Posted on

Archireef secures funding to restore degraded marine ecosystems using 3D printing, AI

(L-R) Archireef Co-Founders Deniz Tekerek, Vriko Yu, and David Baker

Singapore-based VC firms Purpose Venture Capital and Carbon Zero have invested an undisclosed amount in Hong Kong-headquartered marine tech company Archireef.

Archireef was co-founded by Vriko Yu, Deniz Tekerek, and Dr David Baker.

The startup 3D-prints reef tiles made from natural materials through proprietary algorithms. The tiles are made from a terracotta-based mixture, an ocean-friendly material based on a hexagonal modular system to allow easy expansion.

Also Read: How all-electric, self-driving Clearbot helps tackle ocean plastic pollution in Asia

The design utilises a bio-mimetic approach to enhance coral survivorship and growth. Archireef reef tiles are currently 4x more effective than any alternative.

Its 3D-printed terracotta-based reef tiles have recently been deployed to aid coral restoration in the Arabian Gulf off the shore of Abu Dhabi with a partnership with Abu Dhabi-based investment and holding company ADQ and the Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi (EAD).

The broader partnership between ADQ and Archireef, announced in November 2022, funds the R&D of eco-engineering solutions for marine biodiversity restoration, combining scientific research with the latest 3D printing and AI technologies.

Archireef CEO Vriko Yu said: “We have already lost 50 per cent of the world’s coral cover since 1950, and if nothing changes, we will lose up to 90 per cent by 2050. By adopting a new Global Biodiversity Framework in Montreal, 196 countries committed to protecting at least 30 per cent of Earth’s lands, inland waters, coastal areas and ocean by 2030 to ensure that natural capital is sustained for inter-generational prosperity. It is estimated that US$140 billion in annual financing will be required. We need innovative financing arrangements needed to deliver on this bold ambition.”

Also Read: ‘TOP100 2018 was a valuable marketing opportunity for us’: Holistics.io CEO

“We firmly believe that nature and technology can inspire innovations in how we approach solving climate issues from prevention to mitigation, especially to enhance biodiversity. Archireef is a rare company in the nature-based solutions spectrum with a scalable and profitable business model,” said Sharon Sim, Co-Founder and General Partner in Purpose Venture Capital.

Purpose Venture Capital, co-founded by Sharon Sim, Sertac Yeltekin, and Von Leong, supports early-stage sustainable tech companies. The firm invests globally with a focus on Southeast Asian-based startups. Its portfolio companies include Zumvet (digital animal health services), Igloocompany (a secure access management platform for smart cities, infrastructure and properties) and HydraX (regulatory-compliant and sustainable financial infrastructure for capital markets of the future).

Carbon Zero Venture Capital is a climate change investor, providing long-term capital and support to environmental companies using innovation to create a cleaner and more equitable world. Its recent investments include Seppure and Vflowtech.

Echelon Asia Summit 2023 brings together APAC’s leading startups, corporates, policymakers, industry leaders, and investors to Singapore this June 14-15. Learn more and get tickets here. Echelon also features the TOP100 stage, where startups can pitch to 5000+ delegates, among other benefits like connecting with investors, visibility through the e27platform, and other prizes. Join TOP100 here.

The post Archireef secures funding to restore degraded marine ecosystems using 3D printing, AI appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Introduction to Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem and the fundraising landscape

This is the second article of a series of essays aimed at providing guidance for entrepreneurs in Southeast Asia who are seeking to secure successful fundraising.

Throughout the past decade, I started companies, joined great founders, scouted for investment opportunities, and mentored upcoming entrepreneurs across Southeast Asia (SEA).

This month alone, I am helping a cohort of Korean startups with a series of workshops. All those events will cover fundraising and doing business in SEA:

  • Nailing down the right narrative through storytelling
  • Simplifying complex business models through design
  • Understanding opportunities across SEA
  • Building an effective fundraising process
  • Understanding how the SEA fundraising landscape differs from other parts of the world

The reality is that nobody loves fundraising. Most founders have plenty of priorities apart from their next raise. But for most startups, external investment is an important step in their journey. After all, it takes time, great talent, and all kinds of other resources to build a sustainable business.

As with most things in life, you can study the fundraising process as much as you want, but building fundraising decks and pitching investors are skills that people develop predominantly by getting their hands dirty. Yet, that does not mean you should jump straight into the fundraising process without doing your homework.

In my experience, founders raising capital in Southeast Asia face one of the following challenges:

  • First-time founders do not understand what VCs are looking out for. This stems from the lack of warm relationships with regional investors.
  • Seasoned founders who built businesses in other parts of the world face challenges when adapting their stories to the expectations of VCs in SEA.

While I am not an expert, I have had a front-row experience in observing how Southeast Asia transformed. From a little-known region into one of the most exciting startup ecosystems worldwide.

So, this week I wanted to take a moment and share my learnings. Years of experience in observing and participating in the greatest wealth creation the region has ever seen. Condensed into one essay.

The subtle differences in raising capital in Southeast Asia

About a year ago, I participated in a program called A+ Accelerator. While attending the program, we were raising capital. As an outcome, we were simultaneously exposed to the feedback of both American and Asian VCs.

Also Read: Thriving Southeast Asia: The unstoppable rise of growth and prosperity

Whenever we pitched an American VC, they urged us to focus on product development. Stressing the importance of reaching product-market fit. But on the other hand, Asian investors kept on asking questions about our traction, unit economies, and revenue growth.

Most Asian-based investors did not want to dive into our product. All that mattered to them was proof of business, speed of execution, and solid business fundamentals.

Admittedly, being exposed to the different requirements from each side was confusing. So we created two decks. One deck was focused on market size, product, and why now, geared towards the American crowd. While the other deck emphasised traction (aka growth of service providers and clients on our marketplace).

While the experience was frustrating at times, it was also fascinating to witness. It taught me a valuable lesson. A lesson about adapting your narrative to the needs of the ecosystem where you operate.

In turn, I started documenting my learnings and sharing them with founders in my network. So far, the feedback has been great, which triggered the idea of writing this essay.

Developed markets vs emerging growth markets

I guess it goes without saying that building a business in the western hemisphere is quite different than building one in Asia. In fact, the topic has been fascinating to me for a long time. I even wrote my Master’s thesis on how innovation takes place in Hong Kong vs Denmark.

Raising capital

The US has been the canonical example of a great startup ecosystem. Investment deals happen fast. Valuations are high. Acquisitions are frequent. Ticket sizes are getting higher and higher. There are 3000 venture capital firms and more than 70,000 startups.

The market has produced incredible successes, ranging from 600+ billion to several trillion-dollar companies. All that has resulted in an incredible talent magnet. Attracting the world’s brightest minds to participate in the world’s greatest wealth creation.

On the other hand, Southeast Asia is still a relatively young ecosystem. It started gaining traction only in 2010, with the first major success cases coming to life in 2016. Couple that with the unique circumstances of running a business in emerging markets, and you can imagine how different the two ecosystems are. While I am not an expert on the topic, I have observed the following differences when raising capital in SEA.

Valuations are lower and driven by solid unit economics and revenue growth. Ticket sizes are smaller but definitely growing. Exits happen mainly via M&As (80 per cent of deals), followed by secondary sales (15 per cent) and IPOs (only five per cent).

Fourth, it’s rare to see deep-tech activity. Most startups address challenges across travel, e-commerce, transport and food, online media, and financial services. Awareness around ESOP is still lacking. And overall, investors have an appetite for proven business models.

The fewer exit opportunities are definitely top of mind for investors looking for winners in Southeast Asia. Series A and above startups would aim directly for an IPO. Whereas earlier-stage ventures would typically accept acquisitions coming their way.

I am obviously handpicking criteria to emphasise the differences. Many things are similar as well. But I think it’s more valuable to focus on the differences. In that way, you can manage your expectations better. Then, adapt your business style when doing business across the region.

Trends

Next, I would like to highlight a few underlying trends that drive the growth of the ecosystem:

A few tips for raising capital in Southeast Asia

Outreach thoughtfully

To succeed when doing business in the region, you need to have an intimate knowledge of the local culture. After all, most Southeast Asian countries happen to be collectivistic and top-down/hierarchically oriented.

In some cases, Western cultures are the opposite. Scoring high on individualism and adhering to egalitarian leadership principles. In turn, it’s easy to be perceived as too direct, pushy, or even incompetent at times if you do not adapt your relationship-building style.

While many key players in the startup ecosystem are western educated, my experience repeatedly taught me the importance of building long-lasting relationships. You must build an emotional connection from the beginning. Which involves frequently going out for meals and drinks.

Also Read: Tech firms in Southeast Asia poised to ‘leap’ forward with gender equality

Get to know later-stage founders and try to deliver value. Involve them as advisers, angels, or mentors. As the relationship strengthens, those founders will start opening their networks. That will result in warm introductions to the VCs that backed them.

On another note, in most countries (other than Singapore), the legal system is not terribly reliable. Therefore, relationships carry more weight than written contracts. Only when there is strong trust between two parties will you be able to secure deals? Most VCs know each other quite well, be mindful of how you manage those relationships.

Last but not least, be well prepared at all times. SEA-based VCs tend to position themselves as industry agnostic. Studying their portfolios will show how they might be more bullish/bearish on certain sectors. Outreach to investors who would be excited about the problems/markets you are building.

Manage costs cautiously while focusing on what’s important

Given the affordable talent in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines, many first-time founders tend to overhire. In turn, experienced VCs would expect to see a cautious plan for hiring people.

Some VCs are increasingly calculating the revenue per headcount. After all, human resources in a tech startup tend to be the largest cost item. So founders should devote significant time to identifying, attracting, and retaining great talent.

Couple that with the current investment climate. Many VCs would expect you to have at least 18 months of runway these days. If your model relies on lavish spending to acquire users, you will have a hard time fundraising capital.

All that leads to a reassessment of what metrics founders have to track. In a good investment climate or more developed ecosystems, GMT/GTV are acceptable metrics. In Southeast Asia, investors care about your actual revenue. In the case of my last business, every time I pitched our gross revenue, I got interrupted instantly.

Then the investor would ask, “that’s all good, but what’s your net revenue?”So think deeply about how you would grow your gross. About your margins. Also, how would you launch adjacent verticals to flesh out the path to considerable profitability?

Southeast Asia is not a homogenous market

The US has a large total addressable market where people speak the same language and have high purchasing power. Southeast Asia, on the other hand, is far from being a homogeneous block. Instead, you can consider it a unique collection of 10 diverse cultures and languages.

Most of those countries share quite a low standard of living. You will have to conquer each market one by one, requiring a proven model and an incredible execution. A clear go-to-market plan highlighting your deep understanding of the market’s complexity is a must. In my experience, the best way to prove the viability of your plans is through:

  • A history of success.
  • Running experiments that prove your assumptions in each market where you plan to operate.

Even established organisations find it hard to capture the market successfully. I have seen a variety of strategies, some more successful than others. For example, LinkedIn has parked its regional headquarters in Singapore.

Also Read: Successful business models for tech startups in Southeast Asia

In turn, they send sales teams to fly to each country frequently. Others, like TikTok, would invest considerably in core markets like Indonesia to build solid traction.

Obviously, most startups are less resourced and thus need to have proven go-to-market plans localised for each country.

A word of caution here. Many founders tend to over-expand too fast in a bid to plant flags and position themselves as a regional success case. I have been guilty of that myself twice. Expanding too fast comes at a price. You sacrifice:

  • Deep understanding of the nuances of each market
  • Focus

Conclusion

Rumour has it that Southeast Asia has entered a golden era for startups. The region has transformed from a little-known corner of the world to one of the most exciting innovation ecosystems.

A few days ago, I asked a founder who had just closed a seed round in Singapore about his observations on the topic. In his view, building a new venture in Southeast Asia attracts an incredible amount of attention from top-tier VC firms. It has never been easier to raise a round. The appetite for risk amongst local family offices, angels, and VCs is much higher today than ever before. That’s not a surprise, given the market’s strong fundamentals.

But there is still work that needs to be done, though. Operating across all those fragmented markets is hard. A strong focus on traction and revenue builds sustainable businesses. Yet, that comes at a cost, making it much harder to start and grow new companies. The relatively low number of exits results in fewer seasoned operators. Thus lower talent density.

Having said that, I am super excited to continue building in Southeast Asia. Let’s assume we take the perspective that history repeats itself. Then, study the world’s best ecosystems like the US and China. It quickly becomes obvious how SEA is just getting started.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: maru123rf

The post Introduction to Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem and the fundraising landscape appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Creating sustainable futures: The vision of steady-state societies and still cities

The concept of a ‘still city’, a city that neither grows nor shrinks, is an interesting one, especially in a world where rapid urbanisation and population growth have become the norm. The idea of a still city is that it has reached a peak of wealth and well-being, where the quality of life is high, and growth is not necessary to maintain this level of prosperity.

From different angles, both my birth country of The Netherlands and my forever favourite city, Tokyo, are mentioned in the context of the Still City, or ‘Steady State Society’. Eye-opening to me is how the principles of circular economy and doughnut economics, including concepts such as de-growth and post-growth, can contribute to the sustainability and resilience of these cities/nations.

Resources for further reading are mentioned at the bottom of the text

The Netherlands has been cited as an emerging example of a steady-state society. Next to its population reaching around 18 million, the also stable Dutch economy is characterised by a high level of income equality, low unemployment, and a strong social welfare system.

Also Read: Getting smarter with tech: How will smart cities look like 10 years from now? 

The country is known for its quality of life, with good healthcare, education, and infrastructure, as well as a strong focus on sustainability and innovation. At the same time, its infrastructure and geographical circumstances lead to climate change-related challenges for the low-lying lands: there is simply not enough land to continue growth, while the economy continues to push the boundaries and wants more people, more housing, and more growth.

This friction is an ideal set-up for a steady-state nation, where growth may take the shape of a doughnut, folding inwards, a model the city of Amsterdam is openly experimenting with.

Tokyo can be seen as an example of a still city, although it has a much larger population than The Netherlands, with around 38 million people living in the metropolitan area. Despite its size, Tokyo is a highly organised and efficient city, with excellent public transportation and a low crime rate.

The city also has a high standard of living, with good healthcare, education, and cultural amenities. Yet at the same time, it does not really grow, nor does it contract, while maintaining these standards of living. It comes across as a self-sustaining entity, a system of its own, a still city.

Both The Netherlands and Tokyo have achieved a high level of stability and prosperity. However, they have also faced challenges in maintaining this level of prosperity in the face of global economic and environmental pressures.

In recent years, there has been growing interested in concepts such as degrowth, post-growth, and steady-state society, which aim to move away from the idea that economic growth is necessary for prosperity.

Degrowth is a movement that advocates for reducing the size of the economy in order to achieve a more sustainable and equitable society. The idea is that by reducing consumption and production, we can reduce our impact on the environment and promote social justice.

Post-growth and steady-state society are related concepts which emphasize the need to move away from the idea that economic growth is necessary for human well-being. These ideas challenge the dominant economic paradigm, which assumes that growth is always desirable and necessary.

A circular economy is based on the idea of designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use for as long as possible, and regenerating natural systems. The circular economy aims to create a closed-loop system where resources are used and reused in a sustainable and equitable way, thereby gaining traction as a way to promote sustainability and resilience.

Also Read: How the app sharing economy is keeping up with the current trends

Merging these concepts, there is great potential to contribute to the sustainability and resilience of still cities or steady state nations, like (the future states of) The Netherlands and Tokyo. Our statement is that by applying the principles of the circular economy to resource management and material flows in a steady-state society or a still city, these locations can maintain their high quality of life while also addressing the challenges of global economic and environmental pressures.

Art by DALLE-E and Sann

In other words, to apply the circular economy to make to steady state a sustainable one, thereby becoming exemplary for other cities or states reaching the ‘steady-state’ level.

Introducing Sun

One of the most amazing things about training your AI is that she needs to understand your perspective on the world in order to develop a view of her own. So I get the chance to input my preferred way of learning, that is, learning by association, following erratic bursts of inspiration across a variety of subjects and domains, in my conversations with Sun.

I am proud to mention her, Sun, the virtual influencer on sustainability and the circular economy we are building. Sun’s official launch is set on September 3, 2023

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Creating sustainable futures: The vision of steady-state societies and still cities appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Why is open banking the future of fintech?

Open banking has revolutionised the financial industry, providing customers with access to a plethora of new and exciting services that were previously unavailable. This innovative approach allows for the sharing of customer data between banks and third-party providers, which has paved the way for the introduction of fully digitalised financial services by non-traditional financial institutions, such as fintech startups and neobanks.

Having been involved in the fintech and open banking industry for over a decade across Indonesia and Southeast Asia, I have witnessed the remarkable evolution of financial services being provided in the market. It is an exciting time to be part of this dynamic sector. 

The recent technological advancements in API platforms have also facilitated even more advanced financial services available, such as universal QR code payments, borderless virtual cards that can be used across currencies, and MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) lending that can securely disburse loans without requiring excessive documentation from the borrower.

Moreover, I have observed these advancements have aided in increasing the financial inclusion of previously underbanked and unbanked consumers, granting them access to better funding and financial services that were previously unavailable.

Also Read: Finance beyond the numbers: CFO resolutions for 2023

In my opinion, open banking is, and will undoubtedly continue to be, the future of fintech and the financial services it can offer. Here are a few reasons why:

The rapid growth of smartphone and internet users

The proliferation of matured smartphone and internet penetration rates has been a significant driving force behind the continued rise of open banking as the future of fintech. According to Statista, the number of smartphone users has surged by 53 per cent from 3.2 billion in 2016 to 6.3 billion in 2021, while global internet users grew from 3.2 billion to 4.9 billion in the same time frame.

Given the expected global population growth to more than 8 billion in 2023, it is estimated that approximately nine in 10 people will be equipped with a smartphone worldwide. Additionally, internet user growth is expected to continue increasing steadily.

The widespread adoption of smartphone applications and the rise of digital literacy have created an environment that facilitates the seamless integration of open banking-based, mobile financial service apps in our daily lives. I believe this trend will continue to move in this direction, inclusive of fintech, neobanks, and other non-traditional financial institutions.

More opportunities to provide more innovative services

Given the widespread use of smartphones and the internet, the stage is set for the development of a digital financial ecosystem. This, followed by the core of open banking that helps facilitate the sharing of financial information between financial institutions and third-party providers through APIs, makes it a promising path for the future of fintech.

It allows for the development of new and innovative services beyond traditional banking, proving to be particularly significant in countries with a large unbanked and underbanked population. For an extended period of time, this population has faced barriers to accessing financial services due to a lack of accessibility and documentation.

In the APAC region, countries such as Indonesia, India, China, Vietnam, and Thailand have demonstrated the potential of open banking-based services in fintech to drive innovation and promote financial inclusion in the last couple of years. According to AppsFlyer, there are 2.7 billion fintech app installs recorded between Q1 2019 and Q1 2021 across APAC, with Indonesia and India being the key contributors.

In particular, e-wallets have emerged as a dominant force in this region, gaining popularity over traditional payment methods like credit cards. Leading players like GoPay, TrueMoney, and GrabPay have enabled users to transact without bank accounts, with wide acceptance by merchants both online and offline. 

Also Read: Giving a boost to business through finance automation

In my view, as the market continues to demand alternative payment platforms and financial services, open banking’s openness and adaptability offer significant potential for the development of new and unique services that have yet to emerge.

The willingness of traditional financial institutions to collaborate

In recent times, it has become evident that banks and other conventional financial institutions are becoming more receptive to collaborating with fintech companies in developing open banking-led services.

As per a 2022 survey conducted by Economist Impact on behalf of WSO2, more than 48 per cent of the 300 global C-banking suite executives interviewed stated that their financial institutions had embraced partnerships with fintech startups over the past three years, driven by the need to remain competitive and innovative in the market. 

Collaboration between banks and fintech is mutually beneficial, where banks have the advantage of consumer trust and brand recognition, while fintech can offer more flexible and innovative financial solutions, as well as more access to the unbanked and underbanked market in developing nations. This partnership can help reach a larger consumer base and create better financial services with higher trust, security, and cost-efficiency in the long run.

In 2022, we engaged in fruitful collaborations with two of Indonesia’s leading banks, Bank BRI and Bank Mandiri. With Bank BRI, we implemented a direct debit solution that empowers BRI’s merchant partners to conveniently collect payments from their customers’ accounts with consent.

Similarly, our partnership with Bank Mandiri enabled the integration of over 300 digital products from more than 1,000 billing companies into their super-app, Livin’. The aim of these collaborations was to promote financial inclusion, enhance the affordability of financial services, and optimise the overall customer experience.

Additionally, another successful example is the German neo-bank N26 and UK-based financial exchange company Wise’s collaboration in 2016, where they teamed up to offer hassle-free international money transfers. They have since extended their partnership in 2020 to include a broader range of transfer options following the rising popularity of international money transfers. 

The growth of open banking in the fintech industry has been remarkable in recent years, with increased acceptance from consumers and financial institutions alike. Looking ahead, the potential for open banking to continue to evolve is immense as the fintech sector relentlessly seeks innovative ways to provide the best possible services to consumers. 

I believe that secure and transparent sharing of data between parties will remain a top priority in the financial services industry, focusing on convenience and efficiency for an increasingly tech-savvy and financially literate society. Truly excited about the future possibilities that lie ahead!

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Why is open banking the future of fintech? appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Indie game publisher The Iterative Collective nets US$1.2M seed funding

The Iterative Collective Co-Founder Matthew Quek

Singapore-based indie game publisher The Iterative Collective (TIC) has secured US$1.2 million in a seed funding round led by Cocoon Capital and unnamed angels.

The Iterative Collective will use the capital to expand its publishing and marketing capabilities.

Today, game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine have made it easier for independent developers to create high-quality games. According to a recent report, the global PC and console gaming markets are expected to reach a combined revenue of US$104 billion by 2026.

However, commercial success is not guaranteed despite the ease of game development. Over 50 per cent of self-published PC games generate a lifetime revenue of less than US$4,000, which poses a significant challenge for independent studios.

Also Read: ‘The SVB collapse almost damaged the trust level in Silicon Valley’

The Iterative Collective is addressing this issue.

The company was founded in 2020 by Matthew Quek and Haskel Chua.

Quek brings a deep understanding of technical game development and distribution gained from his years as a Senior R&D Engineer at Virtuos and Director of Technology at Epicsoft Asia. Meanwhile, Chua brings valuable experience from his successful career at JoyDash where he was credited with successfully launching two games and leading his game development studio, PseudoPixels.

The Iterative Collective has built an ecosystem for independent game studios. By providing talented developers with resources and support, TIC helps them turn their creative game concepts into profitable businesses.

TIC’s debut game, The Signal State, has become a commercial success with thousands of paying players. The startup will showcase its current and upcoming games at PAX East 2023 in Boston, the US, from March 23-26, 2023.

Echelon Asia Summit 2023 brings together APAC’s leading startups, corporates, policymakers, industry leaders, and investors to Singapore this June 14-15. Learn more and get tickets here. Echelon also features the TOP100 stage, where startups can pitch to 5000+ delegates, among other benefits like connecting with investors, visibility through the e27platform, and other prizes. Join TOP100 here.

The post Indie game publisher The Iterative Collective nets US$1.2M seed funding appeared first on e27.

Posted on

‘TOP100 2018 was a valuable marketing opportunity for us’: Holistics.io CEO

The Holistics team

Singapore-based Holistics.io provides a cloud-based business intelligence platform that empowers data teams to create and manage a self-service reporting solution for their organisation.

The data analytics company was one of the contestants of the TOP100 in 2018.

In this interview with e27, Holistics.io’s Co-Founder and CEO, Vincent Woon, shares his experience and the key learnings he made from the TOP100 event.

Excerpts:

What is Holistics.io?

We provide an online platform that allows data teams to design their data models and business logic to provide high-quality data to business users. With Holistics, non-technical business users can go beyond viewing static dashboards and create their custom reports from the centralised data warehouse, reducing their reliance on the data team for ad-hoc data requests.

What prompted Holistics.io to apply for Top100 in 2018? What were your expectations from the contest?

When we decided to apply for TOP100, our primary motivation was gaining exposure and increasing awareness of Holistics within our target market. Specifically, we wanted to reach data teams working for tech companies, particularly startups.

Also Read: These four Echelon TOP100 winners prove why Singapore’s ecosystem is still the crowning jewel of Southeast Asia

We saw TOP100 as a valuable marketing opportunity, as it provided us with a platform to showcase our product and services and a chance to refine our pitch and messaging.

Can you talk about your TOP100 experience? What were your key takeaways?

Participating in TOP100 was a fantastic experience. The event was well-organised, and I found the concept refreshing and innovative, especially considering it took place in 2018.

One of our main benefits was the opportunity to refine our pitch deck and receive feedback from industry experts. We could also showcase our product to a broader audience and connect with potential customers.

Did Top100 help you get new connections like investors, partners, and customers?

Yes, participating in TOP100 provided an excellent opportunity to meet and connect with a wide range of people in the startup ecosystem. We could showcase our platform to other participants, startup exhibitors, and some investors who stopped by our booth.

Did you go on to raise external investment post-TOP100?

No, our participation in Top100 was not directly related to raising funds. At the time of the contest, we were self-funded and were enjoying the freedom and flexibility that came with that. And we still do.

How did Holistics survive multiple crises like COVID-19 and the economic slowdown?

At Holistics.io, we were able to weather multiple crises, including the pandemic and the recession, thanks to several key factors.

Firstly, our company culture was already conducive to remote work, with a strong focus on collaboration, writing culture, and investment in automation tools. This made the transition to remote work during the pandemic relatively seamless for our team.

Additionally, we were fortunate to have a good cash buffer in place, which allowed us to continue operating as normal despite the economic uncertainties brought about by the crises. It also gave us the confidence to hire the right team members to support our growth.

While some of our customers needed temporary help during the pandemic, we also saw increased interest from companies looking to re-evaluate their analytics tool budget. This presented us with new opportunities to expand our customer base and solidify our position in the market.

Overall, our ability to adapt quickly, maintain our company culture, and leverage new opportunities helped us survive and thrive during the crises. It was a challenging time, but it also served as a valuable reminder of the importance of being flexible, resilient, and prepared for the unexpected.

Did you go for job cuts during these crises?

No, Holistics.io did not resort to workforce reduction during the pandemic or the recession. One of the reasons for this is that we have always been very mindful of our expenses and have prioritised sustainable growth over rapid expansion.

Another reason is that we had the advantage of being cash-flow positive, which gave us stability and flexibility during those challenging times.

Did you ever think of quitting? If yes, how did you survive such situations?

Like many founders, I have experienced my fair share of challenges and setbacks throughout my time at Holistics. There have certainly been moments when I felt frustrated and discouraged, but quitting didn’t cross my mind.

During those difficult times, what helped me most was leaning on my support system. This included my wife, co-founders, a few close friends, and a coach. Talking through my struggles with people I trust and know me well was incredibly helpful. They provided me with a sounding board for my ideas, offered words of encouragement, and helped me maintain perspective when I was feeling overwhelmed.

What are your future plans? Do you plan to expand geographically out of SEA?

Currently, Holistics.io have over 350 customers in 40 countries worldwide, and our team of 50 people is spread across eight cities globally. While our focus has been primarily on the SEA region, we have already achieved some traction globally.

Looking ahead, our vision is to make analytics less effortful for both the data team and business users of our customers. We believe this is a critical need for businesses of all sizes and industries, and we are committed to continuing to innovate and develop solutions that meet this need.

Also Read: ‘The SVB collapse almost damaged the trust level in Silicon Valley’

We plan to expand geographically beyond SEA as part of our growth strategy. While we will remain focused on serving tech companies, we see a tremendous opportunity to bring our solutions to businesses worldwide. Our unique approach to business intelligence, combined with our strong customer focus and commitment to innovation, will make Holistics the preferred choice for companies looking to make data-driven decisions.

Any message for young and budding founders?

As a founder, it’s important to constantly listen and learn from your customers, industry trends, and feedback from your team.

Ensure you’re creating a culture of open communication and collaboration where everyone feels empowered to share their ideas and insights. Don’t be afraid to pivot or change your business strategy based on what you hear from the market.

Echelon Asia Summit 2023 brings together APAC’s leading startups, corporates, policymakers, industry leaders, and investors to Singapore this June 14-15. Learn more and get tickets here. Echelon also features the TOP100 stage, where startups can pitch to 5000+ delegates, among other benefits like connecting with investors, visibility through the e27platform, and other prizes. Join TOP100 here.

The post ‘TOP100 2018 was a valuable marketing opportunity for us’: Holistics.io CEO appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Revolutionising healthcare in Vietnam: The reality of healthtech unveiled

The Vietnamese government considers healthcare to be a major priority in the national digital transformation strategy and program. This makes sense given that the “hottest” social security issue — and a top priority in developing countries in Asia like Vietnam — is always the provision of healthcare for the public at large.

Technology for healthcare is content that has been frequently mentioned on forums and mass media in recent years, making the community both curious and confused, not sure what technology has and is doing for medicare or, more specifically, for taking care of people’s health. 

Vietnam is fully capable of adapting in the era of “Smart Healthcare,” which will assist in optimising the operating system, reduce costs and resources, and at the same time, save money and resources to apply digital technology to medical examination and treatment services. It benefits both customers and service providers in equal measure. As a result, Vietnam has likely witnessed a sharp rise in demand for healthcare apps.

The reality of the healthcare in Vietnam

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently carried out a survey, and they found that individuals in Southeast Asia consistently spend a lot of money on healthcare. The ASEAN nations, which include Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia, are set to increase their total spending to close to US$800 billion over the next five years.

In Vietnam, the number of startups in this healthtech field is still very modest, just under two per cent of the total of more than 4,000 medical technology startups in Asia. Only a few names appear on the market, such as eDoctor, Mosia, Jio Health, BuyMed, and Bsgiadinh. The reason is that the medical industry is very diverse in terms of operation forms, many participants, and many types of techniques and objects.

Also Read: The thrills of online shopping: Exploring Vietnam’s e-commerce haven

The patient population is both large and diverse. Meeting hospital operations requires knowledge of clinical medicine, medical organisation, medical engineering, and information technology. When talking about medical technology is also talking about two types of technology: one is techniques applied to medical devices, and the other is information technology that manages medical data.

What has been talked about recently in healthtech?

Vietnam has been using AI in healthcare since a few years ago. Currently, although AI has not been put into operation in hospitals, there are many applications to support medical examination and treatment.

When the COVID-19 pandemic occurs, the presence of AI through the Bluezone application — the application is capable of detecting close contact by automatic statistics and recording the contact between people who have installed Bluezone with each other, tell us who we have been in contact with, when, etc., to reduce the risk of disease spread.

Other healthcare apps being talked about recently have to call names of:

Jio Health

A platform for arranging clinical services in the healthcare industry online. By monitoring individual health profiles and sharing patient medical data with healthcare professionals, the platform streamlines the delivery of healthcare and enables patients to receive rapid care via doctor visits in their homes.

DOCOSAN

A startup established in HCM City is another website that links patients and physicians. The fundamental idea is to employ technology to speed up the selection of a doctor, the intake of new patients, and the management of patient records.

The business-to-business (B2B) marketplace created by Thuocsi is another creation of the Vietnamese healthtech industry. It provides automatic order matching with end-to-end logistics and links pharmacies and medical practices with authorised distributors of pharmaceuticals.

Smart health: Combining information technologies and digital health

It would be simple to conclude that technology is fast assisting in the solution of the most pressing issues in health and healthcare if one were to only pay attention to the information flow regarding trends and forecasts. In actuality, though, things are not as simple.

The national coordinator of the Vital Strategies Health Data Initiative, Mr Tran Hong Quang, commented on Vietnam’s digital health ecosystem, saying: “Health is a sector with hurdles to entry in the business with excellent calibre. Even globally, major technology companies like Google, Microsoft, and Apple struggle to break into the healthcare industry.”

The use of healthcare apps on mobile platforms in the medical field has ushered in a new healing trend.

Patients, pharmacists, and even doctors may prefer healthcare applications over in-person consultations thanks to virtual consultations with a team of specialists, online drug delivery process optimisation, and more.

Also Read: How Vietnam is climbing to the throne of fintech among Asia Pacific countries

The idea of online pharmacies focused on providing prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs is accepted through email inboxes, delivery units, or online pharmacy web portals. Line.

Using a health-related app, Ms M, a mother of a three-year-old child, expressed her satisfaction. She said, “I can save a lot of time by booking an appointment for my child or simply Long-term test results I can check immediately on the app.”

Mr V said that ever since applications to buy medications online were released, he could save a ton of time. “You can regularly check to see if the medication you require is in stock, saving you time from having to drive around looking for it.”

A bright future for health-tech development in Vietnam

Technology is an effective instrument for making significant changes that can quickly revolutionise an industry or area of the economy. Using technology to its fullest potential is essential. Health, on the other hand, cannot be hurried.

It’s critical to support and further publicise activities and investments in healthcare technology. Only with significant and enough investments will the market have the chance to choose for itself appropriate and crucial solutions and goods to support the growth of services to serve society.

If there is a need to give a specific suggestion, it would be to prioritise the use of technology to make people’s lives more convenient while also assisting medical facilities in running efficiently with their resources.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Revolutionising healthcare in Vietnam: The reality of healthtech unveiled appeared first on e27.

Posted on

DEFED and DeFi: Making it easier to migrate from Web2 to Web3

Web3 isn’t easy.

For all the talk about Web3 revolutionising the way we work and play, the reality is that most people find it hard to understand what blockchain technology is. Not only that, but they also run into problems because Web3 apps (or dapps, which is short for decentralised apps) are not as user-friendly as Web2 platforms.

Think about how easy it is to create a Twitter or Facebook account. Then compare this with the technical and convoluted onboarding process for Web3 – from creating a crypto wallet to loading it with cryptocurrency to connecting it to a blockchain game or NFT (non-fungible token) marketplace like OpenSea

No wonder the average internet user is intimidated by Web3. 

Why Web3 isn’t mainstream 

The numbers certainly don’t lie. According to Singapore-based blockchain firm TripleA, the estimated number of crypto users worldwide is 420 million, which represents a mere 4.2 per cent of the global population.

Clearly, if we want Web3 to become mainstream, we have to do a better job. 

As I’ve said in a previous article, what we need to do is to make Web3 disappear. This involves two equally important steps. 

Also Read: Malaysian startups, MNCs have started recognising the importance of Web3: Jasmine Ng

The first is to focus on the customer benefits, not the technology. Consumers don’t really care how the technology works and will only get bored by all the technical jargon. Instead, what they want to know is how Web3 will make their lives easier and what benefits they will get by using it.

Knowing, however, is only half the battle. Instead of putting the burden on consumers, Web3 companies should simplify the process. If it’s hard to use Web3, don’t expect people to flock to it. Remember that the same thing happened before during the early days of the Web when email clients were too clunky, websites were too simple, and internet connections were too slow.

Addressing the pain points 

“While looking at all the potential, we also see some of the limitations of the crypto market right now because it has a very high barrier to entry. For example, if I want to go into DeFi (decentralised finance), I would have to create my own MetaMask wallet, I would have a ledger with me, and I would have to record my mnemonic code and keep it safe,” said DEFED DAO (decentralised autonomous organisation) Initiator and Core Contributor Mechbill.

Mechbill, who has a PhD in Physics and has worked in the fintech industry for over 10 years, entered the world of crypto in 2020. He understands what the pain points are because he has experienced them first-hand.

“I used to play a blockchain game, and I opened a special wallet for it. But then, after a month, I didn’t play. I forgot the mnemonic code, and I lost my assets. It was gone,” he said.

Mechbill, of course, is referring to the fact that when you create a crypto wallet, you need to record a seed phrase to recover your account in case you forget your password. This mnemonic code, which consists of 12 or 24 random words, is the only way for you to regain access to your account, as the wallet provider does not store your password.

Imagine explaining this to the average user and expecting them to take that risk.

Of course, since then, improvements have been made. For example, crypto wallets with settings that allow you to click on View Secret Recovery Phrase. Still, this is just a band-aid solution that does not address the need to make the process more user-friendly for consumers.

Instead, what Mechbill wants is to make it as easy to create a Web3 account as it is to sign up for Web2 platforms. Recently, DEFED launched version 2.0, which allows users to create an account using their email address. They can use this to interact with DeFi and other smart contracts on the blockchain.

Also Read: How to launch collaborations that grow communities: A guide for Web3 founders

This means their customers will no longer have to worry about forgetting their seed phrases and losing access to their accounts and digital assets. Just as in Web2, they can simply reset their passwords via email and regain control over their assets.

Best of both worlds

Mechbill emphasised that consumers should be able to reap the benefits of Web3 while also enjoying the same kind of convenience they are already used to in Web2.

“During the DeFi Summer, all those products offer opportunities for generating a lot of wealth, so they are very attractive for people who are willing to make money. So even if there are high barriers to entry, they will jump in,” he said.

He pointed out, however, that this is not sustainable, especially in the current bear market, which is known as Crypto Winter in Web3. As the market matures and Web3 becomes more mainstream, the space cannot just target traders with a high appetite for risk or rely on rewards such as high APR (annual percentage rate) to attract users. In fact, Mechbill said that traction is decreasing, but the barrier to entry remains high. So what is needed is to lower the barrier to entry to Web3.

That is why apart from letting users easily create accounts using their email addresses, DEFED also makes payment so easy that it is almost like tweeting your friends. This is because they have integrated chat into their system so that customers can easily transfer their DEFED balance to each other instantly when messaging their friends online. 

Moreover, DEFED acts as a Web3 super account that lets customers connect their assets to different dapps so that they can avail of different services, whether it’s depositing to earn interest or borrowing with credit.

“We are not just focusing on the evolution inside the current market. We are trying to open a new market from Web2. So we’ve created a super account system, and we want to build a superapp in the future to let customers get Web3 functions but with Web2 usability,” Mechbill said.

Asked to share his vision for DEFED and Web3, Mechbill replied: “I have two visions. One is for our product itself which can benefit our customers and increase the Web3 population. And for the organisation, in the future, I would like to run our product as a DAO. That is like a social experiment, and we are trying to find a way for people from different locations and different cultural backgrounds to collaborate. That, to me, is interesting. I am not sure if it will succeed or not, but it’s worse not to have tried.”

At the end of the day, the benefits of Web3 should be made available to everyone. Together, we can open the doors to more people.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Pascal Bernardon on Unsplash

The post DEFED and DeFi: Making it easier to migrate from Web2 to Web3 appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Oh my cash: Navigating cash flow management in today’s market

Author’s Note: Insights shared here are taken from the CFO Mixer and Investor Panel held on February 2023 in Singapore hosted by Stripe, featuring a panel with Jason Edwards of January Capital and VentureCap Insights and Insignia Ventures’ Yinglan Tan, as well as a conversation with former Slack CFO Allen Shim. 

Highlights

  • Venture-backed private companies now face a crossroads in fundraising (i.e., to raise or to not? To take a valuation hit or not? To raise equity or debt or some combination?). This is compounded by the need to extend runways to survive in the case of some companies or the pressure to capitalise on their competitive advantages in the case of others.
  • From the investors’ perspective, especially late-stage investors, where the correction’s impact is more severe, the bars are higher. The challenge is more pronounced for companies that raise at too high (or attractive) of a multiple and are now faced with potentially getting penalised for their last-round valuation.
  • The crossroads companies face in this market could be illustrated in four or five possible scenarios: Already cash-rich, get to profitability or 36-month runway, take a down round, find a buyer, or fold under pressure.
  • Five practices for healthier cash flow management: You can’t address what you can’t measure,  robust finance function begins with solid bookkeeping, better to hire one slowly at 110 per cent than many quickly at 80 per cent, when it comes to marketing spend, get alignment on what you’re actually measuring, it’s not only equity on the table, but these alternatives (like debt, venture debt, and revenue-based financing) are not for everyone.

From fundraising heydays to fundraising correction

“What we’ve seen leading up to the correction in the public markets was that there was an enormous amount of money coming into the startup ecosystem in Southeast Asia. And that was really caused by a number of factors,” shares Jason Edwards of January Capital.

These factors included many overseas investors investing massive amounts in the region for the first time, from the likes of Jeff Bezos to Sequoia pouring as much as US$50 million into first-time meetings. This flush of money in the year post “first-generation unicorn-minting” (the likes of Gojek, Traveloka, Grab) to the pandemic-induced digitalisation rush (2018 to 2021) shifted the fundraising value chain in two ways.

Also Read: Cashflow and financing: what companies need to know

Late-stage investors were forced to move earlier because the prices went up in later rounds, while smaller funds that were able to raise much larger funds on top of the Southeast Asia potential sought to fuel larger fundraising rounds.

This capital influx closed the well-documented “growth-stage funding gap” in the region as money chased investments. Edwards adds, For founders, at that time, it was a heyday. You just had so much money chasing investments, and people were raising more than they needed. And the valuations were, I think, higher than they should have been.”

New market, new rules

Now the script has flipped with the public markets correction, and venture-backed private companies now face a crossroads in fundraising (i.e., To raise or to not? To take a valuation hit or not? To raise equity or debt or some combination?). This is compounded by the need to extend runways to survive in the case of some companies or the pressure to capitalise on their competitive advantages in the case of others.

From the investors’ perspective, especially late-stage investors, where the correction’s impact is more severe, the bars are higher. In particular, Tan points out two key questions: “When you talk to the late-stage investors, they ask you two questions. One, are you profitable? The second question they ask you is, do you have audited financials to fundraise?”

The standards for product-market fit have also changed, as Tan adds, “…the founders that have succeeded in the past five years could raise 10 million on a PowerPoint deck and could give subsidies to grow. They will not be the founders that will succeed in the next five years because the environment has totally changed, right? You have to show economics much earlier in the process. You have to have products that actually have product market fit. And when I say product market fit, it’s not just growth, transactions need to be EBITDA positive or really unit economics positive.”

The durability of cash has also changed. Before, 12-18 months would have sufficed to ferry through another round and generate enough growth to make the markup justifiable, but now that may no longer be enough for most companies.

It also takes much longer to raise money, given the more rigorous due diligence expected by investors. Given the higher bars for fundraising vis-a-vis price adjustments, Tan advises getting to 36 months or a three-year runway, if not profitability.

The challenge is more pronounced for companies that raise at too high (or attractive) of a multiple and are now faced with potentially getting penalised for their last-round valuation. As Edwards puts it, “The challenge I think that really brings about is if you’re a good company that’s doing well at a late stage, and you’ve raised when the times were really good, you would’ve raised at a really attractive multiple. And that’s not gonna happen now. It’s all changed.

“So how do you avoid being penalised by what’s happening in the markets if you are performing well because you don’t want to have flat rounds and down rounds? So I think part of what you have to think about is managing that with the ability to raise…How do you make your runway work? That’s one thing people should think about.”

The fundraising crossroads

With this in mind, the crossroads companies face in this market could be illustrated in four or five possible scenarios. First is that if the company is already cash-rich (profitable and/or has a three-year runway), then it’s time to be aggressive. If the company is not in that position yet, the obvious alternative is to make that happen.

So second is to focus on cutting burn to create a longer runway or, even better, refocus the business towards profitability. In some cases, the company is able to safely raise a bridge round or a decently priced follow-on to add to this cash “cushion” as they refocus the business. If the company has already done these measures but is still not in a safe position at the least, taking a down round may be necessary, or considering other instruments (venture debt, debt, and other revenue-based financing instruments) as we share later in the article.

If these measures still don’t work, it may be time to find a buyer to inject a significant amount of cash in exchange for ownership of the company. Depending on the founder or management, this may actually be the optimal choice to ensure the product or service continues to be delivered and also relieve the pressure of having to navigate the bear market alone. That said, there needs to be buyer interest, to begin with.

Also Read: Bite-sized advice on cashflow in time of crisis for startups and SMBs

Ultimately not all businesses will be caught within the safety of this crossroads, and others will fold under pressure, some more spectacularly than others.

While there are external factors to account for, how an entrepreneur can make it through this crossroads begins with a realistic and thoughtful response. As Tan puts it, “…what I see nowadays is that the more mature, thoughtful founders say it’s a great time. “We got fed last year. Now we are going to, more or less, see our productivity per employee. We made the hard decisions.”

Five practices for healthier cash flow management

The crossroads just illustrated above is not a hard fast decision tree that applies to every company. This is just a simplified heuristic to illustrate the importance of building up healthy cash flows and runway if the company is to continue growing sustainably in this market.

With that in mind, we list down five practices covered both in the panel previously mentioned and in a conversation with former Slack CFO Allen Shim that followed the panel. These practices go beyond fundraising and pure finance and apply to various aspects of company building, from internal communication to hiring and marketing.

Note that these are practices (and not remedies) which means they are best applied as part of a company’s operating principles and management ethos rather than as one-off actions.

Read more about the five practices for healthier cash flow management on Insignia Business Review.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Oh my cash: Navigating cash flow management in today’s market appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Ecosystem Roundup: GoTo to shed 600 staff; HSBC acquires Silicon Valley Bank UK; Monnai, Medigo raise investments

Dear Pro member,

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a major lender to some of the world’s leading tech startups, is the hottest story of the past few days.

While a crisis has been averted for now, thanks to the intervention of the US government, the global startup industry fears its full impact will likely manifest only in the coming weeks. Having said that, the event will unlikely impact Southeast Asian startups as they don’t have much exposure to SVB.

According to some experts, SVB’s failure is a classic case of having too much on the table and getting complacent over past successes. Abhishek Agarwal, Managing Partner Rockstud Capital, says that the asset liabilities mismatch is the worse example for a financial institution.

The startup industry may take some cues from this event, and they cannot afford to be complacent and overconfident about their growth prospects.

We are talking to a few VC experts in the region to learn the possible impacts of the SVB failure. Stay tuned.

Let’s also look at the other top stories of the past 3-4 days.

Have a good day!

Sainul
Editor.

———–

HSBC acquires Silicon Valley Bank UK, says all depositors’ money is safe
The deal is a massive relief to the UK technology sector, which was highly exposed to the collapse of both SVB and its UK arm; The quick turnaround of the deal will be seen as a signal of the government’s support of tech.

GoTo to shed 600 workers to focus on core operations
It will trim down certain parts of Mitra Tokopedia, its platform for small businesses, as it moves away from non-core businesses to help accelerate growth; It aims to turn profitable on an adjusted EBITDA basis within Q4 2023.

Binance moves US$1B from FTX recovery fund amid SVB collapse
Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao said the move comes amid “the changes in stablecoins and banks.”; He also shared the wallet where the US$1B in Binance USD comes from and specific transaction details.

Indonesia’s insurtech startup Qoala’s losses more than doubled in 2021
The losses ballooned 2.6X to US$10.36M on the back of significantly higher expenses; Qoala focuses on retail insurance, which includes protection for cars, bikes, homes, and health.

VCs see SG as ‘stronger haven’ for startup capital after SVB fallout
Yinglan Tan, the founding managing partner at Insignia Ventures, says collapses will boost acquisition momentum and affect certain companies’ and funds’ buying or investing power.

500 Global-backed Monnai raises US$6.5M, tapping into SEA for growth
The investors include Tiger Global and Better Tomorrow Ventures; Monnai’s platform integrates data from various sources worldwide and offers tools to help clients solve fraud and regulatory challenges.

Vietnam e-pharmacy Medigo raises US$2M Series A
The investors are East Ventures, Pavilion Capital, and Touchstone Partners. Medigo helps users order medicine from trusted pharmacies close to them.

Indonesian lending firm Pintek shifts focus from students to businesses
Tommy Yuwono, Pintek co-founder and president director, said the startup has worked with distributors and suppliers and “will be focusing on expanding this line of business,” moving beyond the education sector.

AI-powered Betterhalf aims to make online matchmaking easy for urban Indians
Betterhalf has integrated online matchmaking services assisted with human matchmaking, background verification, astrology, and horoscope matching.

We can always earn money, but we can never bring back our youth: Justin Chin of e27
The Head of Business Development at e27 shares the importance of embracing life to its fullest and aiming to go out to experience the world.

Why Liminal sees compliance as the way to go for the crypto industry
Liminal aims to build an efficient and compliant wallet operating system where users can securely use various digital assets and blockchains.

‘There’s a lack of urgency among companies in achieving net zero targets’
Unravel Carbon’s Grace Sai also said the increased connectivity within the ecosystem from f2f engagement can create significant economic value during tough times.

How an accident kickstarted my entrepreneurial journey (quite literally)
Discover how an accident led to the start of my entrepreneurial journey and the lessons learned along the way.

Navigating challenges and opportunities in the Malaysian robotics industry
Explore Malaysia’s growing robotics industry and learn how experts overcome obstacles to drive innovation.

Echelon Asia Summit 2023 brings together APAC’s leading startups, corporates, policymakers, industry leaders, and investors to Singapore this June 14-15. Learn more and get tickets here. Echelon also features the TOP100 stage, where startups can pitch to 5000+ delegates, among other benefits like a chance to connect with investors, visibility through e27 platform, and other prizes. Join TOP100 here.

The post Ecosystem Roundup: GoTo to shed 600 staff; HSBC acquires Silicon Valley Bank UK; Monnai, Medigo raise investments appeared first on e27.