4 vendor layers. - Are regulators keeping up?
Because if this goes unchecked, schools might become the new NBFCs — too big, too complex, and too slippery to monitor.
My two paise
I’m not anti-capital in education. Money can do good, if governed right.
But what we can’t afford is:
- commodified classrooms,
- academic assembly lines,
- or “value-added services” that are just fee bloat in disguise.
The school, for all its evolution must remain a place of learning, not just earning.
There’s room for both heart and hustle. But if we start optimising education the way we optimise quick commerce, we’ll lose the very thing we’re trying to build: a smarter, more equitable future.
Final note
India’s schools are becoming more than just places of learning, they’re turning into strategic assets in the portfolios of global investors. For the startup ecosystem, this raises a key question: how will the influx of private equity reshape opportunities in edutech, education services, and the wider learning economy?
If we optimise education the way we optimise quick commerce, we risk losing sight of its true purpose. The challenge, and opportunity, is to strike the balance between heart and hustle.
Next time you see a school franchise opening 30 branches overnight with a glossy brochure, 3 logos, and a parent app, check who’s funding it. Because somewhere between the SmartBoards and STEM labs, there’s a term sheet.
And behind every term sheet… is a thesis.
—
Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.
Join us on Instagram, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, and our WA community to stay connected.
Image courtesy: Canva Pro
The post Classroom capitalism: Why private equity is quietly taking over Indian schools appeared first on e27.








