Posted on

With a US$2M funding in tow, Protenga wants to innovate the food system with insects

The YumGrub pet food by Protenga

As the global community faces the threat of global warming and climate change, startups are looking at the possible solutions to some of the most pressing challenges that come with it –from food scarcity to water conservation. In Malaysia, one startup builds its solutions based on something that is already part of the natural ecosystem: insects.

“Insect’s role in nature is to create cycles, breaking down organic materials and standing at the base of the food chain. We have been and continue to be excited by the potential that technology provides to harness this power of insects and leverage for a more sustainable food system,” explains Founder and CEO Leo Wein in an email to e27.

“After initial research and first production of flies, Protenga took the idea of growing black soldier flies from academic papers to commercial activities.”

The company’s journey began in 2016 with this vision of making insects “do the work” to create a regenerative food system that is in balance with nature. Protenga built its first pilot commercial farm in Johor Baru after raising its US$2 million seed funding round in 2020; it uses insect by-products from the farm to produce organic fertiliser and animal feed.

After achieving several key milestones, the company returned today with the closing of a US$2 million venture debt facility with a syndicate of Singapore-based investors. With this new funding in tow, Protenga is ready to develop its next-generation production facilities and introduce its pet food brand YumGrubs.

By expanding its smart insect farms, the company aims to make insect farming accessible and profitable. This new production facility will also provide co-manufacturing for third-party and white-label brands to accelerate insect-based pet food’s growth and transition into the pet food mainstream.

Also Read: COVID-19, the environment, and the tech ecosystem: what opportunity is available out there for us?

“Accessing debt financing starts our journey of bringing insect farming from being predominantly equity-financed to a broader set of financing options such as infrastructure financing or conventional bank loans and decouples the expansion of our physical production facilities from our equity-based growth investments in our technology and commercialisation platform. We have also been extremely pleased with the very positive customer and market feedback on our pet food offerings, providing validation of our team’s intensive R&D work over the last year,” Wein comments on the funding round.

Saving the world with insects

When asked about how their smart farm works, and how exactly it differs from the rest, Wein begins his explanation by stating that Protenga technology captures 600,000 data points related to farm performance every day.

“Every grow-out cycle and every new facility … helps us better understand how to optimise production based on various feedstocks, micro-climates, SOPs, insect strains, etc. Like a giant parallelised experiment in search of optimal configurations which then can be quickly replicated across thousands of similar sites. By running many small(er) well-controlled experiments in quick succession or even in parallel, we learn and improve much faster than large-scale operators,” he says.

“The faster we can scale insect production, the faster we can transition the food system away from its dependency on the oil industry. With around a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions coming from the agriculture sector, the faster the transition happens, the better the world is at achieving its goals toward CO2 neutrality and limiting the impacts of climate change. We have a model which is capital efficient, allowing fast scaling,” he continues.

He further elaborated that feeding the world is a global challenge that requires massive scale for true commercial and impact success –and scaling the more sustainable solutions is where the efforts should be concentrated.

“Today, the annual global production of all insect protein is only about 10,000 metric tons, while fish meal alone is about five million tons (and soy is around 500 million tons). The world needs players optimised for scale and resilience which requires the right combination of business model, production system (tech and facility design), genetics, commercial product development and capital structure. We believe we built such technology,” he stresses.

Also Read: How consumers are prioritising sustainability beyond the single lens of eco-friendly products

With the work that they (and the insects) are doing, Protenga believes that they will be able to tackle six out of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), particularly in the area of improving farming and industrial practices and eliminating hunger.

Users of Protenga products themselves are divided into the B2B (for animal feed and fertilisers) and B2C categories (for pet food). Currently available in Malaysia and Singapore, the company is looking forward to making its products available in other countries “soon”.

What is next for Protenga

The Protenga team consists of 30 individuals with various backgrounds and skillsets, breeding specialists (ensuring the best quality of black soldier flies are grown), farming operators (taking care of the larvae), engineering (designing innovative mechanical, electronics and sensors IoT systems) and corporate roles.

The company said that with its seed funding, it was able to build and launch three facilities, enabling Protenga to produce significant double-digit tonnage every month, while using less than one third the capital compared to the industry.

When asked about what is next for the company, Wein said that the year 2022 will be all about scaling.

“We are launching our second-generation Smart Insect Farm which will step up further the automation of the operation, leveraging our insectOS tech platform combining IoT sensors, climate control and production efficiency best practices,” he closes.

“While scaling farming activities, we are also launching our Pet Food products, under the YumGrubs brand, to let dog owners feed their puppies with sustainable high-quality fresh food. We believe they will love it and it is a major step to make insect protein mainstream.”

Ready to meet new startups to invest in? We have more than hundreds of startups ready to connect with potential investors on our platform. Create or claim your Investor profile today and turn on e27 Connect to receive requests and fundraising information from them.

Image Credit: Protenga

The post With a US$2M funding in tow, Protenga wants to innovate the food system with insects appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Igloo closes US$19M Series B, promotes Raunak Mehta as Co-Founder and CEO

Raunak Mehta (in pic) was previously Igloo CMO

Singapore-headquartered insurtech startup Igloo (formerly Axinan) has closed a US$19 million Series B funding round, led by Cathay Innovation.

ACA and Openspace Ventures joined the round, bringing its total fundraising to over US$36 million.

Igloo will use the new money to drive product innovation and innovate its dynamic risk assessment and AI-powered claims assessment tools. In line with its ‘Insurance for All’ vision, its product development and distribution focus will further target the underinsured low to mid-income population segments in Southeast Asia.

Besides, the insurtech firm will also acquire intermediary assets, which bring synergies to Igloo’s business model.

Alongside the funding, Igloo has also announced promoting its Chief Commercial Officer Raunak Mehta as Co-Founder and CEO. He will work alongside Co-Founder Wei Zhu, who is on Igloo’s Board of Directors.

Raunak brings tons of experience and has previously held leadership roles at Flipkart and Zalora. Since joining Igloo in 2018, he has spearheaded its market entry into the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Malaysia.

Also Read: ‘Microinsurance will play a pivotal role in accelerating financial inclusion in SEA’: Raunak Mehta of Igloo

Mehta said: “With the continued backing of our investors, we are well-positioned to expand our operations in countries like Vietnam, The Philippines, and Malaysia, and provide a highly localised offering for each Southeast Asian market.”

Incorporated in 2016 by Wei Zhu (ex-CTO of Grab), Igloo leverages big data, real-time risk assessment, and end-to-end automated claims management to create B2B2C insurance solutions for platform and insurance companies.

To date, Igloo has partnered with over 50 well-known brands across the markets in various verticals, including insurance, telecommunications, e-commerce, hospitality, health tech and financial services.

Igloo claims to have facilitated over 200 million policies across Southeast Asia since 2019. In 2021, it nearly tripled its gross written premium facilitation, and its solutions helped underwrite over 75 million policies in Southeast Asia.

Recently, the company launched Ignite by Igloo, an app to streamline the insurance sales journey for agents and direct intermediaries. The AI-powered app offers an accessible online solution that brings together multiple insurance products on a single platform and supports agents to improve customer engagement and manage products to better address customer needs.

Besides Singapore, the firm has offices in Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Its tech centres are located in China.

In 2020, Igloo raised an undisclosed Series A-plus funding round, led by InVent.

Southeast Asia has a burgeoning digital economy, which is expected to hit US$360 billion in 2025, according to Bain, Google and Temasek’s economy report. This growth has catalysed a need for digital insurance products such as cybersecurity and e-wallet insurance, which has opened up a US$10 billion opportunity for digital players and insurance companies in the region.

Ready to meet new startups to invest in? We have more than hundreds of startups ready to connect with potential investors on our platform. Create or claim your Investor profile today and turn on e27 Connect to receive requests and fundraising information from them.

The post Igloo closes US$19M Series B, promotes Raunak Mehta as Co-Founder and CEO appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How to tackle climate change by choosing a career in cleantech

Climate change is the biggest challenge the world is facing today. It crosses borders and languages, income brackets and cultures. Its impact can be most effectively addressed when there is a concerted international effort.

Singapore’s recent budget decision to progressively raise the carbon tax to reach a net-zero target by mid-century is a positive signal of the city-state’s commitment to long-term climate goals.

Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 will require innovation in new energy infrastructure and green solutions to accelerate the reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Solar, wind, hydro and energy storage breakthroughs create thousands of new jobs. According to the World Economic Forum, there were estimated to be around 10 million new job openings last year, a number that’s only growing.

By 2030, the green economy is expected to offer up to 24 million new green jobs. These possibilities provide great opportunities for those looking to start a career in the green industry today.

Opportunities galore

With the energy transition underway, it’s no surprise that students, graduates, and professionals already in the workforce are thinking about contributing to the green transition and kickstart a career in renewable energy.

The good news is that these value-based jobs are competitively paid and in high demand, with the growing renewable energy sector requiring all sorts of roles, skills, and diversity.

Over the last few years, we’ve gone through a seismic shift where concerns about climate and sustainability are now acknowledged as a major strategic challenge by both private corporations and governments.

Also Read: Transitioning to new energy? Here’re 5 prominent solutions for your business

There are many diverse options that one can consider for a career in cleantech, such as shaping sustainability strategy at traditional companies and banks, driving products and operations at startups working on green solutions, becoming an investor in sustainable ventures, or even forming policies in the public sector.

Indeed, for those who don’t want to work in the private sector, there are opportunities in public service and nonprofits where you can make a meaningful impact.

A career in renewables or cleantech is also an opportunity to be surrounded by like-minded individuals who share a vision for a greener planet while getting the chance to work on cutting-edge technology and be at the forefront of change.

For students and graduates, there is no better time than now to be early adopters and ride the waves of change in Singapore and the wider region as every nation doubles down on its commitment to net zero.

Build networks and do internships

Today’s climate tech ecosystem encompasses startups building solutions across a wide range of industries and use cases.

My advice to today’s young people is to get excited at the prospect of a career in cleantech and get exposure as early as possible. Educate yourself about the opportunities, immerse yourself in research, read articles, and bookmark the names of companies doing compelling things that are of interest.

Internships are a great way to start, but so are attending trade shows and conferences, networking, and self-study outside your core curriculum at university.

Internships and placements while as a student allow you to get the best of both worlds, combining institution-based learning with structured on-the-job training. If you do well, you may even end up with a job offer after graduation.

My startup, VFlowTech, is reinventing energy storage with Vanadium redox flow technology in Singapore. We welcome interns and graduates, and professionals who are either already in the renewable sector or looking to make the switch.

Also Read: 13 cleantech startups to watch in Asia

We’re also partnering with Local universities like Nanyang Technological University (NTU), the National University of Singapore (NUS) and the University of Glasgow to support students with PhD scholarships. The new programme will nurture students who want to build a fulfilling career in cleantech.

Reskilling and switching sectors

Reskilling is an option for professionals already in the workforce who want to take an entirely new career path than the one they have pursued till now.

Even if you don’t have a background or expertise in the (renewable) energy industry, cleantech is so diverse that you may very well find a role that fits what you’re looking for perfectly. Indeed, many renewable energy and green companies are now refining their job descriptions to attract people from non-traditional fields.

Traits that make a good cleantech candidate include being solutions-oriented with a keen interest in the sector and a mind for designing new processes, technology, and equipment.

Just being interested and sustaining that interest over time is half the battle, as it’s always obvious when a candidate is genuinely interested versus just looking for a paycheck. Being a team player and knowing how to ask the right questions and accommodate feedback is also vital.

As mentioned, one of the best ways to get started is through networking and building relationships (or just sparking a conversation) with people already in the industry. So be curious, open, and engaging at events, online, or during internships and placements.

I wish everyone looking to start a career in cleantech in the year ahead the best of luck, and please do reach out to me if you’d like to grab a coffee and talk more about the exciting developments in this fast-evolving space.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image Credit: wajan

The post How to tackle climate change by choosing a career in cleantech appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Crypto governance: Adopting a decentralised approach to governance

A revolution in financial services is occurring quicker than anyone anticipated. Digital assets, a loose term encompassing cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and security tokens, have gained attention in banking and capital markets.

Crypto-native financial institutions, Decentralised Finance (DeFi), have driven much of the innovation in the ecosystem to date by offering blockchain-based products and services to their customers.

Permissionless blockchains such as Bitcoin and DeFi Protocol providers have also adopted a radically different, decentralised approach to governance.

Governance deals with decision-making, including who gets to propose changes to the code’s rules that make up a DeFi protocol or blockchain. How to respond to a specific market condition?

How are developer grants decided in a decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO)? How will the social consensus be reached in a decentralised ecosystem efficiently and timely manner?

Many of the blockchain networks and DeFi protocols organise themselves as DAO. It is a topic gaining attention after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started to explore how decentralised the DeFi protocols are.

We have tried to capture our understanding of the governance processes followed by Bitcoin, Balancer DeFi, and Polka Dot in the crypto space. Examples also include permissionless blockchain and DeFi.

Decentralised decision-making

Governance tokens enable token holders to participate in the decentralised decision-making process.

Also Read: Demystifying NFTs and DeFi

An example of various participants in the system voting to approve a development grant or an increase in transaction fees

With multiple participants, including investors, developers, and community token holders focusing on their interests, it is a complex problem that will require constant evaluation and tweaking.

Token engineering is a subject that deals with the issue of designing the token to incentives and disincentivise certain types of behaviours.

A real-world example would be the negative interest rate by central banks to increase spending. The objective is to incentivise behaviours toward the desired outcome.

Adam Smith, the Scottish economist, said, “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their interest.”

A look at Bitcoin

Any Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) starts with documenting the proposal, and the author champions the proposal to gain community consensus. It includes the bitcoin developers. BIP can go through various statuses, such as draft, proposed/rejected/withdrawn, final, etc. Ultimately, any BIP acceptance will require a 95 per cent vote.

Balancer, a DeFi protocol, has a Balancer Governance token. The holder of this token has the power to modify protocol fees that are collected from users using the protocol. They also get to decide how to spend the costs collected.

Can quadratic voting improve transparency and efficiency in governance

Polka dot has an interesting approach to governance. Anyone can propose by depositing a minimum number of tokens for a period. The longer the period, the higher the value of the vote.

For example, if Sam proposes five DOT with a one week lock-in period. Converting it to a number of votes would mean 5*1 = 5 votes. When James seconds the proposal with a ‘yes,’ voting with five DOT for an eight week lock-in period, it converts to 5*2 = 10 votes.

DAOs that disperse grants are exploring the option of quadratic voting. Quadratic voting introduces the concept of ‘cost of the vote.’ The approach offers voters the option of giving up their influence on some proposals to impact others.

Also Read: Banks and fintech: An arranged marriage built on trust, but does it last long?

For example, if Jim has 100 governance tokens for a DAO and wants to strongly support one of the proposals from the list of five with ten votes, it will cost him 100 governance tokens. The formula applied here is the cost of vote = (Number of Vote) ^ 2. It leaves Jim with no votes for other proposals.

A token-based voting approach comes with its own sets of limitations:

  • Token voters will vote in favour of proposals that benefit them. A fee increase in any DAO is a good example. Beneficiaries of a fee increase will probably vote for an increase. The consumers of the DAOs services who end up paying don’t get to voice their options.
  • The concentration of tokens leading to centralised decision making is another challenge.
  • Some of the proposals can be technical. In the case of DAO, ‘code is law’ and ‘code is open-source’ can be misleading. How many can decision-making participants read the code? It leads to dependence on experts in the network.

While governance in DAO as a topic is in its early stages, some of the experiments that have been explored include vote delegation, minimum quorum, specialised committees, upgradeable smart contracts, time delays on sensitive actions, etc.

Not all governance requirements can be addressed by voting. Depending on the kind of service offered by the DAO, one should tailor the governance process. While doing this, the emphasis should be on a human-centric governance approach that integrates on-chain and off-chain solutions in ways that preserve transparency and efficiency.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image Credit: max8xam

The post Crypto governance: Adopting a decentralised approach to governance appeared first on e27.

Posted on

What Southeast Asia startups bring to the global stage of innovation

Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem has historically been formed by learnings from more mature markets. But the growth of the region’s digital economy has uncovered uniquely emerging market challenges that have given rise to new species of venture-backed startups.

This article dives into one example, mental health tech company Intellect, as they leveraged their localised approach to the nuances of East Asia’s relationship with mental health to rapidly scale across the region.

Highlights

  • Amidst the short-term uncertainties, Southeast Asia will continue to be ripe for startup and venture capital opportunities. Among the venture-backed companies, endurance will be determined by solid business fundamentals and strong moats.
  • Southeast Asia has seen clone and mutant business models rise in the region, but “new species” companies brought about by uniquely local needs pose greater possibilities to build localised product-market fit and strong and sustainable moats for growth essential to endure through short-term uncertainties.
  • Asia’s fastest-growing and largest mental health tech platform Intellect is a “new species” company born out of an environment ripe for mental health tech adoption.
  • As a “new species” company, it has leveraged the possibilities of solid and sustainable moats from a single market to multiple markets across East Asia through its tech platform, a network of local mental health care professionals, and the synergies across its multi-product ecosystem.
  • More “new species” can be expected to emerge in Southeast Asia as more uniquely local demands and pain points are addressed by venture-backed tech companies.

While short-term uncertainties of interest hikes, geopolitical tensions, and the pandemic loom overhead, a recurring narrative we’ve had on this publication is that Southeast Asia will continue to be ripe for startup and venture capital opportunities regardless of the seasons.

Now the question is, which venture-backed companies stand to see the seasons pass and take advantage of the growth story fundamentals you should all be familiar with by now, growing middle income, talent influx, the region outpacing China’s GDP growth, etc.?

Also Read: A sneak peek into healthtech startups operating in Vietnam

Just as we wrote back in 2020 amidst the initial impact of the pandemic in articles about fundraising in a bear market, dancing skyscrapers, and the longevity of blue oceans, a lot of it will boil down to which companies will be able to justify real growth with their prices, leveraging solid business fundamentals, revenues, and strong moats.

Stage 1: “Clones” leveraging market opportunity

Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem has had a history of (or arguably found its origins in) playing host to Silicon Valley or European clones (i.e. building X or Y in Southeast Asia) that have ended mainly up not faring too well.

These clones saw the growth opportunity but didn’t truly localise (i.e. we’re not just talking about language here), possibly due to the bias of “why change the winning formula?” and the costs that come with pivots in new markets.

In other cases, global companies tried to set up regional operations or acquire these clones, but the results did not often pan out so well.

Stage 2: “Mutants” finding stronger product-market fit

Then mutants emerged, seeing the opportunity to surpass these clones by building specific to the nuances and needs of the local markets.

The classic example is Gojek with their two-wheeled, ojek approach to scale ride-hailing services in Indonesia instead of the premium taxi vibes of Uber in the region.

Many of these mutants were able to pull in funding primarily because of the “time machine” thesis where investors, seeing the success of very similar comparables in mature markets, conclude that these Southeast Asia localised versions could fare similarly or even better with the region’s growth opportunity because they were able to find more sustainable product-market fit.

Stage 3: “New species” building stronger moats

The biggest challenge for mutants has been building strong enough moats to force the hand of potential competitors, making them think twice about expanding resources to compete on the local advantages or unique proposition the incumbent company already has.

This is where new species come in, effectively flipping the script on the localisation challenge and turning it into a localisation moat against competitors. Instead of tweaking, let alone transplanting existing models to local markets, new species are brought about local problems that necessitate a unique, innovative approach.

The product itself might not be innovative, but more often than not, in Southeast Asia, startups have to be creative with distribution and the way they package or deliver their value proposition.

Also Read: Bright, new horizons: Why the potential of Central Asian startups is hard to ignore

Emerging markets are more likely to produce these new species, especially since we call them “new” relative to business models that have seen success in more mature and developed markets.

Payfazz is one example we’ve discussed in the context of finding growth in Indonesia’s historically underserved rural economy. They leveraged a strong distribution network to build a “self-learning” platform and engineer “platform-driven growth” as opposed to “market-driven growth.”

The agents serving as touchpoints for their financial services app became drivers of the platform’s product development roadmap (we cite a specific case study here).

One thing to note here is that these categories are not static states for any single company, especially for such dynamic organisms as startups. Clones and mutants can evolve even further to become new species, and some new species are not always born overnight.

And so, in the context of an increasingly uncertain environment, “new species” lend themselves to greater chances of thriving and enduring.

When being a “new species” is the key to global scale

While the drivers for the internet economy across more previously niche, untapped, or stigmatised market segments have unveiled more local needs leading to the creation of more new species, in this article, we write about the learnings from one such company, in particular, mental health tech company Intellect.

This is because instead of localisation simply being an evolution designed to build stronger moats and thus more sustainable growth, Intellect’s localisation of its mental healthcare offerings also importantly unlocked global scale.

Their “hyper-localisation”, as they call it, has been their key to scale beyond Southeast Asia and across the Asia Pacific, with multinational companies among their enterprise clients and app users from over 150+ countries, all in all, serving more than 3 million people.

Compared to how Southeast Asia’s startup ecosystem was populated, driven by learnings from more mature markets, these “new species” turn the tables on this narrative and pose a new one entirely: what can the rest of the world learn from Southeast Asia?

Also Read: Hyperlocal mapping: a solution for real-world interactions in the retail metaverse

Specifically, we identify three key insights on how this “new species” evolution could unlock global scale for Intellect.

These are outlined further below with excerpts taken from our interview with The Ken on their recently published piece on the company, a piece which also goes more in-depth into the industry as a whole:

  • Environment drives the evolution of “new species”. Demand for mental healthcare in a region with diverse experiences and pain points made it ripe for a “new species” company like Intellect to emerge.
  • Populating new markets as a “new species” goes beyond language localisation and bears having the resources to cater to the differences across these markets. Intellect leverages technology and a network of local mental health professionals to expand their coverage across East Asia.
  • Evolution needs to be fast short-term and sustainable long-term. Intellect can do this through synergies within its ecosystem of products and offerings.

Environment drives the evolution of “new species”

Evolution isn’t an isolated event; the environment also has to be conducive for these “new species” to emerge. There were shifts in consumer behaviour and even business perception around mental health that would allow Intellect to thrive in Asia the same way that mental health companies have in the West.

“Five years ago, there were hardly any investments in healthtech (in Southeast Asia). With greater awareness of healthcare issues, rising healthcare spending, and greater trust in digital solutions, there’s more momentum for healthtech startups, and this has attracted US$1.1 billion in funding in the first half of 2021”, infers our findings through an article published in November 2021.

The issues in particular Intellect is addressing regarding mental health are not new but long-standing pain points: underserved segments, high costs to access mental healthcare, and inaccessibility.

In Asia, especially, there has also been the stigma associated with availing this kind of healthcare (which is now changing). We’ve also observed these same challenges and pain points in other healthcare subsectors, like sexual and reproductive health.

It’s worth noting that many of these pain points that are unique to the region play heavily into the emergence of these “new species.”

As mentioned above, while the problems have persisted, what has changed are the attitudes and perception of mental health, especially in the workplace, with shifts like “The Great Resignation”, remote work, self-care movements putting the pressure on businesses to invest in their employees’ mental wellbeing actively and making them realise that employees’ mental well being has a direct impact on the bottom line.

Also Read: What telemedicine and Health Tech holds across SEA amidst COVID-19

Theo talks about the shift on our podcast, “It was not long ago, two or three years back, mental health…was a nice-to-have piece. Now, it’s become evident that if companies don’t actively look after employees’ wellbeing, the ones affected are the companies themselves.

“So I think it’s become quite clear that workforces are looking at this in a way where, “It’s my people first,” but also…. “How does this affect my business? And my bottom line as well?” So we actually can show robust correlations that better well-being leads to better outcomes for companies.”

With pre-pandemic mental health spending in APAC more than tripling from US$100 million in 2019 to US$310 million in 2020, and projected to hit $US620 million in 2025, Intellect sees massive opportunity in providing this hyper-localised solution built for Asia.

There is apparent demand for these solutions, but according to Theo on our podcast, there “are not enough players that are making a big enough dent in Asia in mental health care.”

If you can localise here, can you localise anywhere?

As we’ve previously discussed, the emergence of “new species” represents a form of localisation that does not just adapt existing solutions but caters to uniquely local pain points and can build on existing infrastructure.

In the case of Intellect, their hyper-localisation is not just about translating their app and programmes but also partnering with local psychiatrists and psychologists and positioning themselves as the platform for Asia, in an industry where most players come from the West.

As Theodoric shares on our latest podcast conversation with him, “I would say the challenges in what we’re trying to drive and move towards more quickly is hyper-localising it towards Asia-wide needs and use cases…Now we are live in 11 languages, and we have therapists on the ground in twelve countries across APAC.

“The goal is not just English-speaking markets, but anywhere in Asia that needs access to care where a lot of our clients have a presence…The key thing is that we win by adding a nuance towards an Asian perspective on mental health.

“In the US, it’s not without stigma, but it’s a lot more open than in Asia. We understand that by market, even between Singapore and Indonesia, or the Philippines and Thailand, there are different nuances. So we hyper-localise it. We get [our solutions] very much geared up for an individual in the local market with actual, live native professionals. That makes it very, very attuned to them.”

However, unlike the Alicia Keys song, if you can make it here (in one market), it doesn’t necessarily follow that you can make it anywhere. Covering multiple markets means understanding and catering to the diversity in the depth and nature of the environments in each of these markets.

Also Read: YC-backed mental health startup Intellect bags US$10M Series A

Theo continues, “One interesting trend we see is that across the region, and there are many, many local nuances by country like Singapore differs quite a bit from Japan and Thailand, [but] the one thing holds true is that it is stigmatised. For the most part, [mental health care] has been seen as a very, very clinically severe topic to touch on, and not so much [something] that’s every day.

“But what’s been very clear as well is that for the markets of the countries that have been affected by the lockdown, it’s become very top-of-mind for them as well. A key part, as you just mentioned, is that we hyper-localise it, not just translating the app, but making sure we answer the nuances of what each market struggles with.”

Evolve or perish

Even with these features and offerings localised to their target markets, the main question for Intellect’s evolution as a “new species” has been maintaining this hyper-localisation while still scaling across the region and expanding its revenues. Without speed in populating and sustaining its growth, “new species” could quickly die out or eventually fall prey to more prominent players.

For Intellect, the way to rapidly scale on top of its hyper-localisation approach has been to address the low adoption of mental healthcare benefits in businesses in Asia.

Since launching their business-facing, digital-first programs in early 2021, Intellect has seen their revenue grow 20x year-on-year driven by enterprise clients availing these programs like foodpanda, Shopback, Singtel, Kuehne & Nagel, and Schroders.

They have also established a strong commercial presence in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australia, where multinational companies often set up their APAC headquarters.

Its go-to-market strategy of launching a consumer app and growing into a multi-product platform approach has enabled it to create unique synergies across its offerings.

For example, users of their consumer app can serve as evangelists for enterprise clients to adopt Intellect’s solutions company-wide. Essentially the B2C product builds the brand for the B2B product.

On the other hand, Intellect’s enterprise business has allowed the company to scale quickly while also driving monetisation and retention in a greater way vis-a-vis the consumer approach.

Expanding the pace and possibilities of “new species” growth

While Intellect’s self-guided mental healthcare app has more than 3 million users across 20 countries globally, serving as the foundation for the brand they have today, the focus for the company has always been to build a complete mental healthcare system for Asia, recognising the specific needs in markets across East Asian countries especially.

What Intellect has done thus far as a “new species” company is to expand the possibilities of having a strong, sustainable moat beyond the shores of a single market.

Also Read: Discussing the future of healthcare tech with Blair Hirst

Of course, the nature of its solution and the industry lends itself more easily to this rapid multi-market, multi-offering ecosystem (versus consumer financial services, for example), but to have executed on these possibilities is a feat on its own.

While Intellect is leading the way in “making this dent” in Asia, and they have made significant headway quite rapidly over the past year, there’s still a lot more to be done in terms of driving adoption of both their consumer and enterprise products here in Asia and localising it to the various markets in the region.

Intellect is just one of many more “new species” of companies that are coming out of Southeast Asia. We will continue to cover here on Insignia Business Review as more uniquely local demands and pain points are addressed by venture-backed tech companies.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image Credit:

The post What Southeast Asia startups bring to the global stage of innovation appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Web3 is going to redefine labour in Asia in a big way: Animoca Brands’s Yat Siu

Animoca Brands Co-Founder and Executive Chairman Yat Siu

Tech giants like Facebook and Microsoft have started building their own tiny meta kingdoms to gain from the growing popularity of metaverse. The only way to fight them is by creating and supporting thousands of tech companies that are building open metaverse, according to Yat Siu, Co-Founder of Animoca Brands.

“While investing in and supporting small companies in the open metaverse, we are creating a movement. That’s why we invest so aggressively. This way, we want to give some autonomy to people,” he says.

Animoca Brands, a Hong Kong-based blockchain, NFT gaming and VC firm, has already invested in tens of startups in Asia, including Axie Infinity, OpenSea, Dapper Labs, Yield Guild Games, Harmony, Alien Worlds, and Star Atlas. The firm now has a growing portfolio of more than 150 investments in NFT-related companies and decentralised projects.

e27 recently sat with Siu for an interview, who discussed why metaverse is essential and how it will redefine the way we live and work.

Below are the edited excerpts from the conversation:

You have invested in several companies. How is your investment strategy different from that of a traditional VC firm?

As an investor, we have a different set of goals. Our macro goal is to see the open metaverse and build Web3. We want to only invest in companies that are building open. You may be making the best beautiful game in the world, but if you’re not planning to build an open, we’re not interested because it doesn’t fit our purpose.

It goes back to our original thesis around a shared network effect. If we can build into a shared network and help grow a business, it will ultimately help grow the rest of the companies, too, because it’s part of the global economy.

Also Read: Animoca Brands unit invests US$50M in Brinc’s metaverse accelerator programme

The other difference is that we are not obligated to return the capital to our investors, unlike a traditional VC fund. But the issue is that you have to pay your LPs out with what you have. But when it comes to the web3 ecosystem, it’s taking value out of that ecosystem. We would be much more comfortable if we could do this and give people crypto to reinvest to buy NFTs. Our purpose and goal are to have people join web3, and this is a balancing act.

We understand people want to make a profit; nothing wrong with that. But we also want you to participate in the ecosystem of the ultimate Web2 and We3. Because if everyone just were there to try to take money out, that would not be healthy. So this is how our target is differently aligned.

What happens, though, is if you invest in projects that Animoca brands are backing, or if you own the NFTs of our projects are supporting, theoretically, if the network effect grows because we’re investing open, then the shared network effect will increase in value.

An analogy is that if you own real estate in Singapore and when the country’s tourism industry grows, your real estate will also increase because you benefited from the network effect of the entire city. You also benefit when its tech industry or restaurant grows.

So that’s kind of the effect we’re looking for. So if you build open, we all win and benefit because we participate.

Does this mean you are driving companies like Microsoft and Facebook crazy by investing in the small metaverse, NFTs and blockchain startups?

Yes. Let’s look at the way the internet started. At the beginning of the internet revolution, investors focused on making profits. If we had purposeful investors who wanted to build an open web back then — which was the objective initially — we would have ensured that the ethos of web1 and web2 stayed more open.

But the nature of capitalism is to maximise profits. When investors discovered they could maximise profit by controlling at least in the paradigm of web2, they did it. But what happened was that it created a zero-sum scenario, where VCs would back a winner. The ultimate result was that the money was funnelled into big companies and unicorns. Small companies never got any help because VCs at that scale would recognise that if they invested in a promising startup, the chances of success were so small.

For instance, if you had invested in Facebook as a public company, you would have made 20-30x. But you are not supposed to make this type of return on a public company that’s supposed to be already mature. That is the issue, meaning the value is controlled only at the top. This way, you are creating a centralised structure.

Our investment strategy is designed not to do that.

Do you believe Facebook will become an open metaverse company eventually that will share revenue with its users?

Facebook, or Meta, probably won’t work on delivering a truly open metaverse because it is a centralised company and as such decentralisation is not in its perceived interest. I think Facebook will try to co-opt the metaverse, just as it co-opted web2, but our hope is that the open approach to the metaverse becomes so dominant that Facebook and companies like it will have no choice but to participate in an open manner.

In the long run, Facebook may well have no choice but to take an open approach, because the economic activity in the open metaverse will be so significant that Facebook and similar closed platforms will not want to miss out on the opportunity.

How does web3’s future look in Asia and Southeast Asia?

Web3 is going to redraw labour in a big way. It is a big opportunity because the kind of labour you perform in the metaverse is more efficient, less dangerous, and better for game players.

Secondly, everything is headed towards the metaverse, anyway. Great value is being generated there. In the web2 paradigm, spending time and effort isn’t rewarded. On web3, however, the users benefit from it. Indeed, the value already existed online, but it is just that it was all centralised and wasn’t shared. So I think web3 will be a breakthrough in places that don’t have economic potential.

Third, web3 will create new tax revenues for countries like India and the Philippines. In the past, these countries had big call centres and acted as the customer service centres for the rest of the world. However, they made very little money for that service.

However, web3 allows these countries to participate in the global economy. Two things will happen here. One, they will expand on their capability. But it goes beyond that. I may be living in India or the Philippines, but web3 and metaverse allow me to buy assets in the US or elsewhere.

Also Read: ‘We want to facilitate organisations’ Web3 transition from bits to atoms’: Brinc CEO Manav Gupta

In the earlier scenario, a person sitting in India could not buy something in New York because if I want to buy something in America, first I need to go there. But in the metaverse, I can do anything if I understand it. I could buy something in The Sandbox. We are already seeing people in the Philippines, Ecuador and India playing Axies or The Sandbox and earning money.

In some cases, these gamers now have two years’ worth of their salary. They don’t cash it out but invest it in other industries, which is good for the ecosystem. It allows them to participate in new projects.

For us, the principal paradigm of web2 is digital ownership and digital property rights. So when you think of anything related to this property, everything will be digital property. Everything will be a form of property in the virtual world because every creative idea can become an asset.

When I’m writing a story, it’s a creative endeavour. In the web3 paradigm, it becomes an asset. However, in the current web2 paradigm, it’s just content.

I know it is too early to ask, but what is going to be web4?

We haven’t thought of web4 per se because we are still early on web3.

As we know, the foundation of web3 is digital property rights. Some people think, ‘Oh, the metaverse is like AR and VR’ and so on. AR and VR are the interfaces, but that’s not what makes them valuable. The foundation of the societies isn’t based on the modernity of the facility. But it’s based on the fact that you have civil liberties, freedom and ownership.

You can own your house and be safe; nobody can take it away. It means you can now invest in a home and pass it to your children. So that’s the first foundation we need. That is what web3 will do.

The other thing is this: there are 4.6 billion people online and 3.2 billion play games, but there are only 10-20 million people in the open metaverse. From that perspective, you have a long way to go before talking about Web4.

As web3 grows in its popularity, the interfaces will also change. The hardware will also evolve. We will get into states where we will eventually have brain implants in the future and will have faster interfaces.

So the shift in all of this has to do with the computing power. For instance, the data paradigm allowed for data, machine learning and AI to become powerful. But if the computing power weren’t fast enough, AI would not work.

So the next level will be that the paradigms will shift when quantum computing becomes more mainstream because then you have a new level of computing power, which opens up new dimensions.

Ready to meet new startups to invest in? We have more than hundreds of startups ready to connect with potential investors on our platform. Create or claim your Investor profile today and turn on e27 Connect to receive requests and fundraising information from them.

The post Web3 is going to redefine labour in Asia in a big way: Animoca Brands’s Yat Siu appeared first on e27.

Posted on

How is the Russia-Ukraine war changing the talk in ESG investing?

The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) community was flabbergasted and alarmed at talks on labelling weapons as sustainable ESG assets with the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Supporters justified this by claiming weapons maintain peace and “are of key importance to uphold and defend democracy, freedom, stability and human rights”. And this may not be the first time ESG investing is dealing with such controversial debate, with industries and companies moving from outcast to hero status in times of crisis.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with this, as ESG investing achieves the best results when it evolves according to the dynamic world we live in, considering the changing risks and opportunities at different points in time. Even as ESG investing may look different as it develops across time, it is here to stay.

According to Bloomberg, global ESG assets are on track to exceed US$53 trillion by 2025, representing more than a third of the US$140.5 trillion in projected total assets under management.

In Asia, more than two-thirds of institutional investors indicated increased interest in ESG investments in the post-COVID world, and total ESG assets in Asia have grown from a mere US$801 million in 2019 to US$7.9 billion in 2020.

The shift to Social (S) in ESG

In the venture capital (VC) space, there are observations on rising numbers of thematic funds specific to the environmental (E) aspect (e.g., climate change, decarbonisation, and nature-based assets) and a focus on governance (G) aspect (e.g., internal audit, management commitment to ESG, stakeholder engagement).

This exemplified that ESG investing is gaining steam, but it may seem that the “S” in ESG has taken the role of the forgotten middle child.

But not for any longer, as investors realise that people/ social impact forms the basis of ESG investing. Everything does not matter if it de-risk or benefits the people, as sustainability arising from environmental and governance factors would ultimately translate into the social value created for the people.

Also Read: Why corporates and investors must climb the mountain called sustainability

Just like how weapons are used to be excluded in ESG investing before the Russia-Ukraine war, its social value is now taking the centre stage together with the environmental impact.

The human-centricity of ESG investing will become more apparent, and the social impact investment will take a more proactive form.

A diagram exhibiting the social impact of environmental and governance factors

Dynamic ESG based on changing landscape to future-proof the firm and portfolio

Drawing back to the Russia-Ukraine war, we observe that the ESG framework is not set in stone and will be evolving based on the changing global or regional landscape. Just like how ESG investors avoided weapons before this war, now there is an ongoing talk about labelling it as a social-positive asset because it has the potential to prevent death and destruction.

From this, the ESG community demonstrates that ESG investing will not be rigid to target outperformance above-market returns. Many investors, including VCs, have acknowledged that ESG does not hamper financial performance but creates long-term value and outsized returns.

More and more started to price in material risks, along with material benefits, effectively de-risking the portfolio while adopting a pro-impact approach. This optimises the future-proofing of the firm and portfolio.

For example, for Quest Ventures’ portfolio companies like Fefifo, food security and sustainable agriculture could materially influence topline sales. For Flex and GajiGesa, financial inclusion can materially convert non-consumers into a new market that is untapped in emerging Asia.

Building back better towards a resilient and sustainable future for the people

Investors, including VCs, invest in sustainable market-creating innovations that shape all nations and regions’ resilient and sustainable futures.

According to Global Sustainable Investment Review 2020 (GSIR), Sustainable investment assets under management make up 35.9 per cent of total assets under management, up from 33.4 per cent in 2018.

The most common sustainable investment strategy is ESG integration (US$25.2 trillion AUM), followed by negative screening (US$15.9 trillion AUM), corporate engagement, and shareholder action (US$10.5 trillion AUM).

Integrating ESG into the investment process will build more sustainable companies early through incorporating ESG during portfolio engagement/ investment stewardship.

Global growth of sustainable investing strategies 2016-2020 from Global Sustainable Investment Review (GSIR)

However, as Harvard Professor Clayton M. Christensen mentioned in Prosperity Paradox, “all good theories must be used in context. They are only useful in certain circumstances. Every country in the world is different in size, population, culture, leadership, and capabilities. Those circumstances play a role in their destiny.”

Also Read: Why is impact investing suddenly so hot?

We must note the nuances across regions and markets when doing ESG investing and building a resilient and sustainable future. With the Russia-Ukraine war in the backdrop, it compels us to keep ESG supporting flexible while allowing for comparison when measuring its impacts.

Taking a pragmatist approach to ESG investing (investing in companies with moderate unmanageable ESG risk and high ESG unmanaged manageable risk) would be optimal in Southeast Asia, as the emerging market presents vast opportunities to improve ESG financial performance at higher-risk companies vastly.

According to the profiling by Pitchbook, a pragmatist VC may:

  • Conduct pre-investment due diligence on the ESG risks derived from broad industry sustainability.
  • Conduct slightly less-intensive pre- or post-acquisition identification of manageable risk mitigation gaps and opportunities.
  • Evaluate how scale will influence sustainability and ESG.
  • Have proactive implementation of ESG-related policies and procedures and quarterly monitoring.

Concluding, the Russia-Ukraine war, amidst its wide-ranging and devastating impacts on people from both nations, had triggered the ESG community and could be changing the conversation on ESG investing through:

  • There is a shift to social (S) in ESG, with a social impact no longer isolated from environmental and governance aspects.
  • The development of a dynamic ESG based on changing regional and global landscape to future-proof the investment firms and portfolio.
  • Building back better towards a resilient and sustainable future by adopting a pragmatist ESG approach.

If you are curious about my position regarding the war: Echoing Singapore’s statement on the Russia-Ukraine war, I too believe that a country’s “sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity must be respected”.

Editor’s note: e27 aims to foster thought leadership by publishing views from the community. Share your opinion by submitting an article, video, podcast, or infographic.

Join our e27 Telegram groupFB community, or like the e27 Facebook page

Image Credit: archnoi1

The post How is the Russia-Ukraine war changing the talk in ESG investing? appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Shipbob co-founder on why int’l expansion is both easier and more difficult than you think

In this episode we are excited to welcome Jivko Bojinov, Co-Founder of Shipbob, a tech-enabled 3PL (third-party logistics provider) that offers simple, fast and affordable fulfilment for thousands of brands across three continents. Prior, Bojinov worked in China at YESSAT, an education consulting and training company and founder of Ivy League Travels.

In our conversation, Bojinov talks about why international expansion is both easier and also more difficult than you think it is, what characteristics to look for when building out a team in international markets, knowing what can and cannot change when figuring out what to localise and navigating the grey area in between, and the benefits of getting career experience abroad.

This episode is sponsored by our partner, ZEDRA. Learn more about how the ZEDRA team can support you in expanding to new markets here.

Also Read: Patreon Chief People Officer on the importance of fostering curiosity in global expansion journey

Find our entire podcast episode library here and learn more about our forthcoming book on global business growth here.

The article was first published by Global Class.

Image Credit: Global Class

The post Shipbob co-founder on why int’l expansion is both easier and more difficult than you think appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Jio Health bags US$20M Series B to expand on-demand home care services in Vietnam

Jio Health Founder Raghu Rai

Jio Health, a health-tech company in Vietnam, has closed a US$20 million in Series B investment led by Singapore-based PE firm Heritas Capital.

Fuchsia Ventures, Kasikorn Bank Group, and Monk’s Hills Ventures also joined, the Ho Chi Minh City-based company said in a press note.

The firm will use the money to expand its Smart Clinics and omnichannel ecosystem across Vietnam. It will also extend its clinical service offering to new consumers and employers and hire talent.

Also Read: BuyMed nets US$8.8M to develop a healthtech e-commerce platform, expand beyond Vietnam

Jio Health was founded in 2014 by Raghu Rai and serial entrepreneur Ken Rohl, with offices in Irvine. It provides affordable care wherever consumers shop, work and live. Its technology encompasses telemedicine, e-prescription fulfilment, digital medical records, and machine-learning for clinical decision support.

Beyond virtual care, the offline matrix of Jio Health’s ecosystem consists of Smart Clinics, on-demand home care, and a network of 300+ Jio-branded neighbourhood pharmacies.

The startup’s online and offline care services are integrated with its lab information systems, e-pharmacy, and clinical operating system.

Jio’s multi-speciality portfolio of care services provides consumers with a one-stop shop that spans over 14 specialities, including pediatric care, chronic disease management, mental health, maternity care, and women’s health.

In April 2019, Jio Health raised a US$5 million Series A round led by Monk’s Hill Ventures to scale its care provider team and clinical operations across Vietnam.

Ready to meet new startups to invest in? We have more than hundreds of startups ready to connect with potential investors on our platform. Create or claim your Investor profile today and turn on e27 Connect to receive requests and fundraising information from them.

Image Credit: Jio Health

The post Jio Health bags US$20M Series B to expand on-demand home care services in Vietnam appeared first on e27.

Posted on

Cake DeFi launches US$100M venture capital arm for global startups in Web3, gaming, fintech

U-Zyn Chua, CTO and Co-founder, Cake DeFi

Cake DeFi, Singapore-based fintech platform that aims to make DeFi services and applications more accessible to the general public, today announced the launch of its venture capital (VC) arm Cake DeFi Ventures with US$100 million in earmarked capital.

The VC arm is led by Cake DeFi co-founders Dr Julian Hosp (CEO) and U-Zyn Chua (CTO) along with newly appointed Investment Partner Nicholas Khoo.

Cake DeFi Ventures is looking to invest in tech startups in Web3, gaming, and fintech, especially those in the metaverse, NFT, blockchain and e-sports industries that “will bring synergistic value to Cake DeFi’s core business.”

Looking to invest in startups from around the world, by the time of the firm’s launch, Cake DeFi Ventures has already invested in tech, media and events startup The Edge Of Company. In a press statement, the firm said that it is currently in talks with a number of startups in Southeast Asia (SEA), the US, and Europe.

“Cake DeFi Ventures is looking for strategic investments that will bring synergies to Cake DeFi’s core business and long-term goals, especially as we enhance and broaden our Web3 offerings. We therefore are in search of startups that possess unique technological and business value propositions (especially in Web3, gaming and fintech) as well as bring us access to a wider Web3 ecosystem. Importantly, the founders have to share our same values and vision for the Web3 space,” explains Chua in an email interview with e27.

The firm plans to “keep the number of investments open for now” depending on the size of respective investments and the number of projects they come across.

Also Read: Demystifying NFTs and DeFi

When asked about the advantages that startups can get by working with Cake DeFi Ventures, Chua said that as a native in Web3 and fintech vertical, the firm has deep insights and immediate visibility to the latest trends, technological innovations and game-changers in this space.

Cake DeFi Ventures Investment Partner Nicholas Khoo

“And because we are entrenched in the Web3 space, we are able to offer more strategic value as investment partners beyond just capital injections. We are able to give them access to resources, proprietary R&D and connections that will aid startups to grow in this space. As a global company with customers in 191 countries, we are able to offer expertise and networks to support these startups in their own global expansion plans,” he said.

About Cake DeFi

As a fintech platform, Cake DeFi described itself as a platform that aims to provide access to decentralised financial services and applications by enabling users to generate returns from their crypto and digital assets. Operated and registered in Singapore, the company said that it is fully compliant with all regulatory requirements of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

Cake DeFi offers three options to generate cash flow and passive income: Lending, Staking and Liquidity Mining. Its pay out rewards twice a day for Staking and Liquidity Mining.

In 2021, Cake DeFi said that it saw a tenfold growth in its registered customer base, with over US$1 billion customer assets. In the same year, its customers received over US$230 million in rewards.

“Global crypto adoption grew by over 800 per cent in 2021, as estimated by blockchain data platform Chainalysis. We naturally saw a huge growth in Cake DeFi’s customers as we offer an easy, safe and fully-transparent platform for cryptocurrency holders to access decentralized financial services and applications to earn cash flow from their crypto. Last year alone, we were able to tenfold our number of registered users. We also paid out US$230 million to our customers, bringing real value and cash flow to our customers,” Chua explains the reason behind the platform’s rapid growth.

Also Read: To infinity and beyond: Why 2022 will be the year of Web3

“Our Trustpilot score (4.8) is one of the highest in our industry which shows that our customers trust us and we bring real value to them. This has helped to generate strong word of mouth and build credibility with our customers. Today, understanding of cryptocurrency is still at a pretty low level. – and we therefore actively educate all potential and existing customers. We even have a programme called Learn & Earn where new customers can earn crypto while deepening their understanding.”

Ready to meet new startups to invest in? We have more than hundreds of startups ready to connect with potential investors on our platform. Create or claim your Investor profile today and turn on e27 Connect to receive requests and fundraising information from them.

Image Credit: Cake DeFi Ventures

 

The post Cake DeFi launches US$100M venture capital arm for global startups in Web3, gaming, fintech appeared first on e27.