Posted on 1 Comment

Ecosystem Roundup: Ant Group soft launches digibank in SG, Temasek’s US$3.6B for eco-friendly investments, Traveloka close to raising US$200M

Traveloka

Traveloka fuels up with US$200M after failed SPAC merger
The company has said that it is still committed to going public after halting its talks with Bridgetown Holdings; Traveloka has garnered a total of US$1.2B from its past investments.

Temasek allocates US$3.6B for eco-friendly investments
It has launched GenZero, an investment platform committed to global decarbonisation; It will offer capital to companies from the early to mature stages under three areas: tech-based solutions, nature-based solutions, and carbon ecosystem enablers.

Carro buys 50% of Indonesian car rental firm MPMRent
MPMRent is the rental unit of Indonesia-based automotive group Mitra Pinasthika Mustika; Aside from having a fleet of more than 13K cars, MPMRent also provides financing services for its customers.

Animoca Brands investments valued at over US$1.5B
It has made more than 340 deals as of April; The company recently led funding rounds in companies, including content production service Gusto Collective, gaming studio Untamed Planet, and Our Happy Company, a social commerce firm.

Alpha JWC, Emtek co-lead Indonesian culinary startup Mangkokku’s US$7M Series A round
Mangkokku operates 50 branches and serves 4M+ bowls annually via its online and offline channels with dozens of permanent and seasonal menus; The startup currently operates 50 branches across several cities.

Dagangan raises US$6.6M to develop new financial services, expand national reach
Investors are Sumitomo Mitsui Banking, Monk’s Hill Ventures, and Payfazz CEO Hendra Kwik. Dagangan is an e-commerce platform that provides same-day and next-day delivery for a variety of household needs.

East Ventures-backed IDN Media secures Series D funding
Investors are Mayapada Group, KMIF, OCBC NISP Ventura, Dentsu Group, and V Media Ventures; IDN Media operates sites including IDN Times, Popbela.com, Popmama.com, Yummy, IDN Creative, IDN Event, and a creator platform called Indonesia Creators Economy.

Ant Group soft launches digibank in Singapore
Anext Bank will be led by Toh Su Mei, a former executive of DBS Bank; Anext Bank will focus on providing digital financial services to local and regional MSMEs, especially those that engage in cross-border operations.

Binance Labs invests in PancakeSwap’s token
PancakeSwap is a decentralized exchange built on BNB Smart Chain; With daily active users hovering above 400K, it is also among the biggest DApps on Binance’s blockchain network.

Australian city mulls accepting Bitcoin for tax payments
Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate said the move is a signal to the younger generation that the city is innovative, noting that the volatility of Bitcoin’s value is not that bad; El Salvador was the first country to approve Bitcoin as an official currency.

Vietnamese customer data firm PrimeData raises seed funding from VIISA
PrimeData helps businesses collect data, set up user databases, and create customer segmentation to develop personalized sales strategies; Its products target retailers, real estate developers, and payment companies, among others.

GoTo Group adopts Gojek’s sustainability initiative
As part of its first focus, Zero Emissions, GoTo Group looks to convert 100% of its fleet to e-vehicles and achieve zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2030; Meanwhile, the company said it generates 335K metric tons of waste annually.

Lazada replaces its group CEO
The e-commerce giant has appointed James Dong as its new group CEO with immediate effect; He replaces Chun Li, who has helmed the company since July 2020.

Temasek-backed crypto exchange FTX launches in Japan
The firm’s operations in the country will be handled by Quoine Corporation, which was acquired by FTX earlier this year and renamed as FTX Japan; FTX offers a trading platform for cryptocurrency and other assets such as prediction markets, options, and volatility products.

The post Ecosystem Roundup: Ant Group soft launches digibank in SG, Temasek’s US$3.6B for eco-friendly investments, Traveloka close to raising US$200M appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Funding winter? Indonesia marches on … and why it will survive the gloom

I spent about 12 days in Jakarta, Indonesia last month, meeting tech founders, investors, executives and operators. Here is a first-hand account and highlights which may be useful for you to know.

Market sentiment

Most people, matching the global sentiment, are plain worried. Everyone understands the funding party of 2021 is over.

Founders have a lot of questions about what they can expect when they go out to raise. Is the market going to be back up in three, six or 12 months?

Companies which were planning to raise in the short-term, are now in a tight spot and looking to shareholders to bridge the gap while companies which recently raised are breathing a sigh of relief. Most are focusing on conserving cash and directing their efforts on proving their business’ sustainable unit economics.

Investors are increasingly herding and hesitant to do non-consensus deals. “Winter is coming” is echoed around SCBD. Such statements are catchy and resonate deeply with people but do not give any sort of clarity to founders and amplify worries about an “abstract winter” i.e., we don’t know what’s going to happen but it’s going to be bad.

Yet, some investors remain optimistic, perhaps rightly so:

  • The economy is strong. Indonesia’s economy is stable and growing, with five per cent YoY growth in Q1 2022, partly spurred by commodity prices and partly by a pick up in private consumption.
  • Attractive entry prices. Funding winter has brought valuations to earth so if you are an investor with capital to deploy, you can enter great businesses and get a nifty return when wider capital inflows pick up again.
  • Strong will thrive. Portfolio companies with strong fundamentals will come out of this downturn stronger i.e., when the debris clears, competitors with weaker fundamentals would have slowed down or shut down.

Real problems, real solutions

Funding winter or not, real problems need to be solved for Indonesians and builders to continue to build effective solutions. For example:

  • Quality education access leads to increased global competitiveness (Co Learn, Binar Academy).
  • Digital payments penetration and transaction data mapping lead to credit access for the traditionally unbanked (Xendit, BukuWarung).
  • Bringing insurance to the new age to promote well-being and productivity of an increasingly diverse/younger workforce (Aman, Oktolife).
  • Empowering micro-entrepreneurs to make a decent living (BintanGo, Super).
  • Bringing down extremely high transport costs to unlock personal savings/investments (Swoopmove).

For the sake of brevity, I have only given a select few examples covering select sectors. We will be releasing comprehensive sector deep dives later this year.

Investor ecosystem

The local venture capital ecosystem is increasingly self-sufficient (at least for the early-stage rounds) with leading funds such as East Ventures, AC Ventures, MDI Ventures, Trihill Capital, Alpha JWC, Skystar Capital and Intudo Ventures together managing over US$2 billion. Many of them have recently closed new bumper funds and are deploying consistently, albeit in a slightly more paced manner.

Also Read: Funding roundup: SG’s KILDE raises US$350K, East Ventures backs Indonesia’s Riliv

There is a general acceptance that international investors especially ones who have not operated in SE Asia for long and don’t have feet on the ground will pull back for now which leads to a concern of a growth-stage funding gap opening up.

Recent transactions (see Xendit, KitaLulus, Astro) would prove otherwise but there are perhaps exceptions or rather a legacy factor at play i.e., announcements are usually three-four months behind deal closure, do expect a few more announcements of US$50 million+ rounds in the next month or so.

Notwithstanding, some international investors who have been entrenched in the SE Asia ecosystem for long, especially ones with new SE Asia-focused funds or evergreen setups, are looking very opportunistically at the market and we see them maintaining or even picking up the pace which positions them primely given the growth stage supply-demand mismatch.

Where are the Chinese? Historically active Chinese VCs in SEA, have been relatively quiet in recent times. However, it is understood there are some new entrants in the market and are looking to establish an on-ground presence in Indonesia. Plus India not being a very open market for Chinese investors, makes Indonesia a net benefactor.

Korean and Japanese investors, although never the dominant set, seem to be plugging away with deals here and there.

Middle Eastern investors have a significant amount of capital committed to Indonesia but mostly via the LP route, backing local VCs, rather than investing directly (for the moment).

Public markets and exits

The crown jewel of Indonesia, GoTo, has fared poorly on the IDX, the market cap has plunged 25 per cent since listing on 11 April 2022. To be fair, there are some knock-on effects from the global market crash, but GoTo will have to readjust to the new reality quickly and start delivering on its promise for its own sake but also for its peers.

To be noted the local listing was most likely a precursor to the eventual US listing but we can expect a delay to those plans. Some other notable tech or tech-related listed companies on IDX like Bukalapak and Bank Neo Commerce (Akulaku-backed) have not done well either.

However, making IDX into a reliable listing option for tech companies is a priority for the government, in the longer term, IDX can become a major listing destination in SE Asia for sub $1b tech companies and a secondary listing destination for larger Indonesian unicorns subject to an establishing an initial track record.

In terms of tech M&A activity in Indonesia, we see more volumes coming through in the medium-term, taking buyer inquiries as a leading indicator. Especially when we look at the micro (US$1-10 million), small (US$10-50 million) and medium (US$50-200 million) size transactions, a lot of companies have done well growing their businesses.

But at the same time have reached the end of the runway in terms of scale, expertise and stamina while big players (potential acquirers) are running away with an unassailable lead, most of the capital is likely to gravitate to these supposed winners given their growth prospects, organisational depth/breadth and expansion ambitions.

SEA expansion

Indonesian companies with unicorn ambitions are looking at neighbouring markets for growth as their domestic serviceable obtainable market saturates.

Also Read: This family office has launched a startup accelerator with a mission to protect, restore biodiversity in SEA

Already, we see large Indonesian tech companies establish a corporate executive base in Singapore, using it as a launchpad into other markets as so many Singapore-based tech companies have done before.

Partly driving this are its shareholders i.e., the Indonesia-first funds (some mentioned before) which have raised significant growth capital and need to deploy across more markets to keep delivering returns, from a capital efficiency pov, having a portfolio grow is relatively easier and synergistic than investing in fresh companies in new markets.

The subtle Indian influence

Operating in both markets of India and Indonesia, I can’t help but notice the similarities in terms of demographics, consumer behaviour and outlook which drive similar business models and value propositions, with Indonesia following India’s example, perhaps two-three years out.

Another peculiar thing I noticed while talking to early-stage founders is how they increasingly referenced Indian unicorns when describing what they’re building.

For example, X for Indonesia, the X often being a bigger Indian tech company. It is a bellwether of the increased capital, company and people flow between the two countries, a bridge we certainly wish to help build in the coming years.

People impact is already prevalent via Indian-origin founders, who seem to be doing quite well for themselves, having built some of the leading tech companies in Indonesia such as Ula, BukuWarung and Co Learn, to name a few.

Signing off

Indonesia is better positioned than ever, despite the current global downturn, relative to a lot of its peers in terms of market dynamics, self-sufficiency, local capital base, government support, and its position in international geopolitics.

Most of all, it is great to see so many strong companies being built by an ever-increasing base of super talented founders and tech execs. I am betting on them to endure this interim blip of a funding winter and thrive through and after.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Funding winter? Indonesia marches on … and why it will survive the gloom appeared first on e27.

Posted on

5 reasons easy claims are important for India and the healthcare sector

The main function of insurance is to ensure a smooth cashless claim settlement or reimbursement along with key product features, but is the sector doing enough to help the insurers?

India’s healthcare sector stood at US$160 billion in 2017, and it is estimated to reach up to US$372 billion in 2022, according to Statista. India’s healthcare market, without a doubt, is now one of the largest sectors in terms of revenue and employment as the industry continues to grow at a rapid speed.

From Long Turnaround Time (LAT) to submitting truckloads of paperwork, from long lines at TPAs (third-party administrators) to pestering doctors to issue another letter for a claim, a health insurance claim often leaves one frustrated. It is not surprising then that ‘claims’ has become a differentiating factor for most providers in the market. 

Insurance providers need to get smarter and move beyond risk remediation to create partnerships with their customers and mitigate risks. With the scope of the market expanding and maturing, lesser capital, new entrants and increasing competition, and tech-enabled customers, insurance companies need to reinvent the whole cycle of how they service their customers.

A ‘claim’ is crucial to the retention of the customer and the company’s growth, given that it might be the only touchpoint between a consumer and the insurance provider.

Also Read: Why India needs to improve access to instant healthcare solutions

Here are the challenges that need to be addressed:

Multi-channel seamless experience

With COVID-19 pushing for digital adaptability, the Indian consumer is increasingly becoming platform-agonistic, beyond metros as well. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and blockchain can help transform IT systems for the insurance provider.

Insurance providers need to adopt AI-powered platforms to help agents market the right policy, set up virtual branches, and then provide a seamless experience when settling claims.

According to IBM, two years before the pandemic in 2018, only 12 per cent of insurance executives reported prioritising true digital transformation, moving toward entirely digitised data and processes, with intelligent workflows spanning systems across the insurer and ecosystem partners.

This number is expected to jump to 64 per cent by 2022. The data that the insurance company receives from the prospective client can help it create a seamless and personalised offering for the person.

Risk concierge

Risk concierge helps boost business value at multiple levels. By moving from being just a seller, insurance companies need to become companions by acting as a concierge for their health needs.

Essentially, a risk concierge finds out what a customer wants and provides what they need at every step of their health insurance, from buying one to hand-holding the insurer through their insurance cycle.

It should be able to assess risks, provide recommendations, and schedule health check-up appointments in case of impending risk to a person’s well-being. For a risk concierge to work well, the company would need to invest heavily in cloud, AI and connected technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT). 

A concierge helps address the health risk of an insured individual holistically, leading to better loyalty from the consumer and creating a true competitive advantage in the over-crowded insurance market, which is inundated with new products and players every day.

It is imperative to move from traditional health insurance providers to an emerging concierge, especially in the Indian market.

Going cashless

Digital claims can increase customer satisfaction scores by 20 per cent, reduce claims expenses by 25-30 per cent, and improve claim handling accuracy, by reducing both overpayments and underpayments, according to McKinsey.

However, a cashless process can only work if the insurer is fully digitally-covered, ensuring end-to-end digitisation of the claims journey. 

Multi-channel FNOL (first notice of loss), automated claims segmentation, and digital claims status tracking are some of the digital processes that an insurance company can adopt.

Servicing the non-digital natives

However, since many people still don’t have credit cards or cannot use digital payment modes, overreliance on IT might undermine customer experience in the most important moments of a customer’s journey. Hence, insurers need to balance the integration of automation with differentiating personal services. 

Also Read: Shaping the future of healthcare with smart hospitals

While most Indian consumers are increasingly moving online, the category called baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) is still struggling with many aspects of technology. This category is the one that needs the claim assistance the most, and thanks to their age, they need to visit the hospital quite regularly.

For a consumer, who is not a digital native, it is imperative for insurance providers to preserve the human touch in insurance claims transformations. The answer would be to balance both aspects, IT and human approach, to provide a holistic experience. 

Communication

Do your communication channels for next-gen customers, and baby boomers line up with customer preferences? With young customers preferring full-service apps or non-selling direct outreach through affinity and community groups, many people need that hand-holding through each step.

As a health-insurance provider, is your communication segmented based on these preferences? 

Moreover, insurers should look at providing services that add value for and delight customers. Based on customer feedback, it should continually improve service offerings, usability, and performance.

This value proposition is usually an underestimated element of a digital transformation. Still, it adds much more value than just introducing newer products in the healthcare insurance market in the longer run.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post 5 reasons easy claims are important for India and the healthcare sector appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Why global investors are eyeing China’s EV landscape (Part 1)

Despite facing overcapacity issues during its formative years, China’s electric vehicle industry has become a magnet for investment within China and worldwide.

VCs are betting big that China will become a major profit centre for global alternative fuel vehicle production, even with the inevitable shakeout and consolidation that is sure to come over the next decade.

Various Chinese startups have announced their ambitions to attract foreign buyers beyond the Chinese borders. In 2021, Chinese electric vehicle startup Aiways forged ahead with its plan to export up to 10,000 vehicles annually in Belgium, Denmark, and Israel.

Xiaopeng Motors (XPeng) is exporting its G3i electric SUV to Europe. Foreign brands such as Tesla and BMW’s successfully exporting “Made in China” electric cars to other markets has also made it a boon to the internationalisation vision of various local players.

The state of Chinese electric vehicle startups

Local electric vehicle startups have mushroomed in the country. Around 500 electric vehicle startups had been established in China by 2019, including some 300 electric vehicle makers. The number of new Chinese firms connected to “new energy vehicles” even increased by 81,000 until mid-August last year, marking up the total to over 321,000, according to Qichacha.

“I’ve been in this industry for 30 years, and in the last couple of years, I’ve seen more change in the automotive industry than I have in the previous 28 years,” said Sam Olsen, Singapore-based Co-Founder of the strategic consultancy MetisAsia and a commentator on Chinese-Western relations.

“You’re in the middle of a very quickly changing industry and therefore, it’s not surprising that lots of Chinese startups are going to be looking at automotive.”

Given the potential, Chinese manufacturers are struggling with capacity issues as sales of non-fossil fuel vehicles lag behind production potential. According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, the new energy vehicle (NEV) sector was only operating at five per cent capacity by the end of 2020.

It had the capacity to build 26.7 million NEVs but only sold 1.4 million. Even worse, only 89 out of the 300 NEV manufacturers actually produce vehicles. Data from Crunchbase also show that 88 cities (out of 655 cities as of 2016) in China are home to at least one electric vehicle startup.

China’s minister for industry and information technology Xiao Yaqing said in September 2021 that the country’s electric vehicle firms are “mostly small and scattered” and in dire need of consolidation.

Since 2017, China has attempted to reduce overcapacity; however, its efforts strumbled in April 2020. For fear that the COVID-19 outbreak might spell the end of its world-leading electric-car sector, Beijing has continued to make it easier for ambitious NEV manufacturers to enter the market.

The same is true at the municipal level. Local governments have supported investments and subsidised local enterprises to prevent bankruptcy regardless of consumer demands. For example, Nanjing provided subsidies to keep Chinese-German all-EV automotive brand Byton afloat for years.

This is because the regional government and political leaders’ career prospects are often tied to regional economic growth, and provinces rely on company taxes to supplement their overall income. In a more aggressive push, provincial authorities even encourage local automakers to expand overseas in order to ramp up economic growth in their areas.

Also Read: The growth of electric vehicles is saving the planet, one trip at a time

“There are a lot of production sites that are currently unused, partly because we have startups, but also major companies like Xiaomi or Evergrande that actually invest a lot of money into these production capacities but actually have not been selling cars yet,” said Gregor Sebastian, an analyst at Mercator Institute for China Studies. “This is a huge drain of money while China is also tackling all sorts of other problems.”

This posed a threat to the future of those “redundant” electric vehicle firms. At the moment, Xpeng, and NIO are the big names within the electric vehicle startup community. But many smaller ones that most people haven’t heard about are not making any profits. The question is what is going to happen with them in two years when the government cuts down on subsidies?

As the subsidies are phased out, and Beijing recognises that it now has a handful of its businesses selling 10,000 vehicles each month, electric vehicles may fall farther down the priority list in terms of pure investment. According to reports, the National Development and Reform Commission is working on legislation for the NEV industry, including minimum production-capacity utilisation rates for provinces and stiffer regulations for approving new projects.

The previous subsidies have given ground for the emergence of Chinese carmakers in literally all segments, which, is also complicating the competition landscape with both domestic and international players.

NIO, the Chinese electric vehicle champion, is striving to foray into high value-added luxury segments of the NEV sector, which was largely dominated by German brands like Audi or Mercedes Benz. But this company has not only been facing stiff competition with international carmakers joining the game but also suffering from competition with other local startups vying for market share.

“This fragmentation is hurting really big startups,” added Sebastian. “I don’t think they [other small electric vehicle companies] are definitely going to succeed. But as long as government subsidies fuel this fragmentation, this is also hurting them in some way.”

Chinese electric vehicle industry catches the fancy of global investors

A large amount of funding in the world today is flowing toward renewable energy. Energy transition investment hit half a trillion dollars for the first time in 2020, according to clean energy analysts BloombergNEF.

BNEF said that the world invested momentous amounts in low-carbon assets, from renewables to cleaner transport, energy storage to electric heat. Among those, companies, governments, and households put US$139 billion of investments into electric vehicles and associated charging infrastructure. This is up 28 per cent versus the previous year and is a new record.

The impetus for climate financing going into electric vehicles is obvious as transportation accounts for around one-fifth of overall greenhouse gas emissions, making it one of the main drivers of climate change.

The UN agency even warned in a 2014 report that seven million deaths each year in the world are due to tiny particulates from cars, power plants, and other sources.

“While they can’t do the job alone, electric vehicles have an indispensable role to play in reaching net-zero emissions worldwide,” Fatih Birol, executive director of the IEA, noted in the Global EV Outlook 2021 report.

The less obvious driver is attributed to the emergence of acceptable and affordable technologies for electric vehicle products and solutions, which gives investors room for a higher return prospect. To illustrate, the price of an electric vehicle battery had dropped from US$1,100 per kWh in 2010 to only US$137 per kWh in 2020 or even as low as US$100 per kWh in China, according to IEA’s report.

“With the evolution of lithium-ion batteries, the price is coming down. Also, the improvements in the electronics and powertrains products that are acceptable in performance for regular users have become available,” said Gopal.

Per data compiled by the author of this article, as of February 2022, the total funding into around 200 Chinese electric vehicle startups listed on Crunchbase amounted to US$39.75 billion, including the highest-funded electric vehicle startups such as WM Motor (US$5.3 billion), NIO (US$5.4 billion), Xpeng (US$4.5 billion) and Li Auto (US$1.2 billion).

This illustrates the strength of China’s venture capital market, which is second only to the US worldwide. However, for early-stage capital, most of it is still coming from local sources, according to data compiled by Ross Brown and Augusto Rocha.

Also Read: How electric mobility startups are tackling climate change in Asia

“Traditionally, the most money that goes into Chinese startups is Chinese money,” said Sam Olsen. “A lot of firms find it very difficult to agree to invest in China because they’re worried about political issues.”

Take the Huawei problem as an example; as one of the largest telecom suppliers in China and the world, the Trump administration cracked down on Huawei Technologies amid the U.S.-China trade war in 2019.

The firm was unable to purchase U.S.-made chips or use US machinery and software for its productions. Countries including New Zealand, Australia, and Japan even crossed out Huawei from their 5G plans.

However, in the face of the overcrowded electric vehicle startup picture and complex political landscape, international investors bet on the Chinese electric vehicle industry in a different way. They focus on state-of-the-art technologies in other niches such as public transit, battery, and charging solutions. Besides, there is also a huge interest from the Chinese government and investors looking at autonomous vehicles, LIDAR systems, and chips.

“There are a lot of startups who are trying to build premium, popular products. NIO, for example. I think that is certain niche areas where potentially even high-risk capital funding can come in,” Gregor said.

For example, some of the world’s biggest oil companies, including BP and Shell, are seeking investments in new low-carbon technologies to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels. They bolster their venture capital arms and keep a close eye on the Chinese tech startup market.

In July 2018, BP invested US$10 million in the NIO Capital US Dollar Fund to together explore opportunities in China’s NEV ecosystem.

In 2019, bp Ventures sealed a deal with PowerShare, a startup providing integrated hardware and software solutions for electric vehicle charging in China; PowerShare connects electric vehicle drivers, charge point operators, and power supply through the platforms, improving the charging experience by locating a charge point to paying for the power supply.

The VC also made a minority investment in Publisher, a Chinese startup with an innovative digital software stack that enables charging to private vehicles and fleets.

“We are not only investing in new forms of charging infrastructure or developing new electric vehicle charging hubs, but we are also investing in technologies which will simply make that transition much easier,” Sophia Nadur, managing partner at new energy-focused venture capital firm bp Ventures, stated in a Climatic talk show.

“In the area of battery technology, we are actively looking at companies that will support the delivery of ultra-fast charging options for customers and fleets.”

In the case of Shell Ventures, the VC firm joined the Series B funding round of Beijing-based XCharge, a cutting-edge electric vehicle charging solution supplier that provides customisable “one-stop” charging services to allow more successful business models.

Since 2015, the startup has deployed more than 35,000 chargers, dispensing over 20 GWh of power per month to roughly 120 electric vehicle models in Asia-Pacific and Europe. Apart from Shell, XCharge also received a strategic investment from Samsung.

A prospect for internationalisation

Driven by hyper-competition and globalisation, startups that develop their business around a new technological platform are more and more influenced by the complexity of markets, capital, industries, suppliers, and technologies.

Therefore, technology firms need to be innovative in developing their business models, but they are also required to internationalise fast and instantaneously from inception. This urges them to go international and adopt appropriate management tools with a systemic view of the firm and its environment.

XCharge, for example, decided to foray into European markets in its early days and achieved significant milestones. The innovative electric vehicle charging solution provider had an office in Hamburg, Germany for three years and will probably have branches set up in the US.

“A lot of companies become successful and then they go global, but we are in the case where we start the global business from the beginning,” said Simon Hou, CEO and Co-Founder of XCharge. “It’s a new way of building a business that is working.”

Following this path, Hou and his colleagues built a globalised team resulting in more global investors and businesses worldwide. He emphasised that China now has a talent base that is ready to make international brands. Hou himself was also an ex-employee at Tesla (China) and Mercedes Benz (Beijing).

Also Read: Thinking out loud: Are electric vehicles as sustainable as we believe?

“If you look at car manufacturers, it’s always been international in every country. But the thing exciting about the electric vehicle business is that new entrants have opportunities and our customers are very open-minded in terms of taking new ideas and new things,” added Hou.

“China’s probably the largest automotive market globally, so you would expect to see some brands in that market. I think it’s a natural development pattern, and some will become successful.”

However, the automotive market is very brand-driven, especially for personal cars. Certain brands have built up a brand value over several decades, and that is hard to beat. In the twentieth century, automotive technology was dominated by three major geographical blocks.

They were the Japanese, the Europeans, and the Americans. Therefore, it would not be an easy game for Chinese brands to make their mark in the global market.

“It will be a harder climb for an unknown brand,” said Gopal. “But these are not one- or two-year kind of stories, companies are here to play this game for decades and we should look at how they build out their brand over time.”

To give a very concrete example, in the 1980s, Hyundai Excel, Korea’s first entrant to the US market, was not very well respected. They were considered poor quality and low reliability, though they could compete on price.

This, however, made ways for Korean brands to adjust themselves, which led to Hyundai’s heavy investments in manufacturing quality, design, and long-term research and development since 1998. According to JD Power and Associates, it is very well regarded for quality, which was even tied with Honda and second only to Toyota by 2004.

“I think it remains to be seen as to how the different brands from different countries evolved,” stated Gopal. “You also have to keep in mind that the existing players are not going to sit quietly and just let somebody else come and take their market share.”

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image credit: Canva Pro

The post Why global investors are eyeing China’s EV landscape (Part 1) appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Vietnamese blockchain gaming guild Ancient8 nets US$6M

Ancient8_funding_news

Vietnamese blockchain gaming guild Ancient8 said today it has completed a US$6 million private financing round led by Makers Fund and C² Ventures.

Existing and new investors, including Pantera Capital, 6th Man Ventures, IOSG Ventures, Folius Ventures, Morningstar Ventures, Th3ia Capital, Sky9 Capital, and Play Ventures, also joined.

Ancient8 will use the money to accelerate the development of the infrastructure for GameFi and the metaverse by building the next generation of software products, community, and guild. Ancient8 will also develop several GameFi infrastructure software products.

Founded in July 2021, Ancient8 builds software to create infrastructure for GameFi. It helps GameFi studios identify high-quality gamers and run Web3-native targeted advertising through the Ancient8 GameFi Identity product and Launchpads.

At the same time, the firm helps gamers and crypto communities create their GameFi identity profile, track and showcase their achievements in Web3, discover high-quality blockchain games, access guild scholarships, and learn about blockchain more effectively.

Also Read: These 21 Web3 startups prove why Vietnam is world’s most surprising crypto hotspot

According to a press statement, the startup has built an active community of 200,000+ members and manages a blockchain gaming guild in Vietnam with 3,500+ scholars. Besides, it has partnered with 25+ top GameFi projects, including Axie Infinity, CyBall, Phantom Galaxies, Bigtime, Tatsumeeko, Delysium, Blast Royale, Apeiron, and Angelic.

“We will continue to expand our product offerings, partner with more innovative projects and games, and grow our influence and reach with a large global community,” said Howard Xu, Co-Founder of Ancient8.

In the coming months, Ancient8 will launch a GameFi Identity product and a pair of GameFi Token and NFT Launchpads designed to enhance the go-to-market strategy of Web3 games. Ancient8 will use these products to connect top blockchain games with its deeply engaged global community of GameFi enthusiasts and enable users to enjoy the most intuitive experience possible in the world of Web3.

In January this year, Ancient8 attracted US$4 million in a seed funding round co-led by VC funds Dragonfly Capital, Pantera Capital, and Hashed.

Fundraising or preparing your startup for fundraising? Build your investor network, search from 400+ SEA investors on e27, and get connected or get insights regarding fundraising. Try e27 Pro for free today.

The post Vietnamese blockchain gaming guild Ancient8 nets US$6M appeared first on e27.